Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intrinsic groundwater vulnerability assessment: issues, comparison of different methodologies and correlation with nitrate concentrations in NW Italy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of aquifer vulnerability is certainly useful in the field of groundwater protection. Nevertheless, within the scientific community, the definition of vulnerability is still under debate and lacks standardisation. As a consequence, the methods for evaluating the vulnerability degree are numerous and often lead to conflicting results. Thus, in this study, three methods that are commonly used in groundwater vulnerability assessments due to their easy application (namely DRASTIC, GOD and TOT) were utilised in four areas of the Piedmont region (NW Italy). The results obtained by the different methods were compared and correlated with the nitrate concentrations in the groundwater. The aims of the study were (i) to evaluate the effectiveness of the adopted methods and their comparability, (ii) to discuss the limits of the intrinsic vulnerability methods and (iii) to verify the applicability of nitrate as a tracer in the assessment of groundwater vulnerability or explain the reasons why it is not applicable. It was observed that the three intrinsic vulnerability methods are not able to uniquely identify the most or least vulnerable areas. Additionally, the comparison of the intrinsic vulnerability indexes only occasionally showed a reasonable correlation. Furthermore, there was no clear correlation between the vulnerability indexes and nitrate concentrations in the groundwater. These results could be explained by several reasons: (1) the methods are mostly based on the level of groundwater protection provided by the overlaying lithologies and do not consider the physical processes occurring in the aquifer; (2) the intrinsic vulnerability methods only consider vertical pathways for contaminants, but a pre-existing contaminant could be present in the aquifer; (3) groundwater nitrate concentrations are affected by the nitrate input and surplus; and (4) nitrates are subject to physical and biological attenuation in aquifers and cannot necessarily be considered stable tracers in the assessment of groundwater vulnerability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albinet M, Margat J (1970) Cartographie de la vulnérabilité à la pollution des nappes d’eau souterraine. Bull BRGM 2ème série 3(4):13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Aller L, Bennet T, Lehr JH, Petty RJ, Hackett G (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating ground-water pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. NWWA/EPA Ser., EPA600/2-87-035, US Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, OK, USA

  • Antonakos AK, Lambrakis NJ (2007) Development and testing of three hybrid methods for the assessment of aquifer vulnerability to nitrates, based on the drastic model, an example from NE Korinthia, Greece. J Hydrol 333(2):288–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquater/Regione Piemonte (1988) Carta Litologico-giacimentologica. http://www.arpa.piemonte.it. Accessed 30 May 2017

  • ASTM (2002) Standard guide for selection of methods for assessing ground water or aquifer sensitivity and vulnerability. ASTM D6030-96, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekesi G, McConchie J (2002) The use of aquifer-media characteristics to model vulnerability to contamination, Manawatu region, New Zealand. Hydrogeol J 10:322–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belmonte-Jiménez SI, Campos-Enríquez JO, Alatorre-Zamora MA (2005) Vulnerability to contamination of the Zaachila aquifer, Oaxaca, Mexico. Geofís Int 44(3):283–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Bove A, Casaccio D, Destefanis E, De Luca DA, Lasagna M, Masciocco L, Ossella L, Tonussi M (2005) Assetto geoidrologico della Regione Piemonte. Idrogeologia della pianura piemontese, Regione Piemonte. Mariogros Industrie Grafiche S.p.A., Torino, p 17

  • Brouyère S, Jeannin PY, Dassargues A, Goldscheider N, Popescu IC, Sauter M, Vadillo I, Zwahlen F (2001) Evaluation and validation of vulnerability concepts using a physically based approach. In: Mudry J, Zwahlen F (eds) Proceedings of the 7th conference on limestone hydrology and fissured media. Sciences et Techniques de l’Environnement, Université de Franche-Comté, Mémoire n°13, pp 67–72

