Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Standalone personal health records in the United States: meeting patient desires

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Health and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 23 June 2012

Abstract

Personal health records (PHRs) are electronic tools for patients to maintain a comprehensive record of their health information. Despite the potential for PHRs to increase patient involvement in their overall health care and lead to shared decision-making with their health care providers, only 11 % of consumers in the United States maintain a PHR. The purpose of this study is to evaluate how standalone PHRs address the reported desires of patients. An Internet search identified nineteen web-based standalone PHRs that were available free-of-charge. A literature search was conducted to identify patient-reported desires for a PHR. A checklist was constructed with an evaluation procedure to assess the presence of functionalities within each standalone PHR that met identified patient desires. Each of the nineteen identified PHRs was then assessed using this checklist. Providing security and privacy protections for patients’ health information; having information presented in layman’s terms; and generating a printed report of health information were the only desires met by more than half of the evaluated PHRs. Only five PHRs met over half of the patient desires. Findings reveal that current standalone PHRs are designed to serve as a repository of health information, rather than as an interactive tool to help patients become more knowledgeable about and involved in their own care. There is a need for patient perspectives to be considered and integrated into the design of PHRs in order for PHRs to achieve their full potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Markle Foundation. The personal health working group final report. 2003. http://www.providersedge.com/ehdocs/ehr_articles/The_Personal_Health_Working_Group_Final_Report.pdf. Accessed 16 Feb 2012.

  3. American Health Information Management Association and the American Medical Informatics Association. The value of personal health records: a joint position statement for consumers of health care. J AHIMA. 2007;78:22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Healthcare Information Management and Systems Society. HIMSS personal health records definition and position statement. 2007. http://www.himss.org/content/files/PHRDefinition071707.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2012.

  5. Ball MJ, Smith C, Bakalar RS. Personal health records: empowering consumers. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2007;21:76–86.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Detmer D, Bloomrosen M, Raymond B, Tang P. Integrated personal health records: transformative tools for consumer-centric care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008;8:45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hess R, Bryce CL, Paone S, et al. Exploring challenges and potentials of personal health records in diabetes self-management: implementation and initial assessment. Telemed J E Health. 2007;13:509–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaelber DC, Jha AK, Johnston D, Middleton B, Bates DW. A research agenda for personal health records (PHRs). J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:729–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahn JS, Aulakh V, Bosworth A. What it takes: characteristics of the ideal personal health record. Health Aff. 2009;28:369–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel VN, Abramson E, Edwards AM, Cheung MA, Dhopeshwarkar RV, Kaushal R. Consumer attitudes toward personal health records in a Beacon community. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17:e104–20.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, Overhage JM, Sands DZ. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13:121–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Archer N, Fevrier-Thomas U, Lokker C, McKibbon KA, Straus SE. Personal health records: a scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18:515–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deloitte Center for Health Solutions. 2011 survey of health care consumers in the United States: key findings, strategic implications. 2011. http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-UnitedStates/Local%20Assets/Documents/US_CHS_2011ConsumerSurveyinUS_062111.pdf. Accessed 24 Feb 2012.

  14. Kaelber D, Pan EC. The value of personal health records. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008:343–347.

  15. DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Smith JC. Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  16. American Health Information Management Association. myPHR. 2012. http://myphr.com. Accessed 25 Feb 2012.

  17. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Demographics of internet users. 2012. http://www.pewinternet.org/Static-Pages/Trend-Data/Whos-Online.aspx. Accessed May 11, 2012.

  18. Smith A. 46 % of American adults are smartphone owners. 2012. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Smartphone-Update-2012/Findings.aspx. Accessed May 11, 2012.

  19. Lafky DB, Horan TA. Prospective personal health record use among different user groups: results of a multi-wave study. Proc Hawaii Int Conf Sys Sci. 2008:233.

  20. Liu LS, Shih PC, Hayes GR. Barriers to the adoption and use of personal health record systems. Proc iConf. 2011:363–370.

  21. Marchionini G, Rimer B K, Wildemuth B. Evidence base for personal health record usability: final report to the National Cancer Institute. 2007. http://www.ils.unc.edu/phr/files/final%20report%20010307.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2012.

  22. Nazi KM. Veterans’ voices: use of the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) Survey to identify My HealtheVet personal health record users’ characteristics, needs, and preferences. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17:203–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pyper C, Amery J, Watson M, Crook C. Patients’ experiences when accessing their on-line electronic patient records in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2004;54:38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pyper C, Amery J, Watson M, Crook C. Access to electronic health records in primary care—a survey of patients’ views. Med Sci Monit. 2004;10:SR17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Weitzman ER, Kaci L, Mandl KD. Acceptability of a personally controlled health record in a community-based setting: implications for policy and design. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11:e14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Winkelman WJ, Leonard KJ, Rossos PG. Patient-perceived usefulness of online electronic medical records: employing grounded theory in the development of information and communication technologies for use by patients living with chronic illness. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12:306–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Peters K, Niebling M, Slimmer C, Green T, Webb JM, Schumacher R. Usability guidance for improving the user interface and adoption of online personal health records. 2009. http://www.usercentric.com/publications/2009/01/05/user-centric-user-research-experts-develop-guidelines-personal-health-record. Accessed 25 Feb 2012.

  28. Walker J, Ahern DK, Le LX, Delbanco T. Insights for internists: “I want the computer to know who I am”. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24:727–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Keselman A, Slaughter L, Smith CA, et al. Towards consumer-friendly PHRs: patients’ experience with reviewing their health records. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007:399–403.

  30. Hourcade JP, Chrischilles EA, Gryzlak BM, et al. Design lessons for older adult personal health records software from older adults. Univers Access HCI. 2011:176–185.

  31. Denton IC. Will patients use electronic personal health records? Responses from a real-life experience. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2011;15:251–9.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hassol A, Walker JM, Kidder D, et al. Patient experiences and attitudes about access to a patient electronic health care record and linked web messaging. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:505–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lober WB, Zierler B, Herbaugh A, et al. Barriers to the use of a personal health record by an elderly population. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006:514–518.

  34. Jones DA, Shipman JP, Plaut DA, Selden CR. Characteristics of personal health records: findings of the Medical Library Association/National Library of Medicine Joint Electronic Personal Health Record Task Force. J Med Libr Assoc. 2010;98:243–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Creighton University Center for Health Services Research and Patient Safety, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE, 68178, USA

    Kevin T. Fuji, Amy A. Abbott, Kimberly A. Galt, Mark Kraft & Ted Kasha

  2. University of Nebraska Medical Center, 984120 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA

    Andjela Drincic

  3. Creighton University School of Nursing, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE, 68178, USA

    Amy A. Abbott

Authors
  1. Kevin T. Fuji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amy A. Abbott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kimberly A. Galt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andjela Drincic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mark Kraft
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ted Kasha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin T. Fuji.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fuji, K.T., Abbott, A.A., Galt, K.A. et al. Standalone personal health records in the United States: meeting patient desires. Health Technol. 2, 197–205 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-012-0028-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-012-0028-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation