Skip to main content
Log in

An analysis of pricing and basis risk for industry loss warranties

  • Abhandlung
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft

Abstract

In recent years, industry loss warranties (ILWs) have become increasingly popular in the reinsurance market. The defining feature of ILW contracts is their dependence on an industry loss index. The use of an index reduces moral hazard and generally results in lower prices compared to traditional, purely indemnity-based reinsurance contracts. However, use of the index also introduces basis risk since the industry loss and the reinsured company’s loss are usually not fully correlated. The aim of this paper is to simultaneously examine basis risk and pricing of an indemnity-based industry loss warranty contract, which is done by comparing actuarial and financial pricing approaches for different measures of basis risk. Our numerical results show that modification of the contract parameters to reduce basis risk can either raise or lower prices, depending on the specific parameter choice. For instance, basis risk can be reduced by decreasing the industry loss trigger, which implies higher prices, or by increasing the reinsured company attachment, thus inducing lower prices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An overview and discussion of different pricing approaches is presented in Embrechts (1998).

  2. An overview of ILW contracts is provided in SwissRe (2006).

  3. This contract form is also called a double-trigger contract (see, e.g., Gründl and Schmeiser, 2002; SwissRe 2009).

  4. Embrechts (1998) points out parallels between the determination of the certainty equivalent in actuarial mathematics and in financial valuation.

  5. For an overview, see Goovaerts et al. (1984).

  6. For pricing insurance contracts in a CAPM framework, see, e.g., Fairley (1979), Hill (1979), D’Arcy and Doherty (1988), and Cummins (1990a).

  7. See, e.g., Doherty and Garven (1986), Cummins (1990b), and Gatzert and Schmeiser (2008).

References

  • Andreadakis, M., Waters, H.R.: The effect of reinsurance on the degree of risk associated with an insurer’s portfolio. ASTIN Bull. 11(2), 119–135 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Björk, T.: Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time. Oxford University Press, New York (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bühlmann, H.: Premium calculation from top down. ASTIN Bull. 15(2), 89–101 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bühlmann, H.: Mathematical Methods in Risk Theory. Springer, Berlin (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnecki, K., Kukla, G., Weron, R.: Property insurance loss distributions. Phys. A, Stat. Mech. Appl. 287(1–2), 269–278 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X., Thomas, B.: Index hedge performance: bootstrap study of hurricane Fran. Discussion papers on securitization of risk. Casualty Actuarial Society (1999)

  • Cummins, J.D.: Asset pricing models and insurance ratemaking. ASTIN Bull. 20(2), 125–166 (1990a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J.D.: Multi-period discounted cash flow rate-making models in property-liability insurance. J. Risk Insur. 57(1), 79–109 (1990b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J.D., Lalonde, D., Phillips, R.D.: The basis risk of catastrophic-loss index securities. J. Financ. Econ. 71(1), 77–111 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J.D., Weiss, M.A.: Convergence of insurance and financial markets: hybrid and securitized risk-transfer solutions. J. Risk Insur. 76(3), 493–545 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Arcy, S., Doherty, N.: The Financial Theory of Pricing Property-Liability Insurance Contracts. S.S. Huebner Foundation, Philadelphia (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, N.A., Garven, J.R.: Price regulation in property-liability insurance: a contingent-claims approach. Journal of Finance 41(5), 1031–1050 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, N.A., Richter, A.: Moral hazard, basis risk, and gap insurance. J. Risk Insur. 69(1), 9–24 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embrechts, P.: Actuarial versus financial pricing of insurance. Surv. Math. Ind. 5(1), 6–22 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairley, W.B.: Investment income and profit margins in property-liability insurance: theory and empirical results. Bell J. Econ. 10(1), 192–210 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Reserve (2007) Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.15. Download (18.04.2007): http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h15/Current/h15.txt

  • Gatzert, N., Schmeiser, H.: The influence of corporate taxes on pricing and capital structure in property-liability insurance. Insur. Math. Econ. 42(1), 50–58 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasserman, P.: Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering. Springer, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts, M.J., de Vylder, F., Haezendonck, J.: Insurance Premiums. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gründl, H., Schmeiser, H.: Pricing double-trigger reinsurance contracts: financial versus actuarial approach. J. Risk Insur 69(4), 449–468 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guy Carpenter: U.S. Reinsurance Renewals at January 1, 2006: Divergent Paths After Record Storms. Available at: www.guycarp.com (2006)

