Skip to main content
Log in

McGill algorithm for precipitation nowcasting by lagrangian extrapolation (MAPLE) applied to the South Korean radar network. Part II: Real-time verification for the summer season

  • Published:
Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The MAPLE system has been implemented in real-time in Korea since June 2008, producing forecasts up to 6 hours every 10 minutes. An object-oriented verification method has been applied for the summer season (June–July–August) over the Korean Peninsula to evaluate and understand the characteristics of the forecast results. The CRA (contiguous rain area) approach is used to decompose the total error into the different error components; location, pattern, and volume errors. The mean displacement error is smaller than 20 km up to the 3-h forecasts and increases with forecast time. The ratio between the displacement (location) error and the total error is less than 7% even for a 3-h forecast. This result indicates that MAPLE produces reliable forecast in terms of precipitation location. However, the pattern error is larger than 90% of the total error. Contingency scores that are defined with different categories of rain intensity and displacement errors show the outstanding performance up to 2.5 hours. MAPLE overpredicts rain areas with the threshold of 1 mm h−1 rain intensity throughout forecast periods. However, the heavy rainfall events are poorly predicted due to the inherent limitation of extrapolation-based nowcasting technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bellon A., I. Zawadzki, A. Kilambi, H. Lee, Y. Lee, and G. Lee, 2010: McGill Algorithm for precipitation nowcasting by Lagrangian extrapolation (MAPLE) applied to the South Korean radar network. Part I: Sensitivity studies of the variational echo tracking (VET) technique. Asia-Pacific J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 369–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casati, B., L. J. Wilson, D. B. Stephenson, P. Nurmi, A. Ghelli, M. Pocernich, U. Damrath, E. E. Ebert, B. G. Brown, and S. Mason, 2008: Forecast verification: current status and future directions. Meteor. Appl., 15, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, E. E., and J. L. McBride, 2000: Verification of precipitation in weather systems: determination of systematic errors. J. Hydrol., 239, 179–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____, U. Damrath, W. Wergen, and M. Baldwin, 2003: The WGNE assessment of short-term quantitative precipitation forecasts. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 84, 481–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____, L. J. Wilson, B. G. Brown, P. Nurmi, H. E. Brooks, J. Bally, and M. Jaeneke, 2004: Verification of nowcasts from the WWRP Sydney 2000 Forecast Demonstration Project. Wea. Forecasting, 19, 73–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germann, U., and I. Zawadzki, 2002: Scaledependence of the predictability of precipitation from continental radar images. Part I: Description of the methodology. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 2859–2873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____, ______, and B. Turner, 2006: Predictability of precipitation from continental radar images. Part IV: Limits to prediction. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 2092–2108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grams, J. S., W. A. Gallus Jr., S. E. Koch, L. S. Wharton, A. Loughe, and E. E. Ebert, 2006: The use of a modified Ebert-McBride technique to evaluate mesoscale model QPF as a function of convective system morphology during IHOP 2002. Wea. Forecasting, 21, 288–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laroche, S., and I. Zawadzki, 1995: Retrievals of horizontal winds from single-doppler clear-air data by methods of cross correlation and variational analysis. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 12, 721–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savvidou, K., S. C. Michaelides, A. Orphanou, P. Constantinides, J.-P. Schulz, U. Voigt, and M. Savvides, 2007: Verification of precipitation forecasts by the DWD limited area model LME over Cyprus. Adv. Geosci., 10, 133–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tartaglione, N., S. Mariani, C. Accadia, S. Michaelides, and M. Casaioli, 2008: Objective verification of spatial precipitation forecasts. In: Precipitation: Advances in Measurement, Estimation and Prediction, Michaelides S., Ed., Springer, 453–472.

  • Turner, B. J., I. Zawadzki, and U. Germann, 2004: Predictability of precipitation from continental radar images. Part III: operational nowcasting implementation (MAPLE). J. Appl. Meteorol., 43, 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, D. S., 2006: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences. Academic Press, 627 pp.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gyuwon Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, H.C., Lee, Y.H., Ha, JC. et al. McGill algorithm for precipitation nowcasting by lagrangian extrapolation (MAPLE) applied to the South Korean radar network. Part II: Real-time verification for the summer season. Asia-Pacific J Atmos Sci 46, 383–391 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-010-1009-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-010-1009-9

Key words

Navigation