Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Unraveling free-living marine nematode community structure from a biodiversity-rich tropical coastal setting based on molecular approaches

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Marine Biodiversity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Free-living marine nematodes are ubiquitous in marine benthic ecosystems and play a key role in ecosystem processes. However limited information exists to date on free-living marine nematode community structure and diversity from biodiversity-rich tropical coastal environments. In this study, molecular tools based on the amplification, clone library generation and sequencing of the nematode 18S rRNA marker were employed to study free-living marine nematode community structure from two sites located in the Central West coast of India. Results based on the sequencing of 110 clones showed dominance of Enoplid and Chromadorid-like nematode 18S rRNA sequences, in addition to Monhysterid and Desmodorid-like sequences across study sites. Ptycholaimellus and Tripyloides-like nematode 18S rRNA sequences were abundant in clone libraries from the study sites. Based on morpho-taxonomic analysis, nineteen free-living marine nematode taxa were identified from both the study sites. Many of the identified taxa such as Ptycholaimellus sp., Tripyloides sp., and Terschellingia longicaudata were also detected in clone library sequences indicating that there was congruency between molecular and morphological approaches. At the same time, a sizeable number of sequences showed identity scores of only 87–96 % with published marine nematode 18S rRNA sequences available in databases indicating that the study sites harbour unreported species of marine nematodes. This finding was also supported by the presence of novel sub-clades based on phylogeny and OTU analysis where a sizeable number of singletons were detected. This study highlights the importance of including 18S rRNA marine nematode sequences in published nucleotide databases targeted specifically from biodiversity-rich tropical coastal regions so that it can ultimately improve our understanding of marine nematode community structure and diversity patterns, population genetics and nematode systematics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alongi DM (1987) Inter-estuary variation and intertidal zonation of free-living nematode communities in tropical mangrove systems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 40:103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appeltans W et al. (2012) The magnitude of global marine species diversity. Curr Biol 22:2189–2202

  • Austen MC (2004) Natural nematode communities are useful tools to address ecological and applied questions. Nematol Monogr Perspect 2:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Austen MC, McEvoy AJ (1997) The use of offshore meiobenthic communities in laboratory microcosm experiments: response to heavy metal contamination. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 211:247–261

  • Bhadury P, Annapurna CA (2011) Marine barcoding studies - how will it help Indian marine benthic studies? Indian J Geo-Mar Sci 40:645–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhadury P, Austen MC (2010) Barcoding marine nematodes- an improved set of nematode 18S rRNA primers to overcome eukaryotic co-interference. Hydrobiologia 641:245–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhadury P, Austen MC, Bilton DT, Lambshead PJD, Rogers AD, Smerdon GR (2006) Development and evaluation of a DNA-barcoding approach for the rapid identification of nematodes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 320:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhadury P, Austen MC, Bilton DT, Lambshead PJD, Rogers AD, Smerdon GR (2008) Evaluation of combined morphological and molecular techniques for marine nematode (Terschellingia spp.) identification. Mar Biol 154:509–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bik HM, Lunt DH, Thomas WKT, Lambshead PJD (2010) Low endemism, continued deep-shallow interchanges and evidence for cosmopolitan distributions in free-living marine nematodes (order Enoplida). BMC Evol Biol 10:389

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castresana J (2000) Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 17:540–552

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Commito JA, Tita G (2002) Differential dispersal rates in an intertidal meiofauna assemblage. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 268:237–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coomans A (2002) Present status and future of nematode systematics. Nematology 5:573–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Ley P, De Ley T, Morris K, Abebe E, Mundo-Ocampo M, Yoder M, Heras J, Waumann D, Rocha-Olivares A, Burr AH, Baldwin JG, Thomas WK (2005) An integrated approach to fast and informative morphological vouchering of nematodes for applications in molecular barcoding. Phil Trans R Soc B 360:1945–1958

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derycke S, Backeljau T, Vlaeminck C, Vierstraete A, Vanfleteren J, Vincx M, Moens T (2007) Spatiotemporal analysis of population genetic structure in Geomonhystera disjuncta (Nematoda, Monhysteridae) reveals high levels of molecular diversity. Mar Biol 151:1799–1812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derycke S, Backeljau T, Moens T (2013) Dispersal and gene flow in free-living marine nematodes. Frontiers Zool 10:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deudero S, Vincx M (2000) Sublittoral meiobenthic assemblages from disturbed and non-disturbed sediments in the Balearics. Sci Mar 64:285–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eskin RA, Hopper BE (1985) Population dynamics and description of Ptycholaimellus hibernus n. sp (Nematoda: Chromadoridae). J Nematol 17:38–45

