Abstract
Phosphorus (P) is necessary for nitrogen fixation in the root nodules of soybeans, a symbiotic process whereby plants support bacterial nitrogen fixation to obtain nitrogen needed for plant growth. Nitrogen accumulation, quantity, weight, specific nitrogenase activity (SNA) and acetylene reduction activity (ARA) of root soybean nodules were analyzed, using a broadly targeted metabolomics method incorporating liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) to study the effects of P level (1, 11, 31, 61 mg/L denoted by P1, P11, P31, P61) on the types and abundance of various metabolites and on the expression of associated metabolic pathways in soybean root nodules. Nitrogen accumulation, quantity, weight, SNA and ARA of root nodules were inhibited by P stress. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis indicated that root nodules responded to P stress by increasing the number of amino acids and derivatives. Down-regulation of ABA, phosphorylcholine, and D-glucose 6-phosphate affected carotenoid biosynthesis, glycerophospholipid metabolism and sugar metabolism which inhibited nodule nitrogen fixation under P stress. More flavonoids were involved in metabolic processes in soybean root nodules under P stress that regulated the nodulation and nitrogen fixation. The pathway ascorbate and aldarate metabolism, and associated metabolites, were involved in the adaptation of the symbiotic soybean root nodule system to P starvation. This work provides a foundation for future investigations of physiological mechanisms that underly phosphorus stress on soybeans.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The symbiotic nitrogen fixation system utilized by legumes is the most efficient known biological nitrogen fixation system. In fact, it is responsible for generating the greatest amount of symbiotically fixed N2, totaling roughly 20 million tons each year (Herridge et al. 2008). Soybean root nodule nitrogen fixation is a symbiotic process, whereby Rhizobium colonize soybean roots to form nodular structures that carry out biological nitrogen fixation (Kijne et al. 1990; Yan et al. 2014; Nanjareddy et al. 2017; Dennis et al. 2015; Downie et al. 1990). In this process, root nodules capture N2 from the air and then the nitrogen is incorporated into nitrogen-containing compounds, which serve as an important nitrogen source. Thus, nitrogen fixation efficiency is a key determinant of soybean growth and yield. Indeed, root nodule-associated nitrogen fixation accounts for over 60% of total nitrogen accumulation in soybean plants during the various developmental stages (Downie et al. 1990; Zhao et al. 2017; Tate 1995).
Phosphorus (P) is the second most important element associated with restricted crop growth as 40% of global output of crops grown on arable land is limited by low soil phosphorus levels (Vance 2001; Richardson and Simpson 2011; Zhou et al. 2019; Ao, et al. 2014). Phosphorus plays an important role in soybean nitrogen fixation, since N2 fixation within root nodules demands abundant P for energy transfer and consumption, as well as for protein and lipid synthesis (Mullen et al. 1988; Gentili and Huss-Danell 2003). Consequently, inorganic phosphate (Pi) deficiency directly impairs many cellular functions, not only by reducing levels of available ATP necessary for enzymatic activity, membrane transport, utilization of inorganic N sources, and photosynthesis, but also by limiting biosynthesis of macromolecules (proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids) (Bosse and Kock 1998). By contrast, adequate phosphorus levels promote soybean morphogenesis and growth by supporting activities of glutamine synthetase, nitrogenase, and nitrate reductase, which are essential enzymes involved in amino acid and protein synthesis (Miao et al. 2006, 2007; Wu et al. 1999; Zarrin et al. 2006; Kutama et al. 2008). Proper application of P can enhance the capacity of nitrogen-fixing root nodules-promoting nitrogen by phosphorus (Li et al. 2021). Therefore, P is pivotal to nodule morphogenesis and efficient N2 fixation.
The process by which soybean plants sense soil P is important for symbiotic nitrogen fixation (Cassman et al. 1981; Miao and Liu 2010). The overall impact of P on nodule nitrogen fixation mainly stems from its effects on host plant growth, nodule formation, nodule growth, nodule function, and nodule metabolism (Robson and O’Hara 1981; Jakobsen 1985; Israel 1987, 1993; Sa and Israel 1991; Cassman et al. 1981; Martin et al. 2017; Tsvetkova and Georgiev 2003; Chen et al. 2011). The amount and rate of nodule nitrogen fixation can be influenced by either high or low soil P level and varies significantly among the various soybean growth stages (Yao et al. 2012, 2018; Wu 2012). Nevertheless, despite previous research efforts, the mechanism by which phosphorus affects soybean nodule-associated nitrogen fixation efficiency remains unknown.
P has dual functions as a critical mineral element in cells and as a signal when P is deficient in nodules (Gentili and Huss-Danell 2003). The PHT1 genes encode a family of plasma membrane phosphate transporters (Nussaume et al. 2011), GmPHT1;1 (Chen et al. 2019) and GmPHT1;4 (Qin et al. 2012) which are expressed in non-fixing regions of nodules, and play a role in nodulation and Pi homeostasis in nodules. High levels of GmPHT1;11 enhanced Pi accumulation in nodules, increased nodule size, and furthermore nitrogenase activity was enhanced by GmPHT1;11 (Lu et al. 2020). Stress-related metabolites such as polyols accumulate in P-deficient roots as well as sugars, which are known to be essential for P stress gene induction (Hernandez et al. 2007).
Recently, research advances have greatly enhanced our understanding of effects of phosphorus on soybean nitrogen fixation (Li et al. 2015). In this work, we analyzed effects of phosphorus levels on differential expression of metabolites and metabolic pathways during the nitrogen fixation process within root nodules. The results provided clues that reveal the key factors related to the physiological mechanism whereby phosphorus levels influence nitrogen fixation within soybean root nodules.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Plant materials and sampling
Soybean (Suinong 14, SN14) plants were grown in sand medium in pots. The nutrient composition and concentration (mg/L) of the nutrient solution were as follows: (NH4)2SO4, 235.80; MgSO4, 240.00; CaCl2, 220.00; Na2MoO4·H2O, 0.03; CuSO4·5H2O, 0.08; ZnSO4·7H2O, 0.22; MnCl2·4H2O, 4.90; H3BO3, 2.86; FeSO4·7H2O, 5.57; and Na2EDTA, 7.45; P levels: P1 (P stress), KH2PO4, 4.39, K2SO4, 42.00, KCl, 36.00; P11 (P stress), KH2PO4, 48.26, K2SO4, 28.00, KCl, 24.00; P31 (normal P), KH2PO4, 136.00; P61 (high P), KH2PO4, 136.00, NaH2PO4·2H2O, 150.96. Nitrogen source is 15 N labeled ammonium sulfate with an abundance of 3.38%.
Before the vegetative cotyledon stage (VC, unfolded cotyledons), only 500 ml distilled water was supplied to plants once per day. From VC to V3 (third trifoliate leafs) stages, P31 nutrient solution was supplied. From V3 stage and thereafter, different P treatments were started for 15 days (R1 stage) supplied in 500 ml nutrient solution once a day.
Rhizobium inoculation was performed when opposite true leaves completely opened as follows: field soybean nodules from plants grown in Haerbin Heilongjiang province were collected during the previous year and stored in a refrigerator. They were ground and added to the nutrient solution, at a rate of approximately 5 g of nodules per liter. Inoculation of soybean plants was performed on five consecutive days to assure that each plant was well inoculated.
Samples (4 replicates for each treatment) were taken from 8:00 to 10:00 am, and the plants were divided into two parts above-ground and under-ground part at the cotyledon scars. After determining the fresh weight of the above-ground part, it was dried it at 65 °C and the dry weight measured. The nitrogen content and 15 N abundance of the dried sample enabled the calculation of nitrogen accumulation, nodule nitrogen accumulation and nodule nitrogen fixation rates. The underground part was removed completely, rinsed with distilled water and dried on filter paper to remove excess water, and then the nitrogenase activity of root nodules was measured. After the measurement, the nodules were removed, and dried at 65 °C for determining the dry weight.
Nodules were collected (6 replicate samples for each treatment) and frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C, and then used for metabolomics analysis.
2.2 Measurement and calculation methods
An acetylene reduction assay was used to measure the nitrogenase activity in root nodules as described by Gremaud and Harper (1989) and Chen et al. (2013). The washed soybean roots with nodules were placed in a 500 ml brown glass bottle and sealed with a rubber plug (with a hole). 50 ml air was extracted and 50 ml acetylene (99.9%) was added with a syringe, which reacted for 2 h. A GC7900 gas chromatograph analyzer (Model GC7900, Shanghai Techcomp Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., China) was used to measure the ethylene content. Specific nitrogenase activity (SNA) was expressed as µmoles of ethylene formed per gram dry weight of nodules per hour. Acetylene reduction activity (ARA) was expressed as µmoles of ethylene formed per plant per hour.
For the determination of nitrogen content in plants, K2SO4 and CuSO4 were used as catalysts and concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4) for digestion, and the nitrogen content was measured by an automatic Kjeldahl nitrogen analyzer.
15N abundance determination: The 15N abundance was measured by a mass spectrometer (Thermo-Fisher Delta V Advantage IRMS, Waltham, MA, USA) in dual inlet (DI) mode.
Statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL) procedure. The multiple comparison was conducted by Duncan’s multiple range test at the 0.05 probability level.
2.3 Metabolites extraction
The freeze-dried samples were crushed with a mixer mill for 30 s at 45 Hz. Then 50 mg aliquot of each individual sample was precisely weighed and transferred to an Eppendorf tube. After addition of 1 ml of extract solution (methanol/water = 3:1, precooled at -40 °C, containing internal standard). After 30 s vortex, the samples were homogenized at 35 Hz for 4 min and sonicated for 15 min in ice-water bath. Then the samples were extracted over night at 4 °C on a shaker. Then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was carefully filtered through a 0.22 microporous membrane, then the resulting supernatants were diluted 10 times with methanol/ water mixture (v:v = 3:1, containing internal standard) and vortexed for 30 s and transferred to 2 mL glass vials. Then 30 ul was taken from each sample and pooled as QC sample. The sample was stored at -80 °C until the UHPLC-MS (Ultra high performance liquid chromatog-mass spectrometry) analysis.
2.4 UHPLC-MS analysis
The UHPLC separation was carried out using an EXIONLC System (SCIEX). The mobile phase A was 0.1% formic acid in water, and the mobile phase B was acetonitrile. The column temperature was set at 40 °C. The auto-sampler temperature was set at 4 °C and the injection volume was 2 µL.
A Sciex QTrap 6500+ (Sciex Technologies), was used for assay development. Typical ion source parameters were: IonSpray Voltage: +5500/-4500 V, Curtain Gas: 35 psi, Temperature: 400 °C, Ion Source Gas 1:60 psi, Ion Source Gas 2: 60 psi, DP: ± 100 V.
2.5 Data preprocessing and annotation
SCIEX Analyst Work Station Software (Version 1.6.3) was employed for MRM (Multiple reaction monitoring) data acquisition and processing (Hair 2010; Dunn et al. 2011). MS raw data (.wiff) files were converted to the TXT format using MSconventer. In-house R program and database were applied to peak detection and annotation.
3 Results
3.1 Effect of P levels on nitrogen accumulation, nodules and nitrogenase activity
With the increase of phosphorus levels, total nitrogen accumulation and nodule nitrogen fixation accumulation significantly increased, P stress significantly decreased the rate of nodule nitrogen fixation but the difference was not significant in P61 compared to P31 (Table 1). P stress significantly decreased the nodule number and weight but it was significantly increased in P61, according to single nodule weight. P stress significantly decreased nodule weight by reducing single nodule size, however the main reason of nodule weight increased in P61 was the increased nodule number (Table 2). The specific nitrogenase activity and acetylene reduction activity of P31 and P61 treatments was significantly higher than in the P stress treatments. The P61 treatment significantly increased acetylene reduction activity and had no significant impact on specific nitrogenase activity compared to P31 (Table 3).
The data are represented as mean values ± standard error (with four replicates). Values with the same letters are not significantly different at the 5% level according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
3.2 Nodule metabolic responses to P
There were significant changes in nitrogen accumulation, nodules and nitrogenase activity when different phosphorus levels were used as treatments for 15 days, as revealed by further metabolomics analysis.
Analysis of metabolic characteristics of nodules in plants grown at four concentrations of phosphorus revealed that there was a total of 1267 expressed metabolites. These included alkaloids, flavonoids, phenols, terpenoids, amino acids and amino acid derivatives, steroids and steroid derivatives, phenylpropanoids, fatty acyls, coumarins, organooxygen compounds, lignans, xanthones, nucleotides and nucleotide derivatives, phytohormone, and other compounds. The identified metabolites are listed in Table S1. The identified metabolites were analyzed using principal component analysis (Jolliffe 2002) to evaluate overall differences between P1, P11, P31, and P61 groups (Fig. 1). According to the first and the second principal component, the four P treatments were assigned to four different regions. Two principal components explained 18.4% of the total variance. The first principal component PC1 and the second principal component PC2 contributed to 11.3% and 7.1% of the interpretation rate, respectively. Thus, significant differences in variance were observed among the four P treatments.
A supervised orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis model was used to compare metabolic characteristics of P1, P11, P31, and P61. The OPLS-DA scatter scores revealed significant differences among pairwise comparison groups (Fig. 2) (Rygg and Wold 2002). Moreover, values of R2Y and Q2, along with results of 200 permutation tests confirmed that the quality of each supervised model was acceptable and that overfitting had not occurred (Table S2).
Analysis of results obtained using a volcano plot based visualization revealed differences in metabolites between different P treatments, with each point representing a metabolite and the point size representing a variable importance parameter (VIP) value based on the OPLS-DA model (Fig. 3). Ultimately, 200, 199, and 107 different metabolites were detected for P1 vs. P31, P11 vs. P31, and P61 vs. P31, comparisons, respectively. Regarding these metabolites, abundance of 110, 100, and 52 metabolites increased, while abundance of 90, 99, and 55 metabolites decreased, respectively (relative to P31 levels), with final values obtained for comparisons of VIP > 1.0 and p < 0.05 (Table S3). We found an interesting trend whereby the greater the difference in P levels between compared groups, the greater the numbers of differential metabolites were detected through pairwise comparisons.
Each point in the middle represents a metabolite, the abscissa represents the multiple change of the group compared to each substance (take the logarithm based on 2), and the ordinate represents the P-value of the Student’s t test (take the logarithm based on 10 Negative number), the size of the scatter point represents the VIP value of the OPLS-DA model, the larger the scatter point, the greater the VIP value. The scattered colors represent the final screening results. Metabolites that are significantly up-regulated are shown in red, metabolites that are significantly down-regulated are shown in blue, and metabolites that are not significantly different are in gray.
As a result of the large number of different metabolites screened among the various P treatments in this study, we applied the combination cutoff of VIP > 1.0 together with a fold change > 2 or < 0.5 as the threshold used for decision-making as to whether or not to conduct further analysis of a given differential metabolites. Ultimately, 273 and 168 differential metabolites were obtained from all groups (P1, P11, P31, P61) based on analysis of variance (ANOVA) significance cutoffs of < 0.05 and < 0.01, respectively. In Fig. 4, a heat map displays chemical classes and abundance of differential metabolites (with ANOVA significance values ≤ 0.01) within nodules of the four groups.
Overall, 84 differential metabolites were detected in the P1 vs. P31 groups (50 with increased abundance and 34 with decreased abundance relative to P31), 81 differential metabolites in the P11 vs. P31 comparison group (43 with increased abundance and 38 with decreased abundance), and 20 differential metabolites in the P61 vs. P31 group (11 with increased abundance and 9 with decreased abundance relative to P31). These differential metabolites were then further analyzed for associations with metabolic pathways as determined using KEGG analysis.
3.3 Nodule metabolite changes associated with different P levels
Pairwise comparisons between P1, P11 or P61 with P31, revealed differences in differential metabolites based on chemical classification and regulation mode (Table S4). In P1 vs. P31, 84 differential metabolites were identified that belonged to 28 classes that mainly included categories for alkaloids (17.86%), amino acids and their derivatives (16.67%), flavonoids (10.71%), nucleotides and their derivatives (5.95%), and organooxygen compounds (5.95%). Regarding abundance of specific metabolites within each of these categories, 80% were increased, 78.57% were increased, 55.56% were decreased, 60% were decreased, and 100% were decreased, respectively, in P1 relative to P31. In P11 vs. P31, 81 differential metabolites were identified that belonged to 27 classes that mainly included alkaloids (20.99%), amino acids and their derivatives (12.35%), flavonoids (11.11%), and nucleotides and their derivatives (7.41%). Again, regarding abundance of metabolites within these categories, 76.47% were increased, 80% were increased, 55.56% were decreased, and 66.67% were decreased, respectively, in P11 relative to P31. In P61 vs. P31, 20 differential metabolites were identified that belonged to 12 classes that mainly included categories of alkaloids (15%), flavonoids (15%), organooxygen compounds (15%), amino acid and their derivatives (10%), and terpenoids (10%), With respect to abundance of metabolites in these categories, 33.33%, 66.67%, 66.67%, 50%, 50% were increased, respectively, in P61 relative to P31. Thus, these metabolites may be influenced by phosphorus-level effects on nitrogen fixation processes within soybean nodules.
Based on the abovementioned results, we further compared and analyzed the different metabolite compounds within each class and generated a heatmap of the changes of differential metabolites (VIP > 1.0 and fold change > 2 or < 0.5). The pairwise comparisons based on P treatment level are shown in Fig. S1. For each pairwise comparison group, corresponding ratios of quantitative values of corresponding differential metabolites were calculated, with the first 15 metabolites with most markedly increased or decreased abundance (relative to P31) is displayed using matchstick illustrations (Fig. S2). For each differential metabolite, values of correlation coefficients were calculated using the Pearson method and then were displayed in the heatmap (Fig. S3).
3.4 KEGG annotation and metabolic pathway analysis of differential metabolites
We identified 57, 59, and 34 KEGG pathways associated with differential metabolites detected for pairwise comparisons P1 vs. P31, P11 vs. P31, and P61 vs. P31, that included 413, 394, and 178 compounds, respectively (Table 4). KEGG metabolic pathway terms associated with highest numbers of differential metabolites included Metabolic pathways (gmx01100), Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites (gmx01110), Biosynthesis of amino acids (gmx01230), ABC transporters (gmx02010), Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis (gmx00970), with numbers of differential metabolites differing among the three comparisons is provided (Table S5). Therefore, nitrogen fixation in soybean root nodules may respond to phosphorus stress through activities associated with these metabolic pathways. Phosphate and amino acid transporters, phosphate, glutamate, glutamine and aspartate were decreased in P1 vs. P31.
After KEGG annotation analysis revealed all the pathways associated with differential metabolites, we performed enrichment analysis and topological analysis on these pathways to reveal key pathways associated with different P levels. Ultimately, the results revealed detection of 50, 55, 27 pathways for P1 vs. P31, P11 vs. P31 and P61 vs. P31, respectively (Fig. 5). The numbers of compounds, differential metabolites and chemical classes differed among the pairwise comparisons (Table 5). Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, beta-alanine metabolism, alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism, galactose metabolism, glycine, serine and threonine metabolism, isoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis, indole alkaloid biosynthesis, arginine and proline metabolism, ascorbate and aldarate metabolism, and glutathione metabolism were the main pathways identified for P1 vs. P31. Flavone and flavonol biosynthesis, nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism, glycine, serine and threonine metabolism, phenylalanine metabolism, beta-alanine metabolism, isoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis, amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism, and glutathione metabolism were the main pathways identified for P11 vs. P31. Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism, beta-alanine metabolism, flavone and flavonol biosynthesis, galactose metabolism, glutathione metabolism, isoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis, pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis, and tyrosine metabolism were the main pathways identified for P61 vs. P31. Ultimately, these metabolic pathways may provide important clues for use in uncovering mechanisms by which phosphorus levels affect nodule nitrogen fixation. Notably, compounds associated with these metabolic pathways for P1 vs. P31 belonged to 6 chemical classes (amino acids and their derivatives, nucleotide and their derivatives, vitamins, pyrimidine nucleotides, carbohydrates and alkaloids). For P11 vs. P31 the pathways belonged to 7 chemical classes (amino acids and their derivatives, nucleotides and their derivatives, pyrimidine nucleotides, carbohydrates, organooxygen compounds, flavonoids, and benzene and substituted derivatives), and for P61 vs. P31 they belonged to 7 chemical classes (amino acid and derivatives, alkaloids, flavonoids, organooxygen compounds, hydroxycinnamoyl derivatives, phenylpropanoids and others). For each pathway identified for each P level-based pairwise comparison, associated metabolite compounds and their relative abundance changes (increased or decreased relative to P31) were different and shown in (Table S6).
Each bubble in the bubble diagram represents a metabolic pathway. The abscissa of the bubble and the size of the bubble indicate the influence factor of the pathway in the topology analysis. The larger the size, the greater the influence factor; the ordinate and color of the bubble indicates the enrichment analysis. P value (take the negative natural logarithm, namely -ln(p)), the darker the color, the smaller the P value, the more significant is the degree of enrichment.
3.5 Analysis of regulatory network of differential metabolites
A metabolic network is a network composed of metabolic reactions and regulatory mechanisms that regulates reactions associated with cellular metabolic and physiological processes. After obtaining corresponding differential metabolite information for each P level-based pairwise comparison group, we performed pathway searches and regulatory interaction network analysis using the soybean KEGG database. For the P1 vs. P31 comparison group, we identified three pathway matches that included alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism (gmx00250), glycine, serine and threonine metabolism (gmx00260), and beta-alanine metabolism (gmx00410), as well as 2 modules of serine biosynthesis, glycerate-3P = > serine (M00020) and polyamine biosynthesis, arginine = > ornithine (M00134), 27 enzymes, 158 reactions, and 110 compounds. For the P11 vs. P31 comparison group, we identified one pathway match, alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism (gmx00250), as well as 2 modules that included GABA (gamma-aminobutyrate) shunt (M00027) and polyamine biosynthesis, arginine = > ornithine (M00134), 24 enzymes, 163 reactions, and 110 compounds. For the P61 vs. P31 comparison group, there were 3 pathway matches that included galactose metabolism (gmx00052), tropane, piperidine and pyridine alkaloid biosynthesis (gmx00960), and betalain biosynthesis (gmx00965), as well as 1 module of biotin biosynthesis, pimeloyl-ACP/CoA = > biot (M00123), 48 enzymes, 187 reactions, and 61 compounds (Fig. S4 and Table S7). These networks may play important roles in processes associated with phosphorus-based regulation of nodule nitrogen fixation.
4 Discussion
Metabolomics is the study of metabolic phenotypes and their relationships with corresponding genes under specific conditions. When used to determine endpoints of biological systems regulation, metabolomics can provide important information associated with changes in organisms. The changes include biological phenotypes, which are observable and measurable changes (e.g., metabolite characteristics) that can be used to understand biological processes and the mechanisms, both intuitively and effectively. For this reason, the field of metabolomics has developed rapidly and has been incorporated into many research fields, including those focused on understanding molecular mechanisms that determine plant phenotypes (Liu et al. 2020; Wei et al. 2019; Tang et al. 2014; Dunn et al. 2011; Wiklund et al. 2008). Many studies have shown that phosphorus plays specific roles in nodule initiation, growth, and function, in addition to its involvement in host plant growth processes (Yao et al. 2018; Miao et al. 2007; Israel 1987, 1993; Gentili and Huss-Danell 2003; Sulieman et al. 2013; Thuynsma et al. 2014). In this study, we analyzed the effects of phosphorus levels on metabolite types and metabolite-associated pathways within soybean nodules.
4.1 Effects of phosphorus level on soybean metabolites and KEGG analysis results
Stress-related primary and secondary metabolites, such as polyols and sugars, are known to accumulate in root nodules of P-deficient bean plants (Hernandez et al. 2007). Subsequently, 10% of these compounds are released by root nodules into the surrounding environment (Tawaraya et al. 2014). Primary metabolites in roots of plants grown under P-deficiency have been shown previously to involve amino acids, organic acids, polyhydroxy acids, fatty acids, sugars, sugar phosphates, polyols, and other nitrogenous compounds (Hernandez et al. 2007). In the present study, we detected abundant metabolites within nodules of plants grown under low phosphorus (P1, P11) and high phosphorus (P61) conditions; and then identified changes in metabolite types and abundance in P1, P11 or P61 groups relative to corresponding P31 indicators (P1 vs. P31, P11 vs. P31, P61 vs. P31) (Table S1).
Our results demonstrated that relative to P31, greater numbers of differential metabolites were found in P1 and P11 than in P61 (Table S3). These metabolites mainly included the amino acids (L-tyrosine, L-arginine, L-asparagine, L-ornithine, L-citrulline, L-histidine) that were present in increased abundance in P1 and P11. This result conflicted with results of previous studies that demonstrated reduced biosynthetic pathway activities associated with amino acid synthesis (gmx01230) in P-deficient nodules (Hernandez, et al. 2009). The possible reasons are that the material used in the present study was soybean and not the common bean, and in addition the concentration, time and treatment methods of phosphorus stress treatment werte quite different. However no significant differences, associated with amino acid rmetabolite quantity or expression, were observed between P61 and P31. Although P stress inhibited nitrogen fixation ability of root nodules by reducing number, weight, specific nitrogenase activity and acetylene reduction activity, the root nodules responded to P stress by increasing the number of amino acids and their derivates. These differential amino acids were mainly up-regulated and involved ABC transporters.
Abscisic acid and phosphorylcholine were decreased under P-deficient conditions (P1 and P11) but were increased in P61. ABA is a hormone that is involved in plant defense mechanisms against diverse stresses and it initiates the stress response in plants through transduction of stress signals. It also improves the ability of plants to resist effects of various types of stress factors (Chen et al. 2006; Gawronska et al. 2003). The reduction of ABA under P deficiency is a very effective mechanism for plant survival under P deficiency stress (Zhu et al. 2018). In this study, abscisic acid (ABA) was mainly associated with metabolic pathways (gmx01100), biosynthesis of secondary metabolites (gmx01110), and plant hormone signal transduction (gmx04075). ABA also inhibited carotenoid biosynthesis as an adaptation to P stress in root nodules. Another identified metabolite, phosphorylcholine, has been shown to be important in phospholipid metabolism. In rice it has been shown to be involved in controlling phosphorus balance and adaptive responses to phosphorus deficiency (Chen et al. 2006). It has also been shown to play a highly significant role in phosphorus deficiency-associated cellular phospholipid remodeling processes and adaptations in rice and other crops. Phosphorylcholine was down-regulated which affected glycerophospholipid metabolism in response to P stress in our study.
