Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Impact of Indoor Tanning Legislation: Newspaper Coverage of the Risks of Indoor Tanning Before and After the California Indoor Tanning Ban for Minors

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On June 1, 2011, the California Senate passed a bill banning minors from indoor tanning. We aimed to determine whether the bill’s passage was associated with longer-term media coverage regarding skin protection and the risks associated with indoor tanning. Articles from 31 English-language California newspapers between June 2010–May 2011 (PRE) and June 2011–May 2012 (POST) were searched using terms related to skin protection. Ninety articles were found for in-depth coding and analysis. There were more skin protection articles in the POST period than in the PRE period (57 vs 33; p < .05). In addition, there were more POST articles mentioning the risks of indoor tanning (33 vs 10; p < .001), and a POST article was more likely to mention the risks (58 vs 30 %; p < .05). The higher number of POST articles mentioning the risks persisted throughout all quarters. Therefore, the California indoor tanning ban was associated with increased longer-term news coverage of skin protection and the risks associated with indoor tanning. This finding has potential influence on the many states that are considering comparable legislation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Autier P (2010) Carcinogenic to humans: why the international agency for research on cancer added indoor ultraviolet (UV) tanning to group I. Melanoma Lett 28(2):1–5

  2. Total Circ: US Newspaper (2013) Alliance for Audited Media. [cited 2013 October 15]

  3. Cokkinides V et al (2012) A profile of skin cancer prevention media coverage in 2009. J Am Acad Dermatol 67(4):570–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stryker JE, Emmons KM, Viswanath K (2007) Uncovering differences across the cancer control continuum: a comparison of ethnic and mainstream cancer newspaper stories. Prev Med 44(1):20–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pew Research Center (2012) Number of americans who read print newspapers continues decline. [cited 2013 November 8]; Available from: http://www.pewresearch.org/daily-number/number-of-americans-who-read-print-newspapers-continues-decline/

  6. Stryker JE, Moriarty CM, Jensen JD (2008) Effects of newspaper coverage on public knowledge about modifiable cancer risks. Health Commun 23(4):380–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Corbett JB, Mori M (1999) Medicine, media, and celebrities: news coverage of breast cancer, 1960–1995. J Mass Commun Q 76(2):229–249

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rogers EM, Dearing JW, Chang S (1991) Aids in the 1980s: the agenda-setting process for a public issue. Assoc Educ J Mass Commun.

  9. Williamson JM, Hocken DB (2010) Pancreatic cancer in the media: the Swayze shift. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92(6):537

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chapman S et al (2005) Impact of news of celebrity illness on breast cancer screening: Kylie Minogue’s breast cancer diagnosis. Med J Aust 183(5):247

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heneghan MK et al (2007) Skin cancer coverage in a national newspaper: a teachable moment*. J Cancer Educ 22(2):99–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith KC, Kromm EE, Klassen AC (2010) Print news coverage of cancer: what prevention messages are conveyed when screening is newsworthy? Cancer Epidemiol 34(4):434–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Henry M et al (2012) How is cancer recently portrayed in Canadian newspapers compared to 20 years ago? Support Care Cancer 20(1):49–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stryker JE et al (2009) Cancer risk communication in mainstream and ethnic newspapers. Prev Chronic Dis 6(1):A23

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jensen JD et al (2010) Making sense of cancer news coverage trends: a comparison of three comprehensive content analyses. J Health Commun 15(2):136–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Slater MD et al (2008) News coverage of cancer in the United States: a national sample of newspapers, television, and magazines. J Health Commun 13(6):523–537

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moriarty CM, Stryker JE (2008) Prevention and screening efficacy messages in newspaper accounts of cancer. Health Educ Res 23(3):487–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stryker JE, Solky BA, Emmons KM (2005) A content analysis of news coverage of skin cancer prevention and detection, 1979 to 2003. Arch Dermatol 141(4):491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Scully M, Wakefield M, Dixon H (2008) Trends in news coverage about skin cancer prevention, 1993‐2006: increasingly mixed messages for the public. Aust N Z J Public Health 32(5):461–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Granner ML et al (2010) Newspaper content analysis in evaluation of a community-based participatory project to increase physical activity. Health Educ Res 25(4):656–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Magzamen S, Charlesworth A, Glantz SA (2001) Print media coverage of California’s smokefree bar law. Tob Control 10(2):154–160

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yanovitzky I (2002) Effects of news coverage on policy attention and actions: a closer look into the media-policy connection. Commun Res 29(4):422–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. ACS (2013) Cancer Facts and Figures 2013. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-036845.pdf

  24. AAD (2010) “Suntelligence: how sun smart is your city?.” Fact Sheet [cited 2013 October 15]; Available from: http://www.aad.org/stories-and-news/news-releases/eb7480d2-ada3-4707-a585-9b703ab45137

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Standards

The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data.

Funding

This study received no financial funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan E. Mayer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mayer, J.E., Swetter, S.M., Guild, S. et al. The Impact of Indoor Tanning Legislation: Newspaper Coverage of the Risks of Indoor Tanning Before and After the California Indoor Tanning Ban for Minors. J Canc Educ 30, 124–129 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0672-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0672-4

Keywords

Navigation