Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“He didn’t say that thalassaemia might come up” — β-thalassaemia carriers’ experiences and attitudes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Community Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tests for haemoglobinopathy carrier status are the commonest genetic screening tests undertaken internationally. Carrier screening for β-thalassaemia is not coordinated in Victoria, Australia, and is instead incorporated into routine practice where most women are screened antenatally, through a full blood examination (FBE). Little is known about how women are screened for β-thalassaemia in Australia as well as their attitudes towards the screening process. This study was conducted to explore carriers’ and carrier couples’ experiences of and attitudes towards β-thalassaemia screening in Australia. Semi-structured interviews with 26 recently pregnant female carriers and ten carrier couples of β-thalassaemia were carried out. Interviews were analysed using inductive content analysis. Unexpectedly, more than half of the women had been made aware of their carrier status prior to pregnancy, with FBEs carried out for numerous reasons other than thalassaemia screening. Most women did not recall being told about thalassaemia before notification of their carrier status and therefore did not make a decision about being screened. They were generally accepting for doctors to decide about testing; however, would have preferred to have been made aware of the screening test. Women also reported receiving insufficient information after being notified of their carrier status, leading to misconceptions and confusion. This genetic screening process, incorporated into routine care whereby informed decisions were not being made by patients, was apparently acceptable overall. Based on the results of this study, we make the following recommendations: (1) individuals should be made aware that they are being tested for thalassaemia at least before a specific thalassaemia diagnostic test is performed; (2) current understanding by known carriers of thalassaemia should be assessed and any misconceptions corrected; (3) written information should be provided to carriers; (4) referral of carrier couples to specialists in thalassaemia and genetics is strongly recommended; (5) the term ‘carrier of β-thalassaemia’ should be used rather than ‘thalassaemia minor’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACOG (2007) ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 78: hemoglobinopathies in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 109:229–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed S, Green J, Hewison J (2005) Antenatal thalassaemia carrier testing: women’s perceptions of “information” and “consent”. J Med Screen 12:69–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andermann A, Blancquaert I, Beauchamp S, Dery V (2008) Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years. Bull World Health Organ 86:317–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atkin K, Ahmad W (1998) Genetic screening and haemoglobinopathies: ethics, politics and practice. Soc Sci Med 46:445–448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birgens H, Ljung R (2007) The thalassaemia syndromes. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 67:11–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chui DH, Cunningham MJ, Luo HY, Wolfe LC, Neufeld EJ, Steinberg MH (2006) Screening and counseling for thalassaemia. Blood 107:1735–1737

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cousens NE, Gaff CL, Metcalfe SA, Delatycki MB (2010) Carrier screening for beta-thalassaemia: a review of international practice. Eur J Hum Genet 18:1077–1083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delatycki MB (2008) Population screening for reproductive risk for single gene disorders in Australia: now and the future. Twin Res Hum Genet 11:422–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elo S, Kyngas H (2008) The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 62:107–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell-Miller P, Gentry P (1989) How effective are your patient education materials? Guidelines for developing and evaluating written educational materials. Diabetes Educ 15:418–422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flander L, Fletcher A, Gertig D, Hopper J (2003) Thalassaemia screening in Victoria from a public health perspective. Department of Human Services, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Gason AA, Sheffield E, Bankier A, Aitken MA, Metcalfe S, Barlow Stewart K, Delatycki MB (2003) Evaluation of a Tay–Sachs disease screening program. Clin Genet 63:386–392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graneheim UH, Lundman B (2004) Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 24:105–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann T, Worrall L (2004) Designing effective written health education materials: considerations for health professionals. Disabil Rehabil 26:1166–1173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh HF, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15:1277–1288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hussey LC (1997) Strategies for effective patient education material design. J Cardiovasc Nurs 11:37–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson SA, Howard KB, Penney BK (2008) Impact of internet use on health-related behaviors and the patient–physician relationship: a survey-based study and review. J Am Osteopath Assoc 108:699–711

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois S, Ford JC, Chitayat D, Desilets VA, Farrell SA, Geraghty M, Nelson T, Nikkel SM, Shugar A, Skidmore D, Allen VM, Audibert F, Blight C, Gagnon A, Johnson JA, Wilson RD, Wyatt P (2008) Carrier screening for thalassaemia and hemoglobinopathies in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 30:950–971

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P, Ezzy D (2005) Qualitative research methods, vol 2nd. Oxford University Press, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Locock L, Kai J (2008) Parents’ experiences of universal screening for haemoglobin disorders: implications for practice in a new genetics era. Br J Gen Pract 58:161–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Massie J, Petrou V, Forbes R, Curnow L, Ioannou L, Dusart D, Bankier A, Delatycki M (2009) Population-based carrier screening for cystic fibrosis in Victoria: the first three years experience. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 49:484–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe SA, Barlow-Stewart K, Campbell J, Emery J (2007) Genetics and blood—haemoglobinopathies and clotting disorders. Aust Fam Physician 36:812–819

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Modell B, Darlison M (2008) Global epidemiology of haemoglobin disorders and derived service indicators. Bull World Health Organ 86:480–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ong L, Haes JD, Hoos A, Lammes F (1995) Doctor–patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 40:903–918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Polit D, Beck C (2006) Essentials of nursing research. Methods, appraisal, and utilization, 6th edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Trent RJ (2006) Diagnosis of the haemoglobinopathies. Clin Biochem Rev 27:27–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsianakas V, Atkin K, Calnan MW, Dormandy E, Marteau TM (2012) Offering antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening to pregnant women in primary care: a qualitative study of women’s experiences and expectations of participation. Health Expect 15:115–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (1998) Proposed international guidelines on ethical issues in medical genetics and genetic services. World Health Organization

  • Wong L, George E, Tan J (2011) A holistic approach to education programs in thalassaemia for multi-ethnic population: consideration of perspectives, attitudes, and perceived needs. J Community Genet 2:71–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the individuals who participated in this study for their invaluable contribution. We are grateful to Prof. Don Bowden and Ms. Carolyn Cameron from Monash Medical Centre; Dr. Janine Campbell and Ms. Liz Kanellos from Royal Women’s Hospital; Ms. Melissa Graetz and Ms. Eleni Mechkaroff from Mercy Hospital for Women; and Dr. Ellen Maxwell and Ms. Irene Giovas from Melbourne Pathology for their assistance in recruiting participants into this study. Sir Mark and Lady Judy Moody Stuart as well as Thalassaemia Australia are thanked for their support for this work. MBD is a National Health and Medical Research Council Practitioner Fellow. This study was supported by the Victorian Government’s Operational Infrastructure Support Program.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin B. Delatycki.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Table S1

Interview topic guide (DOC 67 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cousens, N.E., Gaff, C.L., Metcalfe, S.A. et al. “He didn’t say that thalassaemia might come up” — β-thalassaemia carriers’ experiences and attitudes. J Community Genet 4, 223–232 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-012-0136-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-012-0136-7

Keywords

Navigation