Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The use of TightRope fixation for ankle syndesmosis injuries: our experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Ten percentage of all ankle fractures sustain an associated syndesmotic injury. TightRope is a relatively new technique for syndesmosis fixation, characterized by a non-absorbable FibreWire held tight between two cortical metal buttons. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results obtained with the use of this device.

Methods

From January 2011 to December 2015, 54 patients with ankle diastases were treated. Eighteen patients were excluded from the study. Fractures of the fibula or tibia requiring fixation were internally fixed using standard AO techniques. Preoperative and the most recent postoperative ankle radiographs were reassessed for measurements of the tibiofibular clear space (TFCS), medial clear space (MCS) and tibiofibular overlap (TFO). Clinical outcomes were assessed at the time of follow-up using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, a self-administered Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) score and patients satisfaction.

Results

The mean follow-up was 28, 64 months. Mean values for MCS, TFCS and TFO were 1.51–1.53 and 0.25 cm, respectively. The mean AOFAS score was 93.11, and the mean FADI score was 130.11. Twenty-nine (80.6 %) patients reported their outcome as excellent or very good.

Conclusions

TightRope technique can achieve flexible fixation of the syndesmosis and permit full range of motion of the tibiofibular joint. Patients can start rehabilitation exercise at an early stage after operation. The results of this study indicate that TightRope fixation is a valid option for syndesmotic injuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fong DTP, Hong Y, Chan LK, Yung PSH, Chan KM (2007) A systematic review on ankle injury and ankle sprain in sports. Sports Med 37(1):73–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Magnan B, Samaila E, Bondi M, Vecchini E, Micheloni GM, Bartolozzi P (2012) Three-dimensional matrix-induced autologous chondrocytes implantation for osteochondral lesions of the talus: midterm results. Adv Orthop 2012:942174. doi:10.1155/2012/942174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Nelson AJ, Collins CL, Yard EE, Fields SK, Comstock RD (2007) Ankle injuries among United States high school sports athletes, 2005–2006. J Athl Train 42(3):381–387

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Rammelt S, Zwipp H, Grass R (2008) Injuries to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: an evidence-based approach to acute and chronic lesions. FCL 13:611–633 (vii–viii)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stuart K, Panchbhavi V (2011) The fate of syndesmotic screws. Foot Ankle Int 32:S519–S525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wagener M, Beumer A, Swierstra B (2011) Chronic instability of the anterior tibiofibular syndesmosis of the ankle: arthroscopic findings and results of anatomical reconstruction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:212–225

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Dattani R, Patnaik S, Kantak A, Srikanth B, Selvan TP (2008) Injuries to the tibiofibular syndesmosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:405–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sman AD, Hiller CE, Refshauge KM (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for diagnosis of ankle syndesmosis injury: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med Jul 47(10):620–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Han SH, Lee JW, Kim S, Suh J-S, Choi YR (2007) Chronic tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: the diagnostic efficiency of magnetic resonance imaging and comparative analysis of operative treatment. Foot Ankle Int 28:336–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Magan A, Golano P, Maffulli N, Khanduja V (2014) Evaluation and management of injuries of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Br Med Bull 111(1):101–115. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldu020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Black EM, Antoci V, Lee JT, Weaver MJ, Johnson AH, Susarla SM, Kwon JY (2013) Role of preoperative computed tomography scans in operative planning for malleolar ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int 34(5):697–704. doi:10.1177/1071100713475355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Porter DA (2009) Evaluation and treatment of ankle syndesmosis injuries. Instr Course Lect 58:575–581

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mukhopadhyay S, Metcalfe A, Guha A, Mohanty K, Hemmadi S, Lyons K, O’Doherty D (2011) Malreduction of syndesmosisdare we considering the anatomical variation? Inj Int J Care Inj 42:1073–1076

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ahmad J, Raikin SM, Pour AE, Haytmanek C (2009) Bioabsorbable screw fixation of the syndesmosis in unstable ankle injuries. Foot Ankle Int 30:99–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Beumer A, Campo MM, Niesing R, Day J, Kleinrensink GJ, Swierstra BA (2005) Screw fixation of the syndesmosis: a cadaver model comparing stainless steel and titanium screws and three and four cortical fixation. Injury 36:60–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cox S, Mukherjee DP, Ogden AL, Mayuex RH, Sadasivan KK, Albright JA, Pietrzak WS (2005) Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis fixation: a cadaveric, simulated fracture stabilization study comparing bioabsorbable and metallic single screw fixation. J Foot Ankle Surg 44:144–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Naqvi GA, Cunningham P, Lynch B, Galvin R, Awan N (2012) Fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries: comparison of tightrope fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy of syndesmotic reduction. Am J Sports Med 40:2828–2835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rigby RB, Cottom JM (2013) Does the arthrex TightRope provide maintenance of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis? a 2-year follow-up of 64 TightRopes in 37 patients. J Foot Ankle Surg 52:563–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Storey P, Gadd RJ, Blundell C, Davies MB (2012) Complications of suture button ankle syndesmosis stabilization with modifications of surgical technique. Foot Ankle Int 33:717–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bell DP, Wong MK (2006) Syndesmotic screw fixation in Weber C ankle injuries—should the screw be removed before weight bearing? Injury 37(9):891–898

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Manjoo A, Sanders D, Tieszer C (2010) Functional and radiographic results of patients with syndesmotic screw fixation: implications for screw removal. J Orthop Trauma 24:2–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Melvin J, Downing K, Ogilvie K (2008) A technique for removal of broken cannulated tricortical syndesmotic screws. J Orthop Trauma 22:648–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schepers T (2012) Acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair. Int Orthop (SICOT) 36:1199–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Casillas M (2006) Operative treatment of acute syndesmotic injuries with screw fixation and without direct exposure or repair of the syndesmotic ligaments. Tech Foot Ankle Surg 5:27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fanter N, Inouye S, McBryde A (2010) Safety of ankle trans-syndesmotic fixation. Foot Ankle Int 31:433–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoiness P, Stromsoe K (2004) Tricortical versus quadricortical syndesmosis fixation in ankle fractures: a prospective, randomized study comparing two methods of syndesmosis fixation. J Orthop Trauma 18:331–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schepers T (2011) To retain or remove the syndesmotic screw: a review of literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:879–883

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Scranton P (2002) Isolated syndesmotic injuries: diastasis of the ankle in the athlete. Tech Foot Ankle Surg 1:88–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Teramoto A, Suzuki D, Kamiya T, Chikenji T, Watanabe K, Yamashita T (2011) Comparison of different fixation methods of the suture-button implant for tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries. Am J Sports Med 39:2226–2232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Thordarson D, Samuelson M, Shepherd L, Merkle P, Lee J (2001) Bioabsorbable versus stainless steel screw fixation of the syndesmosis in pronation-lateral rotation ankle fractures: a prospective randomized trial. Foot Ankle Int 22:335–338

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Thornes B, McCartan D (2006) Ankle syndesmosis injuries treated with the TightRope suture-button kit. Tech Foot Ankle Surg 5:45–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Weening B, Bhandari M (2005) Predictors of functional outcome following transsyndesmotic screw fixation of ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma 19:102–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. De Vil J, Bonte F, Claes H, Bongaerts W, Verstraete K, Verdonk R (2009) Bolt fixation for syndesmotic injuries. Injury 40:1176–1179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. DeGroot H, Al-Omari A, Ghazaly S (2011) Outcomes of suture button repair of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 32:250–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Naqvi GA, Shafqat A, Awan N (2012) Tightrope fixation of ankle syndesmosis injuries: clinical outcome, complications and technique modification. Injury 43:838–842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Thornes B, Shannon F, Guiney AM, Hession P, Masterson E (2005) Suture-button syndesmosis fixation: accelerated rehabilitation and improved outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 431:207–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Willmott HJ, Singh B, David LA (2009) Outcome and complications of treatment of ankle diastasis with tightrope fixation. Injury 40:1204–1206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cottom JM, Hyer CF, Philbin TM, Berlet GC (2008) Treatment of syndesmotic disruptions with the Arthrex Tightrope: a report of 25 cases. Foot Ankle Int 29(8):773–780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bayer T, McKenna J (2015) Technical tips for the removal of TightRope ankle syndesmosis fixation. Foot Ankle Surg 21(3):214–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jordan T, Talarico R, Schuberth J (2011) The radiographic fate of the syndesmosis after trans-syndesmotic screw removal in displaced ankle fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg 50:407–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lin CF, Gross ML, Weinhold P (2006) Ankle syndesmosis injuries: anatomy, biomechanics, mechanism of injury, and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and intervention. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36:372–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Arthrex. Surgical Technique. (Online): www.ankletightrope.com

  43. Martin RL, Burdett RG, Irrgang JJ (1999) Development of the foot and ankle disability index (FADI). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 29:A32–A33

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sheri AH, Hertel J (2005) Reliability and sensitivity of the foot and ankle disability index in subjects with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train 40(1):35–40

    Google Scholar 

  45. Coughlin MJ (1991) Treatment of bunionette deformity with longitudinal diaphyseal osteotomy with distal soft tissue repair. Foot Ankle 11(4):195–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wiker_y A, Hoiness P, Andreassen G, Hellund J, Madsen J (2010) No difference in functional and radiographic results 8.4 years after quadricortical compared with tricortical syndesmosis fixation in ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma 24:17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Forsythe K, Freedman K, Stover M, Patwardhan A (2008) Comparison of a novel FiberWire-button construct versus metallic screw fixation in a syndesmotic injury model. Foot Ankle Int 29:49–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Klitzman R, Zhao H, Zhang L, Strohmeyer G, Vora A (2010) Suture-button versus screw fixation of the syndesmosis: a biomechanical analysis. Foot Ankle Int 31:69–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Miller A, Paul O, Boraiah S, Parker R, Helfet D, Lorich D (2010) Functional outcomes after syndesmotic screw fixation and removal. J Orthop Trauma 24:12–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Teramoto A, Kura H, Uchiyama E, Suzuki D, Yamashita T (2008) Three-dimensional analysis of ankle instability after tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries: a biomechanical experimental study. Am J Sports Med 36:348–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Coetzee C, Ebeling P (2009) Treatment of syndesmosis disruptions: a prospective, randomized study comparing conventional screw fixation vs TightRope_ fiber wire fixation-medium term results. SA Ortho J 33:32–37

    Google Scholar 

  52. Miller RS, Weinhold PS, Dahners LE (1999) Comparison of tricortical screw fixation versus a modified suture construct for fixation of ankle syndesmosis injury: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma 13:39–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Schepers T, Van Lieshout E, de Vries M, Van der Elst M (2011) Complications of syndesmotic screw removal. Foot Ankle Int 32:1040–1044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Hsu YT, Wu CC, Lee WC, Fan KF, Tseng IC, Lee PC (2011) Surgical treatment of syndesmotic diastasis: emphasis on effect of syndesmotic screw on ankle function. Int Orthop 35:359–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Welck MJ, Ray P (2013) Tibialis anterior tendon entrapment after ankle tightrope insertion for acute syndesmosis injury. Foot Ankle Spec 6(3):242–246. doi:10.1177/1938640013477131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Carlo Poma Hospital, Strada Lago Paiolo 10, 46100, Mantova, Italy

    M. Bondi, N. Rossi, A. Pizzoli & L. Renzi Brivio

Authors
  1. M. Bondi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Rossi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Pizzoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. L. Renzi Brivio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Bondi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bondi, M., Rossi, N., Pizzoli, A. et al. The use of TightRope fixation for ankle syndesmosis injuries: our experience. Musculoskelet Surg 100, 217–222 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-016-0421-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-016-0421-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation