Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Spatial prediction of soil erosion risk by remote sensing, GIS and RUSLE approach: a case study of Siruvani river watershed in Attapady valley, Kerala, India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Siruvani watershed with a surface area of 205.54 km2 (20,554 hectare), forming a part of the Western Ghats in Attapady valley, Kerala, was chosen for testing RUSLE methodology in conjunction with remote sensing and GIS for soil loss prediction and identifying areas with high erosion potential. The RUSLE factors (R, K, LS, C and P) were computed from local rainfall, topographic, soil classification and remote sensing data. This study proved that the integration of soil erosion models with GIS and remote sensing is a simple and effective tool for mapping and quantifying areas and rates of soil erosion for the development of better soil conservation plans. The resultant map of annual soil erosion shows a maximum soil loss of 14.917 t h−1 year−1 and the computations suggest that about only 5.76% (1,184 hectares) of the area comes under the severe soil erosion zone followed by the high-erosion zone (11.50% of the total area). The dominant high soil erosion areas are located in the central and southern portion of the watershed and it is attributed to the shifting cultivation, and forest degradation along with the combined effect of K, LS and C factor. The RUSLE model in combination with GIS and remote sensing techniques also enables the assessment of pixel based soil erosion rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Quraishi AMF (2003) Soil erosion risk prediction with RS and GIS for the northwestern part of Hebei Province, China. Pak J Appl Sci 3(10–12):659–669

    Google Scholar 

  • Angima SD, Stott DE, O’Neill MK, Ong CK, Weesies GA (2003) Soil erosion prediction using RUSLE for Central Kenyan highland conditions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 97(1–3):295–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnoldus HMJ (1980) An approximation of the rainfall factor in the universal soil loss equation. In: De Boodt M, Gabriels D (eds) Assessment of erosion. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp 127–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggs G, Devonport C, Evans K, Puig P (2001) GIS-based rapid assessment of erosion risk in a small catchment in the wet/dry tropics of Australia. Land Degrad Dev 12:417–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandramohan T, Durbude DG (2002) Estimation of soil erosion potential using universal soil loss equation. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 30(4):181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CWRDM (1997) Attapady wasteland comprehensive environmental conservation project. Eco-restoration plan, Vol 1. Center for Water Resources Development and Management, Kerala

  • Dabral PP, Baithuri N, Pandey A (2008) Soil erosion assessment in a hilly catchment of North Eastern India using USLE, GIS and remote sensing. Water Resour Manag 22:1783–1798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flugel WA, Marker M, Moretti S, Rodolfi G, Sidrochuk A (2003) Integrating geographical information systems, remote sensing, ground truthing and modelling approaches for regional erosion classification of semi-arid catchments in South Africa. Hydrol Process 17:929–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu g, Chen S, McCool DK (2006) Modelling the impacts of no-tillage practices on soil erosion and sediment yield with RUSLE, SEDD and ArcView GIS. Soil and Tillage Res 85 (1–2):38–49

  • Hoyos N (2005) Spatial modeling of soil erosion potential in a tropical watershed of the Colombian Andes. Catena 63(1):85–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK, Kumar S, Varghese J (2001) Estimation of soil erosion for a Himalayan watershed using GIS technique. Water Resour Manag 15:41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasrotia AS, Singh R (2006) Modeling runoff and soil erosion in a catchment area, using the GIS, in the Himalayan region, India. Environ Geol 51:29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karydas CG, Sekuloska T, Silleos GN (2009) Quantification and site-specification of the support practice factor when mapping soil erosion risk associated with olive plantations in the Mediterranean island of Crete. Environ Monit Assess 149:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouli M, Soupios P, Vallianatos F (2009) Soil erosion prediction using the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) in a GIS framework, Chania, Northwestern Crete, Greece. Environ Geol 57:483–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna Bahadur KC (2009) Mapping soil erosion susceptibility using remote sensing and GIS: a case of the Upper Nam Wa watershed, Nan Province, Thailand. Environ Geol 57:695–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukal SS, Sur HS, Gill SS (2007) Factors responsible for soil erosion hazard in submontane Punjab, India. Soil Use Manag 7(1):38–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (2004) Soil erosion assessment and its verification using the universal soil loss equation and geographic information system: a case study at Boun, Korea. Environ Geol 45:457–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lekha KR (2004) Field instrumentation and monitoring of soil erosion in coir geotextile stabilised slopes—a case study. Geotext Geomembr 22(5):399–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim KJ, Myung Sagong M, Engel BA, Tang Z, Choi J, Kim K (2005) GIS-based sediment assessment tool. Catena 64:61–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu D, Li G, Valladares GS, Batistella M (2004) Mapping soil erosion risk in Rondonia, Brazilian Amazonia: using RUSLE, remote sensing and GIS. Land Degrad Dev 15:499–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuura H (2000) Design guidelines for mechanical soil and water conservation works and water resources development. Technical report for the Attapady wasteland comprehensive environmental conservation project (AWCECOP), ID-P111. Attapady Hills Area Development Society, Government of Kerala

