Skip to main content
Log in

Processing of earthquake catalog data of Western Turkey with artificial neural networks and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Turkey is one of several countries frequently facing significant earthquakes because of its geological and tectonic position on earth. Especially, graben systems of Western Turkey occur as a result of seismically quite active tensional tectonics. The prediction of earthquakes has been one of the most important subjects concerning scientists for a long time. Although different methods have already been developed for this task, there is currently no reliable technique for finding the exact time and location of an earthquake epicenter. Recently artificial intelligence (AI) methods have been used for earthquake studies in addition to their successful application in a broad spectrum of data intensive applications from stock market prediction to process control. In this study, earthquake data from one part of Western Turkey (37–39.30° N latitude and 26°–29.30° E longitude) were obtained from 1975 to 2009 with a magnitude greater than M ≥ 3. To test the performance of AI in time series, the monthly earthquake frequencies of Western Turkey were calculated using catalog data from the region and then the obtained data set was evaluated with two neural networks namely as the multilayer perceptron neural networks (MLPNNs) and radial basis function neural networks (RBFNNs) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). The results show that for monthly earthquake frequency data prediction, the proposed RBFNN provides higher correlation coefficients with real data and smaller error values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexandridis A, Chondrodima E, Efthimiou E, Papadakis G, Vallianatos F, Triantis D (2014) Large earthquake occurrence estimation based on radial basis function neural networks. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 52(9)

  • Alptekin O, Ilkışık M, Ezen U, Uçer SB (1990) Heat flow, seismicity and the crustal structure of western Anatolia. In: Savascin MY & Eronat AH (eds) Proc. Internat. Earth Sc. Congr. on Aegean Regions, Izmir/Turkey, v.II. p. 1–12

  • Alves EI (2006) Earthquake forecasting using neural networks: results and future work. Nonlinear Dynamics 44:341–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodri B (2001) A neural network model for earthquake occurrence. J Geodyn 32:289–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buscema PM, Massini G, Maurelli G (2015) Artificial adaptive systems to predict the magnitude of earthquakes. Boll Geofis Teor Appl 56(n. 2):227–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Ham MF, Kostanic I (2000) Principles of neurocomputing for science & engineering. McGraw-Hill

  • Haykin S (1999) Neural network: a comprehensive foundation. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang JS R (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern 23(3)

  • Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute Database, http://www.koeri.boun.edu.tr, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul

  • Koçyiğit A, Yusufoğlu H, Bozkurt E (1999) Evidence from the Gediz graben for episodic two-stage extension in western Turkey. J Geol Soc Lond 156:605–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Külahçı F, İnceöz M, Doğru M, Aksoy E, Baykara O (2009) Artificial neural networks model for earthquake prediction with radon monitoring. Appl Radiat Isot 67(1):212–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales-Esteban A, Martinez-Alvarez F, Reyes J (2013) Earthquake prediction in seismogenic areas of the Iberian Peninsula based on computational intelligence. Tectonophysics 593:121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiang L (2000) The application of neural network to the analysis of earthquake precursor chaotic time series. Acta Seismol Sin 13(4):434–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency Database, http://www.deprem.gov.tr, Ankara

  • Reyes J, Morales-Esteban A, Martinez-Alvarez F (2013) Neural networks to predict earthquakes in Chile. Appl Soft Comput 13:1314–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royden L (1993a) The tectonic of slab pull at continental convergent boundaries. Tectonics 12:303–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royden L (1993b) Evolution of retreating subduction boundaries formed during continenta collision. Tectonics 12:629–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayıl N, Osmanşahin I (2008) An investigation of seismicity for Western Anatolia. Nat Hazards 44:51–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sri Lakshmi S, Tiwari RK (2009) Model dissection from earthquake time series: a comparative analysis using modern non-linear forecasting and artificial neural network approaches. Comput Geosci 35:191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang FWM, Wang Y, Shen Z-K (2015) Earthquake potential of the Sichuan-Yunnan region, western China. J Asian Earth Sci 107:232–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yıldırım E, Gülbağ A, Horasan G, Doğan E (2011) Discrimination of quarry blasts and earthquakes in the vicinity of Istanbul using soft computing techniques. Comput Geosci 37:1209–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakeri N S S, Pashazadeh S (2015) Application of neural network based on genetic algorithm in predicting magnitude of earthquake in North Tabriz Fault (NW Iran). Res Commun 109(9)

  • Zamani A, Sorbi MR, Safavi AA (2013) Application of neural network and ANFIS model for earthquake occurrence in Iran. Earth Sci Inf. doi:10.1007/s12145-013-0112-8

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilknur Kaftan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaftan, I., Şalk, M. & Şenol, Y. Processing of earthquake catalog data of Western Turkey with artificial neural networks and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Arab J Geosci 10, 243 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-3021-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-3021-1

Keywords

Navigation