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791

  • Fisher R, Sheaves MJ (2003) Community structure and spatial variability of marine nematodes in tropical Australian pioneer seagrass meadows. Hydrobiologia 495:143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu SJ, Cai LZ, Yang J, Zhou XP, Peng X, Cao J (2012) Spatial and seasonal variations of subtidal free-living marine nematode assemblages in the Northern Beibu Gulf, South China Sea. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 92:255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee MJ, Austen M, De Smet G, Ferraro T, McEvoy A, Moore S, Van Gausbeki D, Vincx M, Warwick RM (1992) Soft sediment meiofauna community responses to environmental pollution gradients in the German Bight and at a drilling site off the Dutch coast. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 91:289–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O (2010) SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol 27:221–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast and accurate method to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52:696–704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heip C, Vincx M, Vranken G (1985) The ecology of marine nematodes. Oceanogr Mar Biol A Rev 23:399–489

  • Meldal BHM, Debenham NJ, De Ley P, De Ley IT, Vanfleteren JR, Vierstraete AR, Bert W, Borgonie G, Moens T, Tyler PA, Austen MC, Blaxter ML, Rogers AD, Lambshead PJD (2007) An improved molecular phylogeny of the Nematoda with special emphasis on marine nematode taxa. Mol Phylogenet Evol 42:622–636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mokievsky V, Azovsky A (2002) Re-evaluation of species diversity patterns of free-living marine nematodes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 238:101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanajkar M, Ingole B (2010) Comparison of tropical nematode communities from the three harbours, west coast of India. Cah Biol Mar 51:9–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Nascimento FJA, Näslund J, Elmgren R (2012) Meiofauna enhances organic matter mineralization in soft sediment ecosystems. Limnol Oceanogr 57:338–346

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parulekar AH (1981) Marine fauna of Malvan, central west coast of India. Mahasagar - Bull Nat Inst Oceanogr NIO 14:33–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira TJ, Fonseca G, Mundo-Ocampo M, Guilherme BC, Rocha-Olivares A (2010) Diversity of free-living marine nematodes (Enoplida) from Baja California assessed by integrative taxonomy. Mar Biol 157:1665–1678

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Platt HM, Warwick RM (1983) Free-living marine nematodes. I. British Enoplids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt HM, Warwick RM (1988) Free-living marine nematodes. II. British Chromadorids. Brill/Backhuys, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Posada D (2008) jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol Evol 25:1253–1256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schloss PD, Handelsman J (2005) Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1501–1506

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schratzberger M, Rees HL, Boyd SE (2000) Effects of simulated deposition of dredged material on structure of nematode assemblages—the role of contamination. Mar Biol 137:613–622

  • Sluka RD (2013) Coastal marine fish biodiversity along the western coast of India. J Threatened Taxa 5:3574–3579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somerfield PJ, Warwick RM, Moens T (2005) Meiofauna techniques. In: Eleftheriou A, McIntyre AD (eds) Methods for the study of marine benthos, 3rd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 229–272

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sukumaran S, Bhokepode K, Telavane M, Kubal P, Gajbhiye SN (2011) Benthic polychaetes in the Ratnagiri bay, India: influence of anthropogenic factors. J Environ Biol 32:719–724

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Punyasloke Bhadury gratefully acknowledge the financial support given by the Earth System Science Organization, Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India to conduct this research.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Amit Kumar

    Present address: Functional and Evolutionary Ecology Laboratory, Stazione Zoologica ‘Anton Dohrn’, Villa Dohrn, Ischia, 80077, Naples, Italy

  2. Diya Sen

    Present address: Molecular and Human Genetics Division, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, 700032, India

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Integrative Taxonomy and Microbial Ecology Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research-Kolkata, Mohanpur Campus, Nadia, West Bengal, India

    Amit Kumar, Diya Sen & Punyasloke Bhadury

Authors
  1. Amit Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Diya Sen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Punyasloke Bhadury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Punyasloke Bhadury.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, A., Sen, D. & Bhadury, P. Unraveling free-living marine nematode community structure from a biodiversity-rich tropical coastal setting based on molecular approaches. Mar Biodiv 45, 537–547 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-014-0234-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-014-0234-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation