Skip to main content
Log in

Combination effects analysis of bottleneck-load order review/release and the dispatching rule: Application to a printed circuit board manufacturing line with multiple bottlenecks

  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to consider the interaction among shop floor control strategies (order review/release and dispatching, ORR) and its effect on the performance of the printed circuit board manufacturing system with multiple bottleneck workstations. For that purpose, we suggest the pull from ORR strategies based on bottleneck-load and simulation tests and TOPSIS analysis are performed to compare various combinations of bottleneck-load ORR mechanisms and dispatching rule at each bottleneck workstation. An experiment is performed based on a real case in Korea and used for data from simulation test. The performance of proposed ORR strategies is improved when the strategies are combined with a suitable dispatching rule at each bottleneck workstation. The experimental results demonstrate that the interaction between the bottleneck-load ORR and the optimal combination of the dispatching rule at each bottleneck workstation is highly relevant with respect that the performance indicators have a characteristic of “lower is better”, such as average tardiness, cycle time, and WIP level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnold, J. R. T., “Introduction to Materials Management,” Prentice Hall, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barrett, R. T. and Barman, S., “A SLAM II Simulation Study of a Simplified Flow Shop,” Simulation, Vol. 47, No. 5, pp. 181–189, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bahaji, N. and Kuhl, M. E., “A Simulation Study of New Multi-Objective Composite Dispatching Rules, CONWIP, and Push Lot Release in Semiconductor Fabrication,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 46, No. 14, pp. 3801–3824, 2008.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Blackstone, J. H., Phillips, D. T., and Hogg, G. L., “A State-of-the-Art Survey of Dispatching Rules for Manufacturing Job Shop Operations,” The International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 27–45, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gilland, W. G., “A Simulation Study Comparing Performance of CONWIP and Bottleneck-based Release Rules,” Production Planning & Control, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 211–219, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hwang, C. L. and Yoon, K. P., “Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications,” Springer-Verlag, 1981.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hopp, W. J. and Spearman, M. L., “Factory Physics: Foundations of Manufacturing Management,” Irwin/McGraw-Hill, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kahraman, C. and Kaya, T., “A Fuzzy Approach to E-Banking Website Quality Assessment based on an Integrated AHP-ELECTRE Method,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, No. 2, pp. 313–334, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lu, H., Huang, G. Q., and Yang, H., “Integrating Order Review/Release and Dispatching Rules for Assembly Job Shop Scheduling using a Simulation Approach,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 647–669, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Park, Y. J., Pan, R., Borror, C. M., Montgomery, D. C., and Lee, G. B., “Simultaneous Improvement of Energy Efficiency and Product Quality in PCB Lamination Process,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Tech., Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 247–256, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Panwalkar, S. S. and Iskander, W., “A Survey of Scheduling Rules,” Operations Research, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 45–61, 1977.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Petroni, A. and Rizzi, A., “A Fuzzy Logic based Methodology to Rank Shop Floor Dispatching Rules,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 76, No. 1, pp. 99–108, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Salvador, M. S., “A Solution to a Special Class of Flow Shop Scheduling Problems,” Proc. of Symposium on the Theory of Scheduling and Its Applications, pp. 83–91, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sha, D. Y., Hsieh, L. F., and Chen, K. J., “Wafer Rework Strategies at the Photolithography Stage,” International Journal of Industrial Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 122–130, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Spearman, M. L., Woodruff, D. L., and Hopp, W. J., “CONWIP: a Pull Alternative to Kanban,” The International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 879–894, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang, T., Kuo, Y., and Cho, C., “A Genetic Algorithms Simulation Approach for the Multi-Attribute Combinatorial Dispatching Decision Problem,” European Journal of Operational Research Vol. 176 No. 3 pp. 185–1873, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wein, L. M., “Scheduling Semiconductor Wafer Fabrication,” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 115–130, 1988.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suk-Jae Jeong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoon, SW., Cho, YJ. & Jeong, SJ. Combination effects analysis of bottleneck-load order review/release and the dispatching rule: Application to a printed circuit board manufacturing line with multiple bottlenecks. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 15, 1725–1732 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-014-0525-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-014-0525-4

Keywords

Navigation