Abstract
Aims and objectives
To assess the outcome of minimally invasive paravaginal repair of symptomatic cystocele and to correlate postoperative outcome with preoperative presentation. The primary outcome was the anatomical outcome measured by postoperative physical examination and the functional outcome was assessed by subjective symptoms and questionnaires. The secondary outcomes were perioperative and postoperative complications.
Materials and methods
In this longitudinal prospective observational study, 44 women underwent laparoscopic or robotic paravaginal cystocele repair from January 2016 to July 2016 and they were followed up to 1 year after surgery in a tertiary advanced laparoscopic center. All patients had a symptomatic lateral cystocele ≥ grade 2 according to Baden–Walker classification. Other coexisting defects like apical cystocele or combined defects were corrected concomitantly. The anatomical outcome was measured by physical examination and functional outcome was assessed by questionnaires—Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory 6 and Urinary Distress Inventory 6 preoperatively and during postoperative follow-up.
Results
All 44 patients were followed up to 12 months after surgery. The anatomical cure rate for cystocele was 97.7%. There were no major complications. All subjective symptoms and quality of life scores improved significantly during postoperative follow-up. The anatomical recurrence rate in our study was 2.3%.
Conclusion
Minimally invasive paravaginal repair of cystocele is an effective advanced laparoscopic procedure. It can be concomitantly performed with other surgical procedures to correct coexisting defects. The anatomical and functional results were outstanding with minimum perioperative morbidity and encouraging long-term outcome.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Price N, Jackson SR. Advances in laparoscopic techniques in pelvic reconstructive surgery for prolapse and incontinence. Maturitas. 2009;62(3):276–80.
Choi KH, Hong JY. Management of pelvic organ prolapse. Korean J Urol. 2014;55(11):693–702.
Brubaker L, Maher C, Jacquetin B, et al. Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2010;16(1):9–19.
Ghoniem G, Stanford E, Kenton K, et al. Evaluation and outcome measures in the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence: International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) guidelines for research and clinical practice. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(1):5–33.
Bedford ND, Seman EI, O’shea RT, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic repair of cystocoele. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55(6):588–92.
Ganatra AM, Rozet F, Sanchez-Salas R, et al. The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review. Eur Urol. 2009;55(5):1089–105.
Kdous M, Zhioua F. 3-year results of transvaginal cystocele repair with transobturator four-arm mesh: a prospective study of 105 patients. Arab J Urol. 2014;12(4):275–84.
Rosen DM, Shukla A, Cario GM, et al. Is hysterectomy necessary for laparoscopic pelvic floor repair? A prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(6):729–34.
Devaseelan P, Fogarty P. The role of synthetic mesh in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;11(3):169–76.
Persu C, Chapple CR, Cauni V, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP–Q)–a new era in pelvic prolapse staging. J Med Life. 2011;4(1):75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Statement
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Dr. Kavitha Yogini Duraisamy, M.S., Fellow in Endogynecology, FMAS, is the Head of Department at Department of Endogynecology, Gem Hospital and Research Center, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. Dr. Devi Balasubramaniam, M.S., Fellow in Endogynecology, FMAS, is a senior Consultant at Department of Endogynecology, Gem Hospital and Research Center, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. Dr. Amrutha Kakollu, M.S., is a Fellow at Department of Endogynecology, Gem Hospital and Research Center, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. Dr. Palanivelu Chinnusamy, M.S, MCh, DNB, FACS, FRCS(Hon) Ed., is a Director at Gem Hospital and Research Center, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. Dr. Kodeeswari Periyasamy, M.S., Fellow in Endogynecology is a Consultant at Gem Hospital and Research Center, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duraisamy, K.Y., Balasubramaniam, D., Kakollu, A. et al. A Prospective Study of Minimally Invasive Paravaginal Repair of Cystocele and Associated Pelvic Floor Defects: Our Experience. J Obstet Gynecol India 69, 82–88 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-018-1137-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-018-1137-1