Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prophylactic oophorectomy may differentially reduce breast cancer risk in women with BRCA1 versus BRCA2 mutations

  • Published:
Current Breast Cancer Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple studies have shown that risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) not only reduces the risk of gynecologic cancer (ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal) cancer in women with mutations in either BRCA1 or BRCA2, but that if performed premenopausally, RRSO also reduces the risk of breast cancer. It has, however, become apparent that mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 cause related, but distinct, cancer susceptibility syndromes. For example, BRCA1-associated breast cancer is markedly more likely to be estrogen receptor negative than BRCA2-associated breast cancer. Similarly, the ovarian cancer penetrance is substantially lower for carriers of BRCA2 mutations than for carriers of BRCA1 mutations. These differences raise the question as to whether RRSO may have different impacts on cancer risk depending on the specific gene mutated. This article reviews what is known about RRSO for reducing BRCA-associated breast and gynecologic cancer risk, as well as early data suggesting RRSO may have differential effects depending upon whether BRCA1 or BRCA2 is mutated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Struewing JP, Hartge P, Wacholder S, et al.: The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews. N Engl J Med 1997, 336:1401–1408.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M, et al.: Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families: The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet 1998, 62:676–689.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, et al.: Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 2003, 72:1117–1130.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. King MC, Marks JH, Mandell JB, et al.: Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science 2003, 302:643–646.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lakhani SR, Van De Vijver MJ, Jacquemier J, et al.: The pathology of familial breast cancer: Predictive value of immunohistochemical markers estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2, and p53 in patients with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. J Clin Oncol 2002, 20:2310–2318.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Foulkes WD, Metcalfe K, Sun P, et al.: Estrogen receptor status in BRCA1- and BRCA2-related breast cancer: The influence of age, grade, and histological type. Clin Cancer Res 2004, 10:2029–2034.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kauff ND, Satagopan JM, Robson ME, et al.: Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with at BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med 2002, 346:1609–1615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rebbeck TR, Lynch HT, Neuhausen SL, et al.: Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med 2002, 346:1616–1622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nunn TW: On Cancer of the Breast. London: J & A Churchill; 1882:71.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Love RR, Philips J: Oophorectomy for breast cancer: history revisited. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002, 94:1433–1434.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liber AM: Ovarian cancer in a mother and five daughters. Arch Pathol 1950, 49:280–290.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Feinleib M: Breast cancer and artificial menopause: A cohort Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1968, 41:315–329.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brinton LA, Schairer C, Hoover RN, et al.: Menstrual factors and risk for breast cancer. Cancer Invest 1988, 6:245–254.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tobacman JK, Greene MH, Tucker MS, et al.: Intraabdominal carcinomatosis after prophylactic oophorectomy in ovarian-cancer prone families. Lancet 1982, 2:795–797.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Piver MS, Jishi MF, Tsukada Y, et al.: Primary peritoneal carcinoma after prophylactic oophorectomy in women with a family history of ovarian cancer: A report of the Gilda Radner Familial Ovarian Cancer Registry. Cancer 1993, 71:2751–2755.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Strewing JP, Watson P, Easton DF, et al.: Prophylactic oophorectomy in inherited breast/ovarian cancer families. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogra 1995, 17:33–35.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miki y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidends D, et al.: A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science 1994, 266:66–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wooster R, Bignell G, Lancaster J, et al.: Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature 1995, 378:789–792.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Burke W, Daly M, Garber J, et al.: Recommendations for follow-up care individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer: II; BRCA1 and BRCA2—Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium. JAMA 1997, 277:997–1003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kauff ND, Barakat RR: Risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in patients with germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. J Clin Oncol 2007, 25:2921–2927.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rutter JL, Wacholder S, Chetrit A, et al.: Gynecologic surgeries and risk of ovarian cancer in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 Ashkenazi founder mutations: An Israeli population-based case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003, 95:1072–1078.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Eisen A, Lubinski J, Klijn J, et al.: Breast cancer risk following bilateral oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: an international case-control study. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23:7491–7496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Neuhausen SL, et al.: Mortality after bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2006, 7:223–229.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Finch A, Beiner M, Lubinski J, et al.: Salpingo-oophorectomy and the risk of ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. JAMA 2006, 296:185–192.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kauff ND, Domchek SM, Friebel TM, et al.: Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast and gynecologic cancer: a multicenter, prospective study. J Clin Oncol 2008, 26:1331–1337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Anglian Breast Cancer Study Group: Prevalence and penetrance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based series of breast cancer cases. Br J Cancer 2000, 83:1301–1308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Satagopan JM, Boyd J, Kauff ND, et al.: Ovarian cancer risk in Ashkenazi Jewish carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Clin Cancer Res 2002, 8:3776–3781.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. King MC, Wieand S, Hale K, et al.: Tamoxifen and breast cancer incidence among women with inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP-P1) breast cancer prevention trial. JAMA 2001, 286:2251–2256.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Narod SA, Brunet JS, Ghadirian P, et al.: Tamoxifen and risk of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a case-control study—Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group. Lancet 2000, 356:1876–1881.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Metcalfe K, Lynch HT, Ghadirian P, et al.: Contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 2004, 22:2328–2335.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Klaren HM, van’t Veer LJ, van Leeuwen FE, et al.: Potential for bias in studies on efficacy of prophylactic surgery for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003, 95:941–947.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rebbeck TR, Kauff ND, Domchek SM: Meta-analysis of risk reduction estimates associated with risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009, 101:80–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Foulkes WD, Goffin J, Brunet JS, et al.: Tamoxifen may be an effective adjuvant treatment for BRCA1-related breast cancer irrespective of estrogen receptor status. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002, 94:1504–1506.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hartmann LC, Degnim A, Schaid DJ: Prophylactic mastectomy for BRCA1/2 carriers: progress and more questions. J Clin Oncol 2004, 22:981–983.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cuzick J, Powles T, Veronesi U, et al.: Overview of the main outcomes in breast-cancer prevention trials. Lancet 2003, 361:296–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chlebowski RT, Col N, Winer EP, et al.: American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment of pharmacologic interventions for breast cancer risk reduction including tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibition. J Clin Oncol 2002, 20:3328–3343.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Cuzick J: Aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer prevention. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23:1636–1643.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noah D. Kauff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arnold, A.G., Kauff, N.D. Prophylactic oophorectomy may differentially reduce breast cancer risk in women with BRCA1 versus BRCA2 mutations. Curr Breast Cancer Rep 1, 157–161 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-009-0022-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-009-0022-4

Keywords