Skip to main content
Log in

Foliar application of the exogenous plant hormones at pre-blooming stage improves flowering and fruiting in cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of declining tree yield has led to an investigation into the effectiveness of foliar application of exogenous hormones to improve flowering, fruit set, and fruit retention in cashew. Five exogenous hormones, one Gibberellic Acid (GA3) and four Auxins (IAA, IBA, NAA, and 2,4-D) at seven different rates of application (0 mg L−1, 10 mg L−1, 25 mg L−1, 50 mg L−1, 100 mg L−1, 250 mg L−1, and 500 mg L−1) were tested on six yield-related components of the two Brazilian cashew genotypes. This trial was a factorial split-split-plot design with each treatment replicated five times within a tree and three replications (three trees) per genotype. Responses varied significantly between exogenous hormones, concentrations and genotypes. The cashew plants used showed hormone-specific and optimum concentration response patterns. Of the five exogenous hormones tested, GA3 was most effective as its application at 50–100 mg L−1 gave five-fold improvements in flowering (precocity and number of hermaphrodite flowers) and fruiting, and about 69% increase in fruit retention ability and 25% in nut size. Panicles treated with GA3 also produced relatively bigger nuts compared to the untreated. Days to flowering was found to be hormone sensitive, while production of hermaphrodite flowers, fruit set, and nut development tended to be concentration specific. The GA3 exhibited a broad concentration tolerance among the five exogenous hormones investigated. Our data showed that using GA3 at 50 mg L−1 will enhance flowering precocity, shorten flowering duration, increase production of hermaphrodite flowers and fruit set significantly, and resultant nuts develop optimally with high percentage retention. Thus, it suggests cashew yield could be increased by exogenous foliar application of GA3 at 50–100 mg L−1 at pre-blooming stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GA3 :

Gibberellic acid

IAA:

Indole-3-acetic acid

IBA:

Indole-3-butyric acid

NAA:

1-naphthaleneacetic acid

2,4-D:

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

References

  • Aliyu OM. 2004. Characterization and compatibility studies in Cashew (Anacardium occidentale L). Ph.D Thesis, University of Ilorin, Nigeria. pp 266

    Google Scholar 

  • Aliyu OM. 2006. Phenotypic correlation and path coefficient analysis of nut yield and yield related components in cashew. Silvae Genet. 55: 19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Aliyu OM. 2008. Compatibility and fruit-set in cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.). Euphytica 160: 25–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aliyu OM, Hammed LA. 2000. A study of nut and apple development in cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.). Nigerian J. Tree Crop Res. 4: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Aliyu OM, Awopetu JA. 2003. Studies on flowering pattern in cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.). Nigerian J. Genet. 18: 29–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Aliyu OM, Awopetu JA. 2007. Multivariate analyses of cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) germplasm in Nigeria. Silvae Genet. 56: 170–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie S, O’Farrell P, Muller W, Wei X, Scott N, Skyes S, Chacko EK. 2002. Assessment and selection of new cashew hybrids. A Report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), Australia, RIRDC Publication No. 01/177, pp 21

  • Chacko EK, Baker I, Downton JWS. 1990. Towards a sustainable cashew industry for Australia. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 3: 39–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Chacko EK, Lu P, Kohli RR. 1995. Photoassimilate production and distribution in relation to productivity in mango (Mangifera indica L.). In: Mango 2000 — Marketing Seminar and Production Workshop Proceedings. Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane, pp. 109–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalupka W. 1981. Influence of growth regulators and polythene covers on flowering of Scots pine and Norway spruce grafts. Silvae Genet. 30: 142–146

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen WS. 1983. Cytokinins of the developing mango fruit. Plant Physiol. 71: 356–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen WS. 1985. Flowering induction in mango (Mangifera indica L.) with plant growth substances. Proceedings National Science Council Part B, Life Sciences (Republic of China) 5: 49–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TL. 2003. Management of flowering in three tropical and subtropical fruit tree species. HortScience 38: 1331–1335

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TL. 2009. Reproductive physiology, In RE Litz, eds., The Mango: Botany, Production and uses, CABI, Oxford, pp 97–169

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TL, Pearce DW, Rood SB. 2001. Correlation of endogenous gibberellic acid with initiation of mango shoot growth. J. Plant Growth Regul. 20: 308–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dokoozlian NK. 2001. Gibberellic acid applied at bloom reduces fruit set and improves size of ‘Crimson Seedless’ table grapes. Hortscience 364: 706–709

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Otmani M. 1992. Principal growth regulator uses in citrus production. Proc.2nd Seminar on Citrus Physiology, Bebedouro Ed. Cargill. pp. 55–69

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. 2008. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Crop Production Statistics Division. http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567. website last visited 19th June 2010

  • Foltan H, Ludders P. 1995. Flowering, fruit set and genotype compatibility in cashew. Ange. Bot. 69: 215–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujioka S, Yamaguchi I, Murofushi N, Takahashi N, Kaihara S, Takimoto A. 1983. The role of plant hormones and benzoic acid in flowering of Lemna aucicostata 151 and 381. Plant Cell Physiol. 24: 241–246

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gawankar MS, Sawale RD, Pawar SN, Chavan SA. 2010. Effect of Ethrel® on flowering, sex-expression and yield in cashew. J. Hort. Sci. 51: 68–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh SN. 1989. Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on flowering duration, yield and shelling percentage of cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.). Indian Cashew J. 19: 19–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Heard TA, Vithanage V. and Chacko EK. (1990). Pollination biology of cashew in the Northern Territory of Australia. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 41: 1101–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kachru RB, Singh RN, Chacko EK. 1972. Inhibition of flowering in Mangifera indica L. by gibberellic acid. Acta Hort. 24: 206–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan NA, Mobin M, Samiullah M. 2004. The influence of gibberellic acid and sulfur fertilization rate on growth and S-use efficiency of mustard (Brassica juncea). Plant Soil 270: 269–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni VJ. 2004. The tri-factor hypothesis of flowering in mango. Acta Hort. 645: 61–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurian RM, Iyer CPA. 1993. Chemical regulation of tree size in mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Alphonso. III. Effects of growth retardants on yield and quality of fruits. J. Hort. Sci. 68: 361–364

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martins PJ, Kasuga LJ. 1995. Variation in cashew tree yield in Southeast Tanzania and the implication for management of cashew smallholder farmers in Tanzania. Exp. Agric. 72: 261–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Masawe PAL, Cundall EP, Caligari PDS. 1996. Distribution of cashew flower sex-types between clones and sides of tree canopies in Tanzania. Ann. Bot. 78: 553–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murthy KN, Yadava RBR, Bigger J. 1975. Increasing fruit set in cashew by hormone spraying. J. Plantation Crops (India), 3: 81–82

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nordstrom A, Tarkowski P, Tarkowska D, Norbaek R, Astot C, Dolezal K, Sandberg G. 2004. Auxin regulation of cytokinin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana: a factor of potential importance for auxin-cytokinin-regulated development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 8039–8044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nunez-Elisea R, Davenport TL. 1983. Abscission and ethylene production of mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruit cv. Tommy Atkin. Proc. Florida State Hort. Soc. 96: 185–188

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nunez-Elisea R, Davenport TL. 1998. Gibberellin and temperature effects on dormancy release and shoot morphogenesis of mango (Mangifera indica L.). Sci. Hort. 77: 11–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ohler JG. 1979. Cashew. Koninklijk instituut voor de Tropen. Teskin, Zutphen Co. Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Parameswaran NK, Daramodaran VK, Prabhakaran PV. 1984. Factors influencing yield in cashew (Anacardium occidentale L). Indian Cashew J. 16: 15–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Patnaik HP, Das MS, Panda JM. 1985. Studies on fruit set and fruit drop in cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) under Orissa conditions. Cashew Causerie 7: 7–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram SL, Bist D, Lakhanpal SC, Jamwal IS. 1976. Search of suitable pollinizers for mango cultivars. Acta Hort. 57: 253–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramming DW, Tarailo R, Badr SA. 1995. ’Crimson Seedless’: A new late maturing, red seedless table grape. Hortscience 30: 1473–1474

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao VNM. 1956. Multiply the better yielding cashew nut. Indian Farming (India). 6: 19–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Roitsch T, Ehneb R. 2000. Regulation of source/sink relations by cytokinins. Plant Growth Regu. 32: 359–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuch UK, Fuchigami HL, Nagao MA. 1990. Gibberellic acid causes earlier flowering and synchronizes fruit ripening of coffee. Plant Growth Regul. 9: 59–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Searle C, Whiley AW, Simpson DR, Saranah JB. 1995. A preliminary phenol-physiological model for ‘Kensington’ mango in subtropical Australia. In Mango 2000-Marketing Seminar and Production Workshop Proceedings. Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane, pp. 109–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Subbaiah CC. 1983. Fruiting and abscission patterns in cashew. J. Agric. Sci. (Cambridge) 100: 423–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topper CP, Caligari PDS, Camara M, Diaora S, Djaha A, Coulibay F, Asante AK, Boamah A, Ayodele EA, Adebola PO. 2001. Report of the West African regional cashew survey covering Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Cote d’Ivore, Ghana and Nigeria. Sustainable Tree Crop Programme (STCP) Report No. BHA-01109. Biohybrids Agrisystem Ltd. P. O. Box 2411, Earley, Reading RG6 5FY, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver RJ. 1958. Effect of gibberellic acid on fruit set and berry enlargement in seedless grapes of Vitis vinifera. Nature 181: 851–852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright G. 2004. Plant growth regulators used in Citrus production. http://ag.arizona.edu/crops/presentations/2004/wrightpgrho051204.pdf An unpublished presentation to the University of Arizona, USA. Website last visited 19th June 2010

  • Wunnachit W, Sedgley M. 1992. Floral structure and Phenology of cashew in relation to yield. J. Hort. Sci. 67: 769–777

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olawale Mashood Aliyu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aliyu, O.M., Adeigbe, O.O. & Awopetu, J.A. Foliar application of the exogenous plant hormones at pre-blooming stage improves flowering and fruiting in cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.). J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 14, 143–150 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-010-0070-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-010-0070-3

Key words

Navigation