Abstract
Medicinally important ancient Navara rice (GI Kerala, India 2007) is a very short duration (60–70 days) variety with a yield of only 0.5 tonnes/hectare costing ~ Rs. 400/kg. It is used for indigenous treatment for chronic diseases by local and oral consumption. In this study, scutellum-derived calli were generated from mature Navara seeds and these were inoculated on different CIM-1 to CIM-5 media supplemented with 2.5 mg/l 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Regeneration of calli on different regeneration media RI, RII and RIII media were performed. Regeneration of 30-day-old calli on RI media showed 30%, for RII it showed no regeneration and on RIII media only 12% regeneration was obtained. The addition of glutamine and proline showed a 30–40% improvement in somatic embryogenesis. The 74–88% callus induction frequency was obtained on CIM-1 to CIM-5. The fresh weight (mg) of 30-day-old calli is CIM-2 < CIM-3 < CIM-4 < CIM-1 << CIM-5 and corresponding size shows CIM-2–CIM-3 < CIM-5 < CIM-1 < CIM-4. A negative correlation between the callus fresh weight and the regeneration efficiency was observed. In CIM-5, 20–25 days 3.4-fold increase and 25–30 days a 1.7-fold increase in fresh weight of calli is noted. The 20-day-old calli transfer to RI media shows 80% regeneration frequency and 6–7 plantlets/callus, which are twofold higher as compared with 30-day-old calli. The somatic embryogenesis and its regeneration on synthetic media provide an alternative for biotechnological intervention for yield improvement, in turn cost reduction for Navara rice.
Change history
09 August 2019
In the original article, on the page 270 the increasing order of fresh weight of calli is for the 10 days post-inoculation as against 15 days mentioned in the text (Table 4). The authors regret the mistake. Authors thank Mr. Haifang Jin, for critically reading the article and enabling us to provide this correction.
References
Abiri R et al (2017) Enhancing somatic embryogenesis of Malaysian rice cultivar MR219 using adjuvant materials in a high-efficiency protocol. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:1091–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1221-y
Aggarwal D, Kumar A, Sharma J, Reddy MS (2012) Factors affecting micropropagation and acclimatization of an elite clone of Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 48:521–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-012-9446-z
Anshika S, Shukla LI (2015) Identification of essential constituents for development of embryogenic non-recalcitrant calli from recalcitrant indica rice variety CR1 and ASD16. GSTF e-J ICT. https://doi.org/10.5176/2251-2489_biotech15.11
Chowdhry CN, Tyagi AK, Maheshwari N, Maheshwari SC (1993) Effect of l-proline and l-tryptophan on somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration of rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Pusa 169). Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 32:357–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00042300
Chu CC (1975) Establishment of an efficient medium for anther culture of rice through comparative experiments on the nitrogen sources. Sci Sin 18:659–668. https://doi.org/10.1360/ya1975-18-5-659
Chutipaijit S, Sutjaritvorakul T (2018) Application of activated charcoal and nanocarbon to callus induction and plant regeneration in aromatic rice (Oryza sativa L.). Chem Spec Bioavailab 30:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09542299.2017.1418184
Dhamangaonkar SN, Shukla LI (2013) Identification of callus induction potential of nine different genotypes of indica rice. J Environ Nanotechnol 2:44–52. https://doi.org/10.13074/jent.2013.06132013
Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res 50:151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(68)90403-5
Ge X, Chu Z, Lin Y, Wang S (2006) A tissue culture system for different germplasms of indica rice. Plant Cell Rep 25:392–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-005-0100-7
Kalve S, Fotschki J, Beeckman T, Vissenberg K, Beemster GT (2014) Three-dimensional patterns of cell division and expansion throughout the development of Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. J Exp Bot 65:6385–6397. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru358
Karthikeyan A, Pandian STK, Ramesh M (2009) High frequency plant regeneration from embryogenic callus of a popular indica rice (Oryza sativa L.). Physiol Mol Biol Plants 15:371–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-009-0042-6
Lin YJ, Qifa Z (2005) Optimising the tissue culture conditions for high efficiency transformation of indica rice. Plant Cell Rep. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-004-0843-6
Manimaran P et al (2013) Infection of early and young callus tissues of indica rice BPT 5204 enhances regeneration and transformation efficiency. Rice Sci 20:415–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6308(13)60153-5
Menke-Milczarek I, Zimny J (2001) NH4 + and NO3 − requirement for wheat somatic embryogenesis. Acta Physiol Plant 23:37–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-001-0020-2
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
Nowak K, Wójcikowska B, Gaj MD (2015) ERF022 impacts the induction of somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis through the ethylene-related pathway. Planta 241:967–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-014-2225-9
