Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Arthroplasty Followed by Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Distraction Osteogenesis Followed by Arthroplasty in the Management of TMJ Ankylosis: A Comparative Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To compare treatment outcome of arthroplasty followed by distraction osteogenesis (AFD) and distraction osteogenesis followed by arthroplasty (DFA) in the management of mandibular deficiencies in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis.

Materials and methods

A total of 20 patients with TMJ Ankylosis were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of patients for whom arthroplasty was done prior to distraction osteogenesis (AFD) for the correction of deficient mandible. Group 2 included patients where distraction osteogenesis was performed prior to arthroplasty (DFA). The treatment outcome was assessed based on maximum interincisal distance, overjet, corpus length, ramus height, upper airway, lower airway, duration of the procedure and the complications for the treatment at the end of 3, 6 and 12 months.

Results

After the treatment was ended, the patients of both groups had increase in mouth opening and appearance was improved remarkably. There was general increase in all the parameters in both the groups. But at the end of 12 months, airway and the ramus height were more stable and the control of the proximal segment was superior in DFA group. Open bite was noticed in 2 cases of AFD group which was treated by elastics. There required additional surgery for the removal of distractors in the AFD Group. Establishing the airway during the surgery was easier in AFD group.

Conclusion

The study concludes that distraction followed by arthroplasty was a better procedure for the management of TMJ ankylosis owing to its stable results and less number of surgeries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Giraddi GB, Arora K, Sai Anusha AJ (2016) Distraction in the treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis with mandibular micrognathia. AnnMaxillofac Surg 6:68–74

    Google Scholar 

  2. Katsnelson A, Markiewicz MR, Keith DA, Dodson TB (2012) Operative management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70(3):531–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.10.003Epub 2011 Dec 30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Loveless TP, Bjornland T, Dodson TB, Keith DA (2010) Efficacy of temporomandibular joint ankylosis surgical treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68(6):1276–1282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.10.014Epub 2010 Mar 20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Feiyun P, Wei L, Jun C, Xin X, Zhuojin S, Fengguo Y (2010) Simultaneous correction of bilateral temporomandibular joint ankylosis with mandibular micrognathia using internal distraction osteogenesis and 3-dimensional craniomaxillofacial models. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68(3):571–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.022Epub 2009 Dec 2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaban LB, Bouchard C, Troulis MJ (2009) A protocol for management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis in children. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67(9):1966–1978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Burston CJ, James RB et al (1978) Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg. 36(4):269–277

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brian P, Judith D et al (2004) Cephalometric evaluation and measurement of the upper airway. SeminOrthod 10(1):3–15

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bansal V, Singh S, Garg N, Dubey P (2014) Transport distraction osteogenesis as a method of reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint following gap arthroplasty for post-traumatic ankylosis in children: a clinical and radiological prospective assessment of outcome. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:227–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hegab AF et al (2015) Outcome of surgical protocol for the treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis based on the pathogenesis of ankylosis and re-ankylosis. A prospective clinical study of 14 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73:2300–2311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lopez EN, Dogliotti PL (2004) Treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis in children: Is it necessary to perform mandibular distraction simultaneously? J CraniofacSurg 15:879–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kwon TG, Park HS, Kim JB, Shin HI (2006) Staged surgical treatment for temporomandibular joint ankylosis: intraoral distraction after temporalis muscle flap reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:1680–1683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sadakah AA, Elgazzar RF, Abdelhady AI (2006) Intraoral distraction osteogenesis for the correction of facial deformities following temporomandibular joint ankylosis: a modified technique. Int J Oral MaxillofacSurg 35:399–406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shang H, Xue Y, Liu Y, Zhao J, He L (2012) Modified internal mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of micrognathia secondary to temporomandibular joint ankylosis: 4-year follow-up of a case. J CraniomaxillofacSurg 40:373–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu S, Wang D, Yin Q, Hu J (2013) Treatment guidelines for temporomandibular joint ankylosis with secondary dentofacial deformities in adults. J CraniomaxillofacSurg 41:117–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shirani G, Arshad M, Mahmoudi X (2018) A new method of treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis with osteodistraction using the Sh-device: a case report. J Dent (Tehran) 15(1):63–68

    Google Scholar 

  16. Neelam NA, Kanchan RR (2009) Management of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea induced by temporomandibular joint ankylosis: a novel 2-stage surgical protocol and report of 5 cases. Asian J Oral Maxillofac Surg 21:27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Andrade NN, Kalra R, Shetye SP (2012) New protocol to prevent TMJ reankylosis and potentially life-threatening complications in triad patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41(12):1495–1500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.06.012Epub 2012 Jul 21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Neelam NA, Paul M, Sriram G, Neha A, Kamil R, Trupti N (2018) Pre-arthroplastic mandibular distraction osteogenesis for the correction of OSA in TMJ ankylosis: a prospective observational study of 25 cases. OralMaxillofac Surg 22(4):409–418

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harsha Gorrela.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. G Harsha, Dr. Aditya Mohan Alwala, Dr. Ramesh K, Dr. Srilatha Tunkimetla, Dr. Rathod Prakash, and Dr. Zainuddinelyaskhan Y declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Clearance

Obtained from Institutional Ethical Committee.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gorrela, H., Alwala, A.M., Ramesh, K. et al. Arthroplasty Followed by Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Distraction Osteogenesis Followed by Arthroplasty in the Management of TMJ Ankylosis: A Comparative Study. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 20, 674–679 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-020-01463-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-020-01463-3

Keywords

Navigation