Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of soil liquefaction beneath the National Capital Region of Delhi: implications for earthquake-resilient structures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Delhi is the capital of India and is located in seismic zone IV as per the Indian Standards which could generate an intensity of ground motion up to VIII on the MMI scale. Concerning the fast-growing population and its demand for an easy life and livelihood, infrastructure is expanding very fast in the National Capital Region (NCR) of Delhi constructing low-rise to medium-rise buildings to skyscrapers with or without building bylaws resulting in uncountable loss of lives and socio-economic losses when a catastrophic earthquake struck. Failure of subsurface soil columns due to liquefaction is the most common phenomenon after and during an earthquake resulting in foundation failure and tilting of the structures, and huge damages occurred. About 75% of the total area of NCR Delhi is falling under water-saturated and very loose alluvium deposits located under seismic intensity VIII on the MMI scale. Therefore, a detailed liquefaction study of the in situ Yamuna River soils is conducted by laboratory analysis to countermeasure the liquefaction potential hazard of the NCR of Delhi. Here, an attempt has been made to measure the soil liquefaction characteristics of the Yamuna River soil (YRS) of the National Capital Region of Delhi using state-of-the-art cyclic triaxial testing (CTT). In this study, a total 4 undisturbed samples (UDS 3, UDS 4, UDS 5, and UDS 9) are collected from the different depths from three different boreholes (BH 4, BH 9, and BH 13) along the flood plain of YRS in the north-eastern part of Delhi. Each UD sampler is 0.45 m in length and is collected from the respective boreholes as per the available Indian Standard Code under the project of seismic microzonation of NCT Delhi. UDSs 5 and 9 are collected from the same borehole BH 13 at different depths below ground level. The sieve analysis shows that UDS 3, UDS 4, UDS 5, and UDS 9 are ML, SM, SW-SM, and ML that are depths ranging between 9.0–9.45 m; 12.0–12.45 m; 15.0–15.45 m, and 27.0–27.45 m respectively. The excess pore water pressure, axial strain, deviator stress, and double-amplitude axial strain (DA) are obtained through stress-controlled and strain-controlled CTT measurements. The stress-controlled CTT is applied for UDS 3 and UDS 4 and strain-controlled CTT is applied for UDS 5 & UDS 9 at given confining pressure of 106 kPa and frequency at 1 Hz yielded the value of excess pore water pressure ratio. It is noted that the double-amplitude (DA) axial strain at 5–6% can liquefy the soils at a higher number of cyclic loading (~ 140th cycles) for cyclic stress ratio (CSR) lying between 0.1 and 0.2 of YRS. It is also observed that the same samples of SM and ML can get liquefied at 15th cycles of loadings with CSR values of about 0.3 and 0.27, respectively, which is equivalent to an earthquake loading of moment magnitude (Mw7.5) of the Yamuna River soil (YRS). The hysteresis curves yielded by the strain-control show that damping is increasing from low to high strain measure of YRS. Therefore, site-specific soil laboratory analysis for laboratory measurements is important to anticipate the area of liquefiable hazard areas along the flood plain of the Yamuna River of Delhi to prepare earthquake-resilient structures of the NCR of Delhi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afacan KB (2019) Estimation of pore water pressure generation and nonlinear site response of liquefied areas. Book Chapter of Geotechnical engineering - advance on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, pp 121–142, Edited by Sayed Hemeda and Mehmet Bans Can Ulker. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88682

  • Alimohammadi H, Amirmojahedi M, Tahat JN (2022) A case history of the application of the deep compaction method with comparison to different ground improvement techniques. Transp Infrastruct Geotechnol (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-022-00229-3

  • Alimohammadi H, Tahat JN (2022) A case study experimental pile load testing (PLT) for evaluation of driven pile behaviors. Arab J Geosci 15(884). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10176-5

  • Al—Omari RR, Shafiqu QSM, Al-Sammaraey MM (2018) Liquefiable sand behavior under different applied cyclic strain amplitude in the cyclic triaxial test. Int J Civil Engg Tech 9:1290–1297

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM Standard: D 5311–92 (2004) Standard test method for load controlled cyclic triaxial strength of soil. ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, Pa, 19428–2959, USA, 2004.

  • ASTM Designation: D 3999–91 (n.d.) Standard test methods for the determination of the modulus and damping properties of soils using the cyclic triaxial apparatus, Annual Book of ASTM standards, Vol. 04.08

  • Atukorala U, Wijewickreme D, Mccammon N (2000) Some observations related to liquefaction susceptibility of silty soils. Proc 12th World Conf Earthq Eng. Pp1–8, Auckland, New Zealand, Bildri o.1324

  • Banerjee, P. K and Yousif, N. B. (1986). A plasticity model for the mechanical behaviour of anisotropically consolidated clay

  • Bhattacharya S (2007) Design and foundations in seismic areas: principles and applications. National information center of Earthq. Eng. IIT, Kanpur, India, pp.477

  • Boulanger RW, Seed RB, Chan CK (1991) Effects of initial static driving shear stress on the liquefaction behavior of saturated cohesionless soils. Rep. No. UCB/GT/91–01, University of California, Berkeley

  • Brennan AJ, Thusyanthan NI, Madabhushi SP (2005) Evaluation of shear modulus and damping in dynamic centrifuge tests. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 131(12):1488–1497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chattaraj R, Sengupta A (2016) Liquefaction potential and strain-dependent dynamic properties of Kasai river sand. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 90:467–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro G (1975) Liquefaction and cyclic mobility of saturated sand. J Geotech Eng ASCE 113(8):827–845

    Google Scholar 

  • Das BM, Puri VK, Prakash S (1999) Liquefaction of silty soils. Proc 2nd Int Conf Earthq Geotech Eng; 1999; Balkema, Rotterdam. pp. 619–623

  • Dammala PK, Kumar SS, Krishna AM, Bhattacharya S (2019) Dynamic soil properties and liquefaction potential of northeast Indian soil for non-linear effective stress analysis. Bull Earthq Eng 17(6):2899–2933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delhi-microzonation report (2016) Seismic microzonation study of National Capital Territory of Delhi, India on 1:10,000scale.p446

  • Dobry R (1985) Liquefaction of soils during earthquakes, Committee on Earthquake Engineering, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C

  • Dobry R, Ladd RS, Yokel FY, Chung RM, Powell D (1982) Prediction of pore water pressure buildup and liquefaction of sand during earthquakes by Cyclic strain method. Natl Bur Stand Build Sci Ser 138, Washington, p 154

  • Erten D, Maher MH (1995) Cyclic undrained behavior of silty sand. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 14(2):115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans MD, Zhou S (1995) Liquefaction behavior of sand-gravel composites. J Geotech Eng 121(3):287–298

  • Govindaraju L (2005) Ph.D. thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore

  • Güler E, Savaş H, Afacan KB (2021) Effect of permeability on liquefaction potential of silty sands. Arab J Geosci 14:1410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07822-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde AFL, Higuchi T, Yasuhara K (2006) Liquefaction, cyclic mobility, and failure of silt. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 132(6):716–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara K (1996) Soil behavior in earthquake geotechnics. Oxford Science publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara K (2008) Flow slides of underwater sand deposits in Jamuna River bed. In: Geotechnical engineering for disaster mitigation and rehabilitation. Science/Springer, Beijing/Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 3–34

  • IS 1893 Part (1) (2016) Guidelines for earthquake resistance design structure, Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhawan, New Delhi

  • Ishihara K (1993) Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. Geotechnique 43(3):351–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2004) Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering and the 3rd International Conference of Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Berkeley, USA (2004) 32–56

  • Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2008) Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Monograph MNO-12,Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA, pp 261 

  • Jakka RS, Rammana GV, Datta M (2010) Shear behavior of loose and compacted pond ash. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30:580–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies M, Been K (2016) Soil liquefaction. CRC Press, London. https://doi.org/10.1201/b19114

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kiku H, Yoshida, N (2000) Dynamic deformation property tests at large strains. 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, January 30–February 4, Auckland, New Zealand

  • Kirar B, Maheshwari BK (2013) Effect of silt content on dynamic properties of Solani Sand, 7th Internatioal Conference on case history in Geotechnical Engineering, Chicago, USA

  • Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (NJ)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar SS, Dey A, Krishna AM (2018) Importance of site-specific dynamic soil properties for seismic ground response studies. Int J Geotech Earthq Eng 9(1):78–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar SS, Krishna AM, Dey A (2017) Evaluation of dynamic Properties of sandy soil at high cyclic strains. Soil Dyn Earthq Engg 99:157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar SS, Muralikrishna A, Dey A (2020) Assessment of dynamic response of cohesionless soil using strain-controlled and stress-controlled cyclic triaxial tests. Geotech Geol Eng 38:1431–1450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd RS, Dobry R, Dutko, Yokel FY, Chung RM (1989) Pore water pressure buildup in clean sands because of cyclic straining. Geotech Test J 12(1):27–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee KL, Seed HB (1967) Cyclic stress conditions cause the liquefaction of sand. J Soil Mech Found Eng ASCE 93(1):47–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KL, Albaisa A (1974) Earthquake-induced settlements in saturated sand. J Geotech Eng ASCE 100(GT4):387–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi D, Bhattacharya S, Hyodo M, Kaneko T (2014) Undrain behavior of two silica grains of sand and practical implications for modeling SSI in liquefiable soils. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 66:293–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheshwari BK, Kale SS, Kaynia AM (2012) Dynamic properties of Solani sand at large strains-a parametric study. Int J Geotech Eng 6:353–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mase LZ, Likitlersuang S, Tobita T (2019) Cyclic behavior and liquefaction resistance of Izumio sands in Osaka, Japan. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 37(7):765–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matasovic N, Vucetic M (1993) Cyclic characterization of liquefaction sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 119(11):1805–1822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal HS, Khan PK, Shukla AK (2014) Soil responses of Delhi ridge and adjacent regions in greater Delhi during the incidence of a local earthquake. Nat Hazards 70:93–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal HS (2020) A new insight of liquefaction of Yamuna soils, Delhi, India. J Soil Dyn Earthq Eng (Under Review)

  • Mandal HS, Khan PK, Shukla AK (2013a) Shear wave attenuation characteristics of central India tectonic zones and its surroundings. J Asian Earth Sci (71):440–451

  • Mandal HS, Shukla AK, Ghatak M, Ranjan R, Mishra OP (2013b) Past and present seismic intensity scenario of Guwahati city, Assam northeast India. J South Asian Disaster Stud pp 77–89

  • Mandal HS, Shukla AK, Khan PK, Mishra OP (2013c) A new insight into probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of Central India. 170(12):2139–2161

  • Mashiri MS (2014) Monotonic and cyclic behaviour of sand-tyre chip (STCh) mixtures, School of Civil, Mining and Environmental Engineering, University of Wollongong, Dissertation/Thesis

  • Delhi_ Microzonation_Report.pdf (2016) A report on seismic hazard microzonation NCT Delhi on 1:10K scale. https://www.moes.gov.in/writereaddata/files/Delhi_Microzonation_report.pdf_pg.414

  • Mishra OP (2020) Seismic microzonation study of South Asian cities and its implications to urban risk resiliency under climate change scenario. Inter J Geosci (IJG) 11(4), https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2020.114012

  • Mishra OP, Priya Singh B, Ram SK, Gera OP, Singh KK, Mukherjee GK, Chakrabortty SVN, Chandrasekhar A, Selinraj SKS (2020) Seismic site specific study for seismic microzonation: a way forward for risk resiliency of vital infrastructure in Sikkim, India. Inter J Geosci (IJG) 11(3):125–144. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2020.113008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty WK, Singh SK, Nath SK, Pal I (2006) First-order seismic microzonation of Delhi, India using geographical information system (GIS). Nat Hazards 40(2):245–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck RB (1979) Liquefaction potential: science versus practice. J Geotech Eng ASCE 105(5):553–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Pervez IA, Vaccari F, Panza GF (2004) Site-specific microzonation study in Delhi metropolitan city by 2D modeling of SH & P-SV waves. Pure Appl Geophys 161:1165–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao K, Satyam D (2007) Liquefaction studies for seismic microzonation of Delhi region. Curr Sci 92(5):646–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravishankar BV, Sitharam TG, Govindaraju L(2005) Dynamic properties of Ahmedabad sands at large strains. In: ProIndian Geotech ConfAhmedabad India 369–372

  • Ravishankar B (2006) Cyclic and monotonic undrained behavior of sandy soils, Ph, D, Thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore

  • Satvati S, Alimohammadi H, Rowshanzamir H, Hejari SM (2020) Bearing capacity of shallow footings reinforced with braid and geogrid adjacent to soil slope. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 6:41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-020-00226-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1981) Evaluation of liquefaction potential of sand deposits based on observations of performance in previous earthquakes. Preprint 81 544, Session on In Situ Testing to Evaluate Liquefaction Susceptibility, ASCE National Convention, St. Louis, MO, October

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1982) Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Earthq Eng Res Inst Monogr

  • Seed HB, Lee KL (2002) Liquefaction of saturated sand during cyclic loading. Proc ASCE SM6 92:105–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 97(9):1249–1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB (1968) Design problem in soil liquefaction. J Geotech EngASCE 113(8):827–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Peacock WH (1971) Test procedures for measuring soil liquefaction characteristics. J Soil Mech Found ASCE 101(6):551–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Lee KL (1966) Liquefaction of saturated sands during cyclic loading. J Soil Mech Found ASCE 92(6):105–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Wong RT, Idriss IM, Tokimatsu K (1986) Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analysis of cohesionless soils. J Geotech Eng 112(11):1016–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma B, Prasanta C, Sharma V, Kumar V, Mandal HS, Mishra OP (2017) Characteristic ground motions of the 25th April Nepal earthquake(Mw 7.9) and its implications for the structural design codes for border areas of India to Nepal. J Asian Earth Sci 133:12–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla AK, Prakash R, Singh D, Singh RK, Pandey AP, Mandal HS, Nayal BMS (2001) Seismic microzonation of NCT Delhi. Proc Work Microzonation Indian Inst Sci Bengaluru. Pp.39–43

  • Singh S (1994) Liquefaction characteristics of silts. Special Geotechnical Publication. 44. ASCE; 1994

  • Sitharam TG, Ravishankar BV, Patil SM (2012) Liquefaction and pore pressure generation in the sand. Cyclic strain controlled triaxial tests. In J Geotech Earthq Eng 3(1):57–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teachavorasinskun S, Thongchim P, Lukkunaprasit P (2002) Shear modulus and damping of soft Bangkok clays. Can Geotech J 39:1201–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoithoi L, Dubey CS, Ningthoujam PS (2016) Liquefaction potential evaluation for subsurface soil layers of Delhi region. J Geol Soc India 88:147–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsukamoto Y, Kawabe S, Matsumoto J, Hagiwara S (2014) Cyclic resistance of two unsaturated silty grains of sand against soil liquefaction. Soils Found 54(6):1094–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ural N, Gunduz Z (2014) The behavior of nonplastic silty soils under cyclic loading. Sci World J. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/635763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vucetic M, Dobry R (1988) Cyclic triaxial strain controlled testing of liquefiable sands. In: Donaghe R.T, Chaney, R.C., Silver, M.L,(eds). Advanced triaxial testing and rock. ASTM, West Conshohocken, P475–480

  • Vucetic M, Dobry R (1991) Effect of Soil Plasticity on Cyclic Response. J Geotech Eng 117(1):89–107

  • Wang Y, Wang Y-L (2017) Liquefaction characteristics of gravelly soil under cyclic loading with constant strain amplitude by experimental and numerical investigations. Soil Dyn Erthq Eng 92:388–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Kammerer AM, Riemer MF, Seed RB, Pestana JM (2004) Laboratory study of liquefaction triggering criteria. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C, Canada, Aug.1–6, 2004 paper no. 2580

  • Yang S-Q, Yang J, Xu P (2020) Analysis of pre-peak deformation and energy dissipation characteristics of sandstone under triaxial cyclic loading. Geomech Geophys Geo-energy Geo Resour 6(1)

  • Yilmaz MT, Pekcan O, Bakir BS (2004) Undrained cyclic shear and deformation behavior of a silt-clay mixture of Adapazari, Turkey. Soil DynEarthq Eng 24:497–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youd TL, Idriss IM, Andrus RD, Arango I, Castro G, Christain JT, Dobry R, Finn WDL, Harder LF Jr, Hynes ME, Ishihara K, Koester JP, Lio SSC, Marcuson WF III, Martin GR, Mitchell JK, Moriwaki Y, Power MS, Robertson PK, Seed RB, Stokoe KHII (2001) Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127:817–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng J, He H, Alimohammadi H (2021) Three-dimensional Wadell roundness for particle angularity characterization of granular soils. Acta Geotech 16:133–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-01004-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank Dr. M. Ravichandran, Secretary, Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES), Government of India, for his encouragement to work on the leading edge of societal benefit. Thanks to colleagues of the National Center for Seismology (NCS) for stimulating discussions during the preparation of this research paper. Our thanks to all the authors of the Report on Seismic Microzonation of NCT-Delhi of NCS-MoES; the report is now available in the public domain. Our special thanks to the Chief Editor of this Journal and the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions who have reviewed this manuscript critically and suggested many valuable comments resulting in this revised version of this manuscript being improved a lot.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Himangshu Sekhar Mandal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Longjun Dong

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mandal, H.S., Mishra, O.P. Assessment of soil liquefaction beneath the National Capital Region of Delhi: implications for earthquake-resilient structures. Arab J Geosci 16, 437 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-023-11529-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-023-11529-4

Keywords

Navigation