Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Orbital Hub: a concept for human spaceflight beyond ISS operations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
CEAS Space Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The International Space Station (ISS) is the greatest endeavour in low-Earth orbit since the beginning of the space age and the culmination of human outposts like Skylab and Mir. While a clear schedule has yet to be drafted, it is expected that ISS will cease operation in the 2020s. What could be the layout for a human outpost in LEO with lessons learnt from ISS? What are the use cases and applications of such an outpost in the future? The System Analysis Space Segment group of the German Aerospace Center investigated these and other questions and developed the Orbital Hub concept. In this paper an overview is presented of how the overall concept has been derived and its properties and layouts are described. Starting with a workshop involving the science community, the scientific requirements have been derived and Strawman payloads have been defined for use in further design activities. These design activities focused on Concurrent Engineering studies, where besides DLR employees participants from the industry and astronauts were involved. The result is an expandable concept that is composed of two main parts, the Base Platform, home for a permanent crew of up to three astronauts, and the Free Flyer, an uncrewed autonomous research platform. This modular approach provides one major advantage: the decoupling of the habitat and payload leading to increased quality of the micro-gravity environment. The former provides an environment for human physiology experiments, while the latter allows science without the perturbations caused by a crew, e.g. material experiments or Earth observation. The Free Flyer is designed to operate for up to 3 months on its own, but can dock with the space station for maintenance and experiment servicing. It also has a hybrid propulsion system, chemical and electrical, for different applications. The hub’s design allows launch with just three launches, as the total mass of all the hub parts is about 60,000 kg. The main focus of the design is on autonomy and reducing crew maintenance and repair efforts, and reducing the need for extravehicular activities. Following a description of the design approach and technical details, cost estimation and a detailed discussion of the use cases for such a station concept, along with the possible scenarios of international cooperation, are also presented in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Philpot, C., Seboldt, W., Quantius, D., Romberg, O.: Project Report: DLR-RY-Post-ISS AP1000 ISS-Analyse und Lessons Learnt (2016)

  2. ISECG: The Global Exploration Roadmap. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Headquarters, Washington. http://www.globalspaceexploration.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/GER_2013.pdf (2013). Accessed 01 Mar 2017

  3. ISS Program Science Forum: International Space Station Benefits for Humanity, 2nd Edition (2015)

  4. Vrakking, V., Quantius, D., Zeidler, C., Philpot, C.,  Romberg, O.: Project Report: DLR-RY-Post-ISS AP2000 Post-ISS: Konzeptbewertung (2016)

  5. Saaty, T.L., Alexander, J.M.: Conflict Resolution: The Analytic Hierarchy Approach. Praeger Publishers, US (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G.: Models, methods, concepts and applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Kluwer Academics Publishers Group, Dordrecht (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Quantius, D., Romberg, O., Maiwald, V. Schubert, D., Schlotterer, D.M., Peter, H.: The Concurrent Engineering Approach Applied on The Solar magnetism eXplorer (SolmeX) Concept. 62nd International Astronautical Congress (IAC) 2011, 3–7 Oct. 2011, Cape Town, South Africa (2011)

  8. Braukhane, A., Maiwald, V., Martelo, A., Quantius, D., Romberg, O.: Be Aware of the Squad: Lessons Learnt from 50 Concurrent Engineering Studies for space systems. 66th International Astronautical Congress (IAC), 11–16 Oct. 2015, Jerusalem, Israel (2015)

  9. Fischer, P.M., Deshmukh, M., Maiwald, V., Quantius, D., Martelo Gomez, A., Gerndt, A.: Conceptual Data Model—a Foundation for successful Concurrent Engineering. 7th International Systems and Concurrent Engineering for Space Applications Conference (SECESA), 5–7 Oct. 2016, Madrid, Spain (2016)

  10. Wertz, J.R., Larson, W.L.: Space Mission Analysis and Design, 3rd edn. Space Technology Library, Microcosm Press, El Segundo (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. GAO-United States General Accounting Office: International Space Station—US Life-Cycle Funding Requirements (1998)

  12. Romberg, O., Quantius, D., Philpot, C., et al.: The Orbital-Hub: Low Cost Platform for Human Spaceflight after ISS. 67th International Astronautical Congress (IAC), 26–30 Sep. 2016, Guadalajara, Mexico (2016)

  13. Lovrinovic, B.: Manoeuvre Estimation and Analysis of the Attitude and Propulsion System for Free Flying Modules of a Low Earth Orbit Space Station. RWTH Aachen/Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Bremen (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Erickson, L.K.: Space Flight: History, Technology and Operations. The Scarecrow Press, New Jersey (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rank, P., Mühlbauer, Q., et al.: The DEOS Automation And Robotics Payload. 11th Symposium on Advanced Space Technologies in Robotics and Automation, ESA ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 12–14 April 2011 (2011)

  16. Friedrich, H., Baune, M., Baune, J.: Man Systems Aspects in the Design Concept Of the Columbus Man-tended Free Flyer Acta Astronautica, vol. 20. Pergamon Press, Great Britian (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Azure Space: 30% Triple Junction GaAs Solar Cell Datasheet. http://www.azurspace.com/images/0003429-01-01_DB_3G30C-Advanced.pdf (2017). Accessed 28 Feb 2017

  18. Orbital ATK-Goleta: UltraFlex Solar Array Systems. https://www.orbitalatk.com/space-systems/space-components/solar-arrays/docs/FS007_15_OA_3862%20UltraFlex.pdf (2017). Accessed 28 Feb 2017

  19. Neubauer, J., et al.: Progress on the Space Qualification of the High Energy ABSL 18650NL Cell. https://batteryworkshop.msfc.nasa.gov/presentations/Progress_Space_Qual_High_Ener_18650NL_Cell_JNeubauer.pdf (2017). Accessed 01 Mar 2017

  20. Strandmoe, S., et al.: Automated Transfer Vehicle (ATV) Flight Control Achievements. 7th International ESA Conference on Guidance, Navigation and Control Systems. Tralee, 2–5 June 2008 (2008)

  21. Airbus Safran Launchers: Chemical Bi-Propellant Thruster Family. http://www.space-propulsion.com/brochures/bipropellant-thrusters/bipropellant-thrusters.pdf (2017). Accessed 08 Nov 2017

  22. Bundesmann, C., et al.: In-situ Temperature, Grid Curvature, Erosion, Beam and Plasma Characterization of a Gridded Ion Thruster RIT-22. 31st International Electric Propulsion Conference. Michigan, 20–24, September 2009 (2009)

  23. Seedhouse, E.: SpaceX’s Dragon: America’s Next Generation Spacecraft. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland (2016)

  24. Jahnke, S., Philpot, C., Maiwald, V., Romberg, O.: Recent Developments on DLR’s Post ISS Concept. 68th International Astronautical Congress (IAC), 25–29 Sep. 2017, Adelaide, Australia (2017)

  25. Murray, C.D., Dermott, S.F.: Solar System Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)

  26. Messerschmid, E., Bertrand, R.: Space Stations: Systems and Utilization. Springer, Berlin (2013)

  27. European Space Agency: ESA Budget for 2017: by domain”, Space in Images. http://www.esa.int/spaceinimages/Images/2017/01/ESA_budget_2017_by_domain (2017). Accessed 27 Mar 2017

  28. European Space Agency: Exploring Together: ESA Space Exploration Strategy. http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/strategies/ESA_Exploration_Strategy_2015.pdf (2017). Accessed 27 Mar 2017

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the overall design team of the CE studies and workshops. Special thanks go to Hans Schlegel, whose detailed insight into space station operations and its environment helped us immensely in setting up a credible station concept. We also thank our partners from Bigelow Aerospace for supporting us with vital data about the habitat and the possibilities of an expandable module, as well as Airbus DS for their valuable contributions during the study phase. We also thank the DLR board for funding this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of System Analysis Space Segment, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Space Systems, Bremen, Germany

    Stephan S. Jahnke, Volker Maiwald, Claudia Philpot, Dominik Quantius, Oliver Romberg, Wolfgang Seboldt, Vincent Vrakking & Conrad Zeidler

Authors
  1. Stephan S. Jahnke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Volker Maiwald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Claudia Philpot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dominik Quantius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Oliver Romberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wolfgang Seboldt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Vincent Vrakking
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Conrad Zeidler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephan S. Jahnke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jahnke, S.S., Maiwald, V., Philpot, C. et al. Orbital Hub: a concept for human spaceflight beyond ISS operations. CEAS Space J 10, 355–379 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12567-018-0203-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12567-018-0203-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation