Skip to main content
Log in

Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Prognosis of PDGFRA-Mutant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Large-Scale, Multi-Institutional, Observational Study in China

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

To evaluate clinicopathologic features and prognosis of post-complete resection in patients with PDGFRA-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), and even to establish a relapse-free survival (RFS) prognostic model for this subgroup.

Methods

This retrospective study used data from patients with primary PDGFRA-mutant GIST who underwent complete resection (2005–2019) at 16 large-scale medical centers in China. Stepwise multivariate Cox regression models were performed to build the prediction model, in which the potential predictors were available in routine clinical practice and using the risk score functions. The prediction model was cross-validated by calibration histogram and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves.

Results

A total of 280 patients with PDGFRA-mutant (172 D842V-mutant and 108 non-D842V-mutant) GIST after complete resection were enrolled. Most tumors originated in the stomach (89.6%). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates were 95.9%, 91.2%, and 89.5%, respectively. The RFS of the non-D842V-mutant group was superior to that of the D842V group (P = 0.033). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that D842V mutation (P = 0.017), non-gastric tumor (P < 0.001), and Ki-67 > 5% (P = 0.005) were the independent variables influencing the prognosis of patients with PDGFRA-mutant GIST. The scoring model showed the predicted and actual cumulative 1-, 3- and 5-year follow-up relapse rates fit well.

Conclusions

PDGFRA-mutant GIST mostly originated in the stomach and had a favorable prognosis after surgery. Non-D842V-mutant patients might have better prognoses than D842V-mutant patients. The prognostic model demonstrated favorable prediction accuracy, suggesting its clinical utility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sircar K, Hewlett BR, Huizinga JD, Chorneyko K, Berezin I, Riddell RH. Interstitial cells of Cajal as precursors of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999;23:377–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Søreide K, Sandvik OM, Søreide JA, Giljaca V, Jureckova A, Bulusu VR. Global epidemiology of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST): a systematic review of population-based cohort studies. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016;40:39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. ESMO/European Sarcoma Network Working Group. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2014;(Supplement 3):iii21–6.

  4. Hirota S, Isozaki K, Moriyama Y, Hashimoto K, Nishida T, Ishiguro S. Gain-of-function mutations of c-kit in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Science. 1998;279:577–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Duensing A, McGreevey L, Chen CJ, Joseph N. PDGFRA activating mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Science. 2003;299:708–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Corless CL, Ballman KV, Antonescu CR, Kolesnikova V, Maki RG, Pisters PWT. Pathologic and molecular features correlate with long-term outcome after adjuvant therapy of resected primary GI stromal tumor: the ACOSOG Z9001 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1563–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby HK, Hartmann JT, Pink D, Schütte J. One vs three years of adjuvant imatinib for operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307:1265–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Meta-Analysis Group (MetaGISm). Comparison of two doses of Imatinib for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis of 1640 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1247–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Onodera T, Goseki N, Kosaki G. Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1984;85:1001–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu B, Yang XR, Xu Y, Sun YF, Sun C, Guo W. Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts prognosis of patients after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:6212–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Joensuu H. Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Hum Pathol. 2008;39:1411–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. Br J Surg. 2015;102:148–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Joensuu H, Hohenberger P, Corless CL. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Lancet. 2013;382:973–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rossi S, Gasparotto D, Miceli R, Toffolatti L, Gallina G, Scaramel E. KIT, PDGFRA, and BRAF mutational spectrum impacts on the natural history of imatinib-naive localized GIST: a population-based study. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39:922–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Martín J, Poveda A, Llombart-Bosch A, Ramos R, López-Guerrero JA, Muro JG. Deletions affecting codons 557–558 of the c-KIT gene indicate a poor prognosis in patients with completely resected gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a study by the Spanish Group for Sarcoma Research (GEIS). J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6190–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Debiec-Rychter M, Sciot R, Le Cesne A, Le Cesne A, Schlemmer M, Hohenberger P. KIT mutations and dose selection for imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:1093–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cassier PA, Fumagalli E, Rutkowski P, Schöffski P, Glabbeke MV, Debiec-Rychter M. Outcome of patients with platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha-mutated gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor era. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:4458–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoo C, Ryu MH, Jo J, Park I, Ryoo BY, Kang YK. Efficacy of imatinib in patients with platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha-mutated gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48:546–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, soft tissue sarcoma. Version 6. 2019; [EB/OL]. http://www.nccn.org.

  20. Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, Gorstein F, Lasota J, Longley BJ. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach. Hum Pathol. 2002;33:459–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun J, Mei Y, Zhu Q, Shou C, Tjhoi WEH, Yang W. Relationship of prognostic nutritional index with prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Cancer. 2019;10:2679–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chang WL, Yang WC, Zeng XY, Li CG, Xiong Z, Wang T. Elevated preoperative platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor prognosis of patients with primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor. BMC Gasteroenterol. 2020;20:124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao WY, Xu J, Wang M, Zhang ZZ, Tu L, Wang CJ. Prognostic value of Ki67 index in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7:2298–304.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gold JS, Gonen M, Gutierrez A, Broto JM, García-del-Muro X, Smyrk TC. Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for recurrence-free survival after complete surgical resection of localised primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:1045–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu X, Qiu H, Wu Z, Zhang P, Feng XY, Chen T. A novel pathological prognostic score (PPS) to identify “very high-risk” patients: a multicenter retrospective analysis of 506 patients with high risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22:2150–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81874184) funded this study, and the journal’s Rapid Service fees.

Authorship

All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.

Author Contributions

Concept and Design: Drs. Tao, Cao, Shen. Acquisition, Analysis, and Interpretation of Data: Drs. P. Zhang, Wang, Gao, Li, B. Zhang, Liang, Y. Zhou, Liao, Feng, Y.B. Zhou, Yu, J. Zhang, Y.J. Zhou, Ye, Chen, Zhao. Drafting of the Manuscript: Drs. P. Zhang, Wang, Li. Critical Revision of the Manuscript for Important Intellectual Content: Drs. Liao, Feng, Y.B. Zhou, Yu, J. Zhang, Y.J. Zhou, Ye, Chen, Y. Zhao.

Disclosures

All named authors confirm that they have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. And this is a retrospective study and does not contain any new studies with human or animal subjects by any of the authors; as such, informed consent of individuals was not required.

Data Availability

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kuntang Shen, Hui Cao or Kaixiong Tao.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 275 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, P., Wang, M., Li, J. et al. Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Prognosis of PDGFRA-Mutant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Large-Scale, Multi-Institutional, Observational Study in China. Adv Ther 39, 2920–2931 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-022-02115-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-022-02115-3

Keywords

Navigation