Skip to main content
Log in

Chitosan controls postharvest anthracnose in bell pepper by activating defense-related enzymes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Food Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anthracnose, a postharvest disease caused by the fungus Colletotrichum capsici is the most devastating disease of bell pepper that causes great economic losses especially in tropical climates. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the antifungal properties of chitosan (low molecular weight from crab shell, Mw: 50 kDa and 75–85 % deacetylated) against anthracnose by inducing defense-related enzymes. The concentrations of 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 % chitosan were used to control the fungus in vitro and postharvest. There was a reduction in C. capsici mycelial growth and the highest chitosan concentration (2.0 %) reduced the growth by 70 % after 7 days incubation. In germination test, the concentration of 1.5 and 2.0 % chitosan reduced spore germination in C. capsici between 80 % and 84 %, respectively. In postharvest trial the concentration of 1.5 % decreased the anthracnose severity in pepper fruit by approximately 76 % after 28 days of storage (10 ± 1 °C; 80 % RH). For enzymatic activities, the concentration of 1.5 and 2.0 % chitosan increased the polyphenol oxidase (PPO), peroxidase (POD) and total phenolics in inoculated bell pepper during storage. Based on these results, the chitosan presents antifungal properties against C. capsici, as well as potential to induce resistance on bell pepper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali A, Mahmud TMM, Sijam K, Siddiqui Y (2010) Potential of chitosan coating in delaying the postharvest anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz.) of Eksotika II papaya. Int J Food Sci Technol 45:2134–2140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ali A, Mahmud TMM, Siddiqui Y (2012) Control of anthracnose by chitosan through stimulation of defence-related enzymes in Eksotika II papaya (Carica papaya L.) fruit. J Biol Life Sci 3:114–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan CR, Hadwiger LA (1979) The fungicidal effect of chitosan on fungi of varying cell wall composition. Exp Mycol 3:285–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Badawy MEI, Rabea EI (2009) Potential of the biopolymer chitosan with different molecular weights to control postharvest gray mold of tomato fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 51:110–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bautista-Baños S, Hernández-López M, Bosquez-Molina E, Wilson CL (2003) Effect of chitosan and plant extracts on growth of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, anthracnose levels and quality of papaya fruit. Crop Prot 22:1087–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bautista-Baños S, Hernandez-Lauzardo AN, Velazquez-del Valle MG, Hernández-López M, Ait Barka E, Bosquez-Molina E, Wilson CL (2006) Review: chitosan as a potential natural compound to control pre and postharvest diseases of horticultural commodities. Crop Prot 25:108–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benhamou N (1996) Elicitor-induced plant defense pathways. Trends Plant Sci 1:233–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Shalom N, Ardi R, Pinto R, Aki C, Fallik E (2003) Controlling gray mould caused by Botrytis cinerea in cucumber plants by means of chitosan. Crop Prot 22:285–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Belanger RR, Benhamou N, Paulitz TC (2000) Defense enzymes induced in cucumber roots by treatments with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Pythium aphanidermatum. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 56:13–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin MJ, Yohalem DS, Harris RF, Andrews JH (1996) Putative mechanism and dynamics of inhibition of apple scab pathogen Venturia inaequalis by compost extracts. Soil Biol Biochem 28:1241–1249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duangmal K, Apenten RKO (1999) A comparative study of polyphenoloxidases from taro (Colocasia esculenta) and potato (Solanum tuberosum var. Romano). Food Chem 64:351–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El Ghaouth A, Arul J, Grenier J, Asselin A (1992a) Antifungal activity of chitosan on two postharvest pathogens of strawberry fruits. Phytopathology 82:398–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El Ghaouth A, Arul J, Asselin A, Benhamou N (1992b) Antifungal activity of chitosan on postharvest pathogens: induction of morphological and cytological alterations in Rhizopus stolonifer. Mycol Res 96:769–779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El Ghaouth A, Arul J, Wilson C, Benhamou N (1997) Biochemical and cytochemical aspects of the interaction of chitosan and Botrytis cinerea in bell pepper fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 12:183–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faoro F, Maffi D, Cantu D, Iriti M (2008) Chemical-induced resistance against powdery mildew in barley: the effects of chitosan and benzothiadiazole. BioControl 53:387–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman S, Katan T, Shabi E (1998) Characterization of Colletotrichum species responsible for anthracnose diseases of various fruits. Plant Dis 82:596–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadwiger LA (1999) Host-parasite interactions: elicitation of defense response in plants with chitosan. In: Jolles P, Muzzarelli RAA (eds) Chitin and chitinases. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, pp 185–200

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krol E (2005) Influence of some chemicals on the viability of Phomopsis viticola sacc. spores. J Plant Prot Res 45:195–203

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leuba JL, Stossel P (1986) Chitosan and other polyamines: anti-fungal activity and interaction with biological membranes. In: Muzzarelli RAA, Jeuniaux C, Gooday GW (eds) Chitin in nature and technology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 215–222

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Tian S, Meng X, Xu Y (2007) Effect of chitosan of postharvest diseases and physiological response of tomato fruits. Postharvest Biol Technol 44:300–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maqbool M, Ali A, Ramachandran S, Smith DR, Alderson PG (2010) Control of postharvest anthracnose of banana using a new edible composite coating. Crop Prot 29:1136–1141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meng X, Yang L, Kennedy JF, Tian S (2010) Effects of chitosan and oligochitosan on growth of two fungal pathogens and physiological properties in pear fruit. Carbohydr Polym 81:70–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz Z, Moret A, Garcés S (2009) Assessment of chitosan for inhibition of Colletotrichum sp. on tomatoes and grapes. Crop Prot 28:36–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muzzarelli RAA (1986) Filmogenic properties of chitin/chitosan. In: Muzzarelli RAA, Peter MG (eds) Chitin in nature and technology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 475–489

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pickersgill B (1997) Genetic resources and breeding of Capsicum spp. Euphytica 96:129–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappussi MCC, Pascholati SF, Benato EA, Cia P (2009) Chitosan reduces infection by Guignardia citricarpa in postharvest ‘Valencia’ oranges. Brazilian Arch Biol Technol 52:513–521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rhouma A, Ben Daoud H, Ghanmi S, Ben Salah H, Romdhane M, Demak M (2009) Antimicrobial activities of leaf extracts of Pistacia and Schinus species against some plant pathogenic fungi and bacteria. J Plant Pathol 91:339–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanazzi G, Gabler FM, Smilanick JL (2006) Preharvest chitosan and postharvest UV irradiation treatments suppress gray mold of table grapes. Plant Dis 90:445–450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar D, Wilson Wijeratnam RS, Wijesundera RLC, Marikar FMT, Abeyesekere M (2000) Antagonistic effect of Trichoderma harzianum on postharvest pathogen of rambutan (Nephelium lappaceum). Phytoparasitica 28:240–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terry LA, Joyce DC (2004) Elicitors of induced disease resistance in postharvest horticultural crops: a brief review. Postharvest Biol Technol 32:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Than PP, Jeewon R, Hyde KD, Pongsupasamit S, Mongkolporn O, Taylor PWJ (2008) Characterization and pathogenicity of Colletotrichum species associated with anthracnose on chilli (Capsicum spp.) in Thailand. Plant Pathol 57:562–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson CL, El Ghaouth A, Chaluts E, Droby S, Stevens C, Lu JL, Khan V, Arul J (1994) Potential of induced resistance to control postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables. Plant Dis 78:837–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zieslin N, Ben-Zaken R (1993) Peroxidase activity and presence of phenolic substances in peduncles of rose flowers. Plant Physiol Biochem 31:333–339

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Ministry of Agriculture (MOA) Malaysia, for providing financial support under the project (05-02-12-SF0031).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asgar Ali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edirisinghe, M., Ali, A., Maqbool, M. et al. Chitosan controls postharvest anthracnose in bell pepper by activating defense-related enzymes. J Food Sci Technol 51, 4078–4083 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-012-0907-5

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-012-0907-5

Keywords

Navigation