Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial assessment of the potential of groundwater quality using fuzzy AHP in GIS

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, fuzzy AHP method is used for extracting the water quality indicators based on the Schuler standard and World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines during a 20-year period. For this purpose, the best fit of the zoning model was performed. Furthermore, by comparing the standard errors, the continuous Raster layer was extracted from the important parameters used in generating the qualitative potential assessment index. The classified layer was generated by integrating continuous layers in the GIS environment and with the use of Python programming. The similarity of the outputs of both methods indicates the presence of large sections of aquifers in the middle and southwestern regions of Iran in the “temporarily drinkable” and “bad” classes. The calculations showed that the majority of aquifers that were located in the “inappropriate” class during the first 10 years fell to less valuable class types. Based on the results of the model, there is a direct correlation between the drop in water resources and the decline in the quality indices. In addition, in the Urmia and Bushehr coastal aquifers, due to excessive water withdrawal and salty water penetration, the quality of the table water is in critical condition. Based on the results of the research, the aquifers in the range of Zagros and Alborz mountains show the least change in water quality. The reason for this is the depth of the aquifer and the ability to recharge it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amineh ZBA, Hashemian SJA-D, Magholi A (2017) Integrating spatial multi criteria decision making (SMCDM) with geographic information systems (GIS) for delineation of the most suitable areas for aquifer storage and recovery (ASR). J Hydrol 551:577–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee P, Singh V, Chatttopadhyay K, Chandra P, Singh B (2011) Artificial neural network model as a potential alternative for groundwater salinity forecasting. J Hydrol 398:212–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertolini M, Braglia M, Carmignani G (2006) Application of the AHP methodology in making a proposal for a public work contract. Int J Proj Manag 24:422–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard F, Hamawand I (2017) Selective electrodialysis for copper removal from brackish water and coal seam gas water. Int J Environ Res 11:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann E, Pruitt T, Clark MP, Brekke L, Arnold JR, Raff DA, Rasmussen RM (2014) An intercomparison of statistical downscaling methods used for water resource assessments in the United States. Water Resour Res 50:7167–7186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini-Moghari S-M, Ebrahimi K, Azarnivand A (2015) Groundwater quality assessment with respect to fuzzy water quality index (FWQI): an application of expert systems in environmental monitoring. Environ Earth Sci 74:7229–7238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalalkamali A, Moradi M, Moradi N (2015) Application of several artificial intelligence models and ARIMAX model for forecasting drought using the standardized precipitation index. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:1201–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaliraj S, Chandrasekar N, Magesh N (2014) Identification of potential groundwater recharge zones in Vaigai upper basin, Tamil Nadu, using GIS-based analytical hierarchical process (AHP) technique. Arab J Geosci 7:1385–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavurmaci M, Üstün AK (2016) Assessment of groundwater quality using DEA and AHP: a case study in the Sereflikochisar region in Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 188:258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Shi Z-H, Yin W, Zhu D, Ng SL, Cai C-F, Lei A-L (2009) A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to eco-environmental vulnerability assessment for the Danjiangkou reservoir area, China. Ecol Model 220:3439–3447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • María J, Jiménez M, Joven JA, Pirla AR, Lanuza AT (2005) A spreadsheet module for consistent consensus building in AHP-group decision making. Group Decis Negot 14:89–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadiri AA, Gharekhani M, Khatibi R, Moghaddam AA (2017) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability using supervised committee to combine fuzzy logic models. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:8562–8577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naghadehi MZ, Mikaeil R, Ataei M (2009) The application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to selection of optimum underground mining method for Jajarm Bauxite Mine, Iran. Expert Syst Appl 36:8218–8226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngai E (2003) Selection of web sites for online advertising using the AHP. Inf Manag 40:233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobre R, Rotunno Filho O, Mansur W, Nobre M, Cosenza C (2007) Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping using GIS, modeling and a fuzzy logic tool. J Contam Hydrol 94:277–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panagopoulos GP, Bathrellos GD, Skilodimou HD, Martsouka FA (2012) Mapping urban water demands using multi-criteria analysis and GIS. Water Resour Manag 26:1347–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahmati O, Samani AN, Mahdavi M, Pourghasemi HR, Zeinivand H (2015) Groundwater potential mapping at Kurdistan region of Iran using analytic hierarchy process and GIS. Arab J Geosci 8:7059–7071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razandi Y, Pourghasemi HR, Neisani NS, Rahmati O (2015) Application of analytical hierarchy process, frequency ratio, and certainty factor models for groundwater potential mapping using GIS. Earth Sci Inf 8:867–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. MacGraw-Hill, New York International Book Company, New York, p 287

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1994) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24:19–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supreetha B, Nayak PK, Shenoy NK (2015) Groundwater level prediction using hybrid artificial neural network with genetic algorithm. Int J Earth Sci Eng 8:2609–2615

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Laarhoven P, Pedrycz W (1983) A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 11:229–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Tarabees E (2011) Integrated evaluation of urban development suitability based on remote sensing and GIS techniques: contribution from the analytic hierarchy process. Arab J Geosci 4:463–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Azhdary Moghaddam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azimi, S., Azhdary Moghaddam, M. & Hashemi Monfared, S.A. Spatial assessment of the potential of groundwater quality using fuzzy AHP in GIS. Arab J Geosci 11, 142 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3484-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3484-8

Keywords