Skip to main content
Log in

Long-Term Survival in Patients Treated by Cytoreductive Surgery with or Without HIPEC for Peritoneal Surface Malignancies—A report from the Indian HIPEC Registry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A previous report from the Indian HIPEC registry showed acceptable early survival and morbidity in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) + / − hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The goal of this retrospective study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes in these patients. Three hundred seventy-four patients treated from December 2010 to December 2016 and enrolled in the Indian HIPEC registry were included. All patients had completed 5 years from the date of surgery. The 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and factors affecting these were evaluated. The histology was epithelial ovarian cancer in 209 (46.5%), pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) in 65 (17.3%) and colorectal cancer in 46 (12.9%) patients. The peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was ≥ 15 in 160 (42.8%). A completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score of 0/1 resection was obtained in 83% (CC-0–65%; CC-1–18%). HIPEC was performed in 59.2%. At a median, follow-up of 77 months (6–120 months), 243 (64.9%) patients developed recurrence, and 236 (63%) died of any cause; 138 (36.9%) were lost to follow-up. The median OS was 56 months (95% CI 53.42–61.07), and the median PFS was 28 months (95% CI 37.5–44.4). The 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year OS was 97.6%, 63%, 37.7% and 24% respectively. The 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year PFS was 84.8%, 36.5%, 27.3% and 22% respectively. The use of HIPEC (p = 0.03) and PMP of appendiceal origin (p = 0.01) was independent predictors of a longer OS. CRS + / − /HIPEC may achieve long-term survival in patients with PM from different primary sites in the Indian scenario. More prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and identify factors influencing long-term survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kepenekian V, Bhatt A, Péron J, Alyami M, Benzerdjeb N, Bakrin N, Falandry C, Passot G, Rousset P, Glehen O (2022) Advances in the management of peritoneal malignancies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 19(11):698–718. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-022-00675-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sugarbaker PH (1995) Peritonectomy procedures. Ann Surg 221(1):29–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199501000-00004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. González-Moreno S (2006) Peritoneal surface oncology: a progress report. Eur J Surg Oncol 32(6):593–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2006.03.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sadeghi B, Arvieux C, Glehen O, Beaujard AC, Rivoire M, Baulieux J, Fontaumard E, Brachet A, Caillot JL, Faure JL, Porcheron J, Peix JL, François Y, Vignal J, Gilly FN (2000) Peritoneal carcinomatosis from non-gynecologic malignancies: results of the EVOCAPE 1 multicentric prospective study. Cancer 88(2):358–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000115)88:2%3c358::aid-cncr16%3e3.0.co;2-o

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cortés-Guiral D, Hübner M, Alyami M, Bhatt A, Ceelen W, Glehen O, Lordick F, Ramsay R, Sgarbura O, Van Der Speeten K, Turaga KK, Chand M (2021) Primary and metastatic peritoneal surface malignancies. Nat Rev Dis Primers 7(1):91. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-021-00326-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhatt A, Mehta S, Seshadri RA. 2019 The current status of peritoneal surface oncology in India. Indian J Surg Oncol. (Suppl 1):41–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-018-00871-9

  7. Bhatt A, Mehta S, Ramakrishnan As, Pande P, Rajan F, Rangole A, Saklani A, Sethna K, Singh S, Zaveri S, Gopinath KS. 2017 Setting up of the Indian HIPEC Registry: a registry for Indian patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. Indian J Surg Oncol. (4):527–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-017-0693-7

  8. Bhatt A, Mehta SS, Zaveri S, Rajan F, Ray M, Sethna K, Katdare N, Patel MD, Kammar P, Prabhu R, Sinukumar S, Mishra S, Rangarajan B, Rangole A, Damodaran D, Penumadu P, Ganesh M, Peedicayil A, Raj H, Seshadri R (2018) Treading the beaten path with old and new obstacles: a report from the Indian HIPEC registry. Int J Hyperthermia 35(1):361–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2018.1503345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Moran BJ, Tzivanakis A (2018) The concept of “obstruction-free survival” as an outcome measure in advanced colorectal cancer management. Pleura Peritoneum 3(1):20180101. https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2018-0101

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Goéré D, Malka D, Tzanis D, Gava V, Boige V, Eveno C, Maggiori L, Dumont F, Ducreux M, Elias D (2013) Is there a possibility of a cure in patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis amenable to complete cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy? Ann Surg 257(6):1065–1071. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827e9289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chia CS, You B, Decullier E, Vaudoyer D, Lorimier G, Abboud K, Bereder JM, Arvieux C, Boschetti G, Glehen O (2016) BIG RENAPE Group. Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: is cure a possibility? Ann Surg Oncol. 23(6):1971–1979. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5081-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chua TC, Moran BJ, Sugarbaker PH, Levine EA, Glehen O, Gilly FN, Baratti D, Deraco M, Elias D, Sardi A, Liauw W, Yan TD, Barrios P, Gómez Portilla A, de Hingh IH, Ceelen WP, Pelz JO, Piso P, González-Moreno S, Van Der Speeten K, Morris DL (2012) Early- and long-term outcome data of patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei from appendiceal origin treated by a strategy of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 30(20):2449–2456. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.39.7166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jacquet P, Sugarbaker PH (1996) Clinical research methodologies in diagnosis and staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. In: Sugarbaker PH (ed) Peritoneal carcinomatosis: principles of management. Kluwer Academic publishers, Boston, pp 359–374

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) https://www.eortc.be › services › doc › ctc › ctcae_4.... Accessed 20th December, 2022

  15. Sinukumar S, Mehta S, As R, Damodaran D, Ray M, Zaveri S, Kammar P, Bhatt A (2019) Analysis of clinical outcomes of pseudomyxoma peritonei from appendicular origin following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy-a retrospective study from INDEPSO. Indian J Surg Oncol. 10(Suppl 1):65–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-018-00870-w

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhatt A, Kammar P, Mehta S, Damodaran D, Zaveri S, Patel MD, Sinukumar S, Ray M, Seshadri R. 2019 Chasing rainbows? The possibility of “cure” in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases undergoing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC-a retrospective study by INDEPSO.Indian J Surg Oncol. (Suppl 1):49–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-019-00879-9

  17. Piñeros M, Abriata MG, de Vries E, Barrios E, Bravo LE, Cueva P, de Camargo CM, Fernández L, Gil E, Luciani S, Pardo C, Zoss W, Bray F, Mery L (2021) Progress, challenges and ways forward supporting cancer surveillance in Latin America. Int J Cancer 149(1):12–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pinheiro PS, Morris CR, Liu L, Bungum TJ, Altekruse SF (2014) The impact of follow-up type and missed deaths on population-based cancer survival studies for Hispanics and Asians. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2014(49):210–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgu016

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kusamura S, Barretta F, Yonemura Y, Sugarbaker PH, Moran BJ, Levine EA, Goere D, Baratti D, Nizri E, Morris DL, Glehen O, Sardi A, Barrios P, Quénet F, Villeneuve L, Gómez-Portilla A, de Hingh I, Ceelen W, Pelz JOW, Piso P, González-Moreno S, Van Der Speeten K, Deraco M (2021) Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) and the French National Registry of Rare Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (RENAPE) The role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in pseudomyxoma peritonei after cytoreductive surgery. JAMA Surg 156(3):e206363. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.6363

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Habinshuti P, Hagenimana M, Nguyen C, Park PH, Mpunga T, Shulman LN, Fehr A, Rukundo G, Bigirimana JB, Teeple S, Kigonya C, Ndayisaba GF, Uwinkindi F, Randall T, Miller AC (2020) Factors associated with loss to follow-up among cervical cancer patients in Rwanda. Ann Glob Health 86(1):117. https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2722

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Alyami M, Kim BJ, Villeneuve L, Vaudoyer D, Képénékian V, Bakrin N, Gilly FN, Cotte E, Glehen O, Passot G (2018) Ninety-day post-operative morbidity and mortality using the National Cancer Institute’s common terminology criteria for adverse events better describe post-operative outcome after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Int J Hyperthermia 34(5):532–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2017.1367846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rau B, Brandl A, Piso P et al (2020) Peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer: results from the German database. Gastric Cancer 23:11–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-019-00978-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baratti D, Kusamura S, Cabras AD, Bertulli R, Hutanu I, Deraco M (2013) Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: long-term survival with complete cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Eur J Cancer 49(15):3140–3148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.05.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kusamura S, Torres Mesa PA, Cabras A, Baratti D, Deraco M (2016) The role of Ki-67 and pre-cytoreduction parameters in selecting diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) patients for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Ann Surg Oncol 23(5):1468–1473. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4962-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cazauran JB, Lasseur A, Pasquer A et al (2017) Total mesenteric peritonectomy for peritoneal metastases (with video). Ann Surg Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6099-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bristow RE, Tomacruz RS, Armstrong DK, Trimble EL, Montz FJ (2002) Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 20(5):1248–1259. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Eisenhauer EL, Abu-Rustum NR, Sonoda Y, Levine DA, Poynor EA, Aghajanian C, Jarnagin WR, DeMatteo RP, D’Angelica MI, Barakat RR, Chi DS (2006) The addition of extensive upper abdominal surgery to achieve optimal cytoreduction improves survival in patients with stages IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 103(3):1083–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.06.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fagotti A, Ferrandina MG, Vizzielli G, Pasciuto T, Fanfani F, Gallotta V, Margariti PA, Chiantera V, Costantini B, GueliAlletti S, Cosentino F, Scambia G (2020) Randomized trial of primary debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (SCORPION-NCT01461850). Int J Gynecol Cancer 30(11):1657–1664. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-001640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Harter P, Sehouli J, Vergote I, Ferron G, Reuss A, Meier W, Greggi S, Mosgaard BJ, Selle F, Guyon F, Pomel C, Lécuru F, Zang R, Avall-Lundqvist E, Kim JW, Ponce J, Raspagliesi F, Kristensen G, Classe JM, Hillemanns P, Jensen P, Hasenburg A, Ghaem-Maghami S, Mirza MR, Lund B, Reinthaller A, Santaballa A, Olaitan A, Hilpert F, du Bois A (2021) DESKTOP III Investigators. Randomized trial of cytoreductive surgery for relapsed ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 385(23):2123–2131. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2103294. Erratum.In:NEnglJMed.386(7):704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aditi Bhatt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 2446 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sinukumar, S., Kammar, P., Ray, M. et al. Long-Term Survival in Patients Treated by Cytoreductive Surgery with or Without HIPEC for Peritoneal Surface Malignancies—A report from the Indian HIPEC Registry. Indian J Surg Oncol 14 (Suppl 1), 198–208 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-023-01727-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-023-01727-7

Keywords

Navigation