Abstract
A three-dimensional (3-D) ocean model is coupled with a two-dimensional (2-D) sea ice model, to revisit a nonlinear advection mechanism, one of the most important mesoscale eddy genesis mechanisms in the marginal ice zone. Two-dimensional ocean model simulations suggest nonlinear advection mechanism is more important when the water gets shallower. Instead of considering the ocean as barotropic fluid in the 2-D ocean model, the 3-D ocean model allows the sea ice to affect the current directly in the surface layer via ocean-ice interaction. It is found that both mesoscale eddy and sea surface elevation are sensitive to changes in a water depth in the 3-D simulations. The vertical profile of a current velocity in 3-D experiments suggests that when the water depth gets shallower, the current move faster in each layer, which makes the sea surface elevation be nearly inverse proportional to the water depth with the same wind forcing during the same time. It is also found that because of the vertical motion, the magnitude of variations in the sea surface elevation in the 3-D simulations is very small, being only 1% of the change in the 2-D simulations. And it seems the vertical motion to be the essential reason for the differences between the 3-D and 2-D experiments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dumont D, Kohout A, Bertino L. 2011. A wave-based model for the marginal ice zone including a floe breaking parameterization. J Geophys Res, 116(C4): doi: 10.1029/2010JC006682
Gula J, Molemaker M J, McWilliams J C. 2015. Topographic vorticity generation, submesoscale instability and vortex street formation in the Gulf Stream. Geophys Res Lett, 42(10): 4054–4062
Häkkinen S. 1986. Coupled ice-ocean dynamics in the marginal ice zones: upwelling/downwelling and eddy generation. J Geophys Res, 91(C1): 819–832
Hibler W D III. 1979. A dynamic thermodynamic sea ice model. J Phys Oceanogr, 9(4): 815–846
Hunke E C, Dukowicz J K. 1997. An elastic-viscous-plastic model for sea ice dynamics. J Phys Oceanogr, 27(9): 1849–1867
Hunke E C, Zhang Y. 1999. A comparison of sea ice dynamics models at high resolution. Mon Wea Rev, 127(3): 396–408
Johannessen J A, Johannessen O M, Svendsen E, et al. 1987. Mesoscale eddies in the Fram Strait marginal ice zone during the 1983 and 1984 Marginal Ice Zone Experiments. J Geophys Res, 92(C7): 6754–6772
Johannessen O M, Johannessen J A, Svendsen E, et al. 1987. Ice-edge eddies in the Fram Strait marginal ice zone. Science, 236(4800): 427–429
Lane E M, Restrepo J M, McWilliams J C. 2007. Wave-current interaction: a comparison of radiation-stress and vortex-force representations. J Phys Oceanogr, 37(5): 1122–1141
Large W G, McWilliams J C, Doney S C. 1994. Oceanic vertical mixing: a review and a model with a nonlocal boundary layer parameterization. Rev Geophys, 32(4): 363–403
Lemarié F, Kurian J, Shchepetkin A F, et al. 2012. Are there inescapable issues prohibiting the use of terrain-following coordinates in climate models?. Ocean Modell, 42: 57–79
Liu A K, Häkkinen S, Peng C Y. 1993. Wave effects on ocean-ice interaction in the marginal ice zone. J Geophys Res, 98(C6): 10025–10036
Liu A K, Holt B, Vachon P W. 1991. Wave propagation in the marginal ice zone: model predictions and comparisons with buoy and synthetic aperture radar data. J Geophys Res, 96(C3): 4605–4621
Liu A K, Mollo-Christensen E. 1988. Wave propagation in a solid ice pack. J Phys Oceanogr, 18(11): 1702–1712
McPhee M G. 1975. Ice-ocean momentum transfer for the adjex ice model. ADJEX Bull, 29: 93–111
McWilliams J C, Restrepo J M, Lane E M. 2004. An asymptotic theory for the interaction of waves and currents in coastal waters. J Fluid Mech, 511: 135–178
Røed L P, O’Brien J J. 1983. A coupled ice-ocean model of upwelling in the marginal ice zone. J Geophys Res, 88(C5): 2863–2872
Shchepetkin A F, McWilliams J C. 2005. The regional oceanic modeling system (ROMS): a split-explicit, free-surface, topographyfollowing-coordinate oceanic model. Ocean Modell, 9(4): 347–404
Squire V A. 2007. Of ocean waves and sea-ice revisited. Cold Reg Sci Technol, 49(2): 110–133
Squire V A, Dugan J P, Wadhams P, et al. 1995. Of ocean waves and sea ice. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 27(1): 115–168
Uchiyama Y, McWilliams J C, Shchepetkin A F. 2011. Wave-current interaction in an oceanic circulation model with a vortex-force formalism: application to the surf zone. Ocean Model, 34(1–2): 16–35
Wadhams P, Holt B. 1991. Waves in frazil and pancake ice and their detection in Seasat synthetic aperture radar imagery. J Geophys Res, 96(C5): 8835–8852
Wadhams P, Parmiggiani F, de Carolis G. 2002. The use of SAR to measure ocean wave dispersion in frazil-pancake icefields. J Phys Oceanogr, 32(6): 1721–1746
Wadhams P, Squire V A, Goodman D J, et al. 1988. The attenuation rates of ocean waves in the marginal ice zone. J Geophys Res, 93(C6): 6799–6818
Williams T D, Bennetts L G, Squire V A, et al. 2013a. Wave-ice interactions in the marginal ice zone: Part 1. Theoretical foundations. Ocean Modell, 71: 81–91
Williams T D, Bennetts L G, Squire V A, et al. 2013b. Wave-ice interactions in the marginal ice zone: Part 2. Numerical implementation and sensitivity studies along 1D transects of the ocean surface. Ocean Modell, 71: 92–101
Yang Haijun, Dai Haijin. 2015. Effect of wind forcing on the meridional heat transport in a coupled climate model: equilibrium response. Climate Dyn, 45(5–6): 1451–1470
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Kong Wenwen for valuable suggestions and discussions. This work is jointly supported by Zhao Jun and Song Junqiang.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dai, H., Cui, J. & Yu, J. Revisiting mesoscale eddy genesis mechanism of nonlinear advection in a marginal ice zone. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 36, 14–20 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-017-1134-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-017-1134-8