Skip to main content
Log in

Interaction between quinclorac and imidazolinones in the control of resistant Cyperus iria to ALS inhibitors

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Herbicides belonging to the chemical group imidazolinones and the quinclorac herbicide are important to control weeds in flooded rice. The objective of this research was to evaluate the interaction of imidazolinones with quinclorac to control Cyperus iria resistant to acetolactate synthase inhibitors (ALS). It was conducted two experiments in a greenhouse in a completely randomized design with four replications. Colby’s methodology was used for experiment 1, through the application of quinclorac isolated and in mixture with herbicides imazethapyr, imazapyr e imazapic. The experiment 2, using dose–response curves, tested the herbicides quinclorac isolated and in different mixtures with the herbicide imazethapyr. For experiment 1, the expected and observed averages were compared. For experiment 2, the results were analyzed using the sigmoidal logistic model. Additive is the main interaction of mixtures of quinclorac with different herbicides from the chemical group of imidazolinones to control resistant C. iria. Mixing with imazethapyr at different proportions can cause an additive effect with quinclorac at higher doses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnhold E (2013) Pacote em ambiente R para análise de variância e análises complementares. Brazilian Braz J Vet Res an Sci 50:488–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awan TH, Cruz PCS, Chauhan BS (2015) Growth analysis and biomass partitioning of Cyperus iria in response to rice planting density and nitrogen rate. Crop Prot 74:92–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckie HJ, Reboud X (2009) Selecting for weed resistance: herbicide rotation and mixture. Weed Technol 23:363–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blouin DC, Webster EP, Zhang W (2004) Analysis of synergistic and antagonistic effects of herbicides using nonlinear mixed-model methodology. Weed Technol 18:464–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chiapinotto DM, Schaedler CE, Fernandes JP, Andres A, Lamego FP (2017) Cross-resistance of rice flatsedge to als-inhibiting herbicides. Planta Daninha 35:e017166827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colby SR (1967) Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dhammu HS, Sandhu KS (2002) Critical period of Cyperus iria L. competition in transplanted rice. Proc. 13th Australian Weeds Conference weeds" threats now and forever. Plant Protection Society of WA, Perth, pp 79–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt DS, Oliveira Neto AM, Noldin JA, Vanti RM (2016) Barnyardgrass with multiple resistance to synthetic auxin ALS and ACCase Inhibitors. Planta Daninha 34:823–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frans RE (1972) Measuring plant responses. In: Wilkinson RE (ed) Research methods in weed science. Southern Weed Science Society, Puerto Rico, pp 28–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Feijó ÂDR, Fipke MV, Silveira LP, Camargo ER, Kruse ND, Avila L (2020) Interaction between saflufenacil and imazapyr+ imazapic in the management of barnyardgrass and weedy rice and selectivity for irrigated rice. Cienc Rural 50:e20190821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galinato MI (1999) Upland rice weeds of South and Southeast Asia. International Rice Research Institute, Makati, p 156

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann K (2010) Auxin herbicides: current status of mechanism and mode of action. Pest Manag Sci 66:113–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heap I. 2019. The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Online. Internet. www.weedscience.org. 16 Sept 2019.

  • Hernández AF, Gil F, Lacasaña M (2017) Toxicological interactions of pesticide mixtures: an update. Arch Toxicol 91:3211–3223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalsing A, Goulart I, Mariot C, Menezes VG, Matzenbacher F, Merotto Junior A (2019) Spatial and temporal evolution of imidazolinone-resitant red rice in “Clearfield” rice cultivations. Pesq Agropec Bras 54:2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matzenbacher F, Kalsing A, Dalazen G, Markus C, Merotto Junior A (2015) Antagonism is the predominant effect of herbicide mixtures used for imidazolinone-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control. Planta Daninha 33:587–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norsworthy JK, Bangarwa SK, Scott RC, Still J, Griffith GM (2010) Use of propanil and quinclorac tank mixtures for broadleaf weed control on rice (Oryza sativa) levees. Crop Prot 29:255–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team, R. (2019) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.

  • Riar DS, Tehranchian P, Norsworthy JK, Nandula V, McElroy S, Srivastava V, Chen S, Bond J, Scott RC (2015) Acetolactate synthase–inhibiting, herbicide-resistant rice flatsedge (Cyperus iria): cross-resistance and molecular mechanism of resistance. Weed Sci 63:748–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritz C, Streibig JC (2005) Bioassay analysis using R. J Stat Softw 12:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen H, Cedergreen N, Skovgaard IM, Streibig JC (2007) An isobole-based statistical model and test for synergism/antagonism in binary mixture toxicity experiments. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 14(4):383–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-007-0022-3

  • Sudianto E, Beng-Kah S, Ting-Xiang N, Saldain NE, Scott RC, Burgos NR (2013) Clearfield® rice: Its development, success, and key challenges on a global perspective. Crop Prot 49:40–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulguim AR, Silva BM, Agostinetto D, Avila Neto RC, Zandona RR (2019) Resistance mapping of the genus cyperus in rio grande do sul and selection pressure analysis. Planta Daninha 37e019186679. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582019370100062

  • Yasuor H, Milan M, Eckert JW, Fischer AJ (2012) Quinclorac resistance: a concerted hormonal and enzymatic effort in Echinochloa phyllopogon. Pest Manag Sci 68:108–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Q, Liu W, Zhang Y, Liu KK (2007) Action mechanisms of acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides. Pestic Biochem Physiol 89:89–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was not particularly founded by any specific research agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors contributed equally with this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Costa Avila Neto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

We have no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avila Neto, R.C., de Souza, P.M., Rubert, J. et al. Interaction between quinclorac and imidazolinones in the control of resistant Cyperus iria to ALS inhibitors. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 26, 161–166 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-022-00169-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-022-00169-x

Keywords

Navigation