Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stabilization of Fe/Cu nanoparticles by starch and efficiency of arsenic adsorption from aqueous solutions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the severity of arsenic contamination of soil and water resources around the world, finding new adsorbents for arsenic removal from the water is of high importance. The present study investigates the possible use and effectiveness of starch-stabilized Fe/Cu nanoparticles for adsorption of arsenic from aqueous solutions. First, Fe/Cu nanoparticles at various starch concentrations of 0, 0.02, 0.04 and 0.06 wt% were synthesized and characterized by X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy and zeta potential/particle size analyzer. Then 0.04 wt% stabilized Fe/Cu nanoparticles were tested for the sorption of As(III) and As(V) from synthetic arsenic-contaminated water. To have an understanding about the arsenic adsorption mechanism of nanoparticles, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed before and after adsorption. The results showed that starch provides nanoparticles with a neutral surface and stabilization of nanoparticles is possible with 0.04 wt% or higher concentrations of starch. For 0.04 wt% starch-stabilized Fe/Cu nanoparticles, the adsorption isotherms fit well within the Langmuir equation, with maximum sorption capacities of 90.1 mg/g for As(III) and 126.58 mg/g for As(V) at a pH of 7.0 from the aqueous arsenic solutions. Examining the XPS spectra of nanoparticles before and after adsorption showed that arsenic adsorption by this nanoparticle can be due to the formation of inner-sphere arsenic complexes on the particle surface, and the surface oxygen-containing functional groups involved in adsorption. The high sorption capacity suggests the potential for applying starch-stabilized Fe/Cu nanoparticles to the contaminated waters for removal of arsenic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahamed S, Kumar Sengupta M, Mukherjee A, Amir Hossain M, Das B, Nayak B, Pal A, Chandra Mukherjee S, Pati S, Nath Dutta R, Chatterjee G, Mukherjee A, Srivastava R, Chakraborti D (2006) Arsenic groundwater contamination and its health effects in the state of Uttar Pradesh (UP) in upper and middle Ganga plain, India: a severe danger. Sci Total Environ 370:310–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azcue JM, Nriagu JO (1994) Arsenic: historical perspectives. In: Nriagu JO (ed) Arsenic in the environment, part I: cycling and characterization. Wiley, New York, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborti D, Mukherjee SC, Pati S, Sengupta MK, Rahman MM, Chowdhury UK, Lodh D, Chanda CR, Chakraborti AK, Basu GK (2003) Arsenic groundwater contamination in Middle Ganga Plain, Bihar, India: a future danger? Environ Health Perspect 111(9):1194–1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choong T, Chuah TG, Robiah Y, Gregory Koay FL, Azni I (2007) Arsenic toxicity, health hazards and removal techniques from water: an overview. Desalination 217:139–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury SR, Yanful EK, Pratt AR (2011) Arsenic removal from aqueous solutions by mixed magnetite–maghemite nanoparticles. Environ Earth Sci 64(2):411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding M, De Jong BHWS, Roosendaal SJ, Vredenberg A (2000) XPS studies on the electronic structure of bonding between solid and solutes: adsorption of arsenate, chromate, phosphate, Pb21, and Zn21 ions on amorphous black ferric oxyhydroxide. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 64(7):1209–1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit S, Hering JG (2003) Comparison of arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: implications for arsenic mobility. Environ Sci Technol 37:4182–4189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA-542-R-02-004 (2002) Arsenic treatment technologies for soil, waste, and water, solid waste and emergency response, (5102G). www.epa.gov/tioclu-in.org/arsenic

  • Freundlich HMF (1906) Over the adsorption in solution. J Phys Chem 57:385–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffinet CJ, Mason SE (2012) Comparative DFT study of inner-sphere As(III) complexes on hydrated a-Fe2O3(0001) surface models. J Environ Monit 14:1860–1871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grieger KD, Fjordbøge A, Hartmann NB, Eriksson E, Bjerg PL, Baun A (2010) Environmental benefits and risks of zero-valent iron nanoparticles (nZVI) for in situ remediation: risk mitigation or trade-off? J Contam Hydrol 118(3):165–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He F, Zhao D (2005) Preparation and characterization of a new class of starch-stabilized bimetallic nanoparticles for degradation of chlorinated hydrocarbons in water. Environ Sci Technol 39:3314–3320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCS (2001) Arsenic and arsenic compounds, 2nd ed. Geneva. World Health Organization, International Program on Chemical Safety (Environmental Health Criteria 224; http://whqlibdoc.who.int/ehc/WHO_EHC_224.pdf)

  • Khin MM, Sreekumaran Nair A, Jagadeesh Babu V, Murugan R, Ramakrishna S (2012) A review on nanomaterials for environmental remediation. Energy Environ Sci 5:8075–8109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubicki JD, Kwonk D, Paul W, Sparks DL (2007) Surface complex structures modelled with quantum chemical calculations: carbonate, phosphate, sulphate, arsenate and arsenite. Eur J Soil Sci 58:932–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo CH, Chen CH, Huang MH (2007) Seed-mediated synthesis of monodispersed Cu2O nanocubes with five different size ranges from 40 to 420 nm. Adv Funct Mater 17:3773–3780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang QQ, Zhao DY, Qian TW, Freeland K, Feng YC (2012) Effects of stabilizers and water chemistry on arsenate sorption by polysaccharide-stabilized magnetite nanoparticles. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:2407–2418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim M, Han GC, Ahn JW, You KS, Kim HS (2009) Leachability of arsenic and heavy metals from mine tailings of abandoned metal mines. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6(11):2865–2879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu CH, Chuang YH, Chen TY, Tian Y, Li H, Wang MK, Zhang W (2015) Mechanism of arsenic adsorption on magnetite nanoparticles from water: thermodynamic and spectroscopic studies. Environ Sci Technol 49(13):7726–7734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maharjan M, Watanabe C, Aktar Ahmad SK, Ohtsuka R (2005) Short report: arsenic contamination in drinking water and skin manifestations in lowland Nepal: the first community-based survey. Am J Trop Med Hyg 73(2):477–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning BA, Fendorf SE, Goldberg S (1998) Surface structures and stability of Arsenic(III) on goethite: spectroscopic evidence for inner-sphere complexes. Environ Sci Technol 32:2383–2388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales-Luckie RA, Sanchez-Mendieta V, Arenas-Alatorre JA, López-Castañares R, Perez-Mazariego JL, Marquina-Fabrega V, Wayne Gómez R (2008) One-step aqueous synthesis of stoichiometric Fe–Cu nanoalloy. Mater Lett 62:4195–4197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Carroll D, Sleep B, Krol M, Boparai H, Kocur C (2013) Nanoscale zero valent iron and bimetallic particles for contaminated site remediation. Adv Water Resour 51:104–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phenrat T, Saleh N, Sirk K, Kim HJ, Tilton RD, Lowry GV (2008) Stabilization of aqueous nanoscale zerovalent iron dispersions by anionic polyelectrolytes: adsorbed anionic polyelectrolyte layer properties and their effect on aggregation and sedimentation. J Nanopart Res 10(5):795–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian Y, Ye F, Xu J, Le ZG (2012) Synthesis of cuprous oxide (Cu2O) nanoparticles/graphene composite with an excellent electrocatalytic activity towards glucose. Int J Electrochem Sci 7:10063–10073

    Google Scholar 

  • Raveendran P, Fu J, Wallen SL (2003) Complete “Green” synthesis and stabilization of metal nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 125:13940–13941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleh TA (2015) Mercury sorption by silica/carbon nanotubes and silica/activated carbon: a comparison study. J Water Supply Res Technol AQUA 64(8):892–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleh TA (2016) Nanocomposite of carbon nanotubes/silica nanoparticles and their use for adsorption of Pb(II): from surface properties to sorption mechanism. Desalination Water Treat 57(23):10730–10744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleh TA, Sarı A, Tuzen M (2017) Effective adsorption of antimony (III) from aqueous solutions by polyamide-graphene composite as a novel adsorbent. Chem Eng J 307:230–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks DL (1989) Kinetics of Soil Chemical Processes. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih MC (2005) An overview of arsenic removal by pressure driven membrane processes. Desalination 172:85–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirk KM, Saleh NB, Phenart T et al (2009) Effect of adsorbed polyelectrolytes on nanoscale zerovalent iron particle attachment to soil surface models. Environ Sci Technol 43:3803–3808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsibranska I, Hristova E (2011) Comparison of different kinetic models for adsorption of heavy metals onto activated carbon from apricot stones. Bulg Chem Commun 43(370):377

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Sun H, Ang HM, Tadé MO (2013) Adsorptive remediation of environmental pollutants using novel graphene-based nanomaterials. Chem Eng J 226:336–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Liu W, Wanga T, Ni J (2015) Arsenate adsorption onto Fe-TNTs prepared by a novel water–ethanol hydrothermal method: mechanism and synergistic effect. J Colloid Interface Sci 440:253–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch AH, Lico MS, Hughes JL (1988) Arsenic in ground water of the Western United States. Groundwater 26(3):333–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W (2003) Nanoscale iron particles for environmental remediation: an overview. J Nanopart Res 5:323–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Yang M, Dou X-M, He H, Wang D-S (2005) Arsenate adsorption on an Fe–Ce bimetal oxide adsorbent: role of surface properties. Environ Sci Technol 39:7246–7253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Li X, Chen JP (2010) An XPS study for mechanisms of arsenate adsorption onto a magnetite-doped activated carbon fiber. J Colloid Interface Sci 343:232–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of Concordia University and the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council for the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, H3G 1M8, Canada

    Yassaman Babaee, Catherine N. Mulligan & Md. Saifur Rahaman

Authors
  1. Yassaman Babaee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Catherine N. Mulligan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Md. Saifur Rahaman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine N. Mulligan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Babaee, Y., Mulligan, C.N. & Rahaman, M.S. Stabilization of Fe/Cu nanoparticles by starch and efficiency of arsenic adsorption from aqueous solutions. Environ Earth Sci 76, 650 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6992-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6992-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation