Abstract
The main objective of this work is to optimize the process parameters of fracture toughness such as composition of the material, a/W ratio and testing methods using the simulation technique using ANSYS tool. The material used here is the aluminum–graphite composite of the composition 6, 9 and 12 wt% of the reinforcement. The design of experiments parameters considered is testing methods, a/W ratios and composition of the composite. All the three parameters and factors are put into Taguchi’s L9 orthogonal array for analysis. The three dimensional modeling is done using the ANSYS software for simulation. The outcomes of the simulation are used to analyze process parameters. From the analysis, it is observed that the fracture toughness of the material is mainly influenced by the composition and a/W ratio, whereas the testing methods will have a least effect. The experimental, simulation and statistical results of fracture toughness agree with each other.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson T L, Fracture Mechanics-Fundamentals and Applications, 3rd Edition, Taylor & Francis Group, New York (2013).
Zhu X-K, and Joyce JA, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 85 (2012) 1.
Phan A V, Ansys Tutorial: 2-D Fracture Analysis, Ansys Release 7.0 (2013), p. 1.
Chandwani R, Wiehahn M, and Timbrell C, in UK ANSYS Conference, Zentech International Limited (2004).
Běhal J, in 20th SVSFEM ANSYS Users' Group Meeting and Conference (2012), p. 1.
Begum Y, Doddamani S, and Nagesh N, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), NCERAME (2015) 19.
ASTM Standards, Standard Test Method for Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken (2017).
Doddamani S, and Kaleemulla M, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale 41 (2017) 490.
Doddamani S, Kiran JO, Kaleemulla M, and Bakkappa B, Journal of The Institute of Engineers (India)-series D 100 (2019) 195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-019-00188-z.
Doddamani S, and Kaleemulla M, Journals Pub, International Journal of Fracture and Damage Mechanics 1 (2016) 40.
Doddamani S, Kaleemulla M, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale 39 (2017) 274.
Doddamani S, and Kaleemulla M, Structural Integrity and Life 18 (2018) 185.
Doddamani S, and Kaleemulla M, Mechanics of Advanced Composite Structures, accepted for publication (2019).
Doddamani S, and Kaleemulla M, Journal of Solid Mechanics, accepted for publication (2019).
Alaneme K K, and Aluko A O, Scientia Iranica A 19 (2012) 992.
Doddamani S, and Kaleemulla M, Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention 19 (2019) 730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-019-00652-8.
Zhou F, Molinari J-F, and Li Y, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 71 (2004) 1357.
Sharanaprabhu C M, and Raviraj M S, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale 14 (2010) 27.
Noury P, and Eriksson K, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 169 (2017) 67.
Razavi S M J, Ayatollahi M R, Sommitsch C, and Moser C, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 169 (2017) 226.
Chen G, and Huang X, Engineering Transactions 64 (2016) 225.
Shlyannikov V, Yarullin R, and Ishtyryakov I, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale 41 (2017) 31.
Kawabata T, and Tagawa T, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 178 (2017) 301.
Rajesh A M, Doddamani S, and Kaleemulla M, Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials, 3 (2020) 120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-020-00133-9.
Radhika N, Subramanian R, and Venkat Prasat S, Journal of Minerals & Materials Characterization & Engineering 10 (2011) 427. https://doi.org/10.1108/00368791311311169.
Dhummansure V, Kalyanrao A A, and Doddamani S, Structural Integrity and Life 20 (2020) 51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Begum, Y., Bharath, K.N., Doddamani, S. et al. Optimization of Process Parameters of Fracture Toughness Using Simulation Technique Considering Aluminum–Graphite Composites. Trans Indian Inst Met 73, 3095–3103 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-020-02113-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-020-02113-5