Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Abdominal Dermal Fat Graft Versus Nasolabial Flap in Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

A prospective study was conducted to find out an effective alternative in the form of non-vascularized abdominal dermal fat graft (ADFG) and to compare its efficacy with the vascularised nasolabial flap (NLF) for the treatment of oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF).

Method

Comparative study comprising of 30 patients with Grade 3 and 4A OSMF, randomly divided into 2 groups: Group A (ADFG) and Group B (NLF). They were evaluated for mouth opening (MO), graft uptake, time taken for mucosalization, pain, intercommissure distance (ICD), scar, duration of surgery (DOS), patient satisfaction and thickness of masseter muscle on ultrasonography.

Findings.

At 6 months, MO improved by 22.4 and 36.2 mm in Group A and Group B, respectively. There was statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) seen for the values between the groups for all the parameters except for ICD and VAS score, which was statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). Intraoral hair growth, facial scar, orocutaneous fistula and commissure tear was seen in Group B. Complete necrosis of graft followed by recurrence was seen in three cases in Group A.

Conclusion

NLF holds better as compared to ADFG in the management of OSMF. However, the cornerstone of success remains habit cessation and aggressive physiotherapy. The limitations of the study are small sample size and short duration of follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pindborg JJ, Sirsat SM (1966) Oral submucous fibrosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 22(6):764–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(66)90367-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. More CB, Gavli N, Chen Y, Rao NR (2018) A novel clinical protocol for therapeutic intervention in oral submucous fibrosis: an evidence-based approach. J Oral MaxillofacPathol 22(3):382–391

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yeh CJ (1996) Application of the buccal fat pad to the surgical treatment of oral submucous fibrosis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 25(2):130–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0901-5027(96)80058-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Borle RM, Nimonkar PV, Rajan R (2009) Extended nasolabial flaps in the management of oral submucous fibrosis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47(5):382–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2008.08.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chow S, Shao J, Wang H. 2008 Sample size calculations in clinical research. 2nd Ed. Chapman & Hall/CRC Biostatistics Series. p 89

  6. More CB, Gupta S, Joshi J, Varma SN (2012) Classification system for oral submucous fibrosis. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 24(1):24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fearmonti R, Bond J, Erdmann D, Levinson H (2010) A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices. Open Access J plast Surg 10:254–363

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gachabayov M, Latifi R (2019) Patient satisfaction following thyroidectomy in surgical mission: a prospective study. Gland Surg 8(4):385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Prajapati K, Chawda J, Thakkar M, Gajera N, Thakkar R, Thakkar J (2021) Oral submucous fibrosis in North Gujarat: a demographic study. Int J PrevClin Dent Res 8(1):9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. PAYMASTER JC (1956) Cancer of the buccal mucosa; a clinical study of 650 cases in Indian patients. Cancer 9(3):431–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Srivastava R, Jyoti B, Pradhan D, Siddiqui Z (2019) Prevalence of oral submucous fibrosis in patients visiting dental OPD of a dental college in Kanpur: a demographic study. J Family Med Prim Care 8(8):2612–2617. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_465_19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar NG, Thapliyal GK (2012) Free dermal fat graft for restoration of soft tissue defects in maxillofacial surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 11(3):319–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-012-0358-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kholakiya Y, Jose A, Rawat A, Nagori SA, Jacob S, Roy choudhury A. (2020) Surgical management of oral submucous fibrosis with “Seagull-nasolabial flap” combined with short-term oral pentoxifylline for preventing relapse. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 121(5):512–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2019.12.015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kshirsagar R, Chugh Modi A, Rai A (2010) Bilateral inferiorly based nasolabial flaps for the management of advanced oral submucous fibrosis. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 9(1):22–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-010-0008-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Tauro D (2009) A unique melolabial flap in the surgical management of oral submucous fibrosis- “the sea gull flap”-an experience with 85 cases. I J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38(5):508. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJOM.2009.03.400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bellini E, Grieco MP, Raposio E (2017) The science behind autologous fat grafting. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 24:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mashiko T, Yoshimura K (2015) How does fat survive and remodel after grafting? ClinPlast Surg 42(2):181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2014.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gupta S, Patel MAR, Haneef M, Ahmed S, Arshi J (2021) Bilateral nasolabial flap and Buccal fat pad flap for reconstruction of fibrotomy defect in surgical management of stage III/IV oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF)–a comparative study. J Oral Med Oral Surg Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 7(2):112–118. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jooo.2021.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rai A, Datarkar A, Rai M (2014) Is buccal fat pad a better option than nasolabial flap for reconstruction of intraoral defects after surgical release of fibrous bands in patients with oral submucous fibrosis? A pilot study: a protocol for the management of oral submucous fibrosis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 42(5):e111–e116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.07.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Anehosur V, Singh PK, Dikhit PS, Vadera H (2021) Clinical evaluation of buccal fat pad and nasolabial flap for oral submucous fibrosis intraoral defects. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 14(3):196–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1943387520962264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wolford LM, Morales-Ryan CA, Morales PG, Cassano DS (2008) Autologous fat grafts placed around temporomandibular joint total joint prostheses to prevent heterotopic bone formation. Proc (BaylUniv Med Cent) 21(3):248–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2008.11928404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kantanen DJ, Closmann JJ, Rowshan HH (2010) Abdominal fat harvest technique and its uses in maxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod 109(3):367–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.09.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Agarwal M, Gupta DK, Tiwari AD (2011) Extended nasolabial flaps in the management of oral submucous fibrosis. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 10(3):216–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-011-0236-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Yadav AO, Vanza BH, Borle RM, Joglekar KA (2013) Custom made protective appliance for oral submucous fibrosis. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 12(4):472–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-012-0406-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Devathambi JR, Aswath N (2013) Ultrasonographic evaluation of oral submucous fibrosis and masseteric hypertrophy. J Clin Imaging Sci 3(Suppl1):12. https://doi.org/10.4103/2156-7514.124057

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chakarvarty A, Panat SR, Sangamesh NC, Aggarwal A, Jha PC (2014) Evaluation of masseter muscle hypertrophy in oral submucous fibrosis patients -an ultrasonographic study. J ClinDiagn Res 8(9):ZC45–ZC47. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/8892.4857

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Dr Dheeraj Kalra for his useful statistics and suggestions.

Funding

This study was not supported by any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JK did all preoperative preparations, history taking, post-operative care, proper follow up, maintained the records & prepared the first draft of the manuscript along with subsequent editing & formatting, JD and SA performed the surgeries, drafted the study conception & design & reviewed the entire paper critically for important intellectual content, revision & editions, UB reviewed the paper & suggested editions accordingly. PD & AN positively contributed to write the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jimmy Kania.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kania, J., Dhuvad, J., Anchlia, S. et al. Abdominal Dermal Fat Graft Versus Nasolabial Flap in Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-022-01741-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-022-01741-2

Keywords

Navigation