Abundance of D-glucose 6-phosphate and galactose 1-phosphate decreased under P1 and P11, but increased under P61 treatment compared to P31. D-glucose 6-phosphate is a key compound associated with sugar metabolism and is involved in glycolysis pathway, pentose phosphate pathway, starch and sucrose metabolism, etc. Phosphorus is associated with energy storage and utilization pathways, and our results suggest that D-glucose 6-phosphate was mainly associated with metabolic pathways (gmx01100), biosynthesis of secondary metabolites-other antibiotics (gmx00998), and starch and sucrose metabolism (gmx00500). ATP is necessary for nitrogen fixation in soybean nodules. The decrease in the abundance of D-glucose 6-phosphate affects energy metabolism, and ATP decreases, thereby inhibiting nitrogen fixation in soybean nodules.
Abundance of uridine 5’-diphospho-D-glucose, adenosine monophosphate and phosphoric acid decreased under P1 and P11. Purine metabolism, down-regulation affects the synthesis of nitrogen metabolism intermediates allantoate and allantoin, which are the main forms of nitrogen transport and storage in soybean and this results in a reduction in nitrogen fixation products (Zhang et al. 1988).
In the current study, changes in ABA, phosphorylcholine, D-glucose 6-phosphate and Pi content mainly involved carotenoid biosynthesis, glycerophospholipid metabolism and sugar metabolism and were associated with the effect of P stress on nitrogen fixation in soybean root nodules. This inhibited the process of nitrogen fixation and the synthesis of nitrogen fixation products.
4.2 Flavonoid differences in nodules
With regard to the symbiosis between soybean roots and rhizobia, the conduction of biochemical signals is a prerequisite for establishing a symbiotic system (Cooper 2004; Miao and Liu 2010). In the symbiotic process between rhizobia and legumes, flavonoids act as initial signaling molecules for nodulation induction by acting to chemoattract rhizobia, regulate synthesis of rhizobia nodulation factor, increase transcriptional expression of nodulation genes, and promote nodulation of rhizobia to enable nitrogen fixation (Chou and Wei 2010; Cooper 2007; Redmond and Batley 1986; Geurts et al. 2005; Walker et al. 2003). Flavonoids such as citrinin, saccharol, apigenin, quercetin, and others have been found in root secretions of legumes, such as soybean (Glycine max), alfalfa (Medicago Sativa), peas (Pisum sativum L.) and pigeon peas (Cajanus cajan). In this study we discovered differences in types and amounts of isoflavones in soybean nodules in plants grown under different phosphorus levels.
Numerous papers dealing with the effects of flavonoids on nodulation can be found in the literature. Several studies have demonstrated that digitoxin obtained from alfalfa can effectively induce expression of the nod gene of Rhizobium meliloti (Novak et al. 2002). In rapeseed, flavonoids have been shown to effectively increase the colonization rate of the root system by Azorhizobium caulinodans ORS571 (Hu et al. 1999). In soybean, the simultaneous addition of isoflavones daidzein and genistein has been shown to effectively stimulate nodulation (An et al. 2017). In bean plants, additions of naringenin, hesperetin, quercetin, and genistein all significantly affected faba bean rhizobial colony diameter, number, and absorbance (Wang et al. 2018). Another study demonstrated that when naringenin, hesperetin, and quercetin were added to a pea-based culture system in high concentrations (10–100 µg/mL), the flavonoids promoted curling and deformation of pea root hairs (Novak et al. 2002).
In this study, we obtained some new ideas on the basis of results that were consistent with previous reports. For example, 25, 21, 9 flavonoids were detected in P1 vs. P31, P11 vs. P31, and P61 vs. P31 groups, in which the abundance of 14, 9, 4 flavonoids (relative to P31 levels) were increased, respectively (Table S8). This indicated that, under P stress, more flavonoids were involved in metabolic processes in soybean root nodules, including nodule nitrogen fixation. Specifically, quercetin abundance was increased in nodules of all P-level based treatment groups. This leads to the speculation that under P stress, the decrease in the number of nodules was smaller than the decrease in the weight of a single nodule. Thus the role of quercetin in nitrogen fixation was mainly to promote the formation of root nodules. Hesperetin, dihydromyricetin, 3’,4’,7-trihydroxyisoflavone, linarin and homopterocarpin were increased, whereas daidzin, glycitin, irisflorentin, pelargonidin-3,5-O-diglucoside chloride, and hesperetin 7-O-glucoside were decreased in soybean root nodules to regulate the effect of P stress on nodule nitrogen fixation.
4.3 Metabolic pathways and networks in response to phosphorus level changes
Great progress has been made in elucidating the steps involved in nodule formation. The first step in this process involves a molecular dialogue between leguminous plants and rhizobial bacteria that is established through recognition of bacterial Nod factors by legume Nod factor receptors, such as NFR1 and NFR5 (Limpens and Bisseling 2003; Oldroyd and Downie 2004; Popp and Ott 2011). For example, this enables Lotus japonicus to recognize its bacterial microsymbiont Mesorhizobium loti, that is required for the initial physiological and cellular responses to the lipochitin-oligosaccharide signal (Radutoiu et al. 2003). Plant responses to P deficiency, as reflected by metabolites within root exudates, differ among metabolites and among growth periods (Tawaraya et al. 2014). Nevertheless, effects of phosphorus on metabolic pathways and metabolic networks within nodules still needs to be further clarified.
After completion of KEGG annotation-based identification of the pathways involved in differential production of metabolites, metabolic transmission analyses (enrichment analysis and mutation analysis) were identified and the various metabolites studied find key pathways with highest correlations with metabolite differences. Further screening, and network analysis of metabolic pathway regulation and interaction revealed that the numbers of differential metabolites detected for P1 vs. P31 and P11 vs. P31 were greater than numbers detected for P61 vs. P31. This indicated that metabolic pathway responses differed among comparison groups due to varying degrees of phosphorus stress (Fig. 5). Specifically, a total of 1155, 1292, and 788 metabolic pathway-associated compounds were detected for comparison groups P1 vs. P31, P11 vs. P31, and P61 vs. P31, respectively, with 125, 123, 48 of the compounds shown to be enriched relative to P31 in P1, P11, and P61, respectively (Table S6). For P1 vs. P31, 15 metabolites were associated with this pathway, of which 3 were differential metabolites. For P11 vs. P31, 15 metabolites were associated with the pathway, including 2 different metabolites. By contrast, no metabolites of this metabolic pathway were detected for P61 vs. P31. Several metabolic pathways were identified through KEGG analysis, such as glutathione metabolism, isoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis, and aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis and these played key roles in plants under each treatment (May et al. 1998; Vitale et al. 1993; Chevalier and Rossignol 2011). However, metabolites involved in metabolic pathways and their regulatory effects differed among groups based on P levels. The pathway ascorbate and aldarate metabolism was closely related to P stress, which implies that this pathway and associated metabolites are involved in the adaptation of the symbiotic soybean root nodule system to P starvation.
5 Conclusion
Under low phosphorus stress conditions (P1, P11), the numbers of differential metabolites and expression abundance of associated metabolic pathways were significantly increased relative to corresponding to the P61 treatment. The metabolites with increased abundance mainly involved amino acids and various flavonoids, while abscisic acid, phosphorylcholine, D-glucose 6-phosphate, uridine 5’-diphospho-D-glucose, and Pi were decreased. The differential metabolites were mainly associated with carotenoid biosynthesis, glycerophospholipid metabolism, sugar metabolism, ascorbic acid and aldonic acid metabolism and these regulate nodule nitrogen fixation under P stress. The results of the present study will be used to analyze further the physiological mechanisms of nodulation and nitrogen fixation in soybean under phosphorus stress.
References
An Q, Yin B, Zhang JC, Yuan M, Wang LX, Yuan T, Cao YB, Niu YB (2017) The chemotaxis and nodulation effect of soybean rhizobium on exogenous flavonoids. Soybean Sci 36(6):900–904. https://doi.org/10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2017.06.0900
Ao X, Guo XH, Zhu Q, Zhang HJ, Wang HY (2014) Effect of phosphorus fertilization to P uptake and dry matter accumulation in soybean with different P efficiencies. J Integr Agric 13(2):326–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60390-1
Bosse D, Kock M (1998) Influence of phosphate starvation on phosphohydrolases during development of tomato seedlings. Plant Cell Environ 21:325–332. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1998.00289.x
Cassman KG, Whitney AS, Fox RL (1981) Phosphorus requirements of soybean and cowpea as affected by mode of N nutrition. Agron J 73:17–22. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1981.00021962007300010005x
Chen H, Wei D, Yao Y, Gong Z, Chunmei M (2013) Study on nitrogenase activity and nitrogen fixation of different soybean varieties. J Nucl Agric Sci 3:379–383
Chen J, Pan KW, Gu B (2006) Physiological function and mechanism of abscisic acid in plants under stress. Plant Physiol Commun 42(6):1176–1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(99)80132-2
Chen LY, Qin L, Zhou LL, Li XX, Chen ZC, Sun LL, Wang WF, Lin ZH, Zhao J, Yamaji N, Ma JF, Gu M, Xu GH, Liao H (2019) A nodule-localized phosphate transporter GmPT7 plays an important role in enhancing symbiotic N 2 fixation and yield in soybean. New Phytol 221:2013–2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15541
Chen ZJ, Cui QQ, Liang CY, Sun LL, Tian J, Liao H (2011) Identifification of differentially expressed proteins in soybean nodules under phosphorus defificiency through proteomic analysis. Proteomics 11:4648–4659. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201100231
Chevalier F, Rossignol M (2011) Proteomic analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes with contrasted root architecture in response to phosphate deficiency. J Plant Physiol 168(16):1885–1890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2011.05.024
Chou MX, Wei XY (2010) Review of research advancements on the molecular basis and regulation of symbiotic nodulation of legumes. Chin J Plant Ecol 34(7):876–888. https://doi.org/10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.07.013
Cooper JE (2004) Multiple responses of rhizobia to flavonoids during legume root infection. Adv Bot Res 41:59–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2296(04)41001-5
Cooper JE (2007) Early interactions between legumes and rhizobia: Disclosing complexity in a molecular dialogue. J Appl Microbiol 103(5):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03366.x
Dennis BH, Vikas G, Dorte M, Nikolaj BA, Stig UA, Jens S, Katharina M (2015) Micro RNA 172 (miR172) signals epidermal infection and is expressed in cells primed for bacterial invasion in Lotus japonicas roots and nodules. New Phytol 208:241–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13445
Downie JA, Economou A, Scheu AK, Johnson AWB, Surin BP (1990) The Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae NodO protein compensates for the exported signal made by the host-specific nodulation genes. In: Gresshoff PM, Roth LE, Stacey G, Newton WE (eds) Nitrogen fixation: Achievements and objectives. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 201–202
Dunn WB, Broadhurst D, Begley P, Zelena E, Francis-Mcintyre S, Anderson N, Brown M, Knowles JD, Halsall A, Haselden JN, Nicholls AW, Wilson ID, Kell DB, Goodacre R (2011) Procedures for large-scale metabolic profiling of serum and plasma using gas chromatography and liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Nat Protoc 6(7):1060–1083. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2011.335
Gawronska H, Deji A, Sakakibara H, Sugiyama T (2003) Hormone mediated nitrogen signaling in plants: implication of participation of abscisic acid in negative regulation of cytokinin-inducible expression of maize response regulator. Plant Physiol Biochem 41:605–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0981-9428(03)00059-7
Gentili F, Huss-Danell K (2003) Local and systemic effects of phosphorus and nitrogen on nodulation and nodule function in Alnus incana. J Exp Bot 54:2757–2767. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erg311
Geurts R, Federova E, Bisseling T (2005) Nod factor signaling genes and their function in the early stages of rhizobium infection. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8(4):346–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2005.05.013
Gremaud MF, Harper JE (1989) Selection and initial characterization of partially nitrate tolerant nodulation mutants of soybean. Plant Physiol 89(1):169–173. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.89.1.169
Hair JF (2010) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn
Hernandez G, Ramirez M, Valdes-Lopez O, Tesfaye M, Graham MA, Czechowski T, Schlereth A, Wandrey M, Erban A, Cheung F, Wu HC, Lara M, Town CD, Kopka J, Udvardi MK, Vance CP (2007) Phosphorus stress in common bean: Root transcript and metabolic responses. Plant Physiol 144(2):752–767. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.107.096958
Hernandez G, Valdes-Lopez O, Ramirez M, Goffard N, Weiller G, Aparicio-Fabre R, Fuentes SI, Erban A, Kopka J, Udvardi MK (2009) Global changes in the transcript and metabolic profiles during symbiotic nitrogen fixation in phosphorus-stressed common bean plants. Plant Physiol 151(3):1221–1238. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.143842
Herridge DF, Peoples MB, Boddey RM (2008) Global inputs of biological nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Plant Soil 311:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9668-3
Hu XJ, Huang QJ, Zhang XJ, Stone P, O’Callaghan K, Cocking E (1999) Study on flavonoids promoting rhizobia to infect rapeseed roots. Soil 1:43–45
Israel DW (1993) Symbiotic dinitrogen fixation and hostplant growth during development of and recovery from phosphours deficiency. Physiol Plant 88(2):294–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1993.tb05502.x
Israel DW (1987) Investigation of the role of phosphorus in symbiotic dinitrogen fixation. Plant Physiol 84(3):835–840. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.84.3.835
Jakobsen I (1985) The role of phosphorus in the nitrogen fixation by young pea plants (Pisum sativum). Physiologia Plantarum (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). J Exp Bot 64:190–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1985.tb02334.x
Jolliffe I (2002) Principal component analysis. Wiley Online Library
Kijne JW, Diaz CL, Pater BS, Smit G, Lugtenberg BJJ (1990) Surface interactions between rhizobia and legume root hair. In: Gresshoff PM, Roth LE, Stacey G, Newton WE (eds) Nitrogen fixation: Achievements and objectives. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 187–192
Kutama AS, Aliyu BS, Saratu AO (2008) Influence of phosphorus fertilizer on the development of root nodules in cowpea(Vigna unguiculata L.Walp) and soybean(Glycine max L Merril). Int J pure Appl Sci 2(3):27–31
Li HY, Wang XX, Liang QX, Lyu XC, Li S, Gong ZP, Dong SK, Yan C, Ma CM (2021) Regulation of phosphorus supply on nodulation and nitrogen fixation in soybean plants with dual-root systems. Agronomy 11:2354. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112354
Li XX, Zhao J, Tan ZY, Zeng RS, Liao H (2015) GmEXPB2, a cell wall b-expansin, affects soybean nodulation through modifying root architecture and promoting nodule formation and development. Plant Physiol 169(4):2640–2653. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01029
Limpens E, Bisseling T (2003) Signaling in symbiosis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6:343–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5266(03)00068-2
Liu YQ, Liu JG, Wang R, Sun H, Li M, Strappe P, Zhou ZK (2020) Analysis of secondary metabolites induced by yellowing process for understanding rice yellowing mechanism. Food Chem 342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128204
Lu MY, Cheng ZY, Zhang XM, Huang PH, Fan CM, Yu GL, Chen FL, Xu K, Chen QS, Miao YC, Han YZ, Feng XZ, Liu LY, Fu YF (2020) Spatial divergence of PHR-PHT1 modules maintains phosphorus homeostasis in soybean nodules. Plant Physiol 184(1):236–250. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.19.01209
Martin J, Saad S, Faouzi B, Olomide OAK, Abeer H, Fathi AAE, Alqarawi AA, Phan LS (2017) Comparative analysis of the combined effects of different water and phosphate levels on growth and biological nitrogen fixation of nine cowpea varieties. Front Plant Sci 8:2111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02111
May MJ, Vernoux T, Leaver C, Montagu MV, Inze D (1998) Glutathione homeostasis in plant: Implication s for environmental sensing and plant development. J Exp Bot 49:649–667. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/49.321.649
Miao SJ, Liu XB (2010) Molecular physiology of nodulation and nitrogen fixation in soybean. Soybean Sci 29(2):319–324
Miao SJ, Qiao YF, Han XZ (2006) The requirement of soybean nodulation and nitrogen fixation for phosphorus. Agricultural Syst Sci Compr Res 22(4):276–282
Miao SJ, Qiao YF, Han XZ (2007) Nodule formation and development in soybeans (Glycine rnux L.) in response to phosphorus supply in solution culture. Pedosphere 17(1):36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(07)60005-8
Mullen MD, Israel DW, Wollum AG (1988) Effects of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) phosphorus nutrition on nodulation and dinitrogen fixation. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:2387–2392. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.54.10.2387-2392.1988
Nanjareddy K, Arthikala MK, Go´mez BM, Blanco L, Lara M (2017) Differentially expressed genes in mycorrhized and nodulated roots of common bean are associated with defense, cell wall architecture, N metabolism, and P metabolism. PLoS ONE 12(8):e0182328. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182328
Novak K, Chovanec P, Skrdleta V, Kropaova M, Lisa L, Nemcova M (2002) Effect of exogenous flavonoids on nodulation of pea (Pisum sativum L.). J Exp Bot 53:1735–1745. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erf016
Nussaume L, Kanno S, Javot H, Marin E, Pochon N, Ayadi A, Nakanishi TM, Thibaud MC (2011) Phosphate import in plants: Focus on the PHT1 transporters. Front Plant Sci 2:83. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2011.00083
Oldroyd GE, Downie JA (2004) Calcium, kinases and nodulation signaling in legumes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5:566–576. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1424
Popp C, Ott T (2011) Regulation of signal transduction and bacterial infection during root nodule symbiosis. Curr Opin Plant Biology 14:458–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pb.2011.03.016
Qin L, Zhao J, Tian J, Chen LY, Sun ZA, Guo YX, Lu X, Gu M, Xu GH, Liao H (2012) The high-affinity phosphate transporter GmPT5 regulates phosphate transport to nodules and nodulation in soybean. Plant Physiol 159:1634–1643. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.199786
Radutoiu S, Madsen LH, Madsen EB, Felle HH, Umehara Y, Grønlund M, Sato S, Nakamura Y, Tabata S, Sandal N, Stougaard J (2003) Plant recognition of symbiotic bacteria requires two LysM receptor-like kinases. Nature 425:585–592. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02039
Redmond JW, Batley M (1986) Flavones induce expression of nodulation genes in rhizobium. Nature 4(23):115–121. https://doi.org/10.1038/323632a0
Richardson AE, Simpson RJ (2011) Soil microorganisms mediating phosphorus availability. Plant Physiol 156:989–996. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.175448
Robson AD, O’Hara GW (1981) Involvement of phosphorus in nitrogen fixation by subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.). Australian J Plant Physiol 8:427–436. https://doi.org/10.1071/pp9810427
Rygg J, Wold S (2002) Orthogonal projections to latent structures (O-PLS). J Chemometr 16(3):119–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.695
Sa TM, Israel DW (1991) Energy status and functioning of phosphorus- deficient soybean nodules[J]. Plant Physiol 97(3):928–935. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.97.3.928
Sulieman S, Ha CV, Schulze J, Tran LS (2013) Growth and nodulation of symbiotic Medicago truncatula at different levels of phosphorus availability. J Exp Bot 64:2701–2712. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert122
Tang D, Dong Y, Guo N, Li L, Ren HK (2014) Metabolomic analysis of the polyphenols in germinating mung beans (Vigna radiata) seedsand sprouts. J Sci Food Agric 94(8):1639–1647. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6471
Tate RL (1995) CharterXII: Symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Soil Microbiol 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-199511000-00009
Tawaraya K, Horie R, Saito S, Wagatsuma T, Saito K, Oikawa A (2014) Metabolite profiling of root exudates of common bean under phosphorus deficiency. Metabolites 4:599–611. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo4030599
Thuynsma R, Valentine A, Kleinert A (2014) Phosphorus deficiency affects the allocation of below-ground resources to combined cluster roots and nodules in Lupinus albus. J Plant Physiol 171:285–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2013.09.001
Tsvetkova GE, Georgiev GI (2003) Effect of phosphorus nutrition on the nodulation, nitrogen fixation and nutrient use efficiency of bradyrhizobium japonicum soybean(Glycine max L. merr.)symbiosis. Bulg J Plant Physiol special issue 331–335
Vance CP (2001) Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and phosphorus acquisition. Plant nutrition in a world of declining renewable resources. Plant Physiol 127:390–397. https://doi.org/10.2307/4280097
Vitale A, Ceriotti A, Denecke J (1993) The role of the endoplasmic reticulum in protein synthesis, modification and intracellular transport. J Exp Bot 44:1417–1444. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/44.9.1417
Walker TS, Bais HP, Vivanco GJM (2003) Root exudation and rhizosphere biology. Plant Physiol 132(1):44–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/44.9.1417
Wang JJ, Dong Y, Xiao JX, Tang Li, Zheng Y (2018) Effects of different flavonoids on the growth of faba bean rhizobia. J southwest forestry Univ 38(5):110–115. https://doi.org/10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2018.05.018
Wei LL, Wang M, Zeng XQ (2019) Metabolomics analysis of molecular mechanism of powdery mildew in Tibetan hulless barley. J Plateau Agric 3(5):493–499
Wiklund S, Johansson E, Sjoestrom L, Mellerowicz E, Edlund UG, Shockcor JP, Gottfries J, Moritz T, Trygg J (2008) Visualization of GC/TOF-MS-based metabolomics data for identification of biochemically interesting compounds using OPLS class models. Anal Chem 80(1):115–122. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0713510
Wu MC, Xiao CZ, Zheng PY (1999) Research on soybean phosphorus nutrition. Sci Agric Sin 32(3):59–65
Wu DT (2012) Effect of phosphorus nutrition on P absorption and yields of soybean. Dissertation for the Master Degree, Northeast Agricultural University
Yan J, Han XZ, Ji ZJ, Li Y, Wang ET, Xie ZH, Chen WF (2014) Abundance and diversity of soybean-nodulating rhizobia in black soil are impacted by land use and crop management. Appl Environ Microbiol 80(17):5394–5402. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01135-14
Yao YB, Wu DT, Gong ZP, Ma CM (2012) Effect of phosphorus level on nitrogen accumulation and yield in soybean. J Nucl Agric Sci 26(6):0947–0951
Yao YB, Wu DT, Gong ZP, Zhao JK, Ma CM (2018) Variation of nitrogen accumulation and yield in response to phosphorus nutrition of soybean(Glycine max L.Merr.). J Plant Nutr 41(9):1138–1147. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2018.1433834
Zarrin F, Muhammad Z, Mfayyaz C (2006) Effect of rhizobium strains and phosphorus on growth of soybean(Glycine max)and survival of rhizobium and p solubilizing bacteria. Pak J Bot 38(2):459–464
Zhang HY, Wang SJ, Zhang XW (1988) Study on the transport characteristics of nitrogenous compounds in the xylem sap of soybean plant. Soybean Sci 7(1):19–24
Zhao LF, Xu YJ, Lai XH (2017) Antagonistic endophytic bacteria associated with nodules of soybean (Glycine max L.) and plant growth-promoting properties. Braz J Microbiol 308:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.06.007
Zhou T, Wang L, Du YL, Liu T, Li SX (2019) Rhizosphere soil bacterial community composition in soybean genotypes and feedback to soil P availability. J Integr Agric 18(10):2230–2241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62115-X
Zhu XF, Zhao XS, Wu Q, Shen RF (2018) Abscisic acid is involved in root cell wall phosphorus remobilization independent of nitric oxide and ethylene in rice (Oryza sativa). Ann Bot 121(7):1361–1368. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcy034
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Chao Yan for dependable assistance in sampling and sample preservation, all friends and colleagues who helped us in any way but are not included in the author list.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32001479), Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China (LH2022C093), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M690945) and Heilongjiang Provincial Postdoctoral Science Foundation (LBH-Z20191).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article are: Yubo Yao (yaoyubo2009@aliyun.com) and Zhenping Gong (gzpyx2004@163.com). Y.Y. and Z.G. conceived the original screening and research plans; Z.G., Y.Y. and C.M. supervised the experiments; Y.Y. performed most of the experiments and analyzed the data; H.Y., G.W., D.Z., performed the experiments; J.Y., S.C. and Q.K. provided technical assistance; Y.Y. and Z.G. conceived the project and wrote the article with contributions of all the authors; Y.Y. supervised and completed the writing.Y.Y. agrees to serve as the author responsible for contact and ensures communication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplemental Fig. S1
Heatmap of hierarchical clustering analysis. (DOCX 783 KB)
Supplemental Fig. S2
Matchstick analysis. (DOCX 314 KB)
Supplemental Fig. S3
Heatmap of correlation analysis. (DOCX 1.93 MB)
Supplemental Fig. S4
Network analysis. (DOCX 643 KB)
Supplemental Table S1
Identified metabolites. (XLSX 66.9 KB)
Supplemental Table S2
Orthogonal projections to latent structures-discriminant analysis model parameter. (XLSX 8.95 KB)
Supplemental Table S3
Different metabolites with final values obtained for comparisons of VIP > 1.0 and p < 0.05. (XLSX 45.9 KB)
Supplemental Table S4
Differential metabolites based on chemical classification and regulation mode. (DOCX 21.6 KB)
Supplemental Table S5
KEGG metabolic pathway associated with differential metabolites. (XLSX 19.6 KB)
Supplemental Table S6
Metabolite compounds and their relative abundance changes to P31. (XLSX 22.2 KB)
Supplemental Table S7
Analysis of differential metabolite regulatory network. (XLSX 45.0 KB)
Supplemental Table S8
The numbers and names of flavonoids. (XLSX 9.90 KB)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yao, Y., Yuan, H., Wu, G. et al. Nitrogen fixation capacity and metabolite responses to phosphorus in soybean nodules. Symbiosis 88, 21–35 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-022-00882-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-022-00882-9