Abstract
The androgen receptor (AR) is widely expressed in human tissues and has biological function in many male and female organs. In particular, the AR plays a critical role in the biology and pathology of the prostate gland. AR activity inhibits breast growth and has pleiotropic actions in breast cancer that are subtype-dependent. Expression of AR splice variants (ARVs) and their role in prostate carcinogenesis has been elucidated in recent studies. We hypothesised that ARVs are also expressed in breast cancers and other hormone sensitive tissues. Herein, the expression of five previously identified ARV transcripts with documented transcriptional capacity (AR-V1, -V3, -V4, -V7, and -V9) was examined in 6 breast (MFM223, MDA-MB-453, MDA-MB-231, ZR75.1, MCF-7, T47D), two prostate (VCaP, LNCaP), and one liver (HepG2) cancer cell lines, a human embryonic kidney cell line (HEK293), and a panel of RNAs representing 21 different human tissues. Four ARVs (V1, V3, V7, V9) were detected to some degree in almost all cell lines and tissues. In addition, four novel ARVs containing a cryptic exon 9 (CE9) were detected in MDA-MB-453 and VCaP cells. Sequencing of ARV amplicons revealed a single nucleotide substitution within CE3 in lung and placental tissue samples that could be translated as an Ile (ATT)>Val (GTT) substitution in the AR-V7 variant protein. Collectively, these data provides insight into the potential complexity of AR transcriptional splicing events in breast cancer cell lines and diverse human tissues, thereby establishing a rationale for further exploration of ARVs in breast cancer and other human pathologies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The androgen receptor (AR) is a sex steroid hormone receptor that directly mediates the actions of androgen hormones. Development of the male phenotype and adult reproductive function is dependent on a functional AR [1], while the role of AR in establishing a female phenotype and regulating adult reproductive function appears to be more modulatory than essential [2]. The AR is widely expressed in many male and female tissues, but the molecular biology of this sex steroid receptor has largely been characterized in studies of the prostate gland, where the AR has critical functions in regulating its development and normal physiology as well as mediating pathology, including cancer development and progression [3]. Indeed, AR is considered the key oncogenic driver at all stages of prostate cancer. Accordingly, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), achieved via blockage of androgen production through castration and/or antagonism of AR activity by anti-androgens, forms the cornerstone of endocrine therapy for this disease [4]. Despite an initial response to ADT, men with prostate cancer invariably progress to an incurable state called castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), thought to occur via therapy-driven adaptive mechanisms that sustain or resurrect an active AR signaling axis in prostate cancer cells [5]. In recent years, increased expression of variant transcripts from the AR gene (ARVs) has been shown to represent one such adaptive mechanism [6].
The AR gene is found at Xq11-13 and has 8 canonical exons that encode a modular transcription factor consisting of an N-terminal transactivation domain (NTD, encoded by exon 1), a central DNA binding domain (DBD, exons 2-3), a hinge region harboring the second half of the bipartite nuclear localization signal (NLS, exon 4), and a C-terminal ligand-binding domain (LBD, exons 5-8) [7, 8]. In addition, at least 7 other so-called “cryptic” exons (CE1-5, CE1b, and CE9) have been identified in the AR gene [9–13]. These cryptic exons can be incorporated into AR transcripts by altered splicing events [14] or as a result of genomic rearrangements [15, 16], yielding at least 14 variant AR transcripts (termed AR-V1 to AR-V14) [10]. As reviewed recently, the majority of ARVs identified to date in prostate cancer cells are generated through splicing of exon 3 to a downstream cryptic exon, producing variant proteins with the NTD/DBD component attached to a C-terminal unique peptide of varying length, thereby splicing out the majority of the LBD [10]. Most ARVs have been shown to be constitutively (AR-V3, -V4, -V7, and -V12) [9, 10, 12, 17] or conditionally (AR-V1 and -V9) [10, 12] active androgen-independent transcription factors in a prostate cancer context. Pre-clinical and clinical studies have supported the concept that ARVs are biologically relevant in prostate cancer, particularly in the genesis of a CRPC [11, 12, 17–20].
In addition to prostate cancer, AR plays a role in other androgen-sensitive malignancies including those of the breast, bladder, kidney, lung, and liver [21, 22]. In particular, the role of AR in breast carcinogenesis has been the topic of increasing interest over the past decade. While it is clear that AR is expressed in the large majority of breast cancers, controversy exists over its role, which appears to vary depending on the molecular subtype [23]. To date, studies examining the expression of ARVs in human tissues or malignancies other than the prostate have been limited. An ARV called AR45 (an N-terminal truncated variant) has been identified in various human tissues, most strongly in the heart, and multiple ARVs with a deletion of exon 2, 3, or 4 have been identified in human testis [13, 24]. An exon 3-deleted ARV has also been observed in breast cancers [25]. Whether C-terminal truncated ARVs found recently in prostate cancer are also expressed in breast cancers and other human tissues remains unexplored.
In this study, evidence is presented for expression of multiple known and novel ARV transcripts in a panel of breast cancer cell lines and human tissues. These observations suggest that ARVs merit further investigation in steroid sensitive tissues and malignancies, particularly in breast cancer.
Materials and Methods
Human Total RNA Survey Panel
A total RNA panel of 21 human tissues (prostate, liver, colon, spleen, lung, testis, kidney, placenta, bladder, brain, adipose, ovary, cervix, heart, skeletal muscle, small intestine, thyroid, thymus, esophagus, trachea, and breast) was purchased from Ambion (Applied Biosystems). As stated in the manufacturer’s instructions, each total RNA sample was comprised of at least 3 tissue donors and prepared from tissues that had been frozen or stored in RNAlater® until processing. Integrity of the RNA was verified by the supplier using capillary electrophoresis on an Agilent2100® bioanalyer. We used 1 μg of RNA per sample to generate cDNA, as described in detail below.
Genomic DNA Samples
Twenty one genomic DNA samples for SNP genotyping were previously isolated from human liver tissues from Caucasian donors obtained from the Liver Bank of the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Flinders Medical Centre [26, 27]. Details of the donors have been previously published [28].
Cell Culture, RNA Extraction, and Reverse Transcription
Ten human cell lines were used in this study including transformed human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293), liver cancer cells (HepG2), breast cancer cells (MFM223, MDA-MB-453, MDA-MB-231, ZR75.1, MCF-7, T47D), and prostate cancer cells (VCaP, LNCaP). The MFM223 cell line was from the European Collection of Cell Cultures via Sigma-Aldrich. The remaining nine cell lines were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). All cell lines underwent verification by short-tandem repeat profiling in 2013 by CellBank Australia. VCaP and HepG2 cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS). Five cell lines (MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-453, ZR75.1, MCF-7, and HEK293) were maintained in RPMI-1640 containing 5 % FBS. T47D cells were cultured in phenol red-free RPMI-1640 with 5 % FBS. MFM223 cells were cultured in Minimum Essential Medium Eagle (MEME, Sigma) containing 10 % FBS, 1xITS (a mixture of recombinant human insulin, human transferrin, and sodium selenite), and 2 mM L-glutamine. Cells were plated in 6-well plates in triplicate for each cell line and cultured for 3–5 days until cells reached 90 % confluence. Total RNA was extracted from the cells of each well using RNeasy Mini Kits (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Reverse transcription (RT) was carried out using reagents from Invitrogen as previously reported [29]. Briefly, total RNA (1 μg) was treated with DNase I at room temperature for 15 min and then reverse-transcribed at 50 °C for 50 min in a final volume of 20 μl of 1xfirst strand buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 75 mM KCl, and 3 mM MgCl2) containing random hexamer primers, 50 units of RNaseOut recombinant ribonuclease inhibitor, and 50 units of Superscript III. The resulting cDNA was diluted into 80 μl of RNase-free water. 3 μl of each diluted sample (∼60 ng) was used as template in quantitative real-time PCR as described below.
To examine the effect of androgen on ARV expression, MDA-MB-453 cells were seeded in six-well plates and cultured in RPMI containing 5 % FBS. 48 h later, medium was replaced with fresh RPMI medium containing 5 % FBS (three wells, RPMI) or phenol red-free RPMI containing 5 % dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) stripped FBS (six wells, DCC). After a further 48 h, RPMI-cultured cells were refreshed with RPMI medium containing 5 % FBS, and the DCC-cultured cells were treated either with vehicle (0.1 % ethanol) or 1 nM dihydrotestosterone (DHT). 24 h later, RNA was harvested from cells and subjected to RT-qPCR to quantify target transcripts including 18S rRNA, ARV1, AR-V3, AR-V7, and AR-V9 as described below.
Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR)
Of the 14 ARVs reviewed by Hu et al [10], five are generated by the splicing of a cryptic exon to exon 2 (AR-V3) or exon 3 (AR-V1, -V4, -V7, and -V9) of the AR gene and all of these have demonstrated hormone independent transcriptional capacity. In contrast, AR45, an N-terminally truncated ARV generated through splicing of cryptic exon 1b to exon 2 of the AR gene is a hormone dependent ARV that can inhibit AR-FL activity in prostate cancer cells or independently activate transcription when co-expressed with certain transcriptional co-activators [13]. Due to demonstrated functional activity in a hormone regulated model system, specific primers (Table 1) were designed to quantify these six ARV transcripts, along with AR-FL and β-actin, by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) in the cell lines and human tissues. The amplified region of each target and the sizes of the amplicons are shown in Fig. 1a. PCR products representing each amplicon were first generated using VCaP cDNA and the identities of the resultant PCR products were validated by sequencing. To enable generation of standard calibration curves for the qPCR analyses, the amplicon of each target transcript was cloned into the PCR-blunt vector (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s protocol. Four serial 10-fold dilutions containing known copy numbers (e.g., 6,000, 600, 60, and 6) of target-containing PCR-blunt vectors were included in each qPCR run in order to calculate copy numbers of target transcripts in the experimental samples being amplified in the same run. Representative standard curves for four ARVs (V1, V3, V7, and V9), AR45, and AR-FL are given in Supplementary Fig. 1. As previously reported, the qPCR product of 18S rRNA was cloned and quantified in a similar manner during each run [29]. qPCR was performed using a RotorGene 3000 instrument (Corbett Research, NSW, Australia) in 20 μl of 1x QIAGEN QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR master mix containing 3 μl (∼60 ng) of cDNA sample and target-specific forward and reverse primers (500 nM each). The amplification conditions consisted of an initial activation step of 95 °C for 15 min, and 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 56 °C to 60 °C for 15 s, and 72 °C for 20 s. Data were obtained during the 72 °C extension phase of each cycle and analyzed by the program RotorGene 6.1 (Corbett Research). Copy numbers of 18S rRNA transcripts were used to normalize the amount of total RNA amplified in each reaction. Each sample was amplified in duplicate and the resultant mean values were used for analysis. The target transcript expression levels were expressed as copy numbers of each target transcript per 109 copies of 18S rRNA in the same samples. All qPCRs were repeated at least twice and similar results were observed.
Cloning of Exons 6-9 of the AR cDNA
PCR using Phusion® High-Fidelity DNA polymerase was conducted to amplify the region encompassing exons 6-9 of the AR using cDNAs generated from a breast and prostate cancer cell line (MDA-MB-453 and VCaP, respectively) using the forward primer at exon 6 (5′-ATGCACAAGTCCCGGATGTA-3′) and a previously reported reverse primer P2(R) located within the cryptic exon 9 [10]. Resultant PCR products were subsequently cloned into the Invitrogen TA vector (pCR®2.1). Inserts were bidirectionally sequenced using primers T7 and Sp6 (Invitrogen).
Results
Identification of Androgen Receptor Splice Variants in Breast Cancer Cell Lines
AR-FL transcript copy number was very high in the prostate cancer cell lines (VCaP>LNCaP), moderate in the MDA-MB-453, MFM223, MCF7, ZR75.1 and T47D breast cancer cells (listed from highest to lowest copy number), and very low in the HepG2 liver cancer cells, HEK-293 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. All breast and prostate cancer cell lines examined expressed AR-V1, AR-V3, AR-V7, AR-V9 and AR45 to some degree (Fig. 1b). ARVs were most abundant in VCaP prostate cancer cells, with expression levels being 4-8 fold (AR-V3, -V7, -V9, AR45) or 80 fold (AR-V1) higher than those observed in LNCaP cells. Compared to LNCaP cells, the breast cancer cell lines generally had a higher copy number of AR-V1 and lower copy numbers of AR-V7, -V9 and AR45. Interestingly, two of the breast cancer cell lines, MDA-MB-231 and ZR75.1, had higher copy numbers of AR-V3 than LNCaP cells. This is surprising because not only do the breast cancer cell lines have considerably lower levels of AR-FL than LNCaP cells, the MDA-MB-231 cells in particular have such low AR-FL expression they are often considered an AR negative breast cancer cell line. Another notable comparative difference among the six breast cancer cell lines is the distinctly higher copy number of AR45 in MDA-MB-453 cells compared to all other lines. When comparing relative ARV to AR-FL copy numbers in each cell line (Fig. 1c), cell type-specific profiles are evident. As expected, the ARV/AR-FL expression ratios across the 10 cell lines are generally less than or approximately equal to 5 %. However, three cell lines (MDA-MB-231, HepG2, and HEK293) that possessed the lowest AR-FL copy numbers had an ARV/AR-FL ratio of >5 % for multiple ARVs. Remarkably, AR-V3 transcript numbers were approximately 75 % as high as those of AR-FL in the MDA-MB-231 cell line.
A recent study with VCaP Xenografts in mice showed a significant increase in ARV expression just 2 days postcastration, and that this increase was completely abrogated by testosterone replacement [30]. We demonstrated that dihydrotestosterone (DHT) negatively regulated ARV expression in the MDA-MB-453 cell line in a similar manner. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 2 , depletion of steroid hormones (e.g., androgens) enhanced the expression of four ARVs (V1, V3, V7, and V9), and this increased expression was completely abolished upon exposure to DHT.
Androgen Receptor Variants in a Panel of Human Tissues
A panel of 21 human tissues were interrogated for expression of AR-FL and ARVs that were detected in the panel of cell lines. Figure 2a shows the copy numbers of each target transcript relative to 109 copies of 18S rRNA in the same tissue sample. AR-FL and the five ARV transcripts were detected in almost all tissues, the exceptions being AR-V3 in spleen and trachea and AR-V7 in the thyroid gland. As expected, steroid-sensitive tissues (prostate, testis, adipose, ovary, cervix and breast) had higher copies of AR-FL transcripts compared to other tissues. Among the 5 ARVs, AR45 was generally the most abundant and AR-V3 the least. Heart tissue had the highest number of AR45 transcripts, consistent with a previous report [13]. The other three ARVs (AR-V1, -V7, and V9) were expressed in tissues at equivalent or 2-3 fold lower levels compared to the prostate. As shown in Fig. 2b, the ARV/AR-FL expression ratios across the primary tissue samples were generally less than 2.5 %; however, AR45 was expressed at ∼5 % of AR-FL in some tissues (spleen, placenta, small intestine) and approaching 20 % in the heart.
Novel and Known Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in AR Cryptic Exon Coding Sequences
Sequencing of the ARV qPCR products to verify the identities of target amplicons identified an A>G substitution in the cryptic exon CE3 coding sequence that results in an Ile (ATT)>Val (GTT) substitution at codon 5 of the AR-V7-specific C-terminal peptide. This substitution was seen in two tissues (lung and placenta). Both the sense (Fig. 3a) and antisense (Fig. 3b) strands of qPCR products from these two tissues were sequenced to confirm the substitution, ruling it out as a PCR artefact and suggesting that it may represent a novel single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). According to the supplier’s specifications (Ambion, Applied Biosystems), the lung RNA sample was pooled from 2 male and 1 female subjects, and the placental RNA sample was pooled from 3 female subjects. DNA samples were not available to examine this substitution among the contributing individuals. To determine the relative frequencies of the two CE3 alleles, the region covering this substitution was amplified from genomic DNA samples of 21 unrelated human subjects and subjected to sequencing. We only found the previously reported CE3-G allele in this population (data not shown). In addition, CE4 has been reported to code either an 11-amino acid or 53-amino acid peptide [9, 11] depending on the presence of a stop codon (TAA) at codon 12 of the CE4-specific peptide (Fig. 3c). Our results showed that CE4 had the TAA insertion, which matches the NCBI reference sequence (NT_0011669.17), in all cell lines and tissues.
Encouraged by the finding of the novel substitution, the NCBI dbSNP database was searched for other novel substitutions in the CEs of the AR gene and four CEs were discovered to have one or two SNPs within their coding sequences. The SNPs at CE1 (rs1337075C>T) and CE5 (rs138753060A>G) are synonymous substitutions, whereas four SNPs result in single amino acid substitutions at ARV-specific C-terminal peptides (Table 2). The deduced ARV-specific C-terminal peptides encoded by these SNPs are summarized in Fig. 3c.
Identification of Novel Exon 9-Containing Splicing Variants
Hu et al recently discovered a cryptic exon (termed exon 9) in the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of the AR gene and three exon 9-containing ARVs (V12, V13, and V14) [10]. To determine whether these three ARVs are expressed in breast cancer cells, a forward primer at exon 6 was paired with a reverse primer P2(R) at exon 9 [11] to amplify the 6510-bp region encompassing exons 6-9 from MDA-MB-453- and VCaP-derived cDNA. Surprisingly, the results consistently revealed amplicons that were smaller than the expected 6510-bp PCR product. As shown in Fig. 4a, both cell lines expressed three amplicons of approximately 1,500, 1,400, and 1,450 bp. VCaP cells also uniquely expressed an amplicon around 3,500 bp in size. The PCR products were cloned and ∼100 individual clones were sequenced to determine their identity. This analysis revealed four novel exon 9-containing ARVs. We designated them AR-V15, AR-V16, AR-V17, and AR-V18 in accordance with the nomenclature proposed by Hu et al [10]. As shown in Fig. 4c, according to genomic coordinates of the NCBI36/gh18 release, AR-V15, -V16, -V17, and -V18 had novel splice junctions of A66858530/G66865370, G66860306/A66865241, G66860333/A66865241, and A66858530/G66865234, respectively. All 4 novel ARVs were detected in MDA-MB-453 cells, whereas three (V15, V16, and V18) were detected in VCaP cells. We observed the AR-V13-specific splicing junction in 14 clones (8 in VCaP and 6 in MDA-MB-453), and the AR-V16-unique splicing junction in 15 clones (8 in VCaP and 7 in MDA-MB-453). The predicted transcript structures of the four novel exon 9-contaning ARVs and their C-terminal unique peptide sequences encoded by exon 9 are shown in Fig. 4b.
