Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Traditional Breeding in Sugar Beet

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With rapidly changing agricultural practices, target environments, and biotic and abiotic stresses, plant breeders face the task of continually selecting plants with desirable traits with the goal to assemble advantageous combinations of genes in new varieties. Sugar beet has been selectively bred since the early nineteenth century with the principle objective to develop varieties with the maximum root and sucrose yield potential at the lowest economic and environmental costs possible. Historically, the most productive developments in sugar beet breeding have been monogerm seed, male-sterility and subsequent hybrid development, and pest and disease resistance. Future sugar beet breeding efforts must make use of the genetic and genomic resources available and those under development to improve the productivity and economic stability of sugar beet in global agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allard, R.W. 1960. Principles of plant breeding. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biancardi, E., M.J. McGrath, L.W. Panella, R.T. Lewellen, and P. Stevanato. 2011. Sugar beet. In Root and tuber crops, handbook of plant breeding, ed. J.E. Bradshaw, 173–219, vol. 7. Springer Science.

  • Bosemark, N.O. 1971. Use of Mendelian male-sterility in recurrent selection and hybrid breeding in beets. In Proceedings of the Eucarpia-fodder crops section, Lusignan, France, Sept. 1970, 127–136.

  • Bosemark, N.O. 1993. Genetics and breeding. In The sugar beet crop, ed. D.A. Cooke, and R.K. Scott, 67–119. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosemark, N.O. 2006. Genetics and breeding. In Sugar beet, ed. A.P. Draycott, 50–88. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Büttner, G., B. Märländer, and R. Manthey. 1995. Breeding for resistance to rhizomania in sugar-beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Journal of Plant Breeding 114: 160–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, A.J., F. Capettini, A.E. Corey, T. Filichkina, P.M. Hayes, A. Kleinhofs, D. Kudrna, K. Richardson, S. Sandoval-Islas, C. Rossi, and H. Vivar. 2003. Mapping and pyramiding of qualitative and quantitative resistance to stripe rust in barley. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107: 922–930.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collard, B.C.Y., and D.J. Mackill. 2008. Marker-assisted selection: An approach for precision plant breeding in the twenty-first century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363: 557–572.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Biaggi, M., and G.N. Skaracis. 2005. Conventional breeding methods. In Genetics and breeding of sugar beet, ed. E. Biancardi, L.G. Campbell, G.N. Skaracis, and M. De Biaggi, 169–220. Enfield: Science Publishers, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuillet, C., P. Landgridge, and R. Waugh. 2008. Cereal breeding takes a walk on the wild side. Trends in Genetics 24: 24–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gidner, S., B.-L. Lennefors, N.-O. Nilsson, J. Bensefelt, E. Johansson, U. Gyllenspetz, and T. Kraft. 2005. QTL mapping of BNYVV resistance from the WB41 source in sugar beet. Genome 48: 279–285.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grimmer, M.K., T. Kraft, S.A. Francis, and M.J.C. Asher. 2008. QTL mapping of BNYVV resistance from the WB258 source in sugar beet. Plant Breeding 127: 650–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimmer, M.K., S. Trybush, S. Hanley, S.A. Francis, A. Karp, and M.J.C. Asher. 2007. An anchored linkage map for sugar beet based on AFLP, SNP and RAPD markers and QTL mapping of a new source of resistance to Beet necrotic yellow vein virus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 114: 1151–1160.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hecker, R.J. 1967. Evaluation of three sugar beet breeding methods. Journal of the American Society Sugar Beet Technologists 14: 309–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecker, R.J. 1985. Reciprocal recurrent selection for the development of improved sugarbeet hybrids. Journal of the American Society Sugar Beet Technologists 23: 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijbroek, W., R.G. Munning, and A.C.P.M. van Swaaij. 2002. The effect of different levels of beet cyst nematodes (Heterodera schachtii) and beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) on single and double resistant sugar beet cultivars. European Journal of Plant Pathology 108: 735–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmerick, R.H., R.E. Finkner, and C.W. Doxtator. 1965. Paired-plant crosses in sugar beets. Journal of the American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists 13: 548–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hittalmani, S., A. Parco, T.V. Mew, R.S. Zeigler, and N. Huang. 2000. Fine mapping and DNA marker-assisted pyramiding of the three major genes for blast resistance in rice. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 100: 1121–1128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C., and U. Wyss. 1999. New approached to control plant parasitic nematodes. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 51: 439–446.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karsai, I., P.M. Hayes, J. Kling, I.A. Matus, K. Mészáros, L. Láng, Z. Bedő, and K. Sato. 2004. Genetic variation in component traits of heading date in Hordeum vulgare subsp. sponteneum accessions characterized in controlled environments. Crop Science 44: 1622–1632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleine, M., H. Voss, D. Cai, and C. Jung. 1998. Evaluation of nematode resistant sugar beet (beta vulgaris L.) lines by molecular analysis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 97: 896–904.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, E. 1958. Beta Rüben. In Handbuch der Pflanzenzüchtung, vol. 3, ed. T. Roemer, and W. Rudorf. Berlin: Paul Parey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langridge, P., E. Lagudah, T. Holton, R. Appels, P. Sharp, and K. Chalmers. 2001. Trends in genetic and genome analyses in wheat: A review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52: 1043–1077.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lein, J.C., K. Asbach, Y. Tian, D. Schulte, C. Li, G. Koch, C. Jung, and D. Cai. 2006. Resistance gene analogues are clustered on chromosome 3 of sugar beet and cosegregate with QTL for rhizomania resistance. Genome 50: 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewellen, R.T. 2006. Registration of CN12 and CN72 sugarbeet germplasm populations with resistance to cyst nematode. Crop Science 46: 1414–1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewellen, R.T., I.O. Skoyen, and A.W. Erichsen. 1987. Breeding sugarbeet for resistance to rhizomania: Evaluation of host–plant reactions and selection for and inheritance of resistance. In Proceedings of the 50th winter congress, IIRB, Brussels, Belgium, vol. 50, 139–156.

  • Liu, H.-Y., and R.T. Lewellen. 2007. Distribution and molecular characterization of resistance-breaking isolates of Beet necrotic yellow vein virus in the United States. Plant Disease 91: 847–851.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H.-Y., J.L. Sears, and R.T. Lewellen. 2005. Occurrence of resistance-breaking Beet necrotic yellow vein virus of sugar beet. Plant Disease 89: 464–468.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, J.S. 1971. Variety development. In Advances in sugar beet production, ed. R.T. Johnson, J.T. Alexander, G.E. Bush, and G.R. Hawkes, 402–435. Ames: Iowa State University of Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrann, G.R.D., M.K. Grimmer, E.S. Mutasa-Göttgens, and M. Stevens. 2009. Progress towards the understanding and control of sugar beet rhizomania disease. Molecular Plant Pathology 10: 129–141.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M., K. Dreher, J.M. Ribaut, and M. Khairallah. 2003. Money matters (II): Costs of maize inbred line conversion schemes at CIMMYT using conventional and marker-assisted selection. Molecular Breeding 11: 235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, F.V. 1942. Cytoplasmically inherited male-sterility in sugar beets. Journal of Agricultural Research 71: 423–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poland, J.A., P.J. Balint-Kurti, R.J. Wisser, R.C. Pratt, and R.J. Nelson. 2009. Shades of gray: The world of quantitative disease resistance. Trends in Plant Science 14: 21–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ribaut, J.M., and D. Hoisington. 1998. Marker-assisted selection: New tools and strategies. Trends in Plant Science 3: 236–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rush, C.M., H.-Y. Liu, R.T. Lewellen, and R. Acosta-Leal. 2006. The continuing saga of rhizomania of sugar beets in the United States. Plant Disease 90: 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savitsky, V.F. 1950. Monogerm sugar beets in the United States. In Proceedings of the American Society Sugar Beet Technologists, vol. 6, 156–159.

  • Savitsky, H. 1975. Hybridization between Beta vulgaris and B. procumbens and transmission of nematode (Heterodera schachtii) resistance to sugar beet. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 17: 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G.A. 1987. Sugar beet. In Principles of cultivar development, vol. 2, ed. W.R. Fehr, 577–625. New York: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneep, J., and J. Hendriksen. 1979. Plant breeding perspectives, 203–233. Wageningen: Pudoc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorrells, M.E., and W.A. Wilson. 1997. Direct classification and selection of superior alleles for crop improvement. Crop Science 37: 691–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. Martin, S.K., K.S. Lewers, R.G. Pamer, and B.R. Hedges. 1996. A testcross procedure for selecting exotic strains to improve pure-line cultivars in predominantly self-fertilizing species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 92: 78–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanksley, S. 1993. Mapping polygenes. Annual Review of Genetics 27: 205–233.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanksley, S.D., and S.R. McCouch. 1997. Seed banks and molecular maps: Unlocking genetic potential for the wild. Science (Washington, DC) 277: 1063–1066.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, E.D. 1989. Identification, distribution, and testing for rhizomania in Beta maritima. Plant Disease 73: 287–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, M.H., W. Heijbroek, and L.M. Pakish. 1999. The sea beet source of resistance to multiple species of root-knot nematode. Euphytica 108: 151–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelley Richardson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richardson, K. Traditional Breeding in Sugar Beet. Sugar Tech 12, 181–186 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-010-0050-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-010-0050-4

Keywords

Navigation