Skip to main content
Log in

Discovery of Cladonema multiramosum sp. nov. (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Cladonematidae) using DNA barcoding and life cycle analyses

  • Articles
  • Marine Biology
  • Published:
Acta Oceanologica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In contrast to typical planktonic hydromedusae, Cladonema medusae are mostly benthic, with specialised adhesive branches to adhere to the substrate. In this study, a Cladonema species discovered in a laboratory aquarium in Fuzhou, China, was confirmed as a new species, based on morphological and molecular analyses. The species was named Cladonema multiramosum sp. nov. Its medusa is distinct from that of congeners possessing substantially more adhesive branches (8–24, rarely 5–7), and tiny branches on the upper radial canals. The validity of C. multiramosumum sp. nov. was also supported by molecular phylogenetic analyses based on the mitochondrial 16S rDNA sequence. However, C. multiramosum sp. nov. medusa also displayed considerable phenotypic plasticity with respect to its radial canals, tentacles, stinging branches per tentacle, oral tentacles, manubrium, and gonads, hindering species identification based solely on morphology. Although some morphological characteristics of hydroids (filiform tentacles and medusa buds) and nematocysts could also be used as diagnostic characters in the genus Cladonema, this information is unavailable for some Cladonema species. Thus, the taxonomy within the genus Cladonema was re-evaluated based mainly on the morphological characteristics of the medusa. Further revision of the genus Cladonema should be made when supplementary information on the life cycle and DNA barcoding are updated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bouillon J, Boero F, Seghers G. 1988. Notes additionelles sur les Hydroméduses de la mer de Bismarck (Hydrozoa-Cnidaria) II. Indo-Malayan Zoology, 5: 87–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouillon J, Gravili C, Pagès F, et al. 2006. An introduction to Hydrozoa. Memoires du Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 194: 591

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucklin A, Hopcroft R R, Kosobokova K N, et al. 2010a. DNA barcoding of Arctic Ocean holozooplankton for species identification and recognition. Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 57(1–2): 40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucklin A, Ortman B D, Jennings R M, et al. 2010b. A “Rosetta Stone” for metazoan zooplankton: DNA barcode analysis of species diversity of the Sargasso Sea (Northwest Atlantic Ocean). Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 57(24–26): 2234–2247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cedeño-Posso C. 2014. First record of the genus Cladonema (medusae and polyps) in Colombia. Zootaxa, 3793(5): 597–599, doi: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3793.5.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ender A, Schierwater B. 2003. Placozoa are not derived cnidarians: evidence from molecular morphology. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 20(1): 130–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farias G B, Leitão S N, De Castro Melo P A M, et al. 2020. First in situ record of the medusa stage of Cladonema radiatum (Cnidaria: Anthoathecata) in the South Atlantic Ocean. Ocean and Coastal Research, 68: e20349, doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s2675-28242020068349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folmer O, Black M B, Hoeh W R, et al. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 3(5): 294–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujiki A, Hou Shiting, Nakamoto A, et al. 2019. Branching pattern and morphogenesis of medusa tentacles in the jellyfish Cladonema pacificum (Hydrozoa, Cnidaria). Zoological Letters, 5(1): 12, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40851-019-0124-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita S, Kuranaga E, Nakajima Y I. 2019. Cell proliferation controls body size growth, tentacle morphogenesis, and regeneration in hydrozoan jellyfish Cladonema pacificum. PeerJ, 7: e7579, doi: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershwin L A, Zeidler W. 2008. Cladonema timmsii, a new species of hydromedusa (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) from a salt lake in South Australia. Zootaxa, 1826(1): 59–68, doi: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1826.1.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghory F S, Ali Q M, Ahmed Q. 2020. First record of Cladonema radiatum Dujardin, 1843 (Hydrozoa: Cladonematidae) from northern Arabian Sea, Pakistan. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Research, 5(3): 14–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Graziussi D F, Suga H, Schmid V, et al. 2012. The “Eyes absent” (eya) gene in the eye-bearing Hydrozoan Jellyfish Cladonema radiatum: conservation of the retinal determination network. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 318(4): 257–267, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.22442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guindon S, Dufayard J F, Lefort V, et al. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology, 59(3): 307–321, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He Jinru, Zheng Lianming, Zhang Wenjing, et al. 2015. Morphology and molecular analyses of a new Clytia species (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Campanulariidae) from the East China Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 95(2): 289–300, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315414000836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirai E. 1958. On the species of Cladonema radiatum var. mayeri Perkins. Bulletin of the Marine Biological Station of Asamushi, 9(1): 23–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindner A, Govindarajan A F, Migotto A E. 2011. Cryptic species, life cycles, and the phylogeny of Clytia (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Campanulariidae). Zootaxa, 2980(1): 23–36, doi: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2980.1.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawrocki A M, Schuchert P, Cartwright P. 2010. Phylogenetics and evolution of Capitata (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa), and the systematics of Corynidae. Zoologica Scripta, 39(3): 290–304, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.2009.00419.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Östman C. 1979. Two types of nematocysts in Campanulariidae (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) studied by light and scanning electron microscopy. Zoologica Scripta, 8(1–4): 5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Östman C. 1982. Nematocysts and taxonomy in Laomedea, Gonothyraea and Obelia (Hydrozoa, Campanulariidae). Zoologica Scripta, 11(4): 227–241, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.1982.tb00536.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Östman C. 1987. New techniques and old problems in hydrozoan systematics. In: Bouillon J, Boero F, Cicogna F, et al, eds. Modern Trends in the Systematics, Ecology, and Evolution of Hydroids and Hydromedusae. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 67–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Östman C. 2000. A guideline to nematocyst nomenclature and classification, and some notes on the systematic value of nematocysts. Scientia Marina, 64(S1): 31–46, doi: https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2000.64s131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell J E. 2018. Successes and challenges in jellyfish ecology: examples from Aequorea spp. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 591: 7–27, doi: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralph P M. 1953. A guide to the athecate (gymnoblastic) hydroids and medusae of New Zealand. Tuatara, 5(2): 59–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghu P R, Tampi P, Durve V. 1961. Note on the occurrence of the Anthomedusa cladonema in the Indian region. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India, 3(1–2): 251–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees W J. 1950. On Cladonema myersi, a new species of hydroid from the Californian Coast. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 119(4): 861–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees J T. 1979. The polyp and immature medusa stages of Cladonema californicum, Hyman, 1947 (Anthomedusae: Cladonemidae) with biological notes and a discussion of the taxonomy of the genus Cladonema. Journal of Natural History, 13(3): 295–302, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00222937900770231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees J T. 1982. The hydrozoan Cladonema in California: a possible introduction from East Asia. Pacific Science, 36(4): 439–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuchert P. 1996. The marine fauna of New Zealand: athecate hydroids and their medusae (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa). New Zealand Oceanographic Institute Memoir, 106: 1–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuchert P. 2006. The European athecate hydroids and their medusae (Hydrozoa, Cnidaria): Capitata part 1. Revue suisse de Zoologie, 113(2): 325–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuchert P. 2016. The polyps of Oceania armata identified by DNA barcoding (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa). Zootaxa, 4175(6): 539–555, doi: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4175.6.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuchert P. 2021. World Hydrozoa Database. Cladonema Dujardin, 1843. http://marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=117049[2021-09-14]

  • Schuchert P, Hosia A, Leclère L. 2017. Identification of the polyp stage of three leptomedusa species using DNA barcoding. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 124(1): 167–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeda N, Deguchi R, Itabashi T. 2018. Reproductive strategies in marine Hydrozoan Jellyfish: sexual medusae and asexual polyps. In: Kobayashi K, Kitano T, Iwao Y, et al, eds. Reproductive and Developmental Strategies. Tokyo: Springer, 157–174

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, et al. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28(10): 2731–2739, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Zhenzu. 1993. Revisions of nominal species on the Hydromedusae of China sea areas. Journal of Oceanography in Taiwan Strait, 12(3): 197–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Lianming, He Jinru, Lin Yuanshao, et al. 2014. 16S rRNA is a better choice than COI for DNA barcoding hydrozoans in the coastal waters of China. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 33(4): 55–76, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-014-0415-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Taixuan, Huang Mingxian. 1958. A study on hydromedusae of Chefoo. Acta Zoologica Sinica, 10(2): 173–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Konglin, Zheng Lianming, He Jinru, et al. 2013. Detection of a new Clytia species (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Campanulariidae) with DNA barcoding and life cycle analyses. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 93(8): 2075–2088, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315413000969

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ruiting Li for her assistance in the culture of C. multiramosum. We thank editors and reviewers for their comments and suggestions on this manuscript. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.

Funding

The Fund of China Ocean Mineral Resources R&D Association under contract No. DY135-B2-13; the National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 41806181; the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China under contract No. 2021J011042; the Program for Innovative Research Team in Science & Technology in Fujian Province University; the Talent Introduction Pre-research Project of Minjiang University under contract No. MJY20017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Konglin Zhou or Jianming Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, K., Gu, Y., Wang, L. et al. Discovery of Cladonema multiramosum sp. nov. (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Cladonematidae) using DNA barcoding and life cycle analyses. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 41, 44–52 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-021-1900-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-021-1900-5

Key words

Navigation