Skip to main content
Log in

Doctoral students’ satisfaction in a research-focused Korean university: socio-environmental and motivational factors

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the relationships between students’ satisfaction with their doctoral program and motivational and socio-environmental factors. In this study, doctoral students’ satisfaction with their program is measured by their learning experiences such as quality of theoretical knowledge, research methodology, and competency. The survey data for this study were collected at a comprehensive and research-focused university in South Korea. Findings indicate that socialization and motivational factors are associated with doctoral students’ satisfaction with their program. Additionally, this study suggests that academic advisors should pay more attention to the changing job markets for PhD students because students’ satisfaction with their doctoral program is strongly related to their future job prospects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (2005). The identity career of the graduate student: Professional socialization to academic sociology. The American Sociologist, 36(2), 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2007). Conceptual model of student satisfaction in higher education. Total Quality Management, 18(5), 571–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auriol, L. (2010). Careers of doctorate holders. OECD report.

  • Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. E. (2009). Cognitive apprenticeship theory and its implications for doctoral education: A case example from a doctoral program in higher and adult education. International Journal of Academic Development, 14(3), 173–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, V. L., Pifer, M. J., & Flemion, B. (2013). Process challenges and learning-based interactions in stage 2 of doctoral education: Implications from two applied social science fields. The Journal of Higher Education, 84(4), 449–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. J., & Randall, J. (2012). Doctoral student satisfaction: An examination of disciplinary, enrollment, and institutional differences. Research in Higher Education, 53(1), 47–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieber, J. P., & Worley, L. K. (2006). Conceptualizing the academic life: Graduate students’ perspectives. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(6), 1009–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biglan, A. (1973). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 204–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Tennant, M. (2006). Putting doctoral education to work: Challenges to academic practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(3), 293–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W. G., & Rudenstine, N. L. (1992). In pursuit of the Ph. D. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brailsford, I. (2010). Motives and aspirations for doctoral study: Career, personal, and inter-personal factors in the decision to embark on a history PhD. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 5(1), 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, H., & Sanders, T. (2007). Getting your PhD: A practical insider’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Corts, D. P., Lounsbury, J. W., Saudargas, R. A., & Tatum, H. E. (2000). Assessing undergraduate satisfaction with an academic department: A method and case study. College Student Journal, 34(3), 399–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., & Brehony, K. J. (2000). Doctoral students’ access to research cultures: Are some more unequal than others? Studies in Higher Education, 25(2), 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeShields, O. W. Jr., Kara, A., & Kaynak, E. (2005). Determinants of business student satisfaction and retention in higher education: Applying Herzberg’s two-factor theory. International Journal of Educational Management, 19(2), 128–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R. G., Zucherman, H., Groen, J. A., & Brucker, S. M. (2010). Educating scholars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, K. M., & Healy, M. A. (2001). Key factors influencing student satisfaction related to recruitment and retention. Journal of marketing for higher education, 10(4), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fochler, M., Felt, U., & Müller, R. (2016). Unsustainable growth, hyper-competition, and worth in life science research: Narrowing evaluative repertoires in doctoral and postdoctoral scientists’ work and lives. Minerva, 54(2), 175–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Aracil, A. (2009). European graduates’ level of satisfaction with higher education. Higher Education, 57(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. K. (2008). “What’s too much and what’s too little?”: The process of becoming an independent researcher in doctoral education. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 326–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. K. (2009). Student and faculty attributions of attrition in high and low-completing doctoral programs in the United States. Higher Education, 58(1), 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. K. (2010). Contrasting the socialization experiences of doctoral students in high-and low-completing departments: A qualitative analysis of disciplinary contexts at one institution. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(1), 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. K., & Gopaul, B. (2012). The part-time doctoral student experience. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7(12), 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C. M. (2005). The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(6), 669–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of today’s doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia, PA: Pew Charitable Trusts

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J. (2015). How to build a better PhD. Nature, 528(7580), 22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregerman, S. R., Lerner, J. S., von Hippel, W., Jonides, J., & Nagda, B. A. (1998). Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect student retention. The Review of Higher Education, 22(1), 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, W. E. (1972). Several factors affecting graduate student satisfaction. The Journal of Higher Education, 43(6), 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, N. (2010). Doctoral experience and learning from a sociocultural perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 829–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horta, H., Sato, M., & Yonezawa, A. (2011). Academic inbreeding: Exploring its characteristics and rationale in Japanese universities using a qualitative perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(1), 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives, G., & Rowley, G. (2005). Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: Ph.D. students’ progress and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), 535–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jairam, D., & Kahl, D. H. Jr. (2012). Navigating the doctoral experience: The role of social support in successful degree completion. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. J. (2017). Characteristics of research and education in doctoral education by academic discipline. Korean Journal of Educational Administration, 35(2), 213–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kram, K. E., & Isabella, L. A. (1985). Mentoring alternatives: The role of peer relationships in career development. Academy of management Journal, 28(1), 110–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A., Brennan, M., & Green, B. (2009). Re-imagining doctoral education: Professional Doctorates and beyond. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(3), 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., & Lee, H. (2017). Korean graduate students’ perceptions of guidance and professional development. Higher Education, 73(5), 725–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, H. (2018). STEM doctoral students’ research stress: Causes and coping mechanism. A case based on Seoul National University. Doctoral dissertation. Seoul National University.

  • Litalien, D., Guay, F., & Morin, A. J. (2015). Motivation for PhD studies: Scale development and validation. Learning and Individual Differences, 41, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Lanham, ML, Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovitts, B. E. (2008). The transition to independent research: Who makes it, who doesn’t, and why. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 296–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, M. A., Timmerman, B. C., Feldon, D. F., & Strickland, D. (2013). Factors affecting the occurrence of faculty-doctoral student coauthorship. The Journal of Higher Education, 84(1), 121–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangematin, V. (2000). PhD job market: Professional trajectories and incentives during the PhD. Research Policy, 29(6), 741–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, P. (2007). Academic capitalism and doctoral student socialization: A case study. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(1), 71–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (2015). Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities: 2015. Arlington, VA. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/sed/2015/.

  • National Statistics Portal (2017). Doctoral degree holders report. Department of Statistics.

  • Nerad, M., & Cerny, J. (1999). Widening the circle: Another look at women graduate students. CGS Communicator, 32(6), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettles, M. T., & Millett, C. M. (2006). Three magic letters: Getting to Ph. D. Baltimore, ML: JHU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, K., Knudsen, K., & Jones, J. (2013). The role of emotional competencies in faculty-doctoral student relationships. The Review of Higher Education, 36(3), 315–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa, A. (2002). Challenging the traditional organization of Japanese universities. Higher Education, 43(1), 85–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polka, J. (2014). Column: A wake-up call. Nature, 511(7508), 256–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. C. (2015). Mass higher education and its challenges for rapidly growing East Asian higher education. In J. C. Shin, G. A. Postiglione & F. Huang (Eds.), Mass higher education development in East Asia (pp. 1–23). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. C., & Cummings, W. K. (2010). Multilevel analysis of academic publishing across disciplines: Research preference, collaboration, and time on research. Scientometrics, 85(2), 581–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. C., & Jung, J. (2014). Academics job satisfaction and job stress across countries in the changing academic environments. Higher Education, 67(5), 603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. C., Jung, J., & Lee, S. J. (2016). Academic inbreeding of Korean professors: Academic training, networks, and their performance. In J. F. Galaz-Fontes, A. Arimoto, U. Teichler & J. Brennan (Eds.), Biographies and careers throughout academic life. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. C., Jung, J., Postiglione, G. A., & Azman, N. A. (2014). Research productivity of returnees from study abroad in Korea, Hong Kong and Malaysia. Minerva, 52, 467–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. C., Kim, Y. S., Lim, H. J., Shim, B. S., & Choi, Y. (2015). The “Sandwich Generation” in Korean Academe: between traditional academic authority and meritocratic culture. Studies in Higher Education, 40(8), 1406–1422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smaglik, P. (2014). Employment: PhD overdrive. Nature, 511(7508), 255–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeby, J. (2000). Disciplinary differences in Norwegian graduate education. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sojkin, B., Bartkowiak, P., & Skuza, A. (2012). Determinants of higher education choices and student satisfaction: The case of Poland. Higher Education, 63(5), 565–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suhre, C. J., Jasen, E. P., & Harskamp, E. G. (2007). Impact of degree program satisfaction on the persistence of college students. Higher Education, 54(2), 207–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (2006). Changing structures of the higher education systems: The increasing complexity of underlying forces. Higher Education Policy, 19(4), 447–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (2014). Doctoral education and training: A view across countries and disciplines. In L. W. Anderson & M. d. Ibarrola (Eds.), The nurturing of new educational researchers: Dialogues and debates (pp. 1–25). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. L., Miller, M., & Mitchell-Kernan, C. (2002). Disciplinary cultures and graduate education. Emergences: Journal for the Study of Media & Composite Cultures, 12(1), 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vekkaila, J., Pyhältö, K., & Lonka, K. (2013). Experiences of disengagement: A study of doctoral students in the behavioral sciences. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 8, 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidman, J. C., Twale, D. J., & Stein, E. L. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: Perilous passage? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, C.-M., Golde, C. M., & McCormick, A. C. (2007). More than a signature: How advisor choice and advisor behaviour affect doctoral student satisfaction. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(3), 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study is supported from National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2014028698).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung Jung Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shin, J.C., Kim, S.J., Kim, E. et al. Doctoral students’ satisfaction in a research-focused Korean university: socio-environmental and motivational factors. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 19, 159–168 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9528-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9528-7

Keywords

Navigation