Abstract
Suitability study for potential landfill sites and Solid Waste Management (SWM) is one of the major challenges for city planners. This study was conducted for the upcoming scientific waste management site of Nashik and Environs, Maharashtra, India. As the state nominated the city for the National Smart Cities Mission, the existing landfill site is on the verge of closure. This study aims to identify spatially suitable potential landfill sites. Study based on remote sensing and geographical information system techniques with multi-criteria decision analysis. It considered environmental, socio-economical, and technical criteria to maintain sustainability and improve the standard of living of people nearby vicinity. Fifteen parameters were considered while selecting a potential landfill site. A constructed analytical hierarchy process (AHP) with a consistency ratio of 0.05557 was used to evaluate the weightage of the nine parameters. Restriction buffer analysis was performed on the four parameters, and restricted zones were omitted. For potential site selection, a threshold limit and selection criteria were used. The study identified several potential landfill sites and their suitability within the wasteland. The required landfill area for the coming years is calculated based on the projected population, and the potential landfill site map shows the effectiveness of the proposed method. This systematic study will assist city planners in identifying potential landfill site suitability for environmental sustainability during the selection process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aksoy E, San BT (2019) Geographical information systems (GIS) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) integration for sustainable landfill site selection considering dynamic data source. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78:779–791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1135-z
Ali A, Farhana P (2021) Sanitary landfill site selection by integrating AHP and FTOPSIS with GIS: a case study of Memari Municipality, India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:7528–7550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11004-7
Behera D, Saxena M, Shankar R (2017) Decadal land-use and landcover change dynamics in the east coast of India—a case study on chilika lake. Indian Geogr J 92(1):73–82
Bilgilioglu S, Gezgin C, Orhan O (2022) A GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making method for the selection of potential municipal solid waste disposal sites in Mersin, Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:5313–5329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15859-2
Central Public Health and Environmental Engineering Organization (2016) Manual on Municipal Solid Waste Management, First Edition. http://cpheeo.gov.in/cms/manual-on-municipal-solid-waste-management-2016.php. Accessed 03 Feb 2020
Dereli MA, Tercan E (2021) Comparison of GIS-based surrogate weighting methods for multi-directional landfill site selection in West Mediterranean Planning Region in Turkey. Environ Dev Sustain 23:3438–3457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00725-x
Endait M, Patil S (2020) Laboratory investigation of compaction characteristics of fresh and degraded municipal solid waste. Waste Dispos Sustain Energy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42768-020-00049-6
Everett JW, Member A, Vieux BE (1996) Landfill siting using geographic information systems. J Environ Eng 122:515–523
Geneletti D (2010) Combining stakeholder analysis and spatial multi-criteria evaluation to select and rank inert landfill sites. Waste Manage 30(2):328–337
Getahun S, Sintayehu L, Kefelegn G (2020) GIS-based potential landfill site selection using MCDM-AHP modeling of Gondar Town, Ethiopia. Afr Geogr Review 40(2):105–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/19376812.2020.1770105
Hannan M, Hussain A, Basri H (2015) A review on technologies and their usage in solid waste monitoring and management systems: issues and challenges. Waste Manage 43:509–523
Kaliraj S, Chandrasekar N (2015) Evaluation of multiple environmental factors for site-specific groundwater recharge structures in the Vaigai River upper basin, Tamil Nadu, India. Using GIS-based weighted overlay analysis. Environ Earth Sci 74(5):4355–4380
Kapilan S, Elangovan K (2018) Potential landfill site selection for solid waste disposal using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). J Cent South Univ 25:570–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-018-3762-3
Kazuva E, Zhang J, Tong Z et al (2021) GIS- and MCD-based suitability assessment for optimized location of solid waste landfills in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:11259–11278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11213-0
Kontos T, Komilis D, Halvadakis C (2005) Siting MSW landfills with a spatial multiple criteria analysis methodology. Waste Manage 25:818–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.04.002
Kharat M, Kamble S, Raut R (2016) Identification and evaluation of landfill site selection criteria using a hybrid Fuzzy Delphi, Fuzzy AHP and DEMATEL based approach. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0171-1
Moeinaddini M, Khorasani N, Danehkar A (2010) Siting MSW landfill using a weighted linear combination and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methodology in a GIS environment. Waste Manage 30:912–920
Özkan B, Özceylan E, Sarıçiçek İ (2019) GIS-based MCDM modeling for landfill site suitability analysis: a comprehensive review of the literature. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:30711–30730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06298-1
Patil S, Endait M (2021) Siting of new landfill for municipal solid waste using GIS and MCDA—a review. S. Patel et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical Conference 2019, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering 134. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6370-0_2.
Pollution Control Law Series (2021) PCLS/02/2021-2022, seventh edition, CPCB, MOEFCC. https://cpcb.nic.in/7thEditionPollutionControlLawSeries2021.pdf. Accessed 03 Aug 2021
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation, 287p, ISBN 0-07-054371-2. McGraw-Hill, New York
Saaty TL (2008) Decision-making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1(1):83–98
Sharifi M, Hadidi M, Vessali E, Mosstafakhani P, Taheri K, Shahoi S, Khodamoradpour M (2009) Integrating multi-criteria decision analysis for a GIS-based hazardous waste landfill siting in Kurdistan Province, western Iran. Waste Manage 29(10):2740–2758
Sisay G, Gebre S, Getahun K (2021) GIS-based potential landfill site selection using MCDM-AHP modeling of Gondar Town, Ethiopia. Afr Geogr Review 40(2):105–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/19376812.2020.1770105
Sumathi VR, Natesan U, Sarkar C (2008) GIS-based approach for optimized siting of municipal solid waste landfill. Waste Manage 28(11):2146–2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.09.032
Tavares G, Zsigraiová Z, Semiao V (2011) Multi-criteria GIS-based siting of an incineration plant for municipal solid waste. Waste Manag 31:1960–1972
Tercan E, Dereli MA, Tapkın S (2020) A GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation for MSW landfill site selection in Antalya, Burdur, Isparta planning zone in Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 79:246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-08974-9
Verma P, Raghubanshi A (2020) Appraisal of kappa-based metrics and disagreement indices of accuracy assessment for parametric and nonparametric techniques used in LULC classification and change detection. Model Earth Syst Environ 6:1045–1059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00740-x
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the support from the ISRO—National Remote Sensing Center, Balanagar, Hyderabad, India
Funding
The authors have not disclosed any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahire, V., Behera, D.K., Saxena, M.R. et al. Potential landfill site suitability study for environmental sustainability using GIS-based multi-criteria techniques for nashik and environs. Environ Earth Sci 81, 178 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10295-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10295-y