Skip to main content
Log in

Preventing controlled substance diversion in perioperative settings: a narrative review

Prévention du détournement de substances contrôlées en milieu périopératoire : un compte rendu narratif

  • Review Article/Brief Review
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Diversion of controlled substances in the perioperative setting is an ongoing challenge, with consequences for patients, anesthesiologists, perioperative staff, and health care facilities alike. Perioperative environments are at high risk for diversion, since controlled substances are frequently handled in these settings, with varying levels of oversight. In this narrative review, we summarize strategies for preventing diversion of controlled substances in perioperative settings (i.e., operating rooms, endoscopy suites, and postanesthesia recovery units).

Source

We performed a targeted literature search in PubMed MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Register of Controlled trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, as well as a manual search for additional references. We used terminology related to drug diversion, drug abuse, anesthesiologists, pharmacists, physicians, operating room personnel, and controlled substances.

Principal findings

Many strategies have been described for preventing diversion in perioperative settings, and these are broadly categorized into: education, distribution, auditing, or provider screening. Some of these approaches may be time- and resource-intensive. There is limited evidence to inform anesthesia departments’ choice of which strategies to adopt.

Conclusion

Although awareness of perioperative controlled substance diversion has been improving, there are too few data to suggest an optimal approach. Anesthesia departments will need to work collaboratively with hospital pharmacies and actively select strategies that are reasonable given local resources.

Résumé

Objectif

Le détournement des substances contrôlées en milieu périopératoire constitue un défi permanent qui a des conséquences pour la patientèle, les anesthésiologistes, le personnel périopératoire et les établissements de soins de santé. Les environnements périopératoires courent un risque élevé de détournement, car les substances contrôlées sont fréquemment manipulées dans ces milieux, avec divers niveaux de surveillance. Dans ce compte rendu narratif, nous résumons les stratégies de prévention du détournement des substances contrôlées dans les milieux périopératoires (c.-à-d. salles d’opération, salles d’endoscopie et salles de réveil).

Sources

Nous avons réalisé une recherche documentaire ciblée dans les bases de données PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, le registre Cochrane des essais contrôlés et la base de données Cochrane des revues systématiques, ainsi qu’une recherche manuelle de références supplémentaires. Nous avons utilisé une terminologie liée au détournement de médicaments, à l’abus de substances, aux anesthésiologistes, aux pharmacien·nes, aux médecins, au personnel de salle d’opération et aux substances contrôlées.

Constatations principales

De nombreuses stratégies ont été décrites pour prévenir le détournement dans les milieux périopératoires, et celles-ci sont généralement classées en éducation, distribution, audit ou dépistage des fournisseurs et fournisseuses de soin. Certaines de ces approches peuvent exiger beaucoup de temps et de ressources. Il existe peu de données probantes pour éclairer le choix des départements d’anesthésie quant aux stratégies à adopter.

Conclusion

Bien que la sensibilisation au détournement périopératoire de substances contrôlées se soit améliorée, il y a trop peu de données pour suggérer une approche optimale. Les départements d’anesthésie devront travailler en collaboration avec les pharmacies hospitalières et choisir activement des stratégies raisonnables qui tiennent compte des ressources locales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists. Controlled drugs and substances in hospitals and healthcare facilities: guidelines on secure management and diversion prevention, 2019. Available from URL: https://www.cshp.ca/docs/pdfs/Controlled_Drugs_and_Substances_in_Hospitals_and_Healthcare_Facilities_2019.02.28.pdf (accessed February 2023).

  2. Fan M, Tscheng D, Hamilton M, Trbovich P. Opioid losses in terms of dosage and value, January 2012 to September 2017: a retrospective analysis of Health Canada data. CMAJ Open 2020; 8: E113–9. https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20190112

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Carman T. Analysis of Health Canada missing controlled substances and precursors data, Jan. 1, 2012–Sept. 30, 2017. Available from URL: https://github.com/taracarman/drug_losses/blob/master/Health%20Canada%20Opioid%20Losses.ipynb (accessed February 2023).

  4. Warner DO, Berge K, Sun H, Harman A, Hanson A, Schroeder DR. Substance use disorder among anesthesiology residents, 1975-2009. JAMA 2013; 310: 2289–96. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281954

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bell DM, McDonough JP, Ellison JS, Fitzhugh EC. Controlled drug misuse by Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists. AANA J 1999; 67: 133–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Boulis S, Khanduja PK, Downey K, Friedman Z. Substance abuse: a national survey of Canadian residency program directors and site chiefs at university-affiliated anesthesia departments. Can J Anesth 2015; 62: 964–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-015-0404-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Booth JV, Grossman D, Moore J, et al. Substance abuse among physicians: a survey of academic anesthesiology programs. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 1024–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200210000-00043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bryson EO, Hamza H. The drug seeking anesthesia care provider. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2011; 49: 157–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/aia.0b013e3181e72553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Pelt M, Meyer T, Garcia R, Thomas BJ, Litman RS. Drug diversion in the anesthesia profession: how can anesthesia patient safety foundation help everyone be safe? Report of a meeting sponsored by the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation. Anesth Analg 2019; 128: e2–4. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000003878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Collins GB, McAllister MS, Jensen M, Gooden TA. Chemical dependency treatment outcomes of residents in anesthesiology: results of a survey. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 1457–62. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000180837.78169.04

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. U.S. Department of Justice. MGH to pay $2.3 million to resolve drug diversion allegations, 2015. Available from URL: https://www.justice.gov/usao-ma/pr/mgh-pay-23-million-resolve-drug-diversion-allegations (accessed February 2023).

  12. United States Drug Enforcement Administration. Record settlement reached in University of Michigan hospital drug diversion civil penalty case, 2018. Available from URL: https://www.dea.gov/press-releases/2018/08/30/record-settlement-reached-university-michigan-hospital-drug-diversion (accessed February 2023).

  13. Dobson G, Chow L, Flexman A, et al. Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia — Revised Edition 2019. Can J Anesth 2019; 66: 75–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-018-1248-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dobson G, Chow L, Filteau L, et al. Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia — Revised Edition 2020. Can J Anesth 2020; 67: 64–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-019-01507-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Filteau L, Pysyk CL. Reflections on opioid stewardship and the journey to improving intraoperative storage and handling. Can J Anesth 2022; 69: 930–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-022-02189-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brummond PW, Chen DF, Churchill WW, et al. ASHP guidelines on preventing diversion of controlled substances. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2017; 74: 325–48. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp160919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Berge KH, Dillon KR, Sikkink KM, Taylor TK, Lanier WL. Diversion of drugs within health care facilities, a multiple-victim crime: patterns of diversion, scope, consequences, detection, and prevention. Mayo Clin Proc 2012; 87: 674–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.03.013

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Fan M, Tscheng D, Hamilton M, Hyland B, Reding R, Trbovich P. Diversion of controlled drugs in hospitals: a scoping review of contributors and safeguards. J Hosp Med 2019; 14: 419–28. https://doi.org/10.12788/jhm.3228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Martin ES, Dzierba SH, Jones DM. Preventing large-scale controlled substance diversion from within the pharmacy. Hosp Pharm 2013; 48: 406–12. https://doi.org/10.1310/hpj4805-406

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ontario College of Pharmacists. Framework for improving the safety and security of controlled substances in hospital high risk areas: recommendations of the Partnered Table to improve the safety and security of controlled substances in hospital high risk areas, 2019. Available from URL: https://www.ocpinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/framework-for-improving-the-safety-and-security-of-controlled-substances-in-hospital-high-risk-areas.pdf (accessed February 2023).

  21. Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. Guideline for the safe management and use of medications in anaesthesia 2021. Available from URL: https://www.anzca.edu.au/getattachment/17f3f75c-9164-41e6-a918-9f403261c8eb/PS51-Guideline-for-the-safe-management-and-use-of-medications-in-anaesthesia-(PILOT (accessed February 2023).

  22. Association of Anaesthetists. Controlled drugs in peri-operative care, 2019. Available from URL: https://anaesthetists.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Guidelines%20PDFs/Controlled_Drugs_Guideline_FINAL%20SEPT%2019.pdf?ver=2019-09-10-123014-160 (accessed February 2023).

  23. American Society of Anesthesiologists’. Statement on security of medications in the operating room, 2018. Available from URL: https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-guidelines/statement-on-security-of-medications-in-the-operating-room (accessed February 2023).

  24. Baethge C, Goldbeck-Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA – a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Res Integr Peer Rev 2019; 4: 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bickham P, Golembiewski J, Meyer T, Murray CG, Wagner D. ASHP guidelines on perioperative pharmacy services. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2019; 76: 903–820. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxz073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fleming K, Boyle D, Billie WJ, Carpenter J, Linck C. A novel approach to monitoring the diversion of controlled substances: the role of the pharmacy compliance officer. Hosp Pharm 2007; 42: 200–9. https://doi.org/10.1310/hpj4203-200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chant C. Diversion inattention: time for action! Can J Hosp Pharm 2019; 72: 171–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Davis CS, Carr D. Physician continuing education to reduce opioid misuse, abuse, and overdose: many opportunities, few requirements. Drug Alcohol Depend 2016; 163: 100–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.04.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Samuelson ST, Bryson EO. The impaired anesthesiologist: what you should know about substance abuse. Can J Anesth 2017; 64: 219–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-016-0780-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bryson EO, Silverstein JH. Addiction and substance abuse in anesthesiology. Anesthesiology 2008; 109: 905–17. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0b013e3181895bc1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. O’Neal B, Bass K, Siegel J. Diversion in the operating room. Hosp Pharm 2017; 42: 359–63. https://doi.org/10.1310/hpj4204-359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Moleski RJ, Easley S, Barash PG, Primer G, Shier NQ, Schrier RI. Control and accountability of controlled substance administration in the operating room. Anesth Analg 1985; 64: 989–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ward CF. Reducing abuse potential and controlled drug management. Anesthesiology 1979; 51: S348. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-197909001-00347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Schmidt KA, Schlesinger MD. A reliable accounting system for controlled substances in the operating room. Anesthesiology 1993; 78: 184–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199301000-00025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Horsey PJ. Controlled drugs in operating theatres. Anaesthesia 1980; 35: 153–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1980.tb03794.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Davis JL. A practical system for narcotic control within the OR/PACU. J Post Anesth Nurs 1989; 4: 32–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Calvery DM, MacKay IM, Naylor MJ, Wilson WD. A narcotic control system for the operating room areas at Toronto General Hospital. Can J Hosp Pharm 1978; 31: 167–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Klein RL, Stevens WC, Kingston HG. Controlled substance dispensing and accountability in United States anesthesiology residency programs. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 806–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199210000-00026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Maltby JR, Levy DA, Eagle CJ. Simple narcotic kits for controlled-substance dispensing and accountability. Can J Anesth 1994; 41: 301–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03009908

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Siegel J, O’Neal B. Code N: Multidisciplinary approach to proactive drug diversion prevention. Hosp Pharm 2007; 42: 244–8. https://doi.org/10.1310/hpj4203-244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Adler GR, Potts FE, Kirby RR, LoPalo S, Hilyard GR. Narcotics control in anesthesia training. JAMA 1985; 253: 3133–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Smiledge PK, Davern PF. An anesthesia controlled substance dispensing system. Hosp Pharm 1984; 19: 609–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Partridge BL, Weinger MB, Sanford TJ. Preventing unauthorized access to narcotics in the operating room. Anesth Analg 1990; 71: 566–7. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199011000-00027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. McClure-Zola E, Cipolle RJ, Zaske DE. Distribution system for controlled substances in the operating room. Am J Hosp Pharm 1981; 38: 687–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Meyer GF, Brandell R, Kehner M, Seltzer JL. Belt pouches for controlled substances in operating rooms. Am J Hosp Pharm 1992; 49: 1484–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Shah N, Sinha A, Thompson A, Tremper K, Meka A, Kheterpal S. An automated software application reduces controlled substance discrepancies in perioperative areas. Anesthesiology 2019; 131: 1264–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000002957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Castellano FC. Developing methods for preventing and detecting substance abuse in the operating room: a disease approach. J Pharm Pract 1993; 6: 159–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/089719009300600404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Carmody G, Vogel D. Unit dose distribution of controlled substances for the operating room. Am J Hosp Pharm 1986; 43: 413–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Donnelly AJ. Revised unit dose distribution of controlled substances for the operating room. Am J Hosp Pharm 1986; 43: 1423–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ossi J. Substance abuse and dependence in the hospital workplace: detection and handling. Perspect Healthc Risk Manage 1991; 11: 21–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhrm.5600110206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hawkins PR. Standardized controlled-substance distribution system for anesthesiology. Am J Hosp Pharm 1992; 49: 133–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Buchanan EC, Gaither MW. Development of an operating room pharmacy substation on a restricted budget. Am J Hosp Pharm 1986; 43: 1719–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Klein RL, Stevens WC, Kingston HGG, Butcher BB. Surgical satellite pharmacies in institutions with anesthesiology training programs for physicians. Am J Hosp Pharm 1992; 49: 2203–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Shafer AL, Lisman SR, Rosenberg MB. Development of a comprehensive operating room pharmacy. J Clin Anesth 1991; 3: 156–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0952-8180(91)90016-g

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. McCarthy BC Jr, Ferker M. Implementation and optimization of automated dispensing cabinet technology. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2016; 73: 1531–6. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp150531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Wellman GS, Hammond RL, Talmage R. Computerized controlled-substance surveillance: application involving automated storage and distribution cabinets. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2001; 58: 1830–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/58.19.1830

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Cello R, Conley M, Cooley T, et al. ASHP guidelines on the safe use of automated dispensing cabinets. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2021; 79: e71–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxab325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Hospital Pharmacy in Canada Editorial Board. Hospital pharmacy in Canada 2011/2012 report. Available from URL: https://www.cshp.ca/docs/pdfs/FULL-2012.pdf (accessed February 2023).

  59. Hospital Pharmacy in Canada Survey Board. Hospital pharmacy in Canada report 2016/2017. Available from URL: https://www.cshp.ca/docs/pdfs/Report%202018.pdf (accessed February 2023).

  60. Zheng WY, Lichtner V, Dort BAV, Baysari MT. The impact of introducing automated dispensing cabinets, barcode medication administration, and closed-loop electronic medication management systems on work processes and safety of controlled medications in hospitals: a systematic review. Res Social Adm Pharm 2021; 17: 832–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.08.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Satterlee GB. System for verifying use of controlled substances in anesthesia. Am J Hosp Pharm 1989; 46: 2506–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Devine B, Gutierrez K, Rogers R. Drug diversion by anesthesiologists: identification through intensive auditing. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2012; 69: 552–6. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp120010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. O’Neal B, Siegel J. Prevention of controlled substance diversion - use of diversion detection software. Hosp Pharm 2007; 42: 564–72. https://doi.org/10.1310/hpj4206-564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Klein RL, Stevens WC, Kingston HQG. Is there a relationship between controlled substance accountability and controlled substance abuse? Anesthesiology 1991; 75: A881. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199109001-00880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Lennon DB, Basmarjian PA, Hatai JK. Involving anesthesiology in drug control. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1997; 54: 1392–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/54.12.1392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Vigoda MM, Gencorelli FJ, Lubarsky DA. Discrepancies in medication entries between anesthetic and pharmacy records using electronic databases. Anesth Analg 2007; 105: 1061–5. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000282021.74832.5e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Brenn BR, Kim MA, Hilmas E. Development of a computerized monitoring program to identify narcotic diversion in a pediatric anesthesia practice. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2015; 72: 1365–72. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp140691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Epstein RH, Dexter F, Gratch DM, Perino M, Magrann J. Controlled substance reconciliation accuracy improvement using near real-time drug transaction capture from automated dispensing cabinets. Anesth Analg 2016; 122: 1841–55. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000001289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Epstein RH, Gratch DM, Grunwald Z. Development of a scheduled drug diversion surveillance system based on an analysis of atypical drug transactions. Anesth Analg 2007; 105: 1053–60. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000281797.00935.08

