Abstract
Objective
To study the efficacy and safety of combining mifepristone before misoprostol use in second trimester to considerably reduce the induction–abortion interval with the lowest possible dose and adverse reaction.
Material and methods
A prospective study was conducted which included 60 patients visiting the antenatal OPD for elective abortions between 13 and 20 weeks of gestation as per the MTP act. They were randomly divided into two groups of 30 each—the study group received mifepristone 200 mg orally before misoprostol, whereas the control group was induced with misoprostol alone. The results were analyzed.
Observation
Statistical analysis of the study was done using χ2 test. The induction–abortion interval was significantly shorter in the study group, thereby decreasing the side-effects of the drug as well as duration of hospital stay.
Conclusion
This study, like many others, offers a reliable, safe, and cost-effective option by combining mifepristone before misoprostol to decrease the induction–abortion interval.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
El Rafaey H, Templeton A. Induction of abortion in second trimester by mifepristone and misoprostol: RCT betn 2 misoprostol regimens. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:475–8.
Webster D, Penny GC, Templeton A. A comparison of 600 and 200 mg mifepristone prior to second trimester abortion with PG misoprostol. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103:706–9.
Nagaria T, Sirmor N. Misoprostol vs mifepristone and misoprostol in second trimester termination of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2012;61:659–662.
Allen R, O’Brien BM. Uses of misoprostol in obstetrics and gynecology. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009;2:159–168.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kulkarni, K.K. Pre-induction with Mifepristone for Second Trimester Termination of Pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol India 64, 102–104 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-013-0472-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-013-0472-5