Omar AA, Dutt M, Gmitter FG, Grosser JW (2016) Somatic embryogenesis: still a relevant technique in citrus improvement. In: Germana MA, Lambardi M (eds) In vitro embryogenesis in higher plants. Springer, New York, pp 289–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3061-6_13
Pawar B, Kale P, Bahurupe J, Jadhav A, Kale A, Pawar S (2015) Proline and glutamine improve in vitro callus induction and subsequent shooting in rice. Rice Sci 22:283–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2015.11.001
Rao AS, Reddy SG, Babu PP, Reddy AR (2010) The antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of methanolic extracts from Njavara rice bran. BMC Complement Altern Med 10:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-10-4
Sahoo RK, Tuteja N (2012) Development of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation technology for mature seed-derived callus tissues of indica rice cultivar IR64. GM Crops Food 3:123–128. https://doi.org/10.4161/gmcr.20032
Shahsavari E (2011) Impact of tryptophan and glutamine on the tissue culture of upland rice. Plant Soil Environ 57:7–10. https://doi.org/10.17221/116/2010-pse
Shalini V, Bhaskar S, Kumar KS, Mohanlal S, Jayalekshmy A, Helen A (2012) Molecular mechanisms of anti-inflammatory action of the flavonoid, tricin from Njavara rice (Oryza sativa L.) in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells: possible role in the inflammatory signaling. Int Immunopharmacol 14:32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2012.06.005
Shoeb F, Yadav JS, Bajaj S, Rajam MV (2001) Polyamines as biomarkers for plant regeneration capacity: improvement of regeneration by modulation of polyamine metabolism in different genotypes of indica rice. Plant Sci 160:1229–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-9452(01)00375-2
Sinha A, Solanki M, Shukla LI (2019) Evidences for differential expression of miR167d-5p, target, positional nucleotide preference, and its role in somatic and different stages of regenerating calli of Oryza sativa. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 136:537–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-018-01535-w
Sivakumar P, Law YS, Ho CL, Harikrishna JA (2010) High frequency plant regeneration from mature seed of elite, recalcitrant Malaysian indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) CV. MR 219. Acta Biol Hung 61:313–321. https://doi.org/10.1556/abiol.61.2010.3.7
Toki S, Hara N, Ono K, Onodera H, Tagiri A, Oka S, Tanaka H (2006) Early infection of scutellum tissue with Agrobacterium allows high-speed transformation of rice. Plant J 47:969–976. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02836.x
Verma D, Joshi R, Shukla A, Kumar P (2011) Protocol for in vitro somatic embryogenesis and regeneration of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Indian J Exp Biol 49:958–963. http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/7353
Visarada KBRS, Sailaja M, Sarma NP (2002) Effect of callus induction media on morphology of embryogenic calli in rice genotypes. Biol Plant 45:495–502. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022323221513
Wani SH, Sanghera GS, Gosal SS (2011) An efficient and reproducible method for regeneration of whole plants from mature seeds of a high yielding indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) variety PAU 201. N Biotechnol 28:418–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2011.02.006
Yang X, Zhang X (2010) Regulation of somatic embryogenesis in higher plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 29:36–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680903436291
Zhang YC et al (2013) Overexpression of microRNA OsmiR397 improves rice yield by increasing grain size and promoting panicle branching. Nat Biotechnol 31:848–852. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2646
Zhang J, Xue B, Gai M, Song S, Jia N, Sun H (2017) Small RNA and transcriptome sequencing reveal a potential miRNA-mediated interaction network that functions during somatic embryogenesis in Lilium pumilum DC. Fisch. Front Plant Sci 8:566. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00566
Zimmerman JL (1993) Somatic embryogenesis: a model for early development in higher plants. Plant Cell 5:1411–1423. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.5.10.1411
Acknowledgements
MS, AS and LIS are grateful to the Department of Biotechnology, India for research grant BT/PR11797/AGR/36/608/2009, MS and AS also thank University Grant Commission (321154, F.25-1/2013-14(BSR)/7-210/2009(BSR)), India for providing SRF. Dr. Shinoj Subramanian (Sr. Scientist), Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Ernakulam, Kerala, India is gratefully acknowledged for providing Navara seeds. Mr Bhanu Prakash R (Scientific advisor M/s. SCIENCE4U Analytics and Research solutions PVT Ltd, Bangalore) is gratefully acknowledged for helping us with “The Unscramble X” software data analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Solanki, M., Sinha, A. & Shukla, L.I. Optimization of in vitro culture media for improvement in yield of Navara ancient Indian medicinal rice. 3 Biotech 9, 270 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-1797-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-1797-2