Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inventory and Quantification of Geosites in the State Tourist Park of Alto Ribeira (PETAR, São Paulo State, Brazil)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Geoheritage Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The territory of Brazil has a high potential for the development of geotourism, due to its natural and cultural diversity. The State Tourist Park of Alto Ribeira (PETAR) is one of the oldest protected areas in the State of São Paulo, created in 1958. The importance of the area is the result of the association between the Atlantic Rainforest with an exceptional biodiversity and karst and caves systems with a unique underground scenario. The area presents distinct tectonic environments that represent the Precambrian geological evolution of south-southeastern Brazil. The karst and caves of the PETAR were already recorded and described as an important national area to the speleological, geological, and paleontological interest, as also classified as UNESCO’s Natural Heritage and included in a proposal to the creation of a Geopark. In the present work, there were inventoried and quantified 19 geosites in the region of PETAR, most of them with speleological interest. The inventory was conducted using the following criteria: representativeness, integrity, accessibility, and scientific and esthetic value. The quantification of geosites was based on four categories of values: intrinsic value, scientific value, tourism value, and value of management. Finally, the relevance of each geosite was calculated, evidencing one geosite with international (Santana cave) and other 12 with national relevance. The conclusions raise the necessity of planning and implementing management procedures to increase the conservation and sustainable use of the analyzed geosites, despite that they are located in a natural protected area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almeida FFM (1977) O Cráton do São Francisco. Revista Brasileira de Geociências 7:349–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borsanelli FA, Lobo HAS (2015) Impactos causados à comunidade local com o fechamento das cavernas turísticas do PETAR em 2008 na visão dos stakeholders envolvidos. Anais do 33° CBE. Campinas:719–727

  • Brasil (2000) Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação – SNUC. Congresso Nacional, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazilian Geological Survey (CPRM) (2018) Sistema de cadastro e quantificação de geossítios e sítios da geodiversidade. CPRM. https://www.cprm.gov.br/geossit/. Accessed 10 August 2018

  • Brilha J (2005) Patrimônio geológico e geoconservação: a conservação da natureza na sua vertente geológica. Palimage Editores, Viseu

    Google Scholar 

  • Brilha J (2016) Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: a review. Geoheritage 8:119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campanha GAC, Basei MAS, Faleiros FM, Nutman AP (2016) The Mesoproterozoic to Early Neoproterozoic passive margin Lajeado Group and Apiaí Gabbro, southeastern Brazil. Geosci Front 7:683–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigna AA, Burri E (2000) Development, management and economy of show caves. Int J Speleol 29:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz FW, Burns SJ, Karmann I, Sharp WD, Vuille M, Cardoso AO, Ferrari JA, Silva Dias PL, Viana O Jr (2005) Insolation-driven changes in atmospheric circulation over the past 116 ky in subtropical Brazil. Nature 434:63–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling RK (2011) Geotourism’s global growth. Geoheritage 3:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faleiros FM, Campanha GAC (2004) Petrografia e microestruturasde tectonitos da Zona de Cisalhamento Ribeira, Vale do Ribeira, SP e PR: implicações no zoneamento metamórfico e estrutural do Supergrupo Açungui e unidades correlatas. Revista Brasileira de Geociências 34:419–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fundação Florestal, Ekos Brasil (2010) Plano de manejo espelológico do Parque Estadual Turístico do Alto Ribeira. Secretaria do Meio Ambiente, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Forti P, Galli E, Rossi A (2000) New rare cave minerals from the Perolas-Santana karst system (São Paulo State, Brazil). Int J Speleol 29:127–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Cortéz A, Carcavilla-Urquí L (2009) Documento metodológico para la elaboración del inventario español de lugares de interés geológico (IELIG). Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia MGM, Brilha J, de Lima FF et al (2017) The inventory of geological heritage of the State of São Paulo, Brazil: methodological basis, results and perspectives. Geoheritage 10:239–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillieson D (2011) Management of caves. In: Van Beynen P (ed) Karst and cave management, springer, pp141–158

  • Grandgirard V (1999) Switzerland - the inventory of geotopes of national significance. In: Vallejo M, Gallego E (eds) Barettino D. Towards the balanced management and conservation of the geological heritage in the new millennium, Sociedad Geológica de España, pp 234–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray M (2004) Geodiversity: valuing and conserving abiotic nature. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasui Y, Carneiro CDR, Coimbra AM (1975) The Ribeira folded belt. Revista Brasileira de Geociências 15:257–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques MH, Reis RP, Brilha J, Mota T (2011) Geoconservation as an emerging geoscience. Geoheritage 3:117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmann I (1994) Evolução e dinâmica atual do sistema cárstico do alto Vale do Rio Ribeira de Iguape, sudeste do Estado de São Paulo. Universidade de São Paulo, Thesis