Discussion
The AR is widely expressed in human tissues and has pathological implications for many human non-cancerous and cancerous diseases in both men and women [1, 21, 22]. Since the AR gene is on the X chromosome and therefore only exists as a single copy per cell in men, functional mutations or genomic variants of the AR generally exert phenotypic consequences. A compendium of genomic anomalies and their phenotypic consequences in men is available on the Androgen Receptor Gene Mutations public database [31]. Among these, mutations in the AR gene that result in abnormal splicing events have long been known to cause some cases of androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) [32–34]. However, the association between a disease state and alternative splicing from the wild type AR gene or aberrant splicing due to genomic rearrangements have been very recent discoveries and so far confined to the field of prostate cancer, where the AR has an indisputable role as an oncogene [14, 15, 19, 35]. The AR splice variants expressed in advanced prostate cancer are largely hormone independent transcription factors that contribute to the maintenance of AR signalling in an androgen-deplete environment and are resistant to conventional anti-androgenic drugs as they lack a ligand binding domain, the docking site for these drugs. While the role of AR in breast cancer is still being defined, and AR is likely to exert tumour suppressive as well as oncogenic effects depending on the molecular subtype [23], several clinical trials employing anti-androgen therapy in the treatment of women with advanced breast cancer are underway (NCT00468715, NCT01597193, NCT00755885). In the current study, we provide evidence for the first time that C-terminal truncated ARVs recently discovered in prostate cancer cells are also expressed in breast cancer cell lines and in multiple human tissues. Importantly, if expression of these ARVs is demonstrated at the protein level, in particular in response to AR targeted therapies as has been reported in prostate cancer [35], expression of ARVs may have relevance for women with breast cancer currently being treated with similar AR-targeted therapies as in the clinical trials cited above.
One of the significant discoveries to arise from the ENCODE project [36] is that the large majority of human genes exhibit some degree of alternative splicing; up to 25 splice variants commonly arise from a single gene in addition to the wild type transcript. The splice variants are generally expressed in a pattern whereby 2-3 variant transcripts are dominant, followed by a wide array of variant transcripts that are expressed at very low copy numbers. Our observations of the pattern of ARV transcript expression in breast cancer cell lines and human tissues are consistent with the ENCODE results. Generally, one or two ARVs were expressed at levels of <5.0 % compared to that of the wild type AR transcript. This data is also consistent with observations of ARV expression in non-cancerous prostate tissues [10, 12, 30]. While such low expression of the ARVs challenges their physiological significance, a recent study of prostate cancer bone metastases shows that mRNA levels may not accurately reflect protein levels [18]. We did not assess protein levels of the ARVs identified in the breast cancer cell lines because our primary aim was to examine the frequency and diversity of variant transcript expression. Future studies will build on the findings herein to determine which ARVs are commonly translated in the normal and malignant breast and other tissues, and how these factors impact on AR signalling in disease states.
It has been proposed that alternative splice variants of genes are rapidly degraded under physiological conditions but may be highly expressed under pathological conditions or other conditions of environmental stress if they are able to provide a selective advantage over their wild type counterparts [36]. This appears to be the case for truncated ARVs in prostate cancer. Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer aims to inhibit classical ligand-mediated AR signalling, which requires an intact ligand binding domain. This treatment can select for ARVs that lack the LBD and are constitutively active, thus sustaining or resurrecting AR signalling in an androgen deplete environment or in the presence of anti-androgens [35, 37]. Based on evidence from pre-clinical studies that the AR can drive growth of a molecular subtype of breast cancer called molecular apocrine [38] or luminal androgen receptor (LAR) breast cancers [39], various forms of ADT (bicalutamide, enzalutamide, abiraterone) are currently in phase I/II clinical trials to examine the efficacy of treating women with ER-negative/AR-positive metastatic breast cancers with agents that repress classical ligand-mediated AR-signalling (see clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00468715, NCT01597193, and NCT00755885). In this study, we detected transcripts of multiple ARVs, including AR-V7, one of the most important ARVs in models of CRPC, in normal breast tissues and breast cancer cell lines, including two molecular apocrine/LAR breast cancer cell line models (MDA-453-MB and MFM223). Thus, the possibility of selection for or up-regulation of constitutively-active ARVs in breast tumours in response to ADT warrants further investigation.
In addition to prostate and breast cancers, AR also plays a role in other androgen-sensitive cancers including bladder, kidney, lung, and liver [21, 22]. For example, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) affects males more frequently than females and is considered to be androgen-dependent [40]. Hence, clinical trials examining the tumour suppressive efficacy of treatment with antiandrogens (e.g. flutamide) for HCC have been conducted [21, 41, 42]. These trials revealed no survival benefit for patients with advanced HCC. As we detected transcripts of multiple ARVs in the hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cell line, and liver tissue had the highest copies of AR-V7 transcripts, we speculate that using flutamide to treat men with HCC could select for ARV expression and concomitant androgen-independent AR-signalling. Our data provides credence for this concept, but the hypothesis remains to be investigated.
As discussed earlier, many ARVs (V1, V4, V5, V6, V7, and V9) share the NTD/DBD domains encoded by canonical exons 1-3 [10, 35]. The C-terminal short peptide of 1-53 amino acids encoded by the cryptic exons is the only structural difference that would contribute to their reported varying capacity for transcriptional activity [17, 30] and differing cellular localization [9, 10, 12, 30]. Thus, polymorphisms that change this peptide sequence would be expected to have potential impact on ARV biological function. In this study we have identified for the first time novel SNPs in four cryptic exons (CE1, CE3, CE4, and CE5) that could potentially lead to single amino acid substitutions at the C-terminal peptides of multiple previously reported ARVs. Chan and colleagues recently showed that K629A and R631A mutations shifted AR-V7 expression from predominantly nuclear to a mixed nuclear/cytoplasmic pattern [43]. The rs370756473G>T SNP leads to an R631L substitution, which is similar to the reported R631A mutation i.e. substitution of a neutral amino acid with a basic amino acid. Therefore, this R631L substitution might have similar effects as R631A mutation. Of note, the novel SNP (nt66831251A>G substitution) discovered in the present study leads to a V632I substitution at the C-terminally adjacent residue and thus might also modulate the activity of the encoded AR-V7 variant protein.
Previous studies have shown that CE2 is spliced to exon 3 using two different cryptic 3′ splice sites, which are only 80 bp apart in the AR gene, to give rise to AR-V5 and -V6 [11]. As shown in Fig. 4c, our results combined with the findings of Hu et al indicate that exon 9 uses four cryptic 3′ splice sites, which are only 135 bp apart in the AR gene, to generate six ARVs [10]. Classic introns have GT at the 5′ donor splice site, AG at the 3′ acceptor splice site, a splice branch site with a core consensus sequence of “CU(A/G)A(C/U)”, and a polypyrimidine tract between the 3′ splice site and the branch site [44]. Among the four 3′ splice sites used by exon 9, two of them (A66865241 and G66865370) conform to the AG-rule and have a conserved branch site and a polypyrimidine tract. It appears that the 3′ splice site at A66865241 is used more often than others as, through this site, exon 9 is spliced to upstream exons to give rise to four ARVs (V13, V14, V16, and V17). Neither of the G66865369 and G66865234 sites follows the AG-rule. Of interest, the site at G66865370 used by AR-V15 is only 1 bp downstream of the previously reported site at G66865369.used by AR-V12 [10]. We observed 4 clones carrying the AR-V15-specific splicing junction. Based on these observations, exon 9 is technically not a single exon but a group of “exons” with distinct 5′ coding sequences. Due to lack of antibodies recognizing the proteins encoded by the novel exon 9-containing transcripts, we were unable to examine the expression of these novel ARVs at protein level. Furthermore, the biological function of these ARVs remains to be determined in future studies.
In conclusion, we present evidence in this study that transcription of the AR gene gives rise to multiple alternatively spliced transcripts in breast cancer cell lines and normal human tissues. While the clinical relevance of these variant transcripts in breast cancer and other tissues awaits confirmation of protein expression, at least one of these splice variants (AR-V7) has documented capacity to encode a functional AR variant protein with clinical relevance in prostate cancer. Our findings suggest that further investigation of these ARVs and their clinical relevance in breast cancer and other androgen-sensitive diseases is warranted. In addition to revealing a broader scope of ARV transcript expression in human tissues, our study has identified novel ARV transcripts and previously unidentified single nucleotide substitutions in cryptic exons within the AR gene that could represent functional SNPs. These data provide a springboard to further study into how ARVs may function in a range of human pathologies.
Abbreviations
- ADT:
-
Androgen deprivation therapy
- AR:
-
Androgen receptor
- AR-FL:
-
Full length AR
- ARV:
-
Androgen receptor splicing variant
- CE:
-
Cryptic exon
- CRPC:
-
Castration-resistant prostate cancer
- DBD:
-
DNA binding domain
- ER:
-
Estrogen receptor
- FBS:
-
Fetal bovine serum
- LAR:
-
Luminal androgen receptor
- LBD:
-
Ligand-binding domain
- NLS:
-
Nuclear localization signal
- NTD:
-
N-terminal domain
- PSA:
-
Prostate-specific antigen
References
Matsumoto T et al (2013) The androgen receptor in health and disease. Annu Rev Physiol 75:201–224
Chang C et al (2013) Androgen Receptor (AR) physiological roles in male and female reproductive systems: lessons learned from AR-knockout mice lacking AR in selective cells. Biol Reprod 89(1):21
Heinlein CA, Chang C (2004) Androgen receptor in prostate cancer. Endocr Rev 25(2):276–308
Fu W et al (2012) Progress of molecular targeted therapies for prostate cancers. Biochim Biophys Acta 1825(2):140–152
Scher HI et al (2004) Targeting the androgen receptor: improving outcomes for castration-resistant prostate cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 11(3):459–476
Brand LJ, Dehm SM (2013) Androgen receptor gene rearrangements: new perspectives on prostate cancer progression. Curr Drug Targets 14(4):441–449
Gelmann EP (2002) Molecular biology of the androgen receptor. J Clin Oncol 20(13):3001–3015
Tilley WD et al (1989) Characterization and expression of a cDNA encoding the human androgen receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86(1):327–331
Dehm SM et al (2008) Splicing of a novel androgen receptor exon generates a constitutively active androgen receptor that mediates prostate cancer therapy resistance. Cancer Res 68(13):5469–5477
Hu R, Isaacs WB, Luo J (2011) A snapshot of the expression signature of androgen receptor splicing variants and their distinctive transcriptional activities. Prostate 71(15):1656–1667
Hu R et al (2009) Ligand-independent androgen receptor variants derived from splicing of cryptic exons signify hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Cancer Res 69(1):16–22
Guo Z et al (2009) A novel androgen receptor splice variant is up-regulated during prostate cancer progression and promotes androgen depletion-resistant growth. Cancer Res 69(6):2305–2313
Ahrens-Fath I et al (2005) Androgen receptor function is modulated by the tissue-specific AR45 variant. FEBS J 272(1):74–84
Liu LL et al (2013) Mechanisms of the androgen receptor splicing in prostate cancer cells. Oncogene. doi:10.1038/onc.2013.284
Li Y et al (2012) AR intragenic deletions linked to androgen receptor splice variant expression and activity in models of prostate cancer progression. Oncogene 31(45):4759–4767
Nyquist MD et al (2013) TALEN-engineered AR gene rearrangements reveal endocrine uncoupling of androgen receptor in prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(43):17492–17497
Sun S et al (2010) Castration resistance in human prostate cancer is conferred by a frequently occurring androgen receptor splice variant. J Clin Invest 120(8):2715–2730
Hornberg E et al (2011) Expression of androgen receptor splice variants in prostate cancer bone metastases is associated with castration-resistance and short survival. PLoS One 6(4):e19059
Li Y et al (2011) Intragenic rearrangement and altered RNA splicing of the androgen receptor in a cell-based model of prostate cancer progression. Cancer Res 71(6):2108–2117
Liu G et al (2013) AR variant AR(v567es) induces carcinogenesis in a novel transgenic mouse model of prostate cancer. Neoplasia 15(9):1009–1017
Chang C et al (2013) Androgen receptor (AR) differential roles in hormone-related tumors including prostate, bladder, kidney, lung, breast and liver. Oncogene. doi:10.1038/onc.2013.274
Siddique HR et al (2012) Androgen receptor in human health: a potential therapeutic target. Curr Drug Targets 13(14):1907–1916
Hickey TE et al (2012) Minireview: the androgen receptor in breast tissues: growth inhibitor, tumor suppressor, oncogene? Mol Endocrinol 26(8):1252–1267
Laurentino SS et al (2013) Identification of androgen receptor variants in testis from humans and other vertebrates. Andrologia 45(3):187–194
Zhu X et al (1997) Identification of an exon 3 deletion splice variant androgen receptor mRNA in human breast cancer. Int J Cancer 72(4):574–580
Bhasker CR et al (2000) Genetic polymorphism of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 (UGT2B7) at amino acid 268: ethnic diversity of alleles and potential clinical significance. Pharmacogenetics 10(8):679–685
Bhasker CR et al (1997) Allelic and functional variability of cytochrome P4502C9. Pharmacogenetics 7(1):51–58
McKinnon RA et al (1991) Localization of CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 messenger RNA in normal human liver and in hepatocellular carcinoma by in situ hybridization. Hepatology 14(5):848–856
Hu DG, Mackenzie PI (2009) Estrogen receptor alpha, fos-related antigen-2, and c-Jun coordinately regulate human UDP glucuronosyltransferase 2B15 and 2B17 expression in response to 17beta-estradiol in MCF-7 cells. Mol Pharmacol 76(2):425–439
Watson PA et al (2010) Constitutively active androgen receptor splice variants expressed in castration-resistant prostate cancer require full-length androgen receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(39):16759–16765
Gottlieb B et al (2012) The androgen receptor gene mutations database: 2012 update. Hum Mutat 33(5):887–894
Lim J, Ghadessy FJ, Yong EL (1997) A novel splice site mutation in the androgen receptor gene results in exon skipping and a non-functional truncated protein. Mol Cell Endocrinol 131(2):205–210
Hellwinkel OJ et al (1999) Complete androgen insensitivity caused by a splice donor site mutation in intron 2 of the human androgen receptor gene resulting in an exon 2-lacking transcript with premature stop-codon and reduced expression. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 68(1–2):1–9
Ris-Stalpers C et al (1994) Differential splicing of human androgen receptor pre-mRNA in X-linked Reifenstein syndrome, because of a deletion involving a putative branch site. Am J Hum Genet 54(4):609–617
Dehm SM, Tindall DJ (2011) Alternatively spliced androgen receptor variants. Endocr Relat Cancer 18(5):R183–R196
Tress ML et al (2007) The implications of alternative splicing in the ENCODE protein complement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(13):5495–5500
Guo Z, Qiu Y (2011) A new trick of an old molecule: androgen receptor splice variants taking the stage?! Int J Biol Sci 7(6):815–822
Farmer P et al (2005) Identification of molecular apocrine breast tumours by microarray analysis. Oncogene 24(29):4660–4671
Doane AS et al (2006) An estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer subset characterized by a hormonally regulated transcriptional program and response to androgen. Oncogene 25(28):3994–4008
El-Serag HB, Rudolph KL (2007) Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology 132(7):2557–2576
Chao Y et al (1996) Phase II study of flutamide in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 77(4):635–639
(2004) Randomized trial of leuprorelin and flutamide in male patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with tamoxifen. Hepatology 40(6):1361-1369
Chan SC, Li Y, Dehm SM (2012) Androgen receptor splice variants activate androgen receptor target genes and support aberrant prostate cancer cell growth independent of canonical androgen receptor nuclear localization signal. J Biol Chem 287(23):19736–19749
Zhuang YA, Goldstein AM, Weiner AM (1989) UACUAAC is the preferred branch site for mammalian mRNA splicing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86(8):2752–2756
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (ID1020931) and Flinders Medical Centre Foundation (DGH and PIM). The Adelaide Prostate Cancer Research Centre is supported by an establishment grant from the PCFA (ID 2011/0452). The DRMCRL is supported by grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (ID 627185; ID 1008349), Cancer Australia (ID 1043497), National Breast Cancer Foundation, Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia/Cancer Australia (ID 1012337), and a Prostate Cancer Research Programs - Transformative Impact Award from the US Department of Defense (W81XWH-13-2-0093). PIM is a NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellow. LAS is supported by Young Investigator Awards from the Prostate Cancer Foundation (the Foundation 14 award; L. A. S.) and the PCFA (L. A. S., YI 0810). T.E.H holds a Postdoctoral Fellowship Award from the US Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program (BCRP; #W81XWH-11-1-0592).
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Fig. 1
The standard calibration curves for wild-type and variant androgen receptor transcripts by quantitiative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-qPCR). The amplicon of each target transcript, including wild-type AR (AR-FL), AR-V1, AR-V3, AR-V7, AR-V9, and AR45, was cloned into the PCR-blunt vector (Invitrogen). Four serial 10-fold dilutions (in duplicate) containing known copy numbers (6, 60, 600, and 6000) of target-containing PCR-blunt vectors were included in each RT-qPCR run to generate standard calibration curves for calculating the copy number of each target transcript in the cell lines or tissues that are assayed in the same run. The standard curves and their linear correlation coefficient values (R) were generated by the Rotor-Gene Real-Time Analysis Software 6.0 (Corbett Research, NSW, Australia). As shown, the standard curves have the Ct values on the Y-axis and the copy number of templates on the X-axis (JPEG 651 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 2
Negative regulation of androgen receptor splice variants by dihydrotestosterone. MDA-MB-453 cells were treated as described in Materials and Methods. RNA was harvested from treated cells and subjected to RT-qPCR to quantify target transcripts including 18S rRNA, ARV1, AR-V3, AR-V7, and AR-V9. After normalization to 18S rRNA, the levels of target transcripts in vehicle (0.1 % ethanol)- and DHT-treated cells were presented as fold change relative to those in RPMI-cultured cells (set as a value of 1). Shown are means ± SD of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) in levels of each target transcript between different treatments was assessed using Student’s T-Test (Microsoft Excel 2010). A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 (JPEG 376 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, D.G., Hickey, T.E., Irvine, C. et al. Identification of Androgen Receptor Splice Variant Transcripts in Breast Cancer Cell Lines and Human Tissues. HORM CANC 5, 61–71 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-014-0171-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-014-0171-4