Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis: Clinical characteristics and management

  • Case Series
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is paucity of published data related to eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE). We aimed to study the clinical characteristics, management, and follow-up of EGE. From March 2014 to December 2018, patients with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms suspected to have EGE were investigated. This is a retrospective study. Complete blood count, upper GI endoscopy (UGIE), and biopsy were done. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) abdomen was done when intestinal obstruction was suspected. Laparoscopic small bowel resection or stricturoplasty and full-thickness biopsy were obtained. EGE was diagnosed if the biopsies showed eosinophilic infiltration of one or more regions of the GI tract (> 30 eosinophils per high power field [HPF]). Patients were treated with immunosuppressive therapy and if indicated surgery. Clinical response to therapy was assessed and patients were followed up for 1 year. Forty-one patients (mean age 34.8 years, median age 32, range 25–70 years, 29 males) had EGE. Upper abdominal pain was the most common symptom. Peripheral eosinophilia was present in 82.9% patients. On UGIE, duodenal lesions were observed in 75% patients. EGE was confirmed in 37 patients by endoscopic duodenal biopsies, in 2 patients by jejunal mucosal biopsies using enteroscopy, and in 2 patients by full thickness surgical biopsies. Forty-one patients were treated with oral corticosteroids inclusive of 4 patients who underwent surgery. Of the 37 patients, 6 were lost to follow-up; 31 patients were followed up for a period of 1 year. All the patients who were treated with corticosteroids responded to initial therapy. Over a follow-up period one case had frequent relapses. EGE should be suspected in patients with upper abdominal pain. Peripheral eosinophilia occurs in the majority. Tissue diagnosis showing eosinophilic infiltration is diagnostic. Oral corticosteroid therapy is highly effective and relapse is rare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Ridolo E, Melli V, De’ Angelis G, Martignago I. Eosinophilic disorders of the gastro-intestinal tract: an update. Clin Mol Allergy. 2016;14:17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Venkataraman S, Ramakrishna BS, Mathan M, et al. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis – an Indian experience. Indian J Gastroenterol. 1998;17:148–9.

  3. Jadhav R, Khairnar H, Kolhe K, et al. Primary eosinophilic gastroenteritis: a case series from western India. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2020;39:411–4.

  4. Klein NC, Hargrove RL, Sleisenger MH, Jeffries GH. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis. Medicine (Baltimore). 1970;49:299–319.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong GW, Lim KH, Wan WK, Low SC, Kong SC. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis: Clinical profiles and treatment outcomes, a retrospective study of 18 adult patients in a Singapore Tertiary Hospital. Med J Malaysia. 2015;70:232-7.

  6. Bagheri M, Ashrafi M, Mohamadnejad M, et al. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis: a case series from Iran. Middle East J Dig Dis. 2011;3:115–8.

  7. Baek MS, Mok YM, Han WC, Kim YS. A patient with eosinophilic gastroenteritis presenting with acute pancreatitis and ascites. Gut Liver. 2014;8:224–7.

  8. Mathur A, Mundada K, Verma A, Agrawal V, Verma V, Ghoshal UC. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis presenting as achalasia cardia and responding to botulinum injection and therapy directed against eosinophilic esophagitis. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2019;38:554-6. 

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Choudhary NS, Puri R, Lipi L, Saraf N. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis mimicking as a malignant gastric ulcer with lymphadenopathy as shown by computed tomography and endoscopic ultrasound. Endosc Ultrasound. 2015;4:78–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shrivastav O, Parikh NS, Jhaveri AB, Ahlawat R. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis: atypical cause for chronic diarrhea in human immunodeficiency virus-associated immunosuppression. Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS. 2019;40:67–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bagasarawala I, Maniar JK, Manked A, Runderawala H. Eosinophilic ascites-rarest presentation of a rare disease, eosinophilic gastroenteritis. J Assoc Physicians India. 2017;65:93–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang M, Li Y. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis: a state -of-the-art review. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;32:64–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen MJ, Chu CH, Lin SC, Shih SC, Wang TE. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis: clinical experience with 15 patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9:2813-6. 

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dinesh Kini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

TMP, DK, SKY, PR, SSS, and VK declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics statement

The study was performed conforming to the Helsinki declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 and 2008 concerning human and animal rights, and the authors followed the policy concerning informed consent as shown on Springer.com.

Disclaimer

The authors are solely responsible for the data and the contents of the paper. In no way, the Honorary Editor-in-Chief, Editorial Board Members, the Indian Society of Gastroenterology or the printer/publishers are responsible for the results/findings and content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amruthesh, T.M., Kini, D., Yachha, S.K. et al. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis: Clinical characteristics and management. Indian J Gastroenterol 40, 338–343 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-021-01160-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-021-01160-0

Keywords

Navigation