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karmann I, Ferrari JA (2002) Carste e Cavernas do Parque Estadual Turístico do Alto Ribeira (PETAR), SP – Sistemas de cavernas com paisagens subterrâneas únicas. In: Schobbenhaus C, Campos DA, Queiroz ET, Berbert-Born M (eds) Sítios geológicos e paleontológicos do Brasil. DNPM/CPRM, pp 401–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Labegalini JA, Auler AS (1997) Caverna Santana, Brazil. In: Hill CA, Forti P (eds) Cave minerals of the world. National Speleological Society, pp 340–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima FF (2008) Proposta metodológica para a inventariação do patrimônio geológico brasileiro. Universidade do Minho, Thesis

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima FF, Brilha JB, Salamuni E (2010) Inventorying geological heritage in large territories: a methodological proposal applied to Brazil. Geoheritage 2:91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobo HAS (2015) Tourist carrying capacity of Santana cave (PETAR-SP, Brazil): a new method based on a critical atmospheric parameter. Tour Manag Perspect 16:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobo HAS (2017) Entre 117 e 1344: qual o limite diário recomendável para a visitação da caverna Santana (PETAR-SP)? Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo 10:645–669

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansur KL, Rocha AJD, Pedreira A et al (2013) Iniciativas Institucionais de valorização do patrimônio geológico no Brasil. Boletim Paranaense de Geociências 70:2–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreira JC (2008) Patrimônio Geológico em Unidades de Conservação: atividades interpretativas, educativas e geoturísticas. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Thesis

    Google Scholar 

  • Nascimento MAL, Ruchkys ÚA, Mantesso Neto V (2008) Geodiversidade, Geoconservação e Geoturismo: trinômio importante para a proteção do patrimônio geológico. Sociedade Brasileira de Geologia, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira RGFA (2010) Geoconservação e desenvolvimento sustentável na Chapada Diamantina (Bahia–Brasil). Universidade do Minho, Thesis

    Google Scholar 

  • Pnud – Programa das Nações Unidas para o Desenvolvimento (2010). Índice de desenvolvimento humano. IBGE. https://cidades.ibge.gov.br. Accessed 5 march 2018

  • Ruchkys UA (2007) Patrimônio geológico e geoconservação no Quadrilátero Ferrífero, Minas Gerais: potencial para a criação de um geoparque da UNESCO. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Thesis

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruchkys UA, Machado MMM (2013) Patrimônio geológico e mineiro do Quadrilátero Ferrífero, Minas Gerais – Caracterização e iniciativas de uso para educação e geoturismo. Boletim Paranaense de Geociências 70:120–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos P, Brilha J (2016) Base studies for the promotion of a highquality geotourism in the Tourist State Park of Alto Ribeira (Brazil). Proceedings of 7th International Conference on UNESCO Global Geoparks, Torquay, pp 241

  • Schobbenhaus C (2006) Projeto Geoparques: proposta de projeto. CPRM. http://www.cprm.gov.br/publique/cgi/cgilua.exe/sys/start.htm?sid=134. Accessed 2 June 2014

  • Schobbenhaus C, Silva CR (2012) Geoparques do Brasil: propostas. CPRM, Brasília

  • Sharples C (2002) Concepts and principles of geoconservation. Tasmanian Parks & Wildlife Service, Tasmania

  • SBE – Sociedade Brasileira de Espeleologia (2018) Cadastro Nacional de Cavernas. SBE. http://www.cavernas.org.br Accessed in 5 December 2017

  • Theodorovicz A (2014) Geoparque Alto Vale do Ribeira: proposta. CPRM, Brasília

  • Uceda AC (2000) - Patrimonio geológico; diagnóstico, clasificación y valoración. Jornadas Sobre Património Geológico y Desarrollo Sostenible, Soria, pp. 23–37

  • Unesco (1999) Atlantic forest south-east reserves. Unesco. http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/893. Accessed 15 February 2018

  • Wall G, Mathieson A (2006) Tourism: change, impacts, and opportunities. Pearson Education, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimbledon WAP (1996) Geosites – a new IUGS initiative. Episodes 19:87–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimbledon WAP (2011) Geosites – a mechanism for protection, integrating national and international valuation of heritage sites. Geologia dell’Ambiente 2:13–25

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research that initially generated the data from this article was supported by the State University of São Paulo (Universidade Estadual Paulista—Unesp) and was funded by CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Coordination for Enhancement of Higher Education Personnel). Additional researches were made with support and funding of CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico—National Council for Scientific and Technological Development).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heros Augusto Santos Lobo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferreira, A.R.R., Lobo, H.A.S. & de Jesus Perinotto, J.A. Inventory and Quantification of Geosites in the State Tourist Park of Alto Ribeira (PETAR, São Paulo State, Brazil). Geoheritage 11, 783–792 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-018-0331-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-018-0331-y

Keywords

Navigation