Skip to main content
Log in

P2 hierarchical decomposition procedure: application to irrigation strategies design

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optimization by simulation of agricultural practices can help to improve irrigation water use efficiency. This work introduces an efficient hierarchical decomposition method to design irrigation management strategies that is modeled as a continuous stochastic problem. Various combinations of selection (greedy, Pareto-based), division (middle, pivot, maximization) and evaluation techniques (global, standard deviation) were tested. We present results of an 8-continuous-parameter irrigation strategies design. Two criteria were chosen to evaluate the different combinations: the achieved direct margin, and the number of simulation runs that were needed to reach it. Selection techniques impacted the resolution time, while the evaluation techniques impacted the direct margin efficiency. Based on the two former criteria, the trade-off combination of greedy selection, pivot partition and average value evaluation appeared to be the most efficient to design irrigation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See for example Ehrgott (2005) for dominance definitions.

References

  • Andradóttir S (1998) A review of simulation optimization techniques. In: Proccedings of the 1998 winter simulation conference, pp 151–158

  • Aubry C, Papy F, Capillon A (1998) Modelling decision-making processes for annual crop management. Agric Syst 56(1):45–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergez JE, Debaeke P, Deumier J, Lacroix B, Leenhardt D, Leroy P, Wallach D (2001a) Moderato: an object-oriented decision tool for designing maize irrigation schedules. Ecol Model 137:43–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergez JE, Eigenraam M, Garcia F (2001b) Comparison between dynamic programming and reinforcement learning: a case study on maize irrigation management. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European conference on information technology in agriculture (EFITA-01), Montpellier (FR), pp 343–348

  • Bergez JE, Garcia F, Lapasse L (2004) A hierarchical partitioning method for optimizing irrigation strategies. Agric Syst 80:235–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergez JE, Garcia F, Wallach D (2006) Representing and optimizing management decisions with crop models. In: Wallach D, Makovski D, Jones JW (eds) Working with dynamic crop models: evaluation, analysis, parameterization, and applications. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 173–207

  • Breiman L (1996) Technical note: some properties of splitting criteria. Mach Learn 24(1):41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrgott M (2005) Multicriteria optimization. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO MG (2002) Water: precious and finite resource. Tech. rep., Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

  • Fu M, Glover F, April J (2005) Simulation optimization: a review, new developments, and applications. In: Proceedings of the 2005 winter simulation conference, pp 83–95

  • Huyer W, Neumaier A (1999) Global optimization by multilevel coordinate search. J Glob Optim 14(4):331–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones D, Perttunen C, Stuckman B (1993) Lipschitzian optimization without the Lipschitz constant. J Optim Theory Appl 79(1):157–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norkin V, Ermoliev Y, Ruszczynski A (1994) On optimal allocation of indivisibles under uncertainty. Oper Res 46(3):381–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ólafsson S, Kim J (2002) Simulation optimization. In: Winter proccedings of the 2002 winter simulation conference, pp 79–84

  • Papy F (2000) Farm models and decision support: a summary review. Research on agricultural systems: accomplishments, perspective and issues, pp 89–107

  • Prasetio Y, Yen J, Zabinsky Z (2004) A probabilistic branch-and-bound scheme for simulation optimization. In: INFORMS annual meeting, Denver, USA

  • Shaffer M, Brodahl M (1998) Rule-based management for simulation in agricultural decision support systems. Comput Electron Agric 21(2):135–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith M (2000) The application of climatic data for planning and management of sustainable rainfed and irrigated crop production. Agric For Meteor 103(1–2):99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallach D, Goffinet B, Bergez J, Debaeke P, Leenhardt D, Aubertot J (2001) Parameter estimation for crop models a new approach and application to a corn model. Agron J 93(4):757–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Crespo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crespo, O., Bergez, J.E. & Garcia, F. P2 hierarchical decomposition procedure: application to irrigation strategies design. Oper Res Int J 11, 19–39 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-009-0040-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-009-0040-z

Keywords

Navigation