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Epstein RH, Gratch DM, McNulty S, Grunwald Z. Validation of a system to detect scheduled drug diversion by anesthesia care providers. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 160–4. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e31821c0fce

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Nemes J. Fighting drug abuse in operating rooms. Mod Healthc 1991; 21: 60–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Cohen MR, Smetzer JL. Partially filled vials and syringes in sharps containers are a key source of drugs for diversion: ISMP targeted medication safety best practice #9. Are patients who are allergic to antibiotics at risk for reactions to vaccine ingredients? Hosp Pharm 2016; 51: 514–9. https://doi.org/10.1310/hpj5107-514

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Ring MT, Pfrimmer DM. Propofol as a drug of diversion: changing disposal practices to reduce risk. Crit Care Nurse 2021; 41: 45–53. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2021123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. McNally D, Singh A, Mishra U. Audit on the use and disposal of controlled drugs within the operating theatres of Sunderland royal Hospital. Anaesthesia 2017; 72: 90. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Traynor K. Hospitals seek solutions for narcotics disposal. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2016; 73: 1484–5. https://doi.org/10.2146/news160058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Schneider D, Ponto J, Martin E. Propofol disposal in the anesthesia setting: overcoming barriers. AANA J 2017; 85: 417–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Gill DL Jr, Goodwin SR, Knudsen AK, Wade C. Refractometer screening of controlled substances in an operating room satellite pharmacy. Am J Hosp Pharm 1990; 47: 817–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Bardas SL, Ferraresi VF, Lieberman SF. Refractometric screening of controlled substances used in operating rooms. Am J Hosp Pharm 1992; 49: 2779–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Donnelly AJ, Newman LM, Petryna HM, Ivankovich AD. Refractometric testing of alfentanil hydrochloride, fentanyl citrate, sufentanil citrate, and midazolam hydrochloride. Am J Hosp Pharm 1993; 50: 298–300.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Eagle CJ, Maltby JR, Kryski S, Hardy D. Use of refractometry to identify opioid-containing solutions. Can J Anesth 1994; 41: 248–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03009840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Sharer KB. Controlled‐substance returns in the operating suite. AORN J 2008; 88: 249–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2008.03.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Berge KH, McGlinch BP. The law of unintended consequences can never be repealed: the hazards of random urine drug screening of anesthesia providers. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 1397–9. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000001972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Rice MJ, Grek SB, Swift MD, Nance JJ, Shaw AD. The need for mandatory random drug testing in anesthesia providers. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 1712–6. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000001796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Tetzlaff J, Collins GB, Brown DL, Leak BC, Pollock G, Popa D. A strategy to prevent substance abuse in an academic anesthesiology department. J Clin Anesth 2010; 22: 143–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.12.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Fitzsimons MG, Baker KH, Lowenstein E, Zapol WM. Random drug testing to reduce the incidence of addiction in anesthesia residents: preliminary results from one program. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 630–5. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e318176fefa

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Fitzsimons MG, Ishizawa Y, Baker KH. Drug testing physicians for substances of abuse: case report of a false-positive result. J Clin Anesth 2013; 25: 669–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.05.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Fitzsimons MG, Baker K, Malhotra R, Gottlieb A, Lowenstein E, Zapol WM. Reducing the incidence of substance use disorders in anesthesiology residents: 13 years of comprehensive urine drug screening. Anesthesiology 2018; 129: 821–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000002348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. New Brunswick Human Rights Commission. Guideline on cannabis, alcohol, and drug addiction, 2018. Available from URL: https://www2.gnb.ca/content/dam/gnb/Departments/hrc-cdp/PDF/Guideline-Cannabis.pdf (accessed February 2023).

  89. Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction. State of policies and practices on substance use in safety-sensitive industries in Canada, 2017. Available from URL: https://www.nuclearsafety.gc.ca/eng/pdfs/RSP-673-1-final-report.pdf (accessed February 2023).

  90. Pidd K, Roche AM. How effective is drug testing as a workplace safety strategy? A systematic review of the evidence. Accid Anal Prev 2014; 71: 154–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.05.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Holmes N. Drug Testing: Legal Implications. Ottawa: Library of Parliament; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Supreme Court of Canada. Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, Local 30 v. Irving Pulp & Paper, Ltd., 2013 SCC 34. Available from URL: https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13106/index.do (accessed February 2023).

  93. Health Canada. Guidance on reporting loss or theft of controlled substances and precursors, 2022. Available from URL: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/publications/healthy-living/loss-theft-controlled-substances-precursors.html (accessed February 2023).

  94. Chisholm AB, Harrison MJ. Opioid abuse amongst anaesthetists: a system to detect personal usage. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009; 37: 267–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Mayall RM. Substance abuse in anaesthetists. BJA Educ 2016; 16: 236–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaed/mkv054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Domino KB, Hornbein TF, Polissar NL, et al. Risk factors for relapse in health care professionals with substance use disorders. JAMA 2005; 293: 1453–60. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.12.1453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Menk EJ, Baumgarten RK, Kingsley CP, Culling RD, Middaugh R. Success of reentry into anesthesiology training programs by residents with a history of substance abuse. JAMA 1990; 263: 3060–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Bryson EO. Should anesthesia residents with a history of substance abuse be allowed to continue training in clinical anesthesia? The results of a survey of anesthesia residency program directors. J Clin Anesth 2009; 21: 508–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.12.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Skipper GE, Campbell MD, Dupont RL. Anesthesiologists with substance use disorders: a 5-year outcome study from 16 state physician health programs. Anesth Analg 2009; 109: 891–6. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181adc39d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Paris RT, Canavan DI. Physician substance abuse impairment: anesthesiologists vs. other specialties. J Addict Dis 1999; 18: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1300/j069v18n01_01

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Wilson JE, Kiselanova N, Stevens Q, et al. A survey of inhalational anaesthetic abuse in anaesthesia training programmes. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 616–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05444.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Wischmeyer PE, Johnson BR, Wilson JE, et al. A survey of propofol abuse in academic anesthesia programs. Anesth Analg 2007; 105: 1066–71. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000270215.86253.30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Horvath C. Implementation of a new method to track propofol in an endoscopy unit. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2017; 15: 102–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. O’Neal BC. Controlled-substance diversion detection: go the extra mile. Hosp Pharm 2004; 39: 868–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/001857870403900909

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author contributions

Michael J. Wong conceptualized the review, performed the literature search, wrote the first draft, and edited and approved this manuscript. Yongjun Wang wrote, edited, and approved this manuscript. Lindsay Blake performed the literature search, and edited and approved this manuscript. Janny X. C. Ke wrote, edited, and approved this manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Gregory Dobson for his guidance and assistance in the planning of this manuscript.

Disclosures

Dr. Janny Ke reports receiving salary support as the Clinical Data Lead, St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada, for the project “Reducing Opioid Use for Pain Management” from the Canadian Digital Supercluster and Consortium (Careteam Technologies Inc., Thrive Health Inc., Excelar Technologies (Connected Displays Inc.), Providence Health Care Ventures Inc., and Xerus Inc.). Dr. Ke has provided paid consulting for Careflow Technologies (Connected Displays Inc.), funded via Providence Health Care Ventures. Starting September 2023, Dr. Ke will receive research and salary support for the Project “Continuous Connected Patient Care” in patients with high perioperative risk, funded by the Canadian Digital Supercluster and Consortium: Medtronic Canada ULC, Cloud Diagnostics Canada ULC, Excelar Technologies (Connected Displays Inc.), Providence Health Care Ventures Inc., 3D Bridge Solutions Inc., and FluidAI (NERv Technology Inc.).

Funding statement

No funding was specifically provided for the preparation of this work.

Editorial responsibility

This submission was handled by Dr. Philippe Richebé, Associate Editor, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d’anesthésie.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Wong MD.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 121 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wong, M.J., Wang, Y., Blake, L. et al. Preventing controlled substance diversion in perioperative settings: a narrative review. Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth 70, 1989–2001 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02574-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02574-4

Keywords

Navigation