Abstract
The proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) analysis was implemented to extract the acoustic modes from the flow field inside a swirl-stabilized combustor obtained from non-reacting large eddy simulation. The major frequencies and the spatial distribution of fluctuating pressure of dominant POD modes were presented. The first four dominant modes occupied more than 70 % of the total energy of the oscillatory flow fields. Cooling flow injection suppressed the amplitude of pressure fluctuation and tended to dissipate the high-order longitudinal acoustic modes. The dominant acoustic modes observed in the fluctuating pressure field in the case with no cooling flow injection were dissipated or shifted by the injection of cooling flow.
Graphical Abstract
.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aubry N, Holmes P, Lumley JL, Stone E (1998) The dynamics of coherent structures in the wall region of the wall boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 192:115–173
Berkooz G, Holmes P, Lumley JL (1993) The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 25:539–575
Freund JB, Colonius T (2009) Turbulence and sound-field POD analysis of a turbulent jet. Int J Aeroacoust 8(4):337–354
Huang Y, Wang S, Yang V (2006) Systematic analysis of lean-premixed swirl-stabilized combustion. AIAA J 44(4):724–740
Kim JC, Yoo KH, Sung HG (2011) Large-eddy simulation and acoustic analysis of a turbulent flow field in a swirl-stabilized combustor. J Mech Sci Tech 25(10):2703–2710
Lieuwen TC, Yang V (2006) Combustion instabilities in gas turbine engines: operational experience, fundamental mechanisms, and modeling. Prog Astro Aeronautics, Virginia
Lu X, Wang S, Sung HG, Hsieh SY, Yang V (2005) Large-eddy simulations of turbulent swirling flows injected into a dump chamber. J Fluid Mech 527:171–195
Podvin B, Lumley JL (1998) A low-dimensional approach for the minimal flow unit. J Fluid Mech 362:121–155
Poinsot T (2005) Theoretical and numerical combustion. Edwards, Philadelphia
Richards GA (1996) Gas turbine combustion instability. Technical Meeting of the Central State Section of the Combustion Institute, May 5–7, St. Louis
Schmid PJ (2010) Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data. J Fluid Mech 656:5–28
Selle L, Benoit L, Poinsot T, Nicoud F, Krebs W (2006) Joint use of compressible large-eddy simulation and helmholtz solvers for the analysis of rotating modes in an industrial swirled burner. Comb Flame 145(1–2):194–205
Sirovich LE (1987) Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. Part I: coherent structures. Q Appl Math XLV:561–571
Sirovich LE, Everson R (1992) Management and analysis of large scientific datasets. Int J Supercomputer Appl 6:50
Sirovich LE, Kirby M, Winter M (1990) An eigenfunction approach to large scale transitional structures in jet flows. Phys Fluids 2:127–135
Sung HG (2007) Combustion dynamics in a model lean-premixed gas turbine with a swirl stabilized injector. J Mech Sci Tech 21(3):495–504
Torniainen ED, Hinz A, Gouldin FC (1997) Tomographic analysis of unsteady reacting flows. AIAA 97-0257
Wang SW, Yang V (2005) Unsteady flow evolution in swirl injectors, part II: external excitations. Phys Fluids 17(4):045107
Yoo KH, Kim JC, Sung HG (2013) Effects of cooling flow on the flow structure and acoustic oscillation in a swirl-stabilized combustor part I. Flow characteristics. J Vis 16:287–295
You DN, Huang Y, Yang V (2005) A generalized model of acoustic response of turbulent premixed flame and its application to gas-turbine combustion instability analysis. Comb Sci Tech 177:1109–1150
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Korea Research Foundation Grant (KRF-2010-0024204) and National Space Laboratory (NSL) Program (No. 2008-2006287) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sung, HG., Yoo, KH. & Kim, JC. Effects of cooling flow on the flow structure and acoustic oscillation in a swirl-stabilized combustor. Part II: Acoustic analysis. J Vis 17, 69–76 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-013-0193-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-013-0193-y