Skip to main content
Log in

Flexural Fatigue Performance of Plain and Fibre Reinforced Concrete

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most of the civil infrastructure are made up of concrete. Concrete is a highly heterogeneous brittle material and under cyclic loading understanding the progress of crack occurring within the material and the structure leading to its degradation is a complicated issue. In view of this, in the present study, studies on the monotonic and fatigue behaviour of notched prism of plain and fibre reinforced concrete (FRC) are carried out. Six prisms are tested under single point monotonic loading to obtain the behaviour of the plain concrete and FRC prisms. The crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) of plain concrete and FRC are measured using calibrated clip gauge attached. From load versus CMOD response, fracture energy is calculated. It is found that the FRC gives better ductility than plain concrete. Nine specimens each of plain concrete and FRC are tested under fatigue loading. Three load ranges are chosen for carrying out the fatigue study. Minimum load is set as 20 % of the ultimate load and the maximum load are varied as 65, 75 and 85 % of the average ultimate load carrying capacity obtained from the monotonic testing of the prisms. Number of cycles to failure for plain concrete and FRC under each load range is obtained. It is observed that the inclusion of fibres improved the flexural fatigue performance of concrete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swamy R N. Development of concrete technology, vol. 1. Applied Science Publishers Ltd (1979) p 221.

  2. Shah S P, Mater Struct, 23 (1990) 457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang J, Stang H, and Victor C L, Int J Fatigue, 21 (1999) 1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cachima P B, Figueiras J A, and Pereira P A A, Cem Concr Compos, 24 (2002) 211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh S P, and Kaushik S K, Cem Concr Compos, 25 (2003) 779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee M K, and Barr B I G, Cem Concr Compos, 26 (2004) 299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heeralal M, Rathish Kumar P, and Rao Y V, Archit Civ Eng, 7 (2009) 19.

  8. Kaur G, Singh S P, and Kaushik S K, Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng, 2 (2012) 436.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goel S, Singh S P, Eng Struct, 74 (2014) 65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rilem T C S, Mater Struct, 18 (1985) 285.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is being published with the kind permission of the Director, CSIR-Structural Engineering Research Centre, Chennai, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nawal Kishor Banjara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Banjara, N.K., Ramanjaneyulu, K., Sasmal, S. et al. Flexural Fatigue Performance of Plain and Fibre Reinforced Concrete. Trans Indian Inst Met 69, 373–377 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-015-0770-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-015-0770-y

Keywords

Navigation