  • Millward AA, Mersey JE (1999) Adapting the RUSLE to model soil erosion potential in a mountainous tropical watershed. Catena 38(2):109–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Burch GJ (1986a) Physical basis of the length slope factor in the universal soil loss equation. Soil Sci Soc Am 50(5):1294–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Burch GJ (1986b) Modeling erosion and deposition topographic effects. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 29(6):1624–1630

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Prasannakumar V, Mathai Thomas (1981) Structure of the western termination of the Bhavani lineament. J Geol Soc India 22:285–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayana VVD, Babu R (1983) Estimation of soil erosion in India. J Irrigat Drain Eng 109(4):419–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasir A, Uchida K, Ashraf M (2006) Estimation of soil erosion by using RUSLE and GIS for Small Mountainous watersheds in Pakistan. Pak J Water Resour 10(1):11–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey A, Mathur A, Mishra SK, Mal BC (2009) Soil erosion modeling of a Himalayan watershed using RS and GIS. Environ Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-009-0038-0

  • Pimentel D, Kounang N (1998) Ecology of soil erosion in ecosystems. Ecosystems 1(5):416–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasannakumar V, Lloyd GE (2007) Lattice preferred orientation and seismic properties in Bhavani shear zone, Southern India. J Geol Soc India 70:282–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, McCool DK, Yoder DC (1997) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE). Agriculture Handbook, vol 703. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, pp 1–251

  • Saha SK, Pande LM (1993) Integrated approach towards soil erosion inventory for environmental conservation using satellite and agrometeorological data. Asia-Pacific Remote Sens. J 5(2):21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankar S, Muraleedharan PK (1990) Human ecology in Attappady reserve. In: Nair KKN et al (eds) Tropical forest ecosystem conservation and development in South and South-east Asia. Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, pp 127–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas CV, Maji AK, Reddy GPO, Chary GR (2002) Assessment of soil erosion using remote sensing and GIS in Nagpur district, Maharashtra for prioritisation and delineation of conservation units. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 30(4):197–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone RP, Hilborn D (2000) Fact sheet, universal soil loss equation. Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs, Ontario, p 12

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian YC, Zhou YM, Wu BF, Zhou WF (2009) Risk assessment of water soil erosion in upper basin of Miyun Reservoir, Beijing, China. Environ Geol 57:937–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Knijff JM, Jones RJA, Montanarella L (2000) Soil erosion risk assessment in Europe EUR 19044 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, p 34

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Gertner G, Fang S, Anderson AB (2003) Mapping multiple variables for predicting soil loss by geostatistical methods with TM images and a slope map. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69:889–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses—a guide to conservation planning. Agriculture Handbook, No 537. US Department of Agriculture Science and Education Administration, Washington, pp 163

  • Xu Y, Zhou Q, Li S (2005) An analysis on spatial–temporal distribution of rainfall erosivity in Guizhou Province. Bull Soil Water Conserv 4:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Yue-qing X, Jian P, Xiao-mei S (2009) Assessment of soil erosion using RUSLE and GIS: a case study of the Maotiao river watershed, Guizhou Province, China. Environ Geol 56:1643–1652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuksel A, Gundogan R, Akay AE (2008) Using the remote sensing and GIS technology for erosion risk mapping of Kartalkaya Dam watershed in Kahramanmaras, Turkey. Sensors 8:4851–4865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou P, Luukkanen O, Tokola T, Nieminen J (2008) Effect of vegetation cover on soil erosion in a mountainous watershed. Catena 75(3):319–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The paper is a contribution of the Center for Geo Information Science and Technology, a joint venture of the University of Kerala, DST and KSCSTE. Financial support from DST and KSCSTE is gratefully acknowledged. The authors gratefully acknowledge the anonymous reviewers for constructive comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Geo Information Science and Technology, University of Kerala, Kariavattom, Thiruvananthapuram, 695581, Kerala, India

    V. Prasannakumar, R. Shiny, N. Geetha & H. Vijith

Authors
  1. V. Prasannakumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Shiny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. N. Geetha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. H. Vijith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Prasannakumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prasannakumar, V., Shiny, R., Geetha, N. et al. Spatial prediction of soil erosion risk by remote sensing, GIS and RUSLE approach: a case study of Siruvani river watershed in Attapady valley, Kerala, India. Environ Earth Sci 64, 965–972 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-0913-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-0913-3

Keywords