  • Bucci A, Barbero D, Lasagna M, Forno MG, De Luca DA (2017) Shallow groundwater temperature in the Turin area (NW Italy): vertical distribution and anthropogenic effects. Environ Earth Sci 76:221

  • Burigana E, Giupponi C, Bendoricchio G (2003) Nitrogen surplus as indicator of agricultural pollution impact in the Venice Lagoon Watershed. In: Bruen M (ed) Diffuse pollution and river basin management. Proceedings of the 7th IWA international conference, Dublin. IWA, pp 171–176

  • Castagna S, Dino GA, Lasagna M, De Luca DA (2015a) Environmental issues connected to the quarry lakes and chance to reuse fine materials deriving from aggregate treatments. In: Lollino G et al (eds) Engineering geology for society and territory – Volume 5, urban geology, sustainable planning and landscape exploitation. Springer, Switzerland, pp 71–74

  • Castagna SED, De Luca DA, Lasagna M (2015b) Eutrophication of Piedmont quarry lakes (north-western Italy): hydrogeological factors, evaluation of trophic levels and management strategies. J Env Assmt Pol Mgmt 17:4. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333215500362 (Codice Scopus: 2-s2.0-84949921862)

  • Civita M, De Regibus C (1995) Sperimentazione di alcune metodologie per la valutazione della vulnerabilità degli aquiferi (in Italian). Quaderni di Geologia Applicata, vol 3. Pitagora Ed, Bologna, pp 63–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Corniello A, Ducci D, Napolitano P (1997) Comparison between parametric methods to evaluate aquifer pollution vulnerability using GIS: an example in the ‘‘Piana Campana’’, southern Italy. In: Marinos PG, Koukis GC, Tsiambaos GC, Stournaras GC (eds) Engineering geology and the environment. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1721–1726

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly D, Dassargues A, Drew D, Dunne S, Goldscheider N, Neale S, Popescu C, Zwhalen F (2002) Main concepts of the “European Approach” for (karst) groundwater vulnerability assessment and mapping. Hydrogeol J 10(2):340–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Luca DA (1990) Studio idrogeologico del settore Sud-Orientale della Pianura Torinese finalizzato alla valutazione della vulnerabilità e del rischio di inquinamento delle acque sotterranee. “Hydrogeological study of south-eastern Turin Plain aimed to vulnerability and groundwater pollution risk assessment”. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Torino, Italy

  • De Luca DA, Verga G (1991) Una metodologia per la valutazione della vulnerabilità degli acquiferi. Acque Sotter 29:30–33

    Google Scholar 

  • De Luca DA, Destefanis E, Forno MG, Lasagna M, Masciocco L (2014) The genesis and the hydrogeological features of the Turin Po Plain fontanili, typical lowland springs in Northern Italy. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73:409–427

    Google Scholar 

  • De Luca DA, Comina C, Lasagna M, Destefanis E, Masciocco L, Godio A, Stocco S (2018) Effectiveness of geophysical surveys for water wells relocation in overexploited aquifers (the example of Maggiore and Traversola Valleys, Northwestern Italy). Environ Earth Sci 77:19

  • Debernardi L, De Luca DA, Lasagna M (2008) Correlation between nitrate concentration in groundwater and parameters affecting aquifer intrinsic vulnerability. Environ Geol 55(3):539–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dragoi IJ, Popa R (2007) Vulnerability assessment of a shallow aquifer situated in Danube’s plain (Olteniaregion, Romania) using different and overlay and index method. In: Witkowski AJ, Kowalczyk A, Vrba J (eds) Groundwater vulnerability assessment and mapping: selected papers from the Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment and Mapping International Conference: Ustron, Poland, 2004. Taylor & Francis, Balkema, pp 73–86

  • Evans TA, Maidment DR (1995) A spatial and statistical assessment of the vulnerability of Texas groundwater to nitrate contamination. CRWR Online Report 95-4. http://www.crwr.utexas.edu/gis/gishydro00/library/evans/rep95_4.htm

  • Foster SSD (1987) Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy. In: Proceedings of the international conference on vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollutants, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, pp 69–86

  • Foster S, Hirata R, Gomes D, D’Elia M, Paris M (2002) Groundwater quality protection: a guide for water utilities, municipal authorities and environment agencies. World Bank Publication, Washington, p 103

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frind EO, Molson JW, Rudolph DL (2006) Well vulnerability: a quantitative approach for source water protection. Ground Water 44(5):732–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillham RW, Cherry JA (1978) Field evidence of denitrification in shallow groundwater flow systems. Water Pollut Res Can 13(1):53–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Grignani C, Sacco D (2005) Elaborazione dati e modellistica per l’individuazione delle zone vulnerabili da nitrati e da fitofarmaci e per la definizione e attuazione dei programmi d’azione. Final Report, p 14. (unpushed data)

  • Irace A, Clemente P, Natalicchio M, Ossella L, Trenkwalder S, De Luca DA, Mosca P, Piana F, Polino R, Violanti D (2009) Geologia e idrostratigrafia profonda della Pianura Padana occidentale. La Nuova Lito, Firenze

    Google Scholar 

  • Javadi S, Kavehkar N, Mousavizadeh MH, Mohammadi K (2010) Modification of DRASTIC model to map groundwater vulnerability to pollution using nitrate measurements in agricultural areas. J Agric Sci Technol 13:239–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Korom SF (1992) Natural denitrification in the saturated zone: a review. Water Resour Res 28:1657–1668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasagna M, De Luca DA (2016) The use of multilevel sampling techniques for determining shallow aquifer nitrate profiles. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:20431–20448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasagna M, De Luca DA (2017) Evaluation of sources and fate of nitrates in the western Po Plain groundwater (Italy) using nitrogen and boron isotopes. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0792-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasagna M, De Luca DA, Debernardi L, Clemente P (2013) Effect of the dilution process on the attenuation of contaminants in aquifers. Environ Earth Sci 70(6):2767–2784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasagna M, Caviglia C, De Luca DA (2014) Simulation modeling for groundwater safety in an overexploitation situation: the Maggiore Valley context (Piedmont, Italy). Bull Eng Geol Environ 73:341–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0500-9 (Codice ISI:000335156900007; Codice Scopus: 2-s2.0-84893203405)

  • Lasagna M, Franchino E, De Luca DA (2015) Areal and vertical distribution of nitrate concentration in Piedmont plain aquifers (North-western Italy). In: Lollino G et al (eds) Engineering geology for society and territory—volume 3, river basins, reservoir sedimentation and water resources. Springer, Basel, pp 389–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasagna M, De Luca DA, Franchino E (2016a) The role of physical and biological processes in aquifers and their importance on groundwater vulnerability to nitrate pollution. Environ Earth Sci 75:961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5768-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasagna M, De Luca DA, Franchino E (2016b) Nitrate contamination of groundwater in the western Po Plain (Italy): the effects of groundwater and surface water interactions. Environ Earth Sci 75:240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5039-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli G, Dadomo A, De Luca DA, Mazzola M, Lasagna M, Pennisi M, Pilla G, Sacchi E, Saccon P (2018) Nitrate sources, accumulation and reduction in groundwater from Northern Italy: insights provided by a nitrate and boron isotopic database. Appl Geochem 91C(2018):23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masetti M, Poli S, Sterlacchini S, Beretta GP, Facchi A (2008) Spatial and statistical assessment of factors influencing nitrate contamination in groundwater. J Environ Manag 86(1):272–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (1993) Groundwater vulnerability assessment, contamination potential under condition of uncertainty. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagopoulos GP, Antonakos AK, Lambrakis NJ (2006) Optimization of the DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment via the use of simple statistical methods and GIS. Hydrogeol J 14(6):894–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postma D, Boesen C, Kristiansen H, Larsen F (1991) Nitrate reduction in an unconfined aquifer: water chemistry, reduction processes, and geochemical modeling. Water Resour Res 27:2027–2045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regione Piemonte (2007) Piano di tutela delle acque. http://www.regione.piemonte.it/ambiente/acqua/pianoTAcque.htm. Accessed 20 Sept 2017

