Skip to main content
Log in

A new patient-specific planning method based on joint contact force balance with soft tissue release in total knee arthroplasty

  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the conventional total knee arthoplasty (TKA) planning used 2D or 3D images of the patient’s lower extremity to determine bone alignment, it was shown that good bone alignment does not always guarantee successful results due to unbalanced joint contact forces and soft tissue tension. Thus, the joint contact force balance and soft tissue tension were pre-operatively calculated using finite element analysis (FEA). Although the results of FEA are accurate, the rigid body spring method (RBSM) has introduced for the joint contact force or pressure distribution due to the high costs for FEA. In this paper, an innovative method was described to quantify the pre- and post-operative knee contact force balance using various engineering techniques, including the free-form deformation (FFD) technique, and RBSM-based cartilage contact force and ligament tension estimation algorithm. Nine cases of TKA planning were performed with three different surgical options, including over-correction of the valgus ratio of the femur, tibial plateau cutting length, and MCL release to redistribute the medial and lateral contact force balance. This method is useful as a patient-specific preoperative planning tool in TKA surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bargar, W. L., Bauer, A., and Börner, M., “Primary and Revision Total Hip Replacement Using the ROBODOC(R) System,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., No.354, pp. 82–91, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pearle, A. D., O’Loughlin, P. F., and Kendoff, D. O., “Robot-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 230–237, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, Y. H. and Minh, H. L., “A Laboratory-Level Surgical Robot System for Minimal Invasive Surgery (MIS) Total Knee Arthroplasty,” Int. J. Prec. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 237–242, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, K. C., Buehler, K. C., and Markel, D. C., “Computer Assisted Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison with Conventional Methods,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 20, Supplement 3, pp. 132–138, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sparmann, M., Wolke, B., Czupalla, H., Banzer, D., and Zink, A., “Positioning of Total Knee Arthroplasty with and without Navigation Support: A Prospective, Randomised Study,” Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, British Volume, Vol. 85, No. 6, pp. 830–835, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sugano, N., “Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 442–448, 2003.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Stulberg, S. D., Picard, F., and Saragaglia, D., “Computer-Assisted Total Knee Replacement Arthroplasty,” Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 25–39, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Böhling, U., Schamberger, H., Grittner, U., and Scholz, J., “Computerised and Technical Navigation in Total Knee-Arthroplasty,” Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 69–75, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsumoto, T., Muratsu, H., Tsumura, N., Mizuno, K., Kurosaka, M., and Kuroda, R., “Soft Tissue Balance Measurement in Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Navigation System,” The Journal of arthroplasty, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 358–364, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsumoto, T., Mizuno, K., Muratsu, H., Tsumura, N., Fukase, N., and et al., “Influence of Intra-Operative Joint Gap on Post-Operative Flexion Angle on Osteoarthritis Patients Undergoing Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, Vol. 15, No. 8, pp. 1013–1018, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Asano, H., Muneta, T., and Sekiya, I., “Soft Tissue Tension in Extension in Total Knee Arthroplasty Affects Postoperative Knee Extension and Stability,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, Vol. 16, No. 11, pp. 999–1003, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kluge, W. H., “Computer-assisted Knee Replacement Techniques,” Curr. Orthop., Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 200–206, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Marcacci, M., Nofrini, L., Iacono, F., Di Martino, A., Bignozzi, S., and Lo Presti, M., “A Novel Computer-Assisted Surgical Technique for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, Vol. 37, No. 12, pp. 1771–1779, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stulberg, S. D., Loan, P., and Sarin, V., “Computer-Assisted Navigation in Total Knee Replacement: Results of an Initial Experience in Thirty-Five Patients,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Vol. 84, Supplement. 2, pp. 90–98, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wasielewski, R. C., Galat, D. D., and Komistek, R. D., “Correlation of Compartment Pressure Data from an Intraoperative Sensing Device with Postoperative Fluoroscopic Kinematic Results in TKA Patients,” Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 333–339, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bellemans, J., Vandenneucker, H., Vanlauwe, J., and Victor, J., “The Influence of Coronal Plane Deformity on Mediolateral Ligament Status: An Observational Study in Varus Knees,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 152–156, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Oh, K. J., Park, W. M., Kim, K., and Kim, Y. H., “Quantification of Soft Tissue Balance in Total Knee Arthroplasty using Finite Element Analysis,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, pp. 1–5, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Takahashi, T., Wada, Y., and Yamamoto, H., “Soft-Tissue Balancing with Pressure Distribution During Total Knee Arthroplasty,” Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, British Volume, Vol. 79, No. 2, pp. 235–239, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mihalko, W. M., Saleh, K. J., Krackow, K. A., and Whiteside, L. A., “Soft-Tissue Balancing during Total Knee Arthroplasty in The Varus Knee,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Vol. 17, No. 12, pp. 766–774, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Haut Donahue, T. L., Hull, M. L., Rashid, M. M., and Jacobs, C. R., “A Finite Element Model of the Human Knee Joint for the Study of Tibio-Femoral Contact,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vol. 124, No. 3, pp. 273–280, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bendjaballah, M. Z., Shirazi-Adl, A., and Zukor, D. J., “Biomechanics of the Human Knee Joint in Compression: Reconstruction, Mesh Generation and Finite Element Analysis,” The Knee, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 69–79, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Halloran, J. P., Petrella, A. J., and Rullkoetter, P. J., “Explicit Finite Element Modeling of Total Knee Replacement Mechanics,” Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 323–331, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sint Jan, S. V., Sobzack, S., Dugailly, P. M., Feipel, V., Lefèvre, P., and et al., “Low-Dose Computed Tomography: A Solution for in Vivo Medical Imaging and Accurate Patient-Specific 3D Bone Modeling,” Clinical Biomechanics, Vol. 21, No. 9, pp. 992–998, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Frush, D. P., Donnelly, L. F., and Rosen, N. S., “Computed Tomography and Radiation Risks: What Pediatric Health Care Providers Should Know,” Pediatrics, Vol. 112, No. 4, pp. 951–957, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chao, E. and Sim, F. H., “Computer-Aided Preoperative Planning in Knee Osteotomy,” The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal, Vol. 15, No. pp. 4–18, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Iglič, A., Kralj-Iglič, V., Daniel, M., and Maček-Lebar, A., “Computer Determination of Contact Stress Distribution and Size of Weight Bearing Area in the Human Hip Joint,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 185–192, 200

  27. Moon, Y. W., Kim, J. G., Han, J. H., Do, K. H., Seo, J. G., and Lim, H. C., “Factors Correlated with the Reducibility of Varus Deformity in Knee Osteoarthritis: An Analysis Using Navigation Guided TKA,” Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 36–43, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Anderson, D. D., Iyer, K. S., Segal, N. A., Lynch, J. A., and Brown, T. D., “Implementation of Discrete Element Analysis for Subject-Specific, Population-Wide Investigations of Habitual Contact Stress Exposure,” Journal of Applied Biomechanics, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 215–223, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Genda, E., Iwasaki, N., Li, G., MacWilliams, B. A., Barrance, P. J., and Chao, E., “Normal Hip Joint Contact Pressure Distribution in Single-Leg Standing-Effect of Gender and Anatomic Parameters,” Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 34, No. 7, pp. 895–905, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Elias, J. J., Wilson, D. R., Adamson, R., and Cosgarea, A. J., “Evaluation of a Computational Model used to Predict the Patellofemoral Contact Pressure Distribution,” Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 295–302, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Laporte, S., Skalli, W., De Guise, J., Lavaste, F., and Mitton, D., “A Biplanar Reconstruction Method Based on 2D and 3D Contours: Application to the Distal Femur,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 1–6, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mitton, D., Deschenes, S., Laporte, S., Godbout, B., Bertrand, S., and et al., “3D Reconstruction of the Pelvis from Bi-Planar Radiography,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1–5, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Koh, K., Kim, Y. H., Kim, K., and Park, W. M., “Reconstruction of Patient-Specific Femurs using X-Ray and Sparse CT Images,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, Vol. 41, No. 7, pp. 421–426, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Li, G., Sakamoto, M., and Chao, E., “A Comparison of Different Methods Inpredicting Static Pressure Distribution in Articulating Joints,” Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 635–638, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hsu, R. W. W., Himeno, S., Coventry., M. B., and Chao, E. Y. S., “Normal Axial Alignment of the Lower Extremity and Load-bearing Distribution at The Knee,” The Journal of Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., No. 255, pp. 215–227, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nuño, N. and Ahmed, A. M., “Sagittal Profile of the Femoral Condyles and Its Application to Femorotibial Contact Analysis,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vol. 123, No. 1, pp. 18–26, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Blankevoort, L., Kuiper, J., Huiskes, R., and Grootenboer, H., “Articular Contact in A Three Dimensional Model of The Knee,” Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 24, No. 11, pp. 1019–1031, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Blankevoort, L. and Huiskes, R., “Ligament-bone Interaction in Three-Dimensional Model of The Knee,” J Biomech Eng, Vol. 113, No. 3, pp. 263–269, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Li, G., Park, S. E., DeFrate, L. E., Schutzer, M. E., Ji, L., and et al., “The Cartilage Thickness Distribution in The Tibiofemoral Joint and Its Correlation with Cartilage To Cartilage Contact,” Clinical Biomechanics, Vol. 20, No. 7, pp. 736–744, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. LaPrade, R. F., Engebretsen, A. H., Ly, T.V., Johansen, S., Wentorf, F. A., and Engebretsen, L., “The Anatomy of the Medial Part of the Knee,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Vol. 89, No. 9, pp. 2000–2010, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Li, G., Sakamoto, M., and Chao, E., “A Comparison of Different Methods In predicting Static Pressure Distribution in Articulating Joints,” Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 635–638, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hull, M., Donahue, T., Rashid, M., and Jacobs, C., “A Finite Element Model of the Human Knee Joint for the Study of Tibio-Femoral Contact,” J Biomech Eng, Vol. 124, No. 3, pp. 273–280, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Moglo, K. E. and Shirazi-Adl, A., “On the Coupling between Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligaments, and Knee Joint Response under Anterior Femoral Drawer in Flexion: A Finite Element Study,” Clinical Biomechanics, Vol. 18, No. 8, pp. 751–759, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Peña, E., Calvo, B., Martínez, M. A., and Doblaré, M., “A Threedimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Combined Behavior of Ligaments and Menisci in the Healthy Human Knee Joint,” Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 39, No. 9, pp. 1686–1701, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Li, G., Lopez, O., and Rubash, H., “Variability of a Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model Constructed Using Magnetic Resonance Images of a Knee for Joint Contact Stress Analysis,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vol. 123, No. 4, pp. 341–346, 2001.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoon Hyuk Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Minh, H.L., Park, W.M., Kim, K. et al. A new patient-specific planning method based on joint contact force balance with soft tissue release in total knee arthroplasty. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 14, 2193–2199 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-013-0297-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-013-0297-2

Keywords

Navigation