Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of intrafractional prostate displacement during prostate radiotherapy using real-time ultrasound system

  • Note
  • Published:
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) is an image-guided radiotherapy system used for tracking intrafraction prostate displacements in real time. The objectives of this study are to evaluate intrafraction prostate displacements and derive planning target volume (PTV) margins for prostate radiotherapy at our institution. The ultrasound (US) data of nine prostate cancer patients referred for VMAT radiotherapy was retrieved. Prior to beam on, patient position was set up with the US probe positioned transperineally with the aid of reference images (fused US and computed tomography images). In each fraction, prostate displacements in three directions [superior/inferior (SI), left/right (LR) and anterior/posterior (AP)] were recorded. PTV margins were determined using Van Herk’s formula. To assess the prostate displacement time trend, continuous displacement data were plotted in 30-s intervals for eight minutes. The intrafraction prostate monitoring found a population mean setup error (Mp) of 0.8, 0.1, − 1.7 mm, a systematic error of (∑p) 0.7, 0.4, 0.9 mm and random error (σp) of 0.2, 0.1, 0.3 mm in SI, LR and AP directions, respectively. The PTV margin was found to be the largest in the AP direction at 2.5 mm compared with 1.9 mm and 1.1 mm for SI and LR directions, respectively. The PTV margin allowed for prostate radiotherapy at our institution was 2.5 mm in all directions. The prostate displacement time trend showed an increase in intrafraction displacements, with most patients were observed to have strong positive correlation between time and intrafraction prostate displacements in SI direction. TPUS is feasible for monitoring intrafraction displacement of the prostate and may facilitate PTV margin generation to account for such displacements during radiotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Ismail N, Ismail A (2019) Disease and economic burden of prostate cancer in malaysia: a review. Int J Public Health Res 9(1):1073–1080

    Google Scholar 

  2. Quan EM, Li X, Li Y, Wang X, Kudchadker RJ, Johnson JL, Zhang X (2012) A comprehensive comparison of IMRT and VMAT plan quality for prostate cancer treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol* Biol* Phys 83(4):1169–1178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bakiu E, Telhaj E, Kozma E, Ruçi F, Malkaj P (2013) Comparison of 3D CRT and IMRT tratment plans. Acta Inf Med 21(3):211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Richardson A, Jacobs P (2017) Intrafraction monitoring of prostate motion during radiotherapy using the Clarity® Autoscan Transperineal Ultrasound (TPUS) system. Radiography 23(4):310–313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pang EPP, Knight K, Fan Q, Tan SXF, Ang KW, Master Z, Tuan JKL (2018) Analysis of intra-fraction prostate motion and derivation of duration-dependent margins for radiotherapy using real-time 4D ultrasound. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 5:102–107

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Stroom JC, Heijmen BJ (2002) Geometrical uncertainties, radiotherapy planning margins, and the ICRU-62 report. Radiother Oncol 64(1):75–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Evans JD (1996) Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., Pacific Grove

    Google Scholar 

  8. Van Herk M (2004) Errors and margins in radiotherapy. In: Seminars in radiation oncology vol 14, No. 1, pp 52–64. WB Saunders

  9. Baker M, Behrens CF (2016) Determining intrafractional prostate motion using four dimensional ultrasound system. BMC Cancer 16(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sihono DSK, Ehmann M, Heitmann S, von Swietochowski S, Grimm M, Boda-Heggemann J, Wertz H (2018) Determination of intrafraction prostate motion during external beam radiation therapy with a transperineal 4-dimensional ultrasound real-time tracking system. Int J Radiat Oncol* Biol* Phys 101(1):136–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang E, Dong L, Chandra A, Kuban DA, Rosen II, Evans A, Pollack A (2002) Intrafraction prostate motion during IMRT for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol* Biol* Phys 53(2):261–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Melian E, Mageras GS, Fuks Z, Leibel SA, Niehaus A, Lorant H, Kutcher GJ (1997) Variation in prostate position quantitation and implications for three-dimensional conformal treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol 38(1):73–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shelton J, Rossi PJ, Chen H, Liu Y, Master VA, Jani AB (2011) Observations on prostate intrafraction motion and the effect of reduced treatment time using volumetric modulated arc therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 1(4):243–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fargier-Voiron M, Presles B, Pommier P, Rit S, Munoz A, Liebgott H, Biston MC (2014) Impact of probe pressure variability on prostate localization for ultrasound-based image-guided radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 111(1):132–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnston H, Hilts M, Beckham W, Berthelet E (2008) 3D ultrasound for prostate localization in radiation therapy: a comparison with implanted fiducial markers. Med Phys 35(6Part1):2403–2413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ballhausen H, Li M, Ganswindt U, Belka C (2018) Shorter treatment times reduce the impact of intra-fractional motion. Strahlenther Onkol 194(7):664–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pang EPP, Knight K, Park SY, Lian W, Master Z, Baird M, Tuan JKL (2020) Duration-dependent margins for prostate radiotherapy—a practical motion mitigation strategy. Strahlenther Onkol 196(7):657–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the Malaysia Ministry of Higher Education Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS/1/2020/SKK03/UM/02/1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by NSMZ, MR, and NMU. The first draft of the manuscript was written by NSMZ and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ngie Min Ung.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

This study is approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) (Approval reference number MREC ID No 2018213-6028).

Consent to participate

No consent from participants is required for this study.

Consent to publish

No consent to publish is required for this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zahir, N.S.M., Saad, M., Alip, A. et al. Evaluation of intrafractional prostate displacement during prostate radiotherapy using real-time ultrasound system. Phys Eng Sci Med 46, 405–412 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-023-01230-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-023-01230-x

Keywords

Navigation