Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating the origins of adult chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta in the Okhotsk and Sea of Japan regions using discriminant analysis of scale characteristics

  • Original Article
  • Biology
  • Published:
Fisheries Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) based on scale patterns was used to develop a methodology of estimating regional origins of chum salmon. Age-4 fish were sampled in 2004–2006 from 12 river stocks of the Okhotsk and Sea of Japan (SJ) regions from Hokkaido to Honshu. The scale radius at the first annulus of each fish was separated into i intervals and the radius of each interval was divided by the number of scale circuli within the interval to quantify scale patterns. The i variables and five other morphometric measurements were used in a stepwise LDA to classify the following regional groups: Hokkaido and Honshu (I), Okhotsk and SJ (II), Okhotsk, Hokkaido SJ and Honshu SJ (III). Percentages of correctly classified fish (hit rates) improved with increased i but tended to be close to asymptotic values in all cases. Hit rates for each river stock in case (I) ranged from 74.3% to 100% (mean 97.2%), estimated by direct maximum likelihood methods using predictor variable sets from the best models for LDAs. Hit rates were lower in cases (II) and (III). This study demonstrated that scale patterns are useful for classifying the origins of chum salmon, at least between Hokkaido and Honshu.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kobayashi T (2009) History of propagation for salmon in Japan. Hokkaido University Press, Sapporo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Morita K, Takahashi S, Ohkuma K, Nagasawa T (2013) Estimation of the proportion of wild chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta in Japanese hatchery rivers. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 79:206–213 (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Morita K (2014) Japanese wild salmon research: toward a reconciliation between hatchery and wild salmon management. NPAFC Newslett 35:4–14

    Google Scholar 

  4. Saito T, Nagasawa K (2009) Regional synchrony in return rates of chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) in Japan in relation to coastal temperature and size at release. Fish Res 95:14–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ogawa G, Shimizu Y (2012) Rehabilitation of artificial hatchery program of chum salmon in Iwate Prefecture after the Great East Japan Earthquake and stock recovery-related problems. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 78:1040–1043 (in Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Watanabe K, Sasaki K, Saito T, Ogawa G (2015) Scenario analysis of the effects of the Great East Japan Earthquake on the chum salmon population-enhancement system. Fish Sci. doi:10.1007/s12562-015-0896-1

    Google Scholar 

  7. Saito T, Okamoto Y, Sasaki K (2015) Biological characteristics of chum salmon in Japan. Bull Fish Res Agen 39:85–120 (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saito T, Kaga T, Hasegawa E, Nagasawa K (2011) Effects of juvenile size at release and early marine growth on adult return rates for Hokkaido chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) in relation to sea surface temperature. Fish Oceanogr 20:278–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hasegawa E, Nara K, Hiroi O (2004) A consideration about estimating method for the effect of restricted set netting on migration of chum salmon by using mark-recapture results. Natl Salmon Resour Center Tech Rep 170:17–49 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Takahashi F (2009) Knowledge at present, obtained from recaptures of otolith thermal marked chum salmon. FRA Salmon Res Rep 3:6–7 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wolf KS, Waste SM (2010) Introduction: tagging, telemetry, and marking compendium project. In: Wolf KS, O’Neal JS (eds) PNAMP special publication: tagging, telemetry and marking measures for monitoring fish populations—a compendium of new and recent science for use in informing technique and decision modalities: Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership special publication 2010-002, chap. 1, pp 1–4

  12. Augerot X (2007) Introduction. In: Johnson DH et al (eds) Salmonid field protocols handbook. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sato S, Ando J, Ando H, Urawa S, Urano A, Abe S (2001) Genetic variation among Japanese populations of chum salmon inferred from the nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial DNA control region. Zool Sci 18:99–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sato S, Kojima H, Ando J, Ando H, Wilmot RL, Seeb LW, Efremov V, LeClair L, Buchholz W, Jin DH, Urawa S, Kaeriyama M, Urano A, Abe S (2004) Genetic population structure of chum salmon in the Pacific Rim inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequence variation. Environ Biol Fishes 69:37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sato S, Templin WD, Seeb LW, Seeb JE, Urawa S (2014) Genetic structure and diversity of Japanese chum salmon populations inferred from single-nucleotide polymorphism markers. Trans Am Fish Soc 143:1231–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoon M, Sato S, Seeb JE, Brykov V, Seeb LW, Varnavskaya NV, Wilmot RL, Jin DH, Urawa S, Urano A, Abe S (2008) Mitochondrial DNA variation and genetic population structure of chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta around the Pacific Rim. J Fish Biol 73:1256–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Beacham TD, Sato S, Urawa S, Le KD, Wetklo M (2008) Population structure and stock identification of chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta from Japan determined by microsatellite DNA variation. Fish Sci 74:983–994

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Beacham TD, Candy JR, Le KD, Wetklo M (2009) Population structure of chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) across the Pacific Rim, determined from microsatellite analysis. Fish Bull 107:244–260

    Google Scholar 

  19. Beacham TD, Candy JR, Wallace C, Urawa S, Sato S, Varnavskaya NV, Le KD, Wetklo M (2009) Microsatellite stock identification of Chum Salmon on a Pacific Rim basis. N AM J Fish Manage 29:1757–1776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Friedland KD, Cadrin SX (2005) Analyses of calcified structures-texture and spacing patterns. In: Cadrin X et al. (eds) Stock identification methods: applications in fishery science. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, pp 185–195

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Pella J, Masuda M (2005) Classical discriminant analysis, classification of individuals, and source population composition of mixtures. In: Cadrin X et al. (eds) Stock identification methods: applications in fishery science. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, pp 517–552

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Bugaev AV, Zavolokina EA, Zavarina LO, Shubin AO, Zolotukhin SF, Kaplanova NF, Volobuev MV, Kireev IN, Myers KW (2009) Stock-specific distribution and abundance of immature chum salmon in the western Bering Sea in summer and fall 2002–2003. N Pac Anadr Fish Comm Bull 5:105–120

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cook RC, Guthrie I (1987) In-season stock identification of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) using scale pattern recognition. In: Smith HD et al. (eds) Sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) population biology and future management. Can Spec Publ Fish Aquat Sci 96:327–334

  24. Gable J, Cox-Rogers S (1993) Stock identification of Fraser River sockeye salmon: methodology and management application. Pacific Salmon Commission Tech Rep 5

  25. Tanaka S, Shepard MP, Bilton HT (1969) Origin of chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) in offshore waters of the North Pacific in 1956–1958 as determined from scale studies. Int North Pac Fish Comm Bull 26:57–155

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ishida Y, Ito S, Takagi K (1989) Stock identification of chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta from their maturity and scale characters. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 55:651–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Watarai O, Igarashi M (1992) A chum scale pattern analyzer and stock identification based on scale patterns by discriminant function and power spectrum analysis. IEEE J Ocean Eng 17:280–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Saito T (2015) Biological monitoring of key salmon populations: Japanese chum salmon. NPAFC Newslett 37:11–19

    Google Scholar 

  29. Newman RM, Weisberg S (1987) Among- and within-fish variation of scale growth increments in brown trout. In: Summerfelt RC, Hall GE (eds) Age and growth of fish. Iowa State University Press, Ames, pp 159–166

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rooper CN, Bryant MD, McCurdy SJ (2000) Use of scales to assess summer growth of resident cutthroat trout in Margaret Lake, Alaska. N AM J Fish Manage 20:467–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ito S, Ishida Y (1998) Species identification and age determination of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) by scale patterns. Bull Nat Res Inst Far Seas Fish 35:131–154 (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Amos MH, Anas RE, Pearson RE (1963) Use of a discriminant function in the morphological separation of Asian and north American races of pink salmon, Oncorhynchus gorbuscha (WALBAUM). Int North Pac Fish Comm Bull 11:73–100

    Google Scholar 

  33. Anas RE (1964) Sockeye salmon scale studies. Int North Pac Fish Comm Annual Rep 1963:158–162

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pearson RE (1964) Use of a discriminant function to classify north American and Asian pink salmon, Oncorhynchus gorbuscha (WALBAUM), collected in 1959. Int North Pac Fish Comm Bull 14:67–90

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mason JE (1966) Sockeye salmon scale studies. Int North Pac Fish Comm Annu Rep 1964:117–118

    Google Scholar 

  36. Anas RE, Murai S (1969) Use of scale characters and a discriminant function for classifying sockeye salmon (Oncohynchus nerka) by continent of origin. Int North Pac Fish Comm Bull 26:157–192

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bilton HT, Messinger HB (1975) Identification of major British Columbia and Alasaka runs of age 1.2 and 1.3 sockeye from their scale characters. Int North Pac Fish Comm Bull 32:109–129

    Google Scholar 

  38. Major RL, Murai S, Lyons J (1975) Scale studies to identify Asian and western Alasakan chinook salmon. Int North Pac Fish Comm Annu Rep 1973:80–97

    Google Scholar 

  39. Major RL, Murai S, Lyons JT (1977) Scale studies to identify Asian and western Alasakan chinook salmon: the 1969 and 1970 Japanese mothership samples. Int North Pac Fish Comm Annu Rep 1974:78–81

    Google Scholar 

  40. Major RL, Murai S, Lyons J (1977) Scale studies to identify Asian and western Alasakan chinook salmon. Int North Pac Fish Comm Annu Rep 1975:68–71

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cook RC, Lord GE (1978) Identification of stocks of Bristol Bay sokeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka, by evaluating scale patterns with a polynominal discriminant method. Fish Bull 76:415–423

    Google Scholar 

  42. Myers KW, Harris CK, Knudsen CM, Walker RV, Davis ND, Rogers DE (1987) Stock origins of chinook salmon in the area of the Japanese mothership salmon fishery. N AM J Fish Manage 7:459–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Unwin MJ, Lucas DH (1993) Scale characteristics of wild and hatchery chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the Rakaia River, New Zealand, and their use in stock identification. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:2475–2484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tattan IA, Whitesel TA, Pan Y (2003) Scale pattern analysis of selected scale characteristics and the first annulus for distinguishing wild and hatchery steelhead in the Hood River, Oregon. N AM J Fish Manage 23:856–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Prager MH, Shertzer KW (2005) An introduction to statistical algorithms useful in stock composition analysis. In: Cadrin X et al. (eds) Stock identification methods: applications in fishery science. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, pp 499–516

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. Millar RB (1990) Comparison of methods for estimating mixed stock fishery composition. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47:2235–2241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Millar RB (1990b) A versatile computer program for mixed stock fishery composition estimation. Can Tech Rep Fish Aquat Sci No 1753

  48. Urawa S, Sato S, Crane PA, Agler B, Josephson R, Azumaya T (2009) Stock-specific ocean distribution and migration of chum salmon in the Bering Sea and North Pacific Ocean. N Pac Anadr Fish Comm Bull 5:131–146

    Google Scholar 

  49. Saito T (2002) Factors affecting survival of hatchery-reared chum salmon in Japan. N Pac Anadr Fish Comm Tech Rep 4:37–38

    Google Scholar 

  50. Fisher JP, Pearcy WG (2005) Seasonal changes in growth of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) off Oregon and Washington and concurrent changes in the spacing of scale circuli. Fish Bull 103:34–51

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hirai Yuzo (2012) Introduction of pattern recognition. Morikita, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank the staff of the National Salmon Resources Center (currently, the Hokkaido National Fisheries Research Institute; HNFS) for collecting chum salmon scales and fish measurements. Scale measurements were assisted by Kaoru Kaneko and Yuko Fudezome. Discussion with my colleagues in the Stock Assessment Group of HNFS (Kengo Suzuki, Kyuji Watanabe, Yukihiro Hirabayashi, Kei Sasaki, Fumihisa Takahashi and Narito Kogarumai) was valuable for developing the methodology and for preparing the manuscript. Two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments to improve the earlier drafts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshihiko Saito.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saito, T. Estimating the origins of adult chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta in the Okhotsk and Sea of Japan regions using discriminant analysis of scale characteristics. Fish Sci 83, 383–400 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-017-1077-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-017-1077-1

Keywords

Navigation