Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Radial head prosthesis: surgical tips and tricks

  • Review
  • Published:
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Radial head prostheses (RHP) have been developed to decrease the complications rate following a radial head resection surgery. The aim of the RHP is to replicate the physiological radiocapitellar tracking, reproducing the mechanical function of the native radial head: to stabilize the elbow and to shear the forces passing through the elbow along with the other stabilizers. The currently used RHP models try to achieve this target with three different prosthesis’ strategies: (a) loose fit stem, (b) bipolar radial head or (c) anatomical radial head. Even if the radial head fixation is the preferred technique in every possible case and the resection can be still considered a possible option, in the last years there has been a growing worldwide consensus in using the radial head replacement in patients with unfixable radial head fractures, especially if associated with complex elbow instability. However, complications after a RHP are not uncommon, and their rate is raising as long as the implants number are increasing. The main difficulties are due to the implantation technique that needs to be performed with the same attention and precision used for the replacement of all the other joints, and to the concurrent treatment of the associated lesions. A personalized postoperative rehabilitation program is essential for obtaining good results and decreasing the complications rate. Concern exists for the young age of the patients that often require a RHP: personal experience and literature analysis suggest that if the clinical and radiographic results are positive after a 6–12-month follow-up, good outcomes can be also expected at a medium- or long-term follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Modified from Hammacher and van der Werken [1]

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hammacher ER, van der Werken C (1996) Radial head fractures: operative or conservative treatment? The Greek temple model. Acta Orthop Belg 62(Suppl 1):112–115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van Riet RP, van Glabbeek F (2007) History of radial head prosthesis in traumatology. Acta Orthop Belg 73(1):12–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Antuña SA, Sánchez-Márquez JM, Barco R (2010) Long-term results of radial head resection following isolated radial head fractures in patients younger than forty years old. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(3):558–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Faldini C, Nanni M, Leonetti D, Capra P, Bonomo M, Persiani V, Galante C, Giannini S (2012) Early radial head excision for displaced and comminuted radial head fractures: considerations and concerns at long-term follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 26(4):236–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nestorson J, Josefsson PO, Adolfsson L (2017) A radial head prosthesis appears to be unnecessary in Mason-IV fracture dislocation. Acta Orthop 88(3):315–319

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bain GI, Ashwood N, Baird R, Unni R (2005) Management of Mason type-III radial head fractures with a titanium prosthesis, ligament repair, and early mobilization. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 Suppl 1(Pt 1):136–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Glabbeek F, Van Riet RP, Baumfeld JA, Neale PG, O’Driscoll SW, Morrey BF, An KN (2004) Detrimental effects of overstuffing or understuffing with a radial head replacement in the medial collateral-ligament deficient elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(12):2629–2635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rowland AS, Athwal GS, MacDermid JC, King GJ (2007) Lateral ulnohumeral joint space widening is not diagnostic of radial head arthroplasty overstuffing. J Hand Surg Am 32(5):637–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shors HC, Gannon C, Miller MC, Schmidt CC, Baratz ME (2008) Plain radiographs are inadequate to identify overlengthening with a radial head prosthesis. J Hand Surg Am 33(3):335–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Frank SG, Grewal R, Johson J, Faber KJ, King GJ, Athwal GS (2009) Determination of correct implant size in radial head arthroplasty to avoid overlenghtening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(7):1738–1746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Athwal GS, Rouleau DM, MacDermid JC, King GJ (2011) Contralateral elbow radiographs can reliably diagnose radial head implant overlengthening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(14):1339–1346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van Riet RP, van Glabbeek F, de Weerdt W, Oemar J, Bortier H (2007) Validation of the lesser sigmoid notch of the ulna as a reference point for accurate placement of a prosthesis for the head of the radius: a cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(3):413–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moon JG, Berglund LJ, Domire Z, An KN, O’Driscoll SW (2009) Stem diameter and micromotion of press fit radial head prosthesis: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 18(5):785–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abdulla I, Langohr GD, Gladwell M, Yeung C, Faber KJ, King GJ, Athwal GS (2015) The effect of fracture comminution on the reliability and accuracy of radial head sizing. J Shoulder Elb Surg 24(3):364–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heijink A, Kodde IF, Mulder PG, Veltman ES, Kaas L, van den Bekerom MP, Eygendaal D (2016) Radial head arthroplasty: a systematic review. JBJS Rev 4(10). doi:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.15.00095

  16. Rotini R, Marinelli A, Guerra E, Bettelli G, Cavaciocchi M (2012) Radial head replacement with unipolar and bipolar SBi system: a clinical and radiographic analysis after a 2-year mean follow-up. Musculoskelet Surg 96(Suppl 1):S69–S79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marsh JP, Grewal R, Faber KJ, Drosdowech DS, Athwal GS, King GJ (2016) Radial head fractures treated with modular metallic radial head replacement: outcomes at a mean follow-up of eight years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98(7):527–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Driscoll SW, Herald JA (2012) Forearm pain associated with loose radial head prostheses. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21(1):92–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Berschback JC, Lynch TS, Kalainov DM, Wysocki RW, Merk BR, Cohen MS (2013) Clinical and radiographic comparisons of two different radial head implant designs. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22(8):1108–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gauci MO, Winter M, Dumontier C, Bronsard N, Allieu Y (2016) Clinical and radiologic outcomes of pyrocarbon radial head prosthesis: midterm results. J Shoulder Elb Surg 25(1):98–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy

    A. Marinelli, E. Guerra, A. Ritali, M. Cavallo & R. Rotini

Authors
  1. A. Marinelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Guerra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Ritali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Cavallo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. Rotini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Marinelli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marinelli, A., Guerra, E., Ritali, A. et al. Radial head prosthesis: surgical tips and tricks. Musculoskelet Surg 101 (Suppl 2), 187–196 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-017-0504-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-017-0504-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation