Skip to main content
Log in

Induced mutagenesis in Jatropha curcas L. using ethyl methanesulphonate (EMS) and assessment of DNA polymorphism through RAPD markers

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethyl methanesulphonate (EMS) has been employed in a number of genotoxic studies in plants as a model alkylated agent that readily reacts with DNA-producing alkylated nucleotides. Therefore, the present study was aimed at assessing DNA polymorphism induced by different concentrations (control, 1, 2, 3, and 4%) of EMS through a Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) marker analysis. The improved agronomic traits such as germination, flowering, maturity, seed traits, and oil content were recorded in 1% EMS-treated plants, while the corresponding parameters reduced significantly (P > 0.05) in 4% EMS-treated plants as compared to the control. Among 25 random primers used, 19 primers produced polymorphic bands. The number of amplicons varied from 1 to 8 with an average of 3.68 bands, of which 2.12 were polymorphic. The highest polymorphic bands (6) and percentage of polymorphism (85.71) were produced by the primer OPAK-20. In a dendrogram constructed based on Jaccard’s coefficient similarity, the treated plants and control were grouped into three clusters: (a) control and 2 and 3% concentrations of EMS-treated plants merged together; (b) 1% concentration of EMS-treated plants clustered alone; (c) 4%concentration of EMS-treated plants also clustered alone. We conclude that the effect of EMS could change the pattern of germination, flowering, seed yield, and oil content of J. curcas. DNA polymorphism detected by RAPD marker analysis offered a useful biomarker assay for the evaluation of effects of chemical mutagens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atienzar FA, Cordi B, Donkin ME, Evenden AJ, Jha AN, Depledge MH. 2000. Comparison of ultraviolet-induced genotoxicity detected by random amplified polymorphic DNA with chlorophyll fluorescence and growth in a marine macroalgae, Palmaria palmate. Aquat. Toxicol. 50: 1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belaj A, Trujilo I, Rosa R, Rallo L, Gimenez MJ. 2001. Polymorphism and discrimination capacity of randomly amplified polymorphic markers in an olive germplasm bank. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 126: 64–71

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwat A, Krishna TG, Bhatia CR. 1997. RAPD analysis of induced mutants of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). J. Genet. 76: 201–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlier JD, Reis A, Duval MF, Conppens G, Leitao JM. 2004. Genetic maps of RAPD, AFLP, and ISSR markers in Ananas bracteatus and Ananas comosus using the pseudo-testcross strategy. Plant Breed. 123: 186–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cenkci S, Cigerci IH, Yildiz M, Ozay C, Bozdag A, Terzi H. 2010. Lead contamination reduces chlorophyll biosynthesis and genomic template stability in Brassica rapa L. Environ. Exp. Bot. 67: 467–473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra A, Tewari S. 2007. Isolation of genomic DNA from Stylo Species without liquid nitrogen suitable for RAPD and STS analyses. Cytologia 72: 287–297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaparro E, Werner DJ, O’Malley D, Sederoff RR. 1994. Targeted mapping and linkage analysis of morphological isozyme, and RAPD markers in peach. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 194–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Charbaji T, Nabulsi I. 1999. Effect of low doses of gamma irradiation on in vitro growth of grapevine. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 57: 129–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demeke T, Adams RP, Chibbar R. 1992. Potential taxonomic use of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) — a case study in study. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84: 990–994

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deshwall RPS, Singh R, Malik K, Randhawa GJ. 2005. Assessment of genetic diversity and genetic relationships among 29 populations of Azadirachta indica A. Juss. using RAPD markers. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 52: 285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1990. Isolation of DNA from fresh plant tissue. Focus 12: 12–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdem G, Oldacay S. 2004. Employment of RAPD technique to assess the genetic stability of Helianthus annuus treated with different mutagenic agents. J. Appl. Sci. 4: 277–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganesh-Ram S, Parthiban TK, Senthilkumar R, Thiruvengadam V, Paramathma M. 2008. Genetic diversity among Jatropha species as revealed by RAPD markers. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 55: 803–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gichner T. 2003. Differential genotoxicity of ethyl methanesulphonate, N-ethyl-N nitrosourea and maleic hydrazide in tobacco seedlings based on data of the comet assay and two recombination assays. Mutat. Res. 538: 171–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green AG, Marshall DR. 1984. Isolation of induced mutants in linseed (Linum usitatissimum) having reduced linolenic acid content. Euphytica 33: 321–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Srivastava M, Mishra GP, Naik PK, Chauhan RS. 2008. Analogy of ISSR and RAPD markers for comparative analysis of genetic diversity among different Jatropha curcas genotypes. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 7: 4230–4243

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ikbal KSB, Dhillon RS. 2010. Evaluation of genetic diversity in Jatropha curcas L. using RAPD markers. Indian J. Biotechnol. 9: 50–57

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ito A, Hayama H, Kashimura Y, Yoshioka H. 2001. Effect of maleic hydrazide on endogenous cytokinin contents in lateral buds, and its possible role in flower bud formation on the Japanese pear shoot. Sci. Hortic. 87: 199–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan IA. 1984. Mutations induced by gamma-irradiation, ethyl methane sulfonate and hydrazine hydrate in mungbean (Phaseolus aureus Roxb.). Bot. Bull. Acad. Sinica 25: 103–110

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan S, Goyal S. 2009. Improvement of mungbean varieties through induced mutations. Afr. J. Plant Sci. 3: 174–180

    Google Scholar 

  • King AJ, He W, Cuevas JA, Freudenberger M, Ramiaramanana D, Graham IA. 2009. Potential of Jatropha curcas as a source of renewable oil and animal feed. J. Exp. Bot. 60: 2897–2905

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Li P, Qi X, Zhou Q, Sun T, Yang Y. 2005. DNA changes in barley (Hordeum vulgare) seedlings induced by cadmium pollution using RAPD analysis. Chemosphere 61: 158–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Yang YS, Zhou Q, Xie L, Li P, Sun T. 2007. Impact assessment of cadmium contamination on rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings at molecular and population levels using multiple biomarkers. Chemosphere 67: 1155–1163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo S, He P, Zheng X, Zhou P. 2002. Inheritance of RAPD markers in an interspecific F1 hybrid of grape between Vitis quinquangularis and V. vinifera. Sci. Hortic. 93: 19–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons-Alcantara M, Mooney R, Lyng F, Cottell D, Mothersill C. 1998. The effect of cadmium exposure on the cytology and function of primary cultures from rainbow trout. Cell Biochem. Funct. 16: 1–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Micke A, Maluszynski M, Donini B. 1987. Induced mutations for crop improvement — a review. Trop. Agric. 64: 259–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra RC, Mohapatra BD, Panda BS. 2001. High yielding mutants of black gram variety PH-25. Mutat. Breed. Newslett. 45: 39

    Google Scholar 

  • Naik PM, Murthy HN. 2009. The effects of gamma and ethyl methanesulphonate treatments on agronomical traits of Niger (Guizotia abyssinica Cass.). Afr. J. Biotech. 8: 4459–4464

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nichterlein K, Marquard R, Friedt W. 1988. Breeding for modified acid composition by induced mutations in linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.). Plant Breed. 101: 190–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ong TM, Song B, Qian HW, Wu ZL, Whong WZ. 1998. Detection of genomic instability in lung cancer tissues by random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. Carcinogenesis 19: 233–235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey RK, Datta SK. 1995. Gamma ray induced cotyledonary variabilities in Jatropha curcas L. J. Nucl. Agric. Biol. 6: 24–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Punia MS. 2007. Current status of research and development on Jatropha (Jatropha curcas) for sustainable biofuel production in India. In: USDA Global Conference on Agricultural Biofuels: Research and Economics, Minneopolis, Minnesota, pp 20–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland GG. 1990. An EMS-induced low-linolenic-acid mutant in McGregor flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). Can. J. Plant Sci. 71: 393–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sestras R. 2004. Horticultural plant breeding (in Romanian), Ed, Academic Press, Cluj-Napoca pp 334

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma R, Mahla HR, Mohpatra T, Bhargva SC, Sharma MM. 2003. Isolating plant genomic DNA without liquid nitrogen. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 21: 43–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sneath PHA, Sokal RR. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy: The principles and practice of numerical classification, San Francisco, Freeman, pp 573

    Google Scholar 

  • Uma S, Sudha S, Saraswathi MS, Nickavasagam M, Selvarajam R, Durai P, Sathiamoorthy S, Siva AS. 2004. Analysis of genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among indigenous and exotic Silk (AAB) group of bananas using RAPD markers. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech.79: 523–527

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatachalam P, Geetha N, Jayabalan N. 1999. Twelve new groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) mutated germplasm registered in ICRISAT gene bank. Mutat. Breed. Newslett. 44: 15–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner T, Motyka V, Strnad M, Schmulling T. 2001. Regulation of plant growth by cytokinin. J. Plant Biol. 98: 10487–10492

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhiyi R, Haowen Y. 2004. A method for genotoxicity detection using random amplified polymorphism DNA with Danio rerio. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 58: 96–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dharman Dhakshanamoorthy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dhakshanamoorthy, D., Selvaraj, R. & Chidambaram, A. Induced mutagenesis in Jatropha curcas L. using ethyl methanesulphonate (EMS) and assessment of DNA polymorphism through RAPD markers. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 16, 201–207 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-012-0079-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-012-0079-x

Key words

Navigation