  • Regione Piemonte (2010) Carta dei suoli 1:50000. http://www.regione.piemonte.it/agri/area_tecnico_scientifica/suoli/suoli1_50/cartografia.htm. Accessed 20 Sept 2017

  • Sànchez-Pérez JM, Bouey C, Sauvage S, Teissier S, Antiguedad I, Vervier P (2003) A standardised method for measuring in situ denitrification in shallow aquifers: numerical validation and measurements in riparian wetlands. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 7(1):87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sener E, Sener S, Davraz A (2009) Assessment of aquifer vulnerability based on GIS and DRASTIC methods: a case study of the Senirkent–Uluborlu Basin (Isparta, Turkey). Hydrogeol J 17(8):2023–2035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorichetta A (2010) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using statistical methods. PhD thesis. Scuola di Dottorato in Terra, Ambiente e Biodiversita. Università degli Studi di Milano

  • Starr RC, Gillham RW (1993) Denitrification and organic carbon availability in two aquifers. Ground Water 31(6):934–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenazzi S, Masetti M, Beretta GP (2017) Groundwater vulnerability assessment: from overlay methods to statistical methods in the Lombardy Plain area. Acque Sotter Ital J Groundw AS21–276:17–27

  • Stigter TY, Ribeiro L, Carvalho Dill AMM (2006) Evaluation of an intrinsic and a specific vulnerability assessment method in comparison with groundwater salinisation and nitrate contamination levels in two agricultural regions in the south of Portugal. Hydrogeol J 14:79–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigter TY, Carvalho Dill AMM, Ribeiro L (2011) Major issues regarding the efficiency of monitoring programs for nitrate contaminated groundwater. Environ Sci Technol 45(20):8674–8682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toda H, Mochizuki Y, Kawanishi T, Kawashima H (2002) Denitrification in shallow groundwater in a coastal agricultural area in Japan. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 63:167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Environment Protection Agency (1996) Drinking water regulations and health advisories. US Environmental Protection Agency Report 822-B-96-002. Office of Water, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrba J, Zaporozec A (1994) Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. International association of hydrogeologists, international contributions to hydrogeology, vol 16. Verlag Heinz Heise, Hannover

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachniew P, Zurek AJ, Stumpp C, Gemitzi A, Gargini A, Filippini M, Rozanski K, Meeks J, Kværner J, Witczak S (2016) Toward operational methods for the assessment of intrinsic groundwater vulnerability: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 46(9):827–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu C, Yao Y, Hayes G, Zhang B, Zheng C (2010) Quantitative assessment of groundwater vulnerability using index system and transport simulation, Huangshuihe catchment, China. Sci Total Environ 408(24):6108–6116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zampetti M (1983) Informazioni e dati relativi alla quantità ed alla qualità delle acque sotterranee nella Comunità Europea. In: Proceedings of the International Conference “Inquinamento delle Acque sotterranee da composti organo-clorurati di origine industriale”. Milano, pp 197–204

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Earth Sciences Department, Turin University, Via Valperga Caluso 35, 10125, Turin, Italy

    Manuela Lasagna, Domenico Antonio De Luca & Elisa Franchino

Authors
  1. Manuela Lasagna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Domenico Antonio De Luca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elisa Franchino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuela Lasagna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lasagna, M., De Luca, D.A. & Franchino, E. Intrinsic groundwater vulnerability assessment: issues, comparison of different methodologies and correlation with nitrate concentrations in NW Italy. Environ Earth Sci 77, 277 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7452-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7452-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation