Skip to main content
Log in

Complex fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly—outcome and complications after locking plate fixation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with locking plates or primary arthroplasty remains a controversial issue in the management of complex proximal humerus fractures. Aim of this study was to evaluate the surgeon- and patient-based outcome of patients older than 65 years who underwent ORIF using locking plate fixation of a 3- or 4-part fracture of the proximal humerus. Twenty-seven patients older than 65 years were treated with locking plate fixation (PHILOS, Fa. Synthes, Umkirch, Germany). At an average follow-up of 44 months, the clinical and the subjective outcome were evaluated, and complications were analyzed. The mean age- and gender-related Constant score was 70% (30–100%) compared with 92% (47–108%) of the contralateral non-injured shoulder. The mean DASH score was 29 points (0–71). Five patients (18.5%) showed clinical signs of an impingement, which was related to malpositioning of the plate in 3 cases. Screw cutout was seen in 22.2% (6 patients). Avascular necrosis of the head or the tubercula was found in 8 patients (29.6%). The revision rate was 29.6%. However, the patients considered the functional status of their shoulder as “good” or “satisfactory.” The functional and patient-orientated results of the locking plate fixation of complex displaced proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are comparable to those of primary arthroplasty and minimally invasive treatment. Proper surgical technique (screw length, plate position) is mandatory for reducing the revision rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frerichmann U, Raschke MJ, Stockle U, Wohrmann S, Lohmann R (2007) Proximal femoral fractures in the elderly. Data from health insurance providers on more than 23 million insured persons–part 2. Unfallchirurg 110(7):610–616. doi:10.1007/s00113-007-1258-y

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brunner F, Sommer C, Bahrs C, Heuwinkel R, Hafner C, Rillmann P, Kohut G, Ekelund A, Muller M, Audige L, Babst R (2009) Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using a proximal humeral locked plate: a prospective multicenter analysis. J Orthop Trauma 23(3):163–172. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181920e5b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sproul RC, Iyengar JJ, Devcic Z, Feeley BT (2010) A systematic review of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Injury. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.058

  4. Dietrich M, Meier C, Lattmann T, Zingg U, Gruninger P, Platz A (2008) Complex fracture of the proximal humerus in the elderly. Locking plate osteosynthesis vs hemiarthroplasty. Chirurg 79(3):231–240. doi:10.1007/s00104-007-1436-z

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thanasas C, Kontakis G, Angoules A, Limb D, Giannoudis P (2009) Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(6):837–844. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.06.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Krappinger D, Bizzotto N, Riedmann S, Kammerlander C, Hengg C, Kralinger FS (2011) Predicting failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Injury. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.01.017

  7. Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, Leunig M (2004) Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13(4):427–433. doi:10.1016/S1058274604000795

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bastian JD, Hertel R (2009) Osteosynthesis and hemiarthroplasty of fractures of the proximal humerus: outcomes in a consecutive case series. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(2):216–219. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2008.09.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP, Paiement GD (2009) Locked plating of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in older patients: the effect of initial fracture pattern on outcome. J Orthop Trauma 23(2):113–119. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e31819344bf

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Neer CS 2nd (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52(6):1077–1089

    Google Scholar 

  11. Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thomas M, Dieball O, Busse M (2003) Normal values of the shoulder strength in dependency on age and gender–comparison with the constant, UCLA, ASES scores and SF36 health survey. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 141(2):160–170. doi:10.1055/s-2003-38662

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Offenbacher M, Ewert T, Sangha O, Stucki G (2003) Validation of a German version of the ‘disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand’ questionnaire (DASH-G). Z Rheumatol 62(2):168–177. doi:10.1007/s00393-003-0461-7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lill H, Josten C (2001) Conservative or operative treatment of humeral head fractures in the elderly? Chirurg 72(11):1224–1234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Misra A, Kapur R, Maffulli N (2001) Complex proximal humeral fractures in adults–a systematic review of management. Injury 32(5):363–372. doi:S0020-1383(00)00242-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kettler M, Biberthaler P, Braunstein V, Zeiler C, Kroetz M, Mutschler W (2006) Treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the PHILOS angular stable plate. Presentation of 225 cases of dislocated fractures. Unfallchirurg 109(12):1032–1040. doi:10.1007/s00113-006-1165-7

    Google Scholar 

  17. Foruria AM, de Gracia MM, Larson DR, Munuera L, Sanchez-Sotelo J (2011) The pattern of the fracture and displacement of the fragments predict the outcome in proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(3):378–386. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.93B3.25083

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hertel R (2005) Fractures of the proximal humerus in osteoporotic bone. Osteoporos Int 16(suppl 2):S65–S72. doi:10.1007/s00198-004-1714-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kralinger F, Unger S, Wambacher M, Smekal V, Schmoelz W (2009) The medial periosteal hinge, a key structure in fractures of the proximal humerus: a biomechanical cadaver study of its mechanical properties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(7):973–976. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.91B7.21857

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cazeneuve JF, Cristofari DJ (2010) The reverse shoulder prosthesis in the treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(4):535–539. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.92B4.22450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bufquin T, Hersan A, Hubert L, Massin P (2007) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: a prospective review of 43 cases with a short-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(4):516–520. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.89B4.18435

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bogner R, Hubner C, Matis N, Auffarth A, Lederer S, Resch H (2008) Minimally-invasive treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(12):1602–1607. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.90B12.20269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Young SW, Segal BS, Turner PC, Poon PC (2010) Comparison of functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty in the primary treatment of acute proximal humerus fracture. ANZ J Surg 80(11):789–793. doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05342.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang L, Zheng J, Wang W, Lin G, Huang Y, Edem Prince GA, Yang G (2011) The clinical benefit of medial support screws in locking plating of proximal humerus fractures: a prospective randomized study. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-011-1227-5

  25. Osterhoff G, Baumgartner D, Favre P, Wanner GA, Gerber H, Simmen HP, Werner CM (2011) Medial support by fibula bone graft in angular stable plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures: an in vitro study with synthetic bone. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(5):740–746. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2010.10.040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Boehm D (2002) Scores. In: Gohlke F, Hedtmann A (eds) Schulter: Das Standardwerk für Klinik und Praxis. Thieme, Stuttgart-New York, pp 98–104

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bjorkenheim JM, Pajarinen J, Savolainen V (2004) Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with a locking compression plate: a retrospective evaluation of 72 patients followed for a minimum of 1 year. Acta Orthop Scand 75(6):741–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Handschin AE, Cardell M, Contaldo C, Trentz O, Wanner GA (2008) Functional results of angular-stable plate fixation in displaced proximal humeral fractures. Injury 39(3):306–313. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2007.10.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Parmaksizoglu AS, Sokucu S, Ozkaya U, Kabukcuoglu Y, Gul M (2010) Locking plate fixation of three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 44(2):97–104. doi:10.3944/AOTT.2010.2275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No fund was received in support of this study. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Schliemann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schliemann, B., Siemoneit, J., Theisen, C. et al. Complex fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly—outcome and complications after locking plate fixation. Musculoskelet Surg 96 (Suppl 1), 3–11 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-012-0181-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-012-0181-8

Keywords

Navigation