Skip to main content
Log in

Does School-Based Recruitment for Anxiety Interventions Reach Youth Not Otherwise Identified? A Comparison Between a School-Based Sample and a Clinical Sample

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
School Mental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to determine how youth with anxiety recruited for a school-based randomized controlled trial (RCT) compare demographically and clinically to clinically referred youth with anxiety who participated in an RCT conducted in community mental health clinics. Youth (N = 99) with anxiety aged 12–15 years were: (a) 37 youth (M age = 13.70, SD = .89; 97.3% Norwegian; 19.0% male) from a school-based RCT and (b) 62 youth (M age = 13.8, SD = 1.0; 88.7% Caucasian; 29.5% male) from an RCT conducted in community mental health clinics. The youth were assessed for anxiety diagnoses, functional impairment, internalizing symptoms, and externalizing symptoms. Compared to the clinically referred youth who received care in community mental health clinics, the youth in the school sample met criteria for fewer anxiety diagnoses, lower severity of diagnoses, and less functional impairment caused by mental health problems. However, the school sample had significantly higher levels of youth-rated anxiety symptoms, t(95) = − 2.33, p = .02, parent-rated depression, t(94) = 4.45, p < .001, and externalizing symptoms, t(96) = 2.86, p = .005. Finally, only 12.1% of the youth who met diagnostic criteria reported receiving services at a community mental health clinic in the last year. Although many of the youth in the school sample met diagnostic criteria for one or more anxiety disorders, few had received services in community mental health clinics. This suggests that recruiting in schools may help identify youth with anxiety that may not otherwise seek mental health services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The term junior high school is used for the Norwegian 8th to 10th grade which is compulsory for youth aged 13–15 years.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks go to all project colleagues and the participants who made this study possible.

Funding

This study was funded by The Western Norway Health Authority (Grant No. 912026), the Norwegian Research Council (Grant No. 229020), and Regional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth Husabo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (2013/2331) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study. Specifically, informant consent and participant assent were obtained from all parents/caretakers and individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Husabo, E., Haugland, B.S.M., McLeod, B.D. et al. Does School-Based Recruitment for Anxiety Interventions Reach Youth Not Otherwise Identified? A Comparison Between a School-Based Sample and a Clinical Sample. School Mental Health 12, 366–377 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-019-09357-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-019-09357-7

Keywords

Navigation