  • Harrington, S., Niehaus, G.: Basis risk with PCS catastrophe insurance derivative contracts. J. Risk Insur. 66(1), 49–82 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig, R.P.: Overview of Florida hurricane insurance market economics. Presentation given to the Florida Joint Select Committee on Hurricane Insurance, Tallahassee, FL, January 19, 2005 (2005)

  • Hill, R.D.: Profit regulation in property liability insurance. Bell J. Econ. 10(1), 172–191 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilti, N., Saunders, M., Lloyd-Hughes, B.: Forecasting stronger profits. Global Reinsurance 6–7 July/August 2004

  • Ishaq, A.: Reinsuring for catastrophes through industry loss warranties—a practical approach. Working Paper, CAS Reinsurance Forum Spring (2005)

  • Kreps, R.: Investment-equivalent reinsurance pricing. Proc. Casualty Actuar. Soc. LXXXV(162), 101–131 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.-P., Yu, M.-T.: Pricing default-risky CAT bonds with moral hazard and basis risk. J. Risk Insur. 69(1), 25–44 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.-P., Yu, M.-T.: Valuation of catastrophe reinsurance with catastrophe bonds. Insur. Math. Econ. 41(2), 264–278 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, G.G., Kollar, J.J.: Catastrophe risk securitization: insurer and investor perspectives. Casualty Actuarial Society discussion paper, Program May 1999, Casualty Actuarial Society, Arlington, VA (1999)

  • Pratt, J.W.: Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32(1/2), 122–136 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SwissRe: Securitization—new opportunities for insurers and investors. Sigma 07/2006. Zürich: Swiss Reinsurance Company (2006)

  • SwissRe: The role of indices in transferring insurance risks to the capital markets. Sigma 04/2009. Zürich: Swiss Reinsurance Company (2009)

  • U.S. Department of Labor: Consumer price index—all urban consumers. Download (17.4.2007): http://www.bls.gov/cpi/ (2007)

  • Wharton Risk Center: Managing large-scale risks in the new era of catastrophes. Report on phase 1 of the study. The Wharton School, Philadelphia (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, L.: On the basis risk of industry loss warranties. J. Risk Finance 1(4), 27–32 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, L.: Hedging catastrophe risk using index-based reinsurance instruments. Casualty Actuarial Society Forum, Spring, pp. 245–268 (2003)

  • Zeng, L.: Enhancing reinsurance efficiency using index-based instruments. J. Risk Finance 6(1), 6–16 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadine Gatzert.

Appendix

Appendix

For the stochastic process as given in (2), one obtains

$$S_{1} = \exp( N( \ln( S_{0} ) + \mu_{S} - 0.5\sigma_{S}^{2},\sigma_{S}) ) = \exp( N( a,b ) ),$$

where N(a,b) denotes a normally distributed random variable with expected value a=ln (S 0)+μ−0.5σ 2 and standard deviation b=σ S , leading to a lognormal distribution for S 1. Given the expected value

$$E( S_{1} ) = \exp( a + 0.5b^{2} )$$

and the standard deviation

$$\sigma( S_{1} ) = \sqrt{( \exp ( b^{2} ) - 1 )E( S_{1} )^{2}},$$

σ S and S 0 can be obtained by transforming these equations. Using

$$a = \ln( E( S_{1} ) ) - 0.5b^{2},$$

and

$$b = \sqrt{\ln \biggl( 1 + \frac{\sigma ^{2}( S_{1} )}{ E( S_{1} )^{2} }\biggr)},$$

the standard deviation of the stochastic process σ S and the initial nominal value S 0 are given by

A derivation of I 0 and σ I for the industry loss distribution I 1 can be done analogously.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gatzert, N., Schmeiser, H. & Toplek, D. An analysis of pricing and basis risk for industry loss warranties. ZVersWiss 100, 517–537 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12297-011-0152-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12297-011-0152-4

Keywords

Navigation