Skip to main content
Log in

Labour migration and investments by remaining households in rural Nepal

  • Published:
Journal of Population Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Existing studies on the development effects of labour migration and remittances provide conflicting evidence and many suffer from self-selection bias. Furthermore, in spite of the significance of labour migration to the Nepalese economy, there are very few studies that formally analyse the development effect of labour migration in this region. Consequently, propensity score matching and a ‘difference-in-difference’ method is used to estimate the effect of labour migration and expectations to receive remittances from these migrants on investments by the remaining households in Chitwan, Nepal. The results suggest a positive role of labour migration and their likelihood of sending remittances on investments in agriculture, a type of productive investment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, R. (1998). Remittances, investment, and rural asset accumulation inPakistan. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 41(1), 155–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Airola, J. (2007). The use of remittance income in Mexico. The International Migration Review, 41(4), 850–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansak, C., & Chezum, B. (2009). How do remittances affect human capital formation of school-age boys and girls? American Economic Review, 99(2), 145–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, J. S., Shivakoti, G. P., Axinn, W. G., & Gajurel, K. (1997). Sampling strategies for rural settings: A detailed example from the Chitwan Valley Family Study, Nepal. Nepal Population Journal, 6, 193–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohra, P., & Massey, D. S. (2009). Processes of internal and international migration from Chitwan, Nepal. International Migration Review, 43(3), 621–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohra-Mishra, P., & Massey, D. S. (2011a). Individual decisions to migrate during civil conflict. Demography, 48(2), 401–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohra-Mishra, P., & Massey, D. S. (2011b). Environmental degradation and out-migration: New evidence from Nepal. In E. Piguet, A. Pécoud, & P. de Guchteneire (Eds.), Migration and climate change (pp. 74–101). UNESCO &Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Haas, H. (2010). Migration and development: A theoretical perspective. International Migration Review, 44(1), 227–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for non experimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durand, G., Parrado, E. A., & Massey, D. S. (1996). Migradollars and development: A reconsideration of the Mexican case. International Migration Review, 30(2), 423–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecer, S., & Tompkins, A. (2010).An econometric analysis of the remittance determinants among Ghanaians and Nigerians in the United States, United Kingdom, and Germany. International Migration.doi:10.1111/j.1468-2435.2010.00604.x.

  • Esquivel, G., & Huerta-Pineda, A. (2007). Remittances and poverty in Mexico: A propensity score matching approach. Integration and Trade Journal, 27, 45–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. H. (2001). Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—or tears: An application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography, 38(1), 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J., McKenzie, D., & Stillman, S. (2009). The impacts of international migration on remaining household members: Omnibus results from a migration lottery program. Policy Research Working Paper 4956. Washington, DC: The World Bank Development Research Group.

  • Government of Nepal. (2011). Nepal living standards surveyIII (NLSS-III). Press Release (8 August 2011): Main Findings. Kathmandu: National Planning Commission Secretariat, Central Bureau of Statistics.

  • Hamilton, S., DeWalt, B. R., & Barkin, D. (2003). Household welfare in four rural Mexican communities: The economic and social dynamics of surviving national crises. Mexican Studies, 19(2), 433–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J. & Todd, P.E. (2009). A note on adapting propensity score matching and selection models to choice based samples. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4304. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).

  • Heinrich, C., Maffioli, A., & Vázquez, G. (2010). A primer for applying propensity-score matching: Impact-evaluation guidelines. Inter-American Development Bank Technical Notes No. 161. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

  • Itzigsohn, J. (1995). Migrant remittances, labor markets, and household strategies: A comparative analysis of low-income household strategies in the Caribbean Basin. Social Forces, 74(2), 633–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koc, I., & Onan, I. (2004). International migrants’ remittances and welfare status of the left-behind families in Turkey. International Migration Review, 38(1), 78–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, M. (1980). Migration from the rural areas of poor countries: The impact on rural productivity and income distribution. World Development, 8(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lokshin, M., Bontch-Osmolovski, M., & Glinskaya, E. (2007).Work-related migration and poverty reduction in Nepal. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series 4231. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Mora Rivera, J. J. (2005). The impact of migration and remittances on distribution and sources income: The Mexican rural case. Paper presented at the United Nations expert group meeting on international migration and development. Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations Secretariat, New York, 6–8 July 2005.

  • Nepal Institute of Development Studies (NIDS). (2008). Nepal migration year book 2008. Kathmandu: Heidel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberai, A. S., & Singh, H. K. M. (1980). Migration, remittances and rural development. International Labour Review, 119(2), 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnwell, M. (1993). Population movements and the third world. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratha, D., Mohapatra, S., & Silwal, A. (2010). The migration and remittances factbook 2011. Washington, DC: Migration and Remittances Unit, World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regmi, G., & Tisdell, C. (2002). Remitting behaviour of Nepalese rural-to-urban migrants: Implications for theory and policy. Journal of Development Studies, 38(3), 76–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichert, J. S. (1981). The migrant syndrome: Seasonal U.S. wage labor and rural development in central Mexico. Human Organization, 40, 56–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rempel, H., & Lobdell, R. A. (1978). The role of urban-to-rural remittances in rural development. Journal of Development Studies, 14(3), 324–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahn, D. E., & Stifel, D. (2003). Exploring alternative measures of welfare in the absence of expenditure data. Review of Income and Wealth, 49(4), 463–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., & Todd, P. (2005). Does matching overcome Lalonde’ scritique of non-experimental estimators? Journal of Econometrics, 125(1–2), 305–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, O., & Bloom, D. E. (1985). The new economics of labor migration. The American Economic Review, 75(2), 173–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumata, C. (2002). Migradollars and poverty alleviation strategy issues in Congo (DRC). Review of African Political Economy, 29(93/94), 619–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E. J. (1992). Remittances and inequality reconsidered: Direct, indirect and interfemoral effects. Journal of Policy Modeling, 14(2), 187–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E. J. (1999). The new economics of labour migration and the role of remittances in the migration process. International Migration, 37(1), 64–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E. J., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Massey, D. S., & Pellegrino, A. (1996). International migration and community development. Population Index, 62(3), 397–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E. J., Rozelle, S., & de Brauw, A. (2003). Migration and incomes in source communities: A new economics of migration perspective from China. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52(1), 75–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2005). Nepal development policy review: Restarting growth and poverty reduction. Report No. 29382-NP. Washington, DC: Poverty Reduction and Economic Management, South Asia Region.

  • Yang, D. (2008). International migration, remittances, and household investment: Evidence from Philippine migrants’ exchange rate shocks. The Economic Journal, 118(528), 591–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pratikshya Bohra-Mishra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bohra-Mishra, P. Labour migration and investments by remaining households in rural Nepal. J Pop Research 30, 171–192 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-012-9097-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-012-9097-2

Keywords

Navigation