Skip to main content
Log in

Prosthodontic Rehabilitation of Velopharyngeal Disorders—A Case Series

  • Clinical Report
  • Published:
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

Abstract

Acquired palatal defects results from cancer resection, whereas cleft palate is the main cause of congenital defects. Both these condition leads to impaired speech intelligibility, seepage of nasal secretions into the oral cavity and vice versa while difficulty in swallowing and hyper nasality is also eminent. In this case report three different technique for treating velopharyngeal disorders have been described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

References

  1. Pinto JH, Pegoraro-Krook MI (2003) Evaluation of palatal prosthesis for the treatment of velopharyngeal dysfunction. J Appl Oral Sci 11(3):192–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chambers MS, Lemon JC, Martin JW (2004) Obturation of the partial soft palatal defect. J Prosthet Dent 91(1):75–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Anandakrishna GN, Gali S (2010) Management of velopharyngeal disorder. J Prosthodont 19(5):397–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor TD, Desjardins RP (1983) Construction of meatus-type obturator: its advantages and disadvantages. J Prosthet Dent 49(1):80–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coskun A, Yaluğ S, Yazicioğlu H (2006) Fabrication of a meatus obturator on a titanium framework with a 1-step impression. Quintessence Int 37(7):575–578

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor TD (2000) Clinical maxillofacial prosthetics. Quintessence, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stewart KL, Rudd KD, Keubker WA (1997) Clinical removable partial prosthodontics, 2nd edn. Ishiyaku Euro America Inc., St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sharry JJ (1974) Complete denture prosthodontics, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sharry JJ (1954) The meatus obturator in cleft palate prosthesis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 7(8):852–855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharry JJ (1958) Meatus obturator in particular and pharyngeal impressions in general. J Prosthet Dent 8(5):893–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Paul G, Harlan B (1958) A supportive type prosthetic speech aid. J Prosthet Dent 8(2):362–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Warren D (1965) A physiologic approach to cleft palate prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 15(4):770–778

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wood MT, Warren DW (1971) Effect of cleft palate prostheses on respiratory effort. J Prosthet Dent 26(2):213–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kelly SW, McLean CC, Manley MC (1996) A clinical report: assessment in the treatment of hypernasal speech with motor neuron disease. J Prosthet Dent 75(5):479–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin FH, Wang TC (2011) Prosthodontic rehabilitation for edentulous patients with palatal defect: report of two cases. J Formos Med Assoc 110(2):120–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Beumer J III, Curtis TA, Firtell DN (1979) Maxillofacial rehabilitation, prosthodontic and surgical consideration. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 286–287

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rahn AO, Boucher LJ (1970) Maxillofacial prosthetics principles and concepts. W B Saunders, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tuna SH, Pekkan G, Gumus HO, Aktas A (2010) Prosthetic rehabilitation of velopharyngeal insufficiency; pharyngeal obturator prosthesis with different retention mechanism. Euro J Dent 4(1):81–87

    Google Scholar 

  19. McKerns D, Bzoch KR (1970) Variations in velopharyngeal valving: the factors of sex. Cleft Palate J 7:652–662

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rilo B, da Silva JL, Martinez-Insua A, Santana U (2002) A titanium and visible light polymerized resin obturator. J Prosthet Dent 87(4):407–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wolf BH, Reitemeier BK, Schmidt AE, Richter GH, Dencan G (2001) In vitro testing of the bond between soft materials used for maxillofacial prostheses and cast titanium. J Prosthet Dent 85(4):401–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yaluğ S, Yazicioğlu H (2003) An alternative approach to fabricating a meatus obturator prosthesis. J Oral Sci 45(1):43–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Polyzois GL (1992) Light-cured combination obturator prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 68(2):345–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Khan Z (1989) Soft palate obturator prosthesis made with visible light-cured resin. J Prosthet Dent 62(6):671–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gonzale JB, Aronson AE (1970) Palatal lift prosthesis for treatment of anatomic and neurologic palatopharyngeal insufficiency. Cleft Palate J 7:91–103

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saurav Banerjee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Banerjee, S., Kumar, S., Chakraborty, N. et al. Prosthodontic Rehabilitation of Velopharyngeal Disorders—A Case Series. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 13, 352–357 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-012-0161-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-012-0161-6

Keywords

Navigation