Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Prospective Study of Minimally Invasive Paravaginal Repair of Cystocele and Associated Pelvic Floor Defects: Our Experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims and objectives

To assess the outcome of minimally invasive paravaginal repair of symptomatic cystocele and to correlate postoperative outcome with preoperative presentation. The primary outcome was the anatomical outcome measured by postoperative physical examination and the functional outcome was assessed by subjective symptoms and questionnaires. The secondary outcomes were perioperative and postoperative complications.

Materials and methods

In this longitudinal prospective observational study, 44 women underwent laparoscopic or robotic paravaginal cystocele repair from January 2016 to July 2016 and they were followed up to 1 year after surgery in a tertiary advanced laparoscopic center. All patients had a symptomatic lateral cystocele ≥ grade 2 according to Baden–Walker classification. Other coexisting defects like apical cystocele or combined defects were corrected concomitantly. The anatomical outcome was measured by physical examination and functional outcome was assessed by questionnaires—Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory 6 and Urinary Distress Inventory 6 preoperatively and during postoperative follow-up.

Results

All 44 patients were followed up to 12 months after surgery. The anatomical cure rate for cystocele was 97.7%. There were no major complications. All subjective symptoms and quality of life scores improved significantly during postoperative follow-up. The anatomical recurrence rate in our study was 2.3%.

Conclusion

Minimally invasive paravaginal repair of cystocele is an effective advanced laparoscopic procedure. It can be concomitantly performed with other surgical procedures to correct coexisting defects. The anatomical and functional results were outstanding with minimum perioperative morbidity and encouraging long-term outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Price N, Jackson SR. Advances in laparoscopic techniques in pelvic reconstructive surgery for prolapse and incontinence. Maturitas. 2009;62(3):276–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Choi KH, Hong JY. Management of pelvic organ prolapse. Korean J Urol. 2014;55(11):693–702.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Brubaker L, Maher C, Jacquetin B, et al. Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2010;16(1):9–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghoniem G, Stanford E, Kenton K, et al. Evaluation and outcome measures in the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence: International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) guidelines for research and clinical practice. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(1):5–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bedford ND, Seman EI, O’shea RT, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic repair of cystocoele. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55(6):588–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ganatra AM, Rozet F, Sanchez-Salas R, et al. The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review. Eur Urol. 2009;55(5):1089–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kdous M, Zhioua F. 3-year results of transvaginal cystocele repair with transobturator four-arm mesh: a prospective study of 105 patients. Arab J Urol. 2014;12(4):275–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosen DM, Shukla A, Cario GM, et al. Is hysterectomy necessary for laparoscopic pelvic floor repair? A prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(6):729–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Devaseelan P, Fogarty P. The role of synthetic mesh in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;11(3):169–76.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Persu C, Chapple CR, Cauni V, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP–Q)–a new era in pelvic prolapse staging. J Med Life. 2011;4(1):75.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kavitha Yogini Duraisamy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Dr. Kavitha Yogini Duraisamy, M.S., Fellow in Endogynecology, FMAS, is the Head of Department at Department of Endogynecology, Gem Hospital and Research Center, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. Dr. Devi Balasubramaniam, M.S., Fellow in Endogynecology, FMAS, is a senior Consultant at Department of Endogynecology, Gem Hospital and Research Center, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. Dr. Amrutha Kakollu, M.S., is a Fellow at Department of Endogynecology, Gem Hospital and Research Center, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. Dr. Palanivelu Chinnusamy, M.S, MCh, DNB, FACS, FRCS(Hon) Ed., is a Director at Gem Hospital and Research Center, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. Dr. Kodeeswari Periyasamy, M.S., Fellow in Endogynecology is a Consultant at Gem Hospital and Research Center, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duraisamy, K.Y., Balasubramaniam, D., Kakollu, A. et al. A Prospective Study of Minimally Invasive Paravaginal Repair of Cystocele and Associated Pelvic Floor Defects: Our Experience. J Obstet Gynecol India 69, 82–88 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-018-1137-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-018-1137-1

Keywords

Navigation