Skip to main content
Log in

The clinical significance of body composition and anthropometric evaluation in athletes

  • Review
  • Published:
Mediterranean Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism

Abstract

Body composition and anthropometric assessment provide the sports physician with useful information on the health state of the athlete and with some necessary elements to plan specific training loads in the most appropriate way. In practice, the chemical composition of an athlete’s body (especially those who carry out 1–2 daily workouts) is always in a physiologic condition that we can define as “dynamic” (concentration of electrolytes, hydration state and relationship between intra-and extra-cellular water, stages of growth of muscle mass and/or reduction of fat mass, etc.), with the exception of few times of year, such as the short resting break before resuming training. As a consequence, a real “baseline” (or “stationary”) physiological state, allowing to detect the parameters of body composition under the same conditions several times during the year, is only rarely achieved. In this paper, we wanted to review the most interesting parameters and methods for the evaluation of athletes’ body composition, and underline their potential applications, possible advantages, theoretical and practical limitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Giampietro M, Bertini I (2005) Valutazione antropometrica e della composizione corporea negli atleti. Cap. 29-31 di “L’alimentazione per l’esercizio fisico e lo sport”, M. Giampietro. Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore, Roma

  2. McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL (2006) Exercise physiology: energy, nutrition, and human performance. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ellis KJ (2000) Human body composition: in vivo methods. Physiol Rev 80(2):649–680

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Heyward VH, Stolarczyk LM (1996) Applied body composition assessment. Human Kinetics, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  5. van Marken Lichtenbelt WD, Hartgens F, Vollaard NB et al (2004) Body composition changes in bodybuilders: a method comparison. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36(3):490–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Giampietro M, Pujia A, Bertini I (2003) Anthropometric features and body composition of young athletes practicing karate at a high and medium competitive level. Acta Diabetol 40:S145–S148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Lorenzo A, Bertini I, Candeloro N et al (1998) Comparison of different techniques to measure body composition in moderately active adolescents. Br J Sports Med 32:215–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bertini I, Pujia A, Giampietro M (2003) A follow-up study of the variations in the body composition of karate athletes. Acta Diabetol 40:S142–S144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Svantesson U, Zander M, Klingberg S et al (2008) Body composition in male elite athletes, comparison of bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Negat Results Biomed 22(7):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dehghan M, Merchant AT (2008) Is bioelectrical impedance accurate for use in large epidemiological studies? Nutr J 9(7):26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Silva AM, Minderico CS, Teixeira PJ et al (2006) Body fat measurement in adolescent athletes: multicompartment molecular model comparison. Eur J Clin Nutr 60(8):955–964

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Heymsfield SB, McManus C, Smith J et al (1982) Anthropometric measurement of muscle mass: revised equations for calculating bone-free mass muscle area. Am J Clin Nutr 36:680–690

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. De Lorenzo A, Bertini I, Iacopino L et al (2000) Body composition measurement in highly trained male athletes: a comparison of three methods. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 40(2):178–183

    Google Scholar 

  14. LaForgia J, Gunn S, Withers (2008) Body composition: validity of segmental impedance analysis. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 17(4):586–591

    Google Scholar 

  15. Silva AM, Heymsfield SB, Gallagher D et al (2008) Evaluation of between-methods agreement of extracellular water measurements in adults and children. Am J Clin Nutr 88(2):315–323

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Quitero AL, Silva AM, Minderico CS et al (2009) Total body water measurements in adolescent athletes: a comparison of six field methods with deuterium dilution. J Strength Cond Res 23(4):1225–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mitsiopoulos N, Baumgartner RN, Heymsfield SB et al (1998) Cadaver validation of skeletal muscle measurement by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography. J Appl Physiol 85:115–122

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shih R, Wang Z, Heo M, Wang W et al (2000) Lower limb skeletal muscle mass: development of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry prediction model. J Appl Physiol 89:1380–1386

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Visser M, Fuerst T, Lang T et al (1999) Validity of fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for measuring fat-free mass and leg muscle mass. J Appl Physiol 87(4):1513–1520

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Matiegka J (1921) The testing of physical efficiency. Am J Phys Anthropol 4:223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Heymsfield SB, McManus C, Stephens V et al (1982) Muscle mass: reliable indicator of protein-energy malnutrition severity and outcome. Am J Clin Nutr 35:1192–1195

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Martin AD, Spenst LF, Drinkwater DT et al (1990) Anthropometric estimation of muscle mass in men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 22:729–733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Doupe MB, Martin AD, Searle MS et al (1997) A new formula for population-based estimation of whole body muscle mass in males. Can J Appl Physiol 22:598–608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Clarys JP, Martin AD, Drinkwater DT (1984) Gross tissue weights in the human body by cadaver dissection. Hum Biol 56:459–473

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee RC, Wang Z, Heo A et al (2000) Total-body skeletal muscle mass: development and cross-validation of anthropometric prediction models. Am J Clin Nutr 72:796–803

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Baumgartner BN et al (2000) Estimation of skeletal muscle mass by bioelectrical impedance analysis. J Appl Physiol 89:465–471

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelangelo Giampietro.

About this article

Cite this article

Giampietro, M., Ebner, E. & Bertini, I. The clinical significance of body composition and anthropometric evaluation in athletes. Mediterr J Nutr Metab 4, 93–97 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12349-011-0052-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12349-011-0052-0

